Subcontractor Tells Fukushima Workers To Hide Radiation Exposure 439
First time accepted submitter fredprado writes "Apparently at least one subcontractor hired to clean up the Fukushima site has been urging their workers to put their radiation detectors lined under lead shieldings.
A diagram can be seen here. The authorities decided not to prosecute him, even after one employee presenting them recordings of him trying to talk the said employee into it."
Health effects in children (Score:5, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Doesn't work. (Score:3, Informative)
Have to step in to defend Adam Smith here. He actually did see the problems that inevitably come with employers having more power than workers, and (as he did with everything) went on at some length about it. If half the people wearing Adam Smith ties had actually read The Wealth of Nations, they'd call him a commie.
Re:Doesn't work. (Score:1, Informative)
Free market Capitalism is fundamentally broken.
Nonsense. Free market Capitalism doesn't exist. Everything is tightly regulated. The entire planet is under various systems of state* run 'capitalism'. Globalism (as defined here) is just the attempt to put it all under one state. Only in contraband will you find anything approaching free market capitalism where all participants have an equal chance at becoming rich and powerful.
*state=corporation
Re:This is why we need more unions and more worker (Score:5, Informative)
In the UK we have Health and Safety guys to enforce that kind of thing. It is their job to protect workers and nothing else. Their authority overrules other managers in most cases.
Re:That Poster... (Score:5, Informative)
The lead is likely very effective at reducing recorded exposure - probably cutting it by 75-90%. Most of the radiation in a typical fission product incident is beta radiation, which will be substantially attenuated by 1 mm of lead (the beta particles won't get through, but probably 1-2% of their energy may get through as bremmstrahlung X-rays). Gamma rays, will also be attenuated but only by a few % (high energy direct photons won't be significantly affected, but photons scattered from concrete, etc. will be of much lower energy, so will tend to be heavily attenuated).
There are plenty of radiation suits that offer 0.1 or 0.2 mm lead equivalent protection (they don't usually contain lead for environmental reasons, bismuth is usually used instead). These are quite useful for protection against beta energy, even if they do nothing for gamma. However, the sheer weight of even a 0.2 mm lead suit makes it only barely practical (though I understand the US military have bought a lot of them).
However, lead boots are a sensible precaution - most of the radiation in a Fukushima type incident is in the form of water soluble or suspended particles, which pool on the floor in puddles. Severe radiation injury to the feet from beta emitters is possible - 1mm lead equivalent rubber boots are tolerable to wear, and would offer substantial protection to the feet.
Re:This is why we need more unions and more worker (Score:4, Informative)
Collective bargaining is an absolutely silly way to conduct business.
Of course it is. That's why Wal-Mart loses so much money and has no influence on its suppliers by buying in bulk.
Re:This is why we need more unions and more worker (Score:4, Informative)
I am pretty fine with the way you chose to call your country, you can choose to be called as you wish imo, but your saying that there is no continent with such name only shows how badly US education has become.
Re:ha ha (Score:3, Informative)
You're right that it was abused, but I would argue that no country has ever implemented communism as Marx talked about it. IE it has never been tried.
Further, there is nothing about Marx's communism that necessarily requires keeping people in the dark in an authoritarian system. IIRC, he called for 'workers to own the means of production.' Kinda hard to be kept in the dark, when you own the damn the thing. It's also not authoritarian when you are the boss, albeit with others.
Now it has been a while since I read both works, but I don't recall anything that would conflict with open/transparent government and democracy. He did want a centrally planned economy, I guess it would have to be authoritarian in the sense that some group makes decisions on what happens; in his time period, I suppose you couldn't query the masses. I think it would be very interesting to see communism implemented again, ie a centrally planned economy, but instead of a small group/department of planners, poll the citizens?
And heck, if we still want to allow entrepreneurship, just make a law that says 51% of shares of any company are divided amongst all employees.