Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Media Security

Reporting From the Web's Underbelly 74

mspohr writes "The New York Times has an interesting article about Brian Krebs (Krebs on Security): 'In the last year, Eastern European cybercriminals have stolen Brian Krebs's identity a half dozen times, brought down his website, included his name and some unpleasant epithets in their malware code, sent fecal matter and heroin to his doorstep, and called a SWAT team to his home just as his mother was arriving for dinner.' His reporting is definitely on the edge. 'Mr. Krebs, 41, tries to write pieces that cannot be found elsewhere. His widely read cybersecurity blog, Krebs on Security, covers a particularly dark corner of the Internet: profit-seeking cybercriminals, many based in Eastern Europe, who make billions off pharmaceutical sales, malware, spam, frauds and heists like the recent ones that Mr. Krebs was first to uncover at Adobe, Target and Neiman Marcus.' The article concludes with this: 'Mr. Joffe worries Mr. Krebs's enemies could do far worse. "I don't understand why he hasn't moved to a new, undisclosed address," he said. "But Brian needs a bodyguard."' (He does have a shotgun.)"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Reporting From the Web's Underbelly

Comments Filter:
  • Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by AlphaWolf_HK ( 692722 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @06:13AM (#46274289)

    Chances are with as high of a high profile as he has, they'd just find him wherever he moves.

  • by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @07:37AM (#46274435) Homepage
    What with the recent harsh criticism of Slashdot, I see once again that despite mentioning the fact that the guy has a blog, the editors cannot be bothered to do a simple search and put the link into the story. No, I don't want someone to reply and add the link, that's not what I'm talking about. The lack of self-awareness is just shocking, but then again I suppose that's why commenters are abandoning this site in droves. I'll be off myself shortly, I expect.
  • Just a shotgun? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jafiwam ( 310805 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @08:23AM (#46274549) Homepage Journal

    This is a good example of where you need a fast-cycling firearm with decent capacity. Either of the AR / AK platforms would work, as well as a variety of (much more expensive) newer styles. Heck, even a Mini-14.

    A shotgun will take care of one guy well enough, but if it's four, you are in deep shit real fast with only 8 or so rounds in a slow loading plaftorm.

  • Re:Just a shotgun? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @08:41AM (#46274595)

    Don't be silly. If there are 4 guys trying to kill you, you are going to die. What good will being armed to the teeth do for you when you get sniped while doing groceries? When a stranger stabs you in the back when you walk in the street? When someone poisons your coffee?

    Americans and their silly guns... well, as long as it makes you feel safe.

  • Re:Just a shotgun? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @09:05AM (#46274673)

    "Just shoot in the general direction the dogs barking" -- this is why we try to limit gun ownership.

With your bare hands?!?

Working...