Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Bitcoin Security The Almighty Buck The Internet News Technology

Bitcoinica Breach Nets Hackers $87,000 In Bitcoins 196

Posted by Soulskill
from the stealing-your-imaginary-money dept.
dynamo52 sends this quote from Ars about a breach involving a Bitcoin exchange: "More than $87,000 worth of the virtual currency known as Bitcoin was stolen after online bandits penetrated servers belonging to Bitcoinica, prompting its operators to temporarily shutter the trading platform to contain the damage. Friday's theft came after hackers accessed Bitcoinica's production servers and depleted its online wallet of 18,547 BTC, as individual Bitcoin units are called, company officials said in a blog post published on Friday. It said the heist affected only a small fraction of Bitcoinica's overall bitcoin deposits and that all withdrawal requests will be honored once the platform reopens." Reader linhares points out a forum post discussing how the attacker(s) hinted at a 'mass leak' in the near future. This attack comes shortly after a leak of a different sort — an FBI document (PDF) about Bitcoin found it way onto the internet. It seems they're worried about the virtual currency's potential use in criminal activities.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bitcoinica Breach Nets Hackers $87,000 In Bitcoins

Comments Filter:
  • by Razgorov Prikazka (1699498) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @05:29PM (#39981473)
    ...That the concept of Bitcoins, nor the encryption behind it, nor anything like that is being breached.
    It's always some kind of security breach that allows malicious folk to get the coins themselves. Or people that get their coins stolen from a leaky windhose box. Something like that.
    So that is cudo`s for Bitcoin huh? I mean, I never heard some story like "hackers have found a way to create Bitcoins without all the hassle (and made it into a nice gui-ed program)" Enter the amount you wish, hit 'generate' and within 2 seconds your bitcoins are ready to be used.
    It is a solid piece of work isn't it?
  • by bonch (38532) * on Saturday May 12, 2012 @05:39PM (#39981525)

    Ironically, Bitcoin serves as a pretty good argument that there should be substantial regulation of financial service providers since people that don't know computers keep losing hundreds of thousands of dollars.

  • by yoctology (2622527) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @05:45PM (#39981557)
    Bitcoins are the tender of the future. The FUTURE. As far as FBI's worry about their use for criminal activity--too late! The things I've seen on an Onion router off the shoulder of Orion. Hell, people earn real goods and services for grinding in a game. Some of those goods and services may well be ILLEGAL. Maybe we should ban grinding to prevent this nefarious use of virtual technology? Some people collect bottles at the roadside for money. Some of this money buys meth and pot. Should be now ban.... and so on.
  • by Michalson (638911) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @05:49PM (#39981577)
    "The root cause of this problem is an email server compromise. The email server belongs to one of our team members."

    A poorly secured email server is not the failure in this statement.

    The failure is what was a non-essential piece of software, what sounds like someone's personal software, doing on this server or even on the same firewalled subnet?
  • by bmo (77928) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @05:50PM (#39981585)

    "an FBI document (PDF) about Bitcoin found it way onto the internet. It seems they're worried about the virtual currency's potential use in criminal activities."

    During the televised SOPA hearings with the House Judiciary Committee, Jared Polis - after introducing the song "The Internet is for Porn" into the Congressional Record - waxed poetic on the underground economy, Bitcoin, drugs, TOR and Silk Road.

    Those watching on /g/ were aghast. "OH GOD HE KNOWS!" was the reaction.

    Yes, folks, they've known for a while.

    Bitcoin, when it's not a scam, is a method of money laundering.

    --
    BMO

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 12, 2012 @05:53PM (#39981597)

    I wonder how many Apple shares the mods own because they keep posting Apple stories. I wonder how many Microsoft shares the mods own because they keep posting Windows stories. I wonder how many Cisco shares the mods own because they keep posting networking stories. I wonder how many Red Hat shares the mods own because they keep posting Linux stories.

    Etc etc. You're a retard.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 12, 2012 @06:03PM (#39981649)

    Bitcoin was an interesting experiment.

    I was one of the lucky ones- I got in before Bitcoin hit prime time for its 15 minutes of fame. Back then mining actually got you something worthwhile when you could dedicate a couple of GPUs and one or two computers to it (back then FPGAs weren't even being discussed that much). It managed to pay for four separate computers, which I later overhauled and replaced the motherboards on so I could stuff three GPUs in each. A few months ago I decided to shut it down (after witnessing random things like the rollback of an entire market because someone sold too many BTCs and it pissed off the big guys who lost a lot of money because they didn't see it coming) and started to cash out. At the end of it all (after I sold my equipment- though that only accounted for ~10% of my total catch), I'd made enough to pay off my car and both me and my fiancee went on a nice trip to Maui for two weeks.

    A friend recently "discovered" BTC and came to me for information on "how to get rich quick". It took me over two hours to convince him that it wasn't worth it anymore, that he could probably pump a good $10K into equipment and not even make back the money power would cost him to run it all. You'd have to invest ten times that into exotic FPGA hardware just to make any reasonable amount of income, and even then I doubt you'll ever pay for the hardware itself before the system completely crashes.

    BTC is, ultimately, a failed experiment. Now that the system has gotten rolling there is little reason to use it for anything other then illegal goods, and nobody wants to be associated with a currency that is predominantly used to move dirty money or pay for black market items. I suppose things might be a bit better if we actually had reasonable exchanges running, but for the most part what is out there right now (including MtGox- which formerly stood for "Magic the Gathering Online eXchange") is just about as untrustworthy as the people using it.

    If you're a potential miner, my advice is to stay away from BTC. If you weren't there when it started, then you're basically not going to make any money. Those few elites still making money off the system will soon leave as the entire thing becomes unprofitable for even them, and then when they cash out the entire system will crash hard- and any BTC you might own will be worth nothing.

    -AC

  • by jjohnson (62583) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @06:52PM (#39981921) Homepage

    It's not kudos for bitcoin even if the design itself is proven perfect, because bitcoins are useless without practical implementations and real markets, and if those real-world applications continually fail for external reasons, the bitcoin economy will never take off.

    Put a little differently, it doesn't matter how perfect bitcoin is on paper. If it can't be made to work in real life, it's useless. And if the computing infrastructure on which bitcoin transactions occur is fundamentally un-securable, then it can't be made to work in real life. It's like deploying an uncrackable ATM in a crime-ridden neighbourhood. It doesn't matter that you can't break into the ATM if you just have to wait for someone to withdraw cash and then rob them.

  • by Troed (102527) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @06:57PM (#39981947) Homepage Journal

    I agree. Anyone who thinks Bitcoin is about "making money" should stay away. It's a monetary agent. It's as much for "making money" as using Western Union is, without anyone being able to say "no" to whom you want to send money.

    I've used it to donate to Wikileaks, among other things (all legal, incredibly enough).

  • by Statecraftsman (718862) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @08:18PM (#39982357) Homepage
    What you're seeing with Bitcoin is sort of like raw access to the Visa network and I'm surprised more theft doesn't occur. As you pointed out it's nontrivial to have a secure computer nowadays.

    As the infrastructure evolves we are likely to see payment processors that use things like multi-sig transactions and stronger security measures to insulate the user from such concerns. Even then, you'll still have the freedom to operate independently.

    Freedom(tm) - A (previously?) core value of the /. community.
  • by History's Coming To (1059484) on Saturday May 12, 2012 @09:41PM (#39982685) Journal
    So why post anonymously? I never heard a better post for justifying a link to your shop.
  • by Sycraft-fu (314770) on Sunday May 13, 2012 @01:55AM (#39983547)

    They are only useful if you can spend them, and if people do spend them. Money is just a theoretical construct to facilitate trade, nothing more. It has no magical powers. As such it only works if people can spend it on things they want, and in fact do spend it. If they can't spend it, they have no reason to hold on to it or obtain it. If they don't spend it, then it isn't performing its purpose of facilitating trade.

    This is why, all other issues aside (and there are a number of them) bitcoins fail as a currency. It has built in deflation which means that people would have an incentive to hoard, not to spend. That makes it fail as a currency. When there's an inherent deflationary setup in a currency, it will never function well.

    Also you can see it doesn't actually function as a currency because to the extent people use it these days it is two main ways:

    1) Mining/speculating. They just trade in and out of it to try and make money. While all currencies have trading and speculation it is not the major activity. With bitcoins, it is by far most of what happens. That means it isn't being used as money, but as a commodity.

    2) To hide payments. People get bitcoins, pay someone they don't want to have it tracked to, and that person/company turns it right back in to an actual currency. That makes it no more a currency than Paypal. It is just a means of payment, and only being used to try and launder the money. At both ends the actual "money" is a regular currency.

    Money isn't money because of some magic reason, or some special thing backing it or any of that. Money is money when people use it as such. When people are willing to accept it in trade for goods and services and willing to spend it on the same, you've got money. Doesn't matter what it is, just that you can spend it and you do in fact spend it. Gold coins, printed paper, bits in a computer, big rocks, all can work (and all have worked).

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 13, 2012 @02:02PM (#39987305)

    Because the sentiment here on slashdot is so against bitcoin that I felt it would be viewed as spammy.

    I use bitcoin for trades, I do not care if it is 50 cents, $5 or $50. I do not hold large bitcoin. But as you can see, others see a vested interest in 'pumping' the price and THAT is a downside to bitcoin. It is not a pump and dump, it is a working currency. The problem is that it is so thinly traded that people who want to pump and dump push it, as well as the true bitcoin fans who have no vested interest other then thinking bitcoin is a great project. It is hard to tell those people apart.

    Bitcoin is truly revolutionary and does things that no other online currency has done.

  • by repapetilto (1219852) on Sunday May 13, 2012 @03:07PM (#39987799)

    Buying shit you don't need is not a virtue. It is wasteful and at the root of many problems that face our society. I don't understand why more people don't see this.

Thufir's a Harkonnen now.

Working...