The Path Toward Improved Biosurveillance 25
Lasrick writes "Interesting opinion piece that explains successes and holes in the U.S. system of detecting and responding to pandemics: 'In April 2009, following an experimental protocol, staff members at a Navy lab in San Diego tested specimens from two patients using a new diagnostic device. Both tested positive for influenza, but, oddly, neither specimen matched the influenza A subtypes that are known to infect humans. This finding raised suspicions, and so the samples were sent to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Further tests would reveal that these two patients were the first reported cases of a novel H1N1 influenza virus that would cause a global pandemic in 2009. In many respects, the Navy lab's discovery of H1N1 is a success story for US efforts to boost its biosurveillance capabilities.'"
Re:Now the bioweapons conspiranoia(?) begins (Score:2, Informative)
And that is how the bioweapons conspiranoia(?) begins.
Actually, for those who are informed ( sorry, dumbass, but you aren't on the list )
this train left the station years ago.
Google "Biopreparat" if you want to get an idea of what might be out
there. It makes anything relative to nuclear weapons look like a child's
toy.
=