Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Shark Security Your Rights Online

Gov't Report: Laser Pointers Produce Too Much Energy, Pose Risk For the Careless 260

coondoggie writes "Commercial grade green and red laser pointers emit energy far beyond what is safe, posing skin, eye and fire hazards. That was the conclusion of a National Institute of Standards and Technology study on the properties of handheld lasers. The study tested 122 of the devices and found that nearly 90% of green pointers and about 44% of red pointers tested were out of federal safety regulation compliance."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gov't Report: Laser Pointers Produce Too Much Energy, Pose Risk For the Careless

Comments Filter:
  • Re:So then... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by aurispector ( 530273 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:02PM (#43227659)

    It's why we can't have nice things. Idiots point lasers at aircraft blinding the pilots and the .gov bans them. Nobody has any common sense.

  • Re:So then... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by DeadCatX2 ( 950953 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:06PM (#43227715) Journal

    Something tells me you don't know the difference between a Code of Federal Regulations and a ban.

  • Re:So then... (Score:0, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:15PM (#43227807)

    A regulation is a ban by another name.

  • Life is unsafe (Score:4, Insightful)

    by jxander ( 2605655 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:19PM (#43227853)

    In a similar report, we've found that 100% of lighters, knives, crampons and Official Red Ryder Carbine-Action Two-Hundred-Shot Range Model Air Rifles are outside tolerable limits for safety.

    Seriously, you'll shoot your eye out, kid.

  • Re:So then... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DeadCatX2 ( 950953 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:19PM (#43227855) Journal

    Have governments have banned you from driving? Because the government regulates who can and cannot drive, in the form of a driver's license. They also regulate how fast you can travel on the road.

    Have governments banned you from drinking? Because government regulates who can and cannot buy alcohol.

  • by flayzernax ( 1060680 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:23PM (#43227907)

    Back in the day men use to resolve these problems on their own. Why the fuck is this even neccissary, and at the very worst "harm caused by laser" in court is perfectly well covered by a gazillion pre-existing assault laws. Should be, "assault with any fucking bloody object". Make it a fucking law and stop tacking bullshit on or putting your grubby little regulatory hands into the marketplaces of this country over stupid shit.

  • by Greyfox ( 87712 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:26PM (#43227957) Homepage Journal
    One retarded kid swallows a magnet, and they can ban buckyballs. A pilot or something might get blinded at some point in the future and we can ban laser pointer sales. 30,000 people a year die from gun violence and we can't even pass universal fucking background checks?

    No. Fuck this shit. I move that every citizen of the USA shall receive from the government one glock 9 mm pistol, one box of hollow point ammunition, one multi-watt laser pointer, one... no, make that TWO extremely fucking dangerous magnets, [unitednuclear.com] and a big fucking bucket of fireworks, to do with as they please. In one year, the survivors can get together and discuss additional regulation. :-/

  • It's not a ban. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by pavon ( 30274 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:27PM (#43227967)

    The government regulators have no desire to prevent you from buying or selling higher power lasers. They do care when you lie to your customers and tell them the lasers are less dangerous than they actually are. They care when you use shoddy manufacturing that allows harmful IR to escape the casing, while again telling the customer that they are completely shielded against this. If these lasers worked as advertized, then there wouldn't be a problem. Alternately if they were sold as class 3B devices (which is what they effectively are) there would be no problem, as the purchasers would know the risks and could plan accordingly. But they weren't and the manufacturers/importers should be held responsible for their recklessness.

  • Re:So then... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by AK Marc ( 707885 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:38PM (#43228089)
    I had a colleague at work who tried to impress me with his tech ability and ability to buy toys. One such example was his laser pointer. He "overclocked" it and bragged about it and how bright it was now. It could burn things and all that. Generally, if it can burn paper, your blink reflex is not sufficient to prevent blindness. Also, there's some level at which a reflection (even a low powered one, like a partial reflection from glass) coulr cause blindness without prolonged use. I informed him that I did not wish to see his toy, and if he intended to bring it to work, to let me know the day before so I could remain home for my own safety. He was greatly pissed off about that. He wanted to show it off, but I'd rather not go blind from some prick who doesn't know what he's doing shining it at me, or a reflective surface near me.
  • Re:How else... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:46PM (#43228195) Homepage Journal

    Just claim to be a member of the NRA and any attempt by the gummint to lower power is infringing your 2nd amendment rights.

    Not so much that...as that it seems the govt. figures we are all fucking idiots that can't be trusted with our own judgment to use anything more dangerous than a butter knife, or maybe those rounded edge scissors we all got in first grade.

    I sure miss lawn darts and clackers and....

  • Re:So then... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DeadCatX2 ( 950953 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:52PM (#43228273) Journal

    Any random person above the age of 16 can acquire a driver's license. There is no restriction, other than age.

    Any random person above the age of 21 can purchase alcohol. There is no restriction, other than age.

    Those statements are not true when it comes to controlled substances. The Controlled Substances Act effectively bans all Schedule I drugs for any purpose. Even people who would otherwise be allowed to manufacture, purchase, or consume Schedule I drugs (i.e. medical marijuana) are in violation of the federal law.

    Now, is the CSA a regulation? Yes. All bans are a regulation, but not all regulations are a ban. This concept is easy to understand in terms of "all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares". Why is it so difficult when it comes to government regulations?

  • Re:So then... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by FrankSchwab ( 675585 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:54PM (#43228293) Journal

    And how, precisely, would "polarized glasses" stop laser light?

    Insightful, indeed.

  • Re:How else... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nugatory78 ( 971318 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:57PM (#43228339)

    it seems the govt. figures we are all fucking idiots that can't be trusted with our own judgment to use anything more dangerous than a butter knife, or maybe those rounded edge scissors we all got in first grade

    I think thats pretty accurate for how a very large number of people in the country should be treated. I definitely don't want a lot of people I know with a commercial laser, as I do like my eyesight. I have a 500 lumen flashlight (its really really bright in a tightly focused beam) and the number of people I told "don't point it at your face because its incredibly bright", that did exactly that is astounding. When I asked why? their response was its only a flashlight... I've seen several people do that with lasers too. Not to mention that is the governments targeted mentality with their current form of "education".

  • Re:How else... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by AaronLS ( 1804210 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @06:21PM (#43228597)

    "figures we are all fucking idiots" more like "KNOWS MOST of us are fucking idiots". Some~most people have poor judgement, and no one really cares about saving them from themselves, but instead keeping by-standards from being victims of their poor judgement. It's why we can't have nice things. Shouldn't everyone get to have nuclear weapons?

  • Re:So then... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by AaronLS ( 1804210 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @06:47PM (#43229019)

    As well as 99% of all light. They do need to see where they are going :)

    Lasers are sometimes polarized, so you could accomplish this with one filter, but you would have to align it with the polarization of the laser, which would require some sort of active system, and there you've gone through all that trouble and only get partial results for lasers that have that polarization. If you were going to go through that much trouble, just build an active system to detect the laser source. What you do once you've targeted the source, I'll leave up to your imagination.

  • Re:How else... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @08:29PM (#43230113) Homepage

    Ah, in favor of tyranny - what a surprise. You'll be glad to know you're not alone - intellectuals have been speaking the same words as you, but calling it Coercive Paternalism instead so it sounds good. [amazon.com]

    "In this book, Sarah Conly rejects the idea of autonomy as inviolable. Thus in many cases it would advance our goals more effectively if government were to prevent us from acting in accordance with our decisions. Her argument challenges widely held views of moral agency, democratic values and the public/private distinction, and will interest readers in ethics, political philosophy, political theory and philosophy of law."

    No more freedom because we might make choices that Sarah Conly disagrees with. What was that bit in George Orwell's seminal tract on tyranny, Animal Farm?

    "No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"

  • Re:Life is unsafe (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Trogre ( 513942 ) on Thursday March 21, 2013 @12:10AM (#43231287) Homepage

    Hell no. These are not like knives.

    These laser pointers are much more dangerous that you might think. Sweep a 120mW laser across the eyes of a room full of people at 10 feet and you've just permanently damaged their retinas before anyone could blink.

    Used with care, they can be crazy awesome fun and I have several, but I treat them as munitions and keep them well locked away because I'm aware of exactly what damage they can do.

    You seriously do not want these in the hands of yobbos who will wave them in the eyes of the first child they see saying, "Look, lightsaber!"

  • Re:How else... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Joce640k ( 829181 ) on Thursday March 21, 2013 @05:59AM (#43232501) Homepage

    I bought an overpowered green laser "pointer"

    I didn't.

    My experience with other people and normal-powered lasers means I wouldn't trust anybody else to have it within a mile of other people's eyes. Constantly having to tell people "no" and "because you're an idiot, that's why" isn't worth it.

Neutrinos have bad breadth.

Working...