Russian Satellite Takes Most Detailed 121-Megapixel Image of Earth Yet 123
Diggester writes "The satellite, known as Elektro-L No.1, took an image from its stationary point over 35,000 kilometers above the Indian Ocean. This is the most detailed image of the Earth yet available, capturing the Earth in a single shot with 121-megapixels. NASA satellites use a collection of pictures from multiple flybys stitched together. The detail in the pic is just amazing."
Re:Upside down? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Wait, what? (Score:5, Interesting)
The Russian method, as linked in the article, is one large picture. It's actually a composite of different wavelengths, which is really cool. The rust effect is from the IR reflection of vegetation.
When NASA does it, as in the pictures that aren't this one, they stitch together a composite.
Re:Looks terrible (Score:5, Interesting)
WHAT
chromatic abberation in MY 1.21 gigapixel space photo?
this was NOT the future I was promised
send it back
Re:why do Russian and US colors vary so much? (Score:5, Interesting)
I really dislike the 2012 Blue Marble, due to the very visible stripes where it's been quilted. It may have far more pixels, but I think the original 1972 Apollo 17 image is far more visually impressive.
But to me, nothing so far beats this 43 year old photo [wikipedia.org].
That's my home, there!
Re:Wait, what? (Score:4, Interesting)
Thank you for Sputnik and Vostok.
You put the U.S. into such a panic about falling behind in science and technology that they funded my science education.
I couldn't have done it today. No more free tax-funded education. We have to go out and buy our education the free market. No more free tuition at City College. You have to be rich to study engineering in America now.
Re:121 Mpixels vs photographic film (Score:5, Interesting)
NOAA satellites image Earth at the same resolution (Score:3, Interesting)