Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Open Source News

Ask Slashdot: Can Closed Source Software Transition To the GPL Successfully? 99

colinneagle writes "Open Source guy Bryan Lunduke has experienced the difficulties of migrating a successful closed source project to an open license first-hand, but still believes — or at least wants to believe — that it can be done. He writes: 'Occasionally, someone makes a go of it, to take a good piece of closed source software and release the source code under a nice, open license. In fact, I did just that about a year ago. I tried to take a software development tool (along with some video games) that I had developed (and was earning a good living from) and migrate them to the GPL with continued development funded via donations. The results were...disastrous. Within a very short period of time of going Open Source, the total funding for the projects fell to less than 20% of what was being brought in via sales when the software was Closed Source, which almost completely impeded the ability to fund continued development. Luckily, I was able to recover and get things back on track, but it was definitely not a fun experience.'" How viable is migrating a closed source project to something open?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ask Slashdot: Can Closed Source Software Transition To the GPL Successfully?

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07, 2013 @09:18AM (#42819287)

    I was heavily involved in this on a github project last year. The concept is good, especially if you have enough of the source with clear copyright to put it under a GPL or change license gracefully. But the transition was really painful because all the weird, internal, badly done source control and essentially randomized selection of Perl components came home to roost, and were so embarrassing and so unstable in a more open environment that it was very difficult to get things re-integrated well. Basically, if you don't *tell* anyone you're running Apache 1.3 and storing SSH keys unencrypted on every system you touch, not that many of us will notice besides the crackers until it's far, far, far too late.

    The cleanup was destabilizing and, frankly, cost me my job. But the project is far more secure and on track for safe deployment worldwide now, so I don't feel bad about that.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07, 2013 @09:40AM (#42819433)

    so that's where 'pulling a lunduke' came from.. i heard it once at work but didn't get the reference. http://www.thepowerbase.com/2012/06/pulling-a-lunduke-holding-source-code-hostage/ [thepowerbase.com]

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...