Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Canada Government NASA Science Your Rights Online

Canadian Bureacracy Can't Answer Simple Question: What's This Study With NASA? 164

Saint Aardvark writes "It seemed like a pretty simple question about a pretty cool topic: an Ottawa newspaper wanted to ask Canada's National Research Council about a joint study with NASA on tracking falling snow in Canada. Conventional radar can see where it's falling, but not the amount — so NASA, in collaboration with the NRC, Environment Canada and a few universities, arranged flights through falling snow to analyse readings with different instruments. But when they contacted the NRC to get the Canadian angle, "it took a small army of staffers— 11 of them by our count — to decide how to answer, and dozens of emails back and forth to circulate the Citizen's request, discuss its motivation, develop their response, and "massage" its text." No interview was given: "I am not convinced we need an interview. A few lines are fine. Please let me see them first," says one civil servant in the NRC emails obtained by the newspaper under the Access to Information act. By the time the NRC finally sorted out a boring, technical response, the newspaper had already called up a NASA scientist and got all the info they asked for; it took about 15 minutes."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Canadian Bureacracy Can't Answer Simple Question: What's This Study With NASA?

Comments Filter:
  • by slashdyke ( 873156 ) on Friday April 20, 2012 @07:39PM (#39752191) Homepage
    For all of you bashing Harper and his politicized government, non-profits and the rest of Canada, all I have to say is we got it right. Eleven or twelve people are working for the government rather than collecting Employment Insurance. Just think how many unemployed could be working in the states if Agencies such as NASA, used the same amount of manpower to answer questions like these. I am sure that would solve the economic slowdown we have been having.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 20, 2012 @07:40PM (#39752201)

    If they don't know what you're doing, they don't know what you're doing wrong.
    -Sir Humphrey

  • by Chris Mattern ( 191822 ) on Friday April 20, 2012 @08:24PM (#39752545)

    At least according to American propaganda it is!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 20, 2012 @09:57PM (#39753097)

    You've solved the dilemma right there. It took NASA *scientists* 15 minutes to do it where it took 51 *bureaucrats*. That is the definition of bureaucracy, the obfuscation of information. Seems they are doing their jobs perfectly.

    Also notice how the numbers from both sources form a perfect palidrome: 15 51 (1551) and 51 15 (5115)... those geniuses at the National Research Council (NRC) knew that National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) would only require 15 minutes but the mathematician at NRC has a palidrome fetish so he/she delayed until 51 people had handled the request in part or in whole. Oh, 1551 + 5115 equal 6666 which compared to 666 is the mark of the Super Beast not just the Beast. And 6666 itself is a palidrome...my goodness the good little bureaucrats at NRC are truly astounding in their revelations.

  • by snowraver1 ( 1052510 ) on Friday April 20, 2012 @10:44PM (#39753323)
    Excuse me, but here in Alberta, we don't call them "tar sands". We prefer the term "freedom sands".

    Vote wild boar! [wildboarparty.ca]

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...