Hip Hop Artists Developing Open Source Beat Making Software 192
First time accepted submitter caseyb89 writes "Beat making software is incredibly expensive, and the high price limits usage to those who can afford it. Two professors at UNC have a dream of allowing all artists access to beat making software, regardless of income level. They are rallying the community on a project to create open source beat making software. The two professors double as DJs and hip hop artists, and they recently spoke at Rio+Social."
Re:Nice Idea (Score:2, Interesting)
But Hip Hop artists just pirate whatever software they need. The only real expense are decent microphones, mixers, preamps and speakers.
full disclosure: I am a sound engineer living in NC who works with hiphop artists.
This.
Though their producers at least make some effort now to reduce their legal exposure by seeking the rights to the sample or knowing just how much they can get away with, rather than blatantly ripping off an drum track from another artist -- lest they end up in court coughing up all of their profits.
Please Define (Score:4, Interesting)
FWIW, Hydrogen [hydrogen-music.org] is free.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Why? (Score:4, Interesting)
Why the hell does this make slashdot?! So we have people with a dream and they are calling for others to help them... Why would anybody do that if they could just as easily help the guys behind great stuff like Ardour, LMMS, Rosegarden, Miep, Hydrogen and the many other applications that aim to do somewhat exactly what these people dream of?!
Why don't these dreamy people join any of the existing projects?
Re:Why? (Score:4, Interesting)
Because those programs you mention are tuned towards actual composition, not hip-hop "beats" creation.
(translation: too complicated)
No, it is not. (Score:4, Interesting)
I've struggled with LMMS for years. I give a try quite often and the end result is torturous. It tries hard to be FL Studio, but "different" but lacks so much that making anything is just entirely too awkward. I've considered contributing to the project but simply don't have the time to invest in it.
I stick with FL Studio and Cubase for my hip hop work (with ProTools M-Powered strictly to send out sessions to studios).
Re:No, it is not. (Score:4, Interesting)
It's free... if you can afford Cubase/Pro Tools. Then yes... use those. But this guy doesn't want to pay... so why would something like LMMS not be good enough to teach someone to make a beat? We're not talking about producing a track for Dr. Diddy, or Jay Snoop.
Why does it seem like, when it comes to software, people don't apply the "beggars can't be choosers" mentality?
"I don't want to pay for it."
"Ok, here you go. I did this in my spare time!"
"That's not what I wanted... this sucks. Spend more of your free time and make it better."
" ... ?"
If's not about whether or not it's "free", it's about whether it's functional or not. Your argument is a typical cop-out whenever the functionality of a FOSS app is called into question. If you've made the decision to write something like this and release it for the world to see, then you need to be prepared to address issues people have with the software. Yes, we could always go out and buy another piece of software instead of using that which you wrote for free, but we're giving your stuff a shot to look for that alternative so being receptive to criticism is part of the process. If the authors didn't want anyone to speak ill of their software, they should have kept it to themselves. Part of the open source process is people contributing to it's usability by giving input like "Hey, maybe you could make plugin selection a bit more obvious to the end user, it's a pain to deal with right now". We all may not have coding skills, but our input on workflow is just as valid.
I've tried Rosegarden under Linux and it works pretty well but several key VST plugins I use simply don't work. Were it not for that, I'd recommend it all day long.
FWIW, FL Studio's basic package costs only $49, with a more functional version at $99. While I understand that some people believe that they can't afford $99, if you're really serious about music you will save for it. Same for Cubase: Steinberg offers an entry level version of Cubase for $99 that's rather well featured for the price (serious music can be made with the "Elements" package). EnergyXT is not only cheap (€59), but also cross platform, working on Windows, MacOS, AND Linux!
For the musician on a budget, there are options. FOSS is one of them if you can find an application you like. LMMS is just not that package for me.