Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Wikipedia Businesses The Internet

How PR Subverts Wikipedia 219

Daniel_Stuckey writes "We all know that Wikipedia can be subverted—it’s an inevitability of an open platform that some people will seek to abuse it, whether to gain some advantage or just for a laugh. Fortunately, the Wikipedia community has strong mechanisms in place to deal with this, from the famous cry of [citation needed] to the rigorous checks and standards put in place by its hierarchy of editors and admins. In recent months though, Insiders have encountered something altogether more worrying: a concerted attack on the very fabric of Wikipedia by PR companies that have subverted the online encyclopedia's editing hierarchy to alter articles on a massive scale—perhaps tens of thousands of them. Wikipedia is the world's most popular source of cultural, historical, and scientific knowledge—if their fears are correct, its all-important credibility could be on the line... Adam Masonbrink, a founder and Vice-President of Sales at Wiki-PR, boasts of new clients including Priceline and Viacom. Viacom didn't respond ... but Priceline — a NASDAQ listed firm with over 5,000 employees and William Shatner as their official spokesman — did. Sadly, Priceline didn't choose to respond to us via Captain Kirk; instead Leslie Cafferty, vice president of corporate communications and public relations, admitted, 'We are using them to help us get all of our brands a presence because I don't have the resources internally to otherwise manage.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How PR Subverts Wikipedia

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 19, 2013 @01:55PM (#45175713)

    Fortunately, the Wikipedia community has strong mechanisms in place to deal with this, from the famous cry of [citation needed] to the rigorous checks and standards put in place by its hierarchy of editors and admins.

    [citation needed]

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 19, 2013 @02:04PM (#45175753)

    Yeah, let's have a Congress of elected representatives who can sit down as reasonable men and women and make collective decisions on important policy issues! Kind of like the model of...

    Oh wait.

  • by j0el ( 154005 ) on Saturday October 19, 2013 @02:32PM (#45175931)

    As a long time marketer I can assure you that we ruin everything. email spam, ugly banner ads, interstitials, SEO manipulation, retargeting, on and on. We do it because it works. Even paid twitter followers work. Robocalls work. Blatant sex works (works really well). When Congress gets involved all that happens is we have to pay lobbyists to make sure we can get around any laws or regulations. When we find ways to make you aware of our clients or their products, when we find ways to make you like us, when we find ways to make you engage with us, even if the response is a very low percent, we will do it.

    Stop me before I annoy you again.

  • by PPH ( 736903 ) on Saturday October 19, 2013 @03:42PM (#45176437)

    Blatant sex works (works really well).

    I am skeptical. Convince me.

  • Re:Laugh (Score:4, Funny)

    by FuzzNugget ( 2840687 ) on Saturday October 19, 2013 @05:19PM (#45177033)

    So Adam wants to cash in on subverting one of greatest assets on the Inet.

    So, in other words, an asset subverted by an asshat.

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...