Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Speed of Sound Is Too Slow For the Olympics 255

Hugh Pickens "For decades sports-event organizers have placed speakers behind athletes to convey the sound of an actual pistol but they found that even though the noise came through the speakers all at once, athletes continued to wait for the 'real' sound, ignoring the sounds that came through the speakers ever-so-slightly slowing down the farthest athlete from the gun. Now Rebecca Rosen writes that when the Olympic runners take to their positions on the track later this week, they'll crouch on the ground, ears pricked, and wait for the starting beep played by a 'pistol' that's not a pistol at all, but something more akin to an electronic instrument with only one key. The pistol itself is silent." Read on for a bit more about the difficulties of timing people with superhuman reaction times.
"A conversation with sprinter Michael Johnson at the Sydney Olympics caused Peter Hürzeler of OMEGA Timing to realize that even with speakers, the speed of sound was still slowing down the farthest athletes. Johnson's reaction time, Hurzeler said, 'was 440 thousandths of a second. Normally athletes leave between 130 and 140 thousandths of a second. ... I asked him, why did you have such a bad starting time?' Turned out, Johnson was in the ninth position, and the sound of the gun was reaching him too slowly.

"In addition after a four year developmental process, a new false start detection system is being introduced this year that will abandon movement in exchange for 'measurement' of pound-force against the back block to determine sprinters reaction times. 'We are measuring the time between the starting gun and when the athlete is moving because to leave the starting block they had to push against and this power is very high' says Hurzeler. 'We did a test last year with Asafa Powell and he was pushing 240 kilograms (529 lbs.) [so] as soon as he gives the time to push against the starting block, it means he will like to leave and we are measuring this in thousandths of seconds and if somebody is leaving before one hundredth thousandth of second, it's automatically a recall, it's a false start.' In track every event is timed to 1/10,000th of a second, and Omega takes 2,000 pictures per second from right before the start of a race to its finish, as backup.

"New touch pads, starting blocks, and timers have also been introduced for swimming."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Speed of Sound Is Too Slow For the Olympics

Comments Filter:
  • Overkill (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @08:22AM (#40840831)

    Why not just move the starting gun to behind the athletes? The further back it is placed, the more equal the distance to each athlete. It doesn't get as much media attention though.

  • by captainpanic ( 1173915 ) on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @08:35AM (#40840935)

    It's more like 10 meters. Which means the difference in time is 0.03s, which is (at the 100m sprint) significant, and can mean the difference between winning or losing, or between a world record or no record.

  • by pev ( 2186 ) on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @08:49AM (#40841055) Homepage

    So. Rather than have the pistol in line with the row at one side, how about having it in the middle halving the dis-advantage at the extreme(s). Even better, have the pistol central but step back 10 - 20 foot or so and that reduces the differential even further. Seems more practical and a lot more inexpensive than a super dooper electronic system.

  • by HaZardman27 ( 1521119 ) on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @08:59AM (#40841145)

    You Americans still don't get this metric stuff do you.

    His problem was not in misunderstanding the metric system, his problem was in failing to do simple algebra.

  • by metrix007 ( 200091 ) on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @09:04AM (#40841205)

    I find it funny that the US gets criticized for not being metric, when the UK isn't either. Officially sure, but they all talk in pounds and stone and ounces.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @09:12AM (#40841285)

    It isn't just the width of the lanes, of course. For some races, the sprinters are started with a considerable offset from one another along the track to account for inside-outside lane length differences.

  • Re:Not sure... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by magarity ( 164372 ) on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @11:10AM (#40842695)

    Sure, that's easily accomplished technically. Except that's not the point of these particular races. Some races are against the clock, many of the cycling races for example. Shorter races, however, aren't against the clock; they are racer against racer. The clock is just there to compare across races and time. So, since the racers are racing against each other, not against the clock, there is all this fussing over starting at the same time.

Happiness is twin floppies.

Working...