Sun Not a Significant Driver of Climate Change 552
damn_registrars writes "Scientists from Edinburgh, Scotland have recently published a study based on 1,000 years of climate data. They have compared the effects of differing factors including volcanic activity, solar activity, and greenhouse gases to find which has the most profound effect on climate. They have concluded that the driving factor since 1900 has been greenhouse gases."
In related news (Score:5, Funny)
In related news, angered Sun goes supernova, replies "I'm not a significant what!?"
Sun Not a Significant Driver (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, ever since Oracle bought them . . .
My dog doesn't agree (Score:5, Funny)
Well tell that to my dog Max who only naps in the sun beams.
Re:Canned Conservative Response Already Ready (Score:3, Funny)
Probably in response to the intolerant religion of climate change.
When will these stupid liberals decide to get their science info from politicians, and ignore those pesky scientists?
Location, Location and Location (Score:5, Funny)
Scientists from Edinburgh, Scotland have recently published a study showing that the sun is not a significant driver of recent climate change.
Of course they think that - there is no sun in Edinburgh.
Re: In related news (Score:2, Funny)
Re:What about the Little Ice Age? (Score:5, Funny)
To further your analogy, one of the passengers in the car is insisting that the acceleration has ceased because the slope leveled off for a few hundred feet a couple of miles back, and continues to claim that the speedometer reads 55 MPH even as the needle climbs toward 100 and the entire State Patrol is chasing the car down the highway.
Re:In related news (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What about the Little Ice Age? (Score:2, Funny)
Installment 34,878 in the popular series "Slashdotter unsure scientists have heard of Sun."
Re: What about the Little Ice Age? (Score:5, Funny)