Forgot your password?
America Online Businesses The Almighty Buck

AOL Reverses Course On 401K Match; CEO Apologizes 123

Posted by timothy
from the what-I-meant-to-say-was dept.
An anonymous reader writes "When we last checked in with Tim Armstrong, the AOL CEO was demonstrating 'Leadership with a Capital L' to employees of the company's Patch local news subsidiary by summarily firing an employee in the middle of a conference call for taking photos. Armstrong continued to serve up tasty material for tech bloggers this past week, blaming $7.1 million in extra expenses from Obamacare, and for $2 million in expenses for 'two AOLers that had distressed babies', for a decision to hold all matching funds for employee 401K programs until the end of each calendar year. After a small firestorm in the press, and a petition from AOL employees unhappy with both the policy change and the way it was presented, Armstrong reversed course, reinstating the per-period match and apologizing for mentioning the individual employee cases (TechCrunch is an AOL subsidiary). Incidentally, Armstrong was originally following in the footsteps of IBM, which made similar changes to its 401K program that went into effect last year."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

AOL Reverses Course On 401K Match; CEO Apologizes

Comments Filter:
  • down the drain (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Dionysus (12737) on Sunday February 09, 2014 @08:41AM (#46201883) Homepage

    So glad I no longer live and work in the US

  • by NapalmV (1934294) on Sunday February 09, 2014 @09:13AM (#46202003)
    CEO pay is also an outlier, what's his plan about it?
  • Re:Lemme guess... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ebno-10db (1459097) on Sunday February 09, 2014 @10:32AM (#46202355)

    Eat the rich!

    They probably taste lousy. I'd settle for the oppressive treatment they received in the radical days of the Eisenhower administration.

    I wish people had a better understanding of history. Calling for a return to the tax structure (up to 90% on the wealthy's incomes), the percentage going to employee compensation, etc., that we had in the 1950's probably would get me branded a "socialist" (by people who don't even understand what the word means). Yet that's what we had in those idyllic Ozzie and Harriet days that so many, including the right wing, see as a lost golden era.

  • by alexander_686 (957440) on Sunday February 09, 2014 @10:58AM (#46202483)

    Actually, most large companies are self insured. They will farm out the “operations” part (billing, negotiating rates, etc.) to a insurance company but will pay all of the costs out of their own pocket.

  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna (970587) on Sunday February 09, 2014 @11:17AM (#46202573) Journal
    Interesting, he raises his own pay by 10 million dollars and then blames Obamacare for 7 million dollar increase in "costs". Even if what this inveterate liar is saying is true, it works out to less than 2 bucks a day per employee.
  • by westlake (615356) on Sunday February 09, 2014 @01:37PM (#46203423)

    I like AOL. It started the internet super-highway after all, and if not for it, we would all be on modems, gets our software by CD, yada-yada-yada.

    AOL spared users the complexities of the Internet Suite of the '90s.

    I still have the boxed set of manuals from Delrina. Clients for Telnet and BBS services, FTP. Archie Veronica, Gopher, IRC Chat, Usenet, a Browser, basic photo editing tools, compressed file management and so on.

    AOL's clients were written for use by ordinary mortals. They played nice with third party software like mIRC.

    GUI. Automatic updates. Fixed price monthly billing. Thousands of local access toll-free numbers. There was a lot to like about AOL and it is past time the geek got off his high horse and admitted it,

"Floggings will continue until morale improves." -- anonymous flyer being distributed at Exxon USA