Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Space

Stephen Hawking Warns Against Confining Ourselves To Earth 414

alancronin writes with this excerpt from CNet: "Stephen Hawking, one of the world's greatest physicists and cosmologists, is once again warning his fellow humans that our extinction is on the horizon unless we figure out a way to live in space. Not known for conspiracy theories, Hawking's rationale is that the Earth is far too delicate a planet to continue to withstand the barrage of human battering. 'We must continue to go into space for humanity,' Hawking said today, according to the Los Angeles Times. 'We won't survive another 1,000 years without escaping our fragile planet.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Stephen Hawking Warns Against Confining Ourselves To Earth

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 13, 2013 @09:52AM (#43440055)

    ah, the basic premise behind Agenda 21, mankind as a cancer that must be suppressed into a state that will be sustained by this single planet. This leads to a single world government, mass depopulation (read death camps, look up negative population credits) and people living sustainably but not self-sufficiently.

  • Paradox (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 13, 2013 @09:54AM (#43440071)

    So let's just become a horde of locusts jumping from planet to planet consuming their resources and polluting them into lifeless rocks until a coalition of alien species has to band together to eliminate the threat humanity represents to the galaxy.

    Or, learn how to survive on this planet before going out and colonizing another one.

    And wouldn't the energy, use of resources, and capital that would be necessary to venture into space accelerate the decline of this planet?

    Space travel isn't exactly a "green" endeavor.

  • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday April 13, 2013 @09:59AM (#43440097)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Paradox (Score:3, Interesting)

    by gatkinso ( 15975 ) on Saturday April 13, 2013 @09:59AM (#43440099)

    >> Space travel isn't exactly a "green" endeavor.

    I agree. I also disagree with the spacer point of view that we need to find a new planet to suck dry as quickly as possible before this one runs out.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 13, 2013 @10:00AM (#43440113)

    People don't need planets to live. Or, at least, not to live on. Lagrange points to anchor habitats are a nice touch. Give me low G, controlled weather, and no Mosquitos any day. Get us out of 'natural' ( ignoring the natural/unnatural false dichotomy) environments and in to ones designed by engineers to handle hard human loving.

  • by Jeremiah Cornelius ( 137 ) on Saturday April 13, 2013 @10:39AM (#43440299) Homepage Journal

    Seems to think we need to change EVERYTHING but our selves.

    "Here, we've been first-rate buggers and pissed all over this trash heap.Let's move n to our next noble and inspiring endeavour - locating the next places where we can foul our own nest."

    Why doesn't he get out and run around a little more often? Fresh air and sunshine! It'd clear the cobwebs in that addled brain of his.

  • by Hartree ( 191324 ) on Saturday April 13, 2013 @11:10AM (#43440469)

    It sounds like quite a number of the people answering are quite happy to see those they like go extinct in order to revel in the anticipation of the extinction of those they don't like.

    *shrug* To steal the title of Dan Ariely's book: Predictably Irrational.

    It's a perverse modification of the judgement of Solomon with the mother saying "That's fine, as long as I can be sure her half of the child is truly dead."

To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

Working...