Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Social Networks Spam The Almighty Buck Twitter Technology

Cash For Tweets and Facebook Posts? Aussie Startup Pays You to Astroturf 156

An anonymous reader writes "While the celebs are already charging big money for their Tweets, an Aussie startup is ranking everyday people and turning them into product salespeople. After a successful start Down Under they have now hit Silicon Valley, but will Americans embrace selling to their friends?" From the article: "In a nutshell, individuals sign up to the Social Loot website and are assigned companies to promote to their circle of online friends. They are then paid on a sliding scale based on the amount of traffic their posts generate, and the quality of referrals and number of resulting sales. This is tracked by a code embedded in the links promoted by Social Loot’s spruikers."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cash For Tweets and Facebook Posts? Aussie Startup Pays You to Astroturf

Comments Filter:
  • by Cryacin ( 657549 ) on Monday April 30, 2012 @10:26PM (#39853487)
    Sounds like the Twits and Facepalmers have a Web 2.0 version of Amway to me. Friends selling to friends (about to be former friends).
  • No more trust. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ZorinLynx ( 31751 ) on Monday April 30, 2012 @10:50PM (#39853643) Homepage

    Great. So now when a friend or acquaintance says something nice about a product or service, I won't be able to trust their opinion because I won't know if they were paid to say it or not.

    Nice job polluting Twitter and other sites with stupid marketing and more distrust in what people say. It's freaking bad enough already.

  • by million_monkeys ( 2480792 ) on Monday April 30, 2012 @11:15PM (#39853803)

    You make a good point. When the Alan Jones cash for comments scandal broke, he got absolutely slammed in court for not disclosing who was paying him to promote various things on his show. The same should apply to tweets. They are broadcasts, and so the people making them should disclose whether it is advertising or not.

    Or you could just not be friends with people who will spam you with crap so they can earn 8 cents a week.

  • by mb.72 ( 2629421 ) <mb@mai[ ]th.com ['kbo' in gap]> on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @02:20AM (#39854557)

    I just emailed Minidisc Australia and Social Loot sales this email:
    ---
    Hi guys

    I'm a previous customer of yours (I purchased a Cowon J3 a couple of years ago, order no 40580), and previously I've recommended other people buy stuff from you.

    I note that you are now using Social Loot advertising (having come across this company via slashdot post):
    http://www.socialloot.com/minidisc_australia [socialloot.com]

    My opinion is that the kind of 'shill advertising' promoted by Social Loot is about as low as it gets. As a result, I will:
    a) no longer be recommending you, in fact I will be recommending against purchasing from you (and will explain my reasoning regarding the use of Social Loot)
    b) no longer consider you for future purchases for myself

    I realise I'm just one person. However, I am the 'go to guy' for a number of relatives and friends for technology matters, and based on past experience I am pretty sure that this will cost you a sale every three months or so. Over the course of one year I would estimate lost revenue at AUS$500 - AUS$1000.

    If you stop using Social Loot advertising I will be happy to reverse my decision on this matter. Please note I've also cced this email to the Social Loot sales email address - unlike them, and apparently you, I am fine with being honest about my opinions.

    Regards

    Mike Both
    ----
    If enough people do this, it could make a difference.

  • by Plunky ( 929104 ) on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @03:09AM (#39854699)

    Are you telling me that this is gonna kill Facebook and Twitter? Really? REALLY?

    In previous years, usenet was a social gathering ground on the internet.. being unmoderated was its strength, but also its weakness and Canter & Siegel started a movement that killed it eventually. This has the capability to kill off twitter and facebook sure, but since they both have a controlling entity who could institute moderation then perhaps they can stave off demise by some quick thinking..

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...