Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Japan Technology

Fixing Fukushima's Water Problem 111

Lasrick writes "This is an excellent analysis of exactly what the problems are at Fukushima, and what risks are posed to the public. From the article: 'The operator of Fukushima Daiichi, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco), has worked hard and has indeed contained most of the significant contamination carried by water used to cool the plant’s damaged reactor cores. Still, a series of events—including significant leakage from tanks built to hold radioactive water—has eroded public confidence. To address the water challenges, an improved water management plan should be created to deal with all levels of contamination, from slightly contaminated groundwater to highly radioactive cooling water flowing out of the damaged cores. This plan needs to build on the many good Tepco efforts of the past two years, but it should also incorporate new technologies that improve water cleanup performance and increase processing capacities. Importantly, this plan needs to include a new level of transparency for and outreach to the Japanese public, so citizens can understand and have confidence in the ultimate solution to the Fukushima water problem, which will almost certainly require the release of water—treated so it conforms to Japanese and international radioactivity standards—into the sea.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Fixing Fukushima's Water Problem

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Treatment (Score:4, Interesting)

    by h4rr4r ( 612664 ) on Monday September 09, 2013 @12:03PM (#44798375)

    I believe they mean water with radioactive material dissolved in it. So you could remove the radioactive material by precipitating it out or RO membranes or something.

  • by Smidge204 ( 605297 ) on Monday September 09, 2013 @12:29PM (#44798747) Journal

    Cement might not be the best option, but I agree that's something along the right lines.

    I was actually thinking gelatin, or some other coagulant, which would entrap the contaminants preventing further leakage without preventing future recovery and processing (you can re-melt gelatin). If the goal is to halt the leaking, something along those lines seems like a potential solution.
    =Smidge=

  • by wisnoskij ( 1206448 ) on Monday September 09, 2013 @12:30PM (#44798753) Homepage

    So they are protecting us from over 60% of the contaminated water. Well good job then, 60% is a passing grade, so I guess this means they are doing a good job.

  • Or not! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 09, 2013 @01:08PM (#44799343)

    In fact they don't know where the core is!

    It could be in the lower parts of the building, but most likely much of it has melted down far into the ground. How far, nobody knows. It may be in the water table. There is sporadic evidence of ongoing fission at the sites.

    They neither have it under control, nor contained.

  • by nitehawk214 ( 222219 ) on Monday September 09, 2013 @02:41PM (#44800755)

    The water will be safe LONG before that. The worst of the stuff in the water has a 30 year half life.

    However, simple distillation (noting that simple is a relative term when dealing with radiation at that level) would be a better choice since that would greatly reduce the volume of waste to store.

    So, now you want to cook water with radioactive materials in it? Considering TEPCO's safety record with radioactive steam, I know exactly what would happen here. Perhaps there are non-heating ways to distill the water, though.

    However some of that radioactive material is tritium, which is nearly impossible to separate from regular water. (Yes, gas vapor centrifuges can probably do it, but not for the amount of water they have to deal with.) Tritium has a half-life of 12ish years, so letting it sit around for a while is still the best way to go.

    The real issue is that TEPCO cannot even sit on radioactive material without messing it up, much less run a reactor or cleaning system with moving parts.

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...