Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Security Your Rights Online

DHS Mistakenly Releases 840 Pages of Critical Infrastructure Documents 50

wiredmikey (1824622) writes The Operation Aurora attack was publicized in 2010 and impacted Google and a number of other high-profile companies. However, DHS responded to the request by releasing more than 800 pages of documents related to the 'Aurora' experiment conducted several years ago at the Idaho National Laboratory, where researchers demonstrated a way to damage a generator via a cyber-attack. Of the documents released by the DHS, none were related to the Operation Aurora cyber attack as requested. Many of the 840 pages are comprised of old weekly reports from the DHS' Control System Security Program (CSSP) from 2007. Other pages that were released included information about possible examples of facilities that could be vulnerable to attack, such as water plants and gas pipelines.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

DHS Mistakenly Releases 840 Pages of Critical Infrastructure Documents

Comments Filter:
  • by DoofusOfDeath ( 636671 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2014 @10:59AM (#47415469)

    that nothing can be kept secret anymore?

    It's hard to say, because in general we don't know about the things that have remained secret. We know the numerator, but not the denominator.

  • by PPH ( 736903 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2014 @12:22PM (#47416267)

    Isn't there supposed to be some gov't office or book of code names to ensure that secret project names are not re-used? Someone looks up 'Aurora' and sees that this was declassified years ago. So they upload it to the public site. Whoops.

    I'm doing a study on architecture in New York City. I think I'll call it the Manhattan Project.

  • Mistake? Suure... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by WegianWarrior ( 649800 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2014 @01:51PM (#47417085) Journal

    Step one: Release a bunch of 'critical' documents by 'mistake'.

    Step two: Twiddle thumbs while terrorists / criminals abuse information released in step one.

    Step three: Point to attack in caused by step two, argue that DHS should be exempt from FOI Request because 'national security'.

    Step four: DHS can do anything they like without the public oversight.

  • by coldfarnorth ( 799174 ) on Wednesday July 09, 2014 @02:12PM (#47417271)

    Now that I've got my flip answer out of the way, it's probably best that I don't leave your little talking points unaddressed.
    (UPDATE: Comboman's response is probably wittier and more concise - someone send 'em a gold star please. But I went to the trouble to type all this, so I'm going to post it anyways. It's the internet way.)

    I vote Democrat because I believe it’s okay if our federal government borrows $85 Billion every single month.

    Yup. Years of neglect have left our infrastructure in a sorry state, inherited wars cost money(!), and let's not even talk about the shitpile that was the economy. When Bush II handed over the reins. (A resounding win for Financial deregulation, wouldn't you say?)

    I vote Democrat because I care about the children but saddling them with trillions of dollars of debt to pay for my bloated leftist government is okay.

    This is really the same as the last one, but hey, it's still better than inventing evidence and starting a war that result in the deaths of ~4,500 of our kids, and maiming or otherwise injuring ~32,000 more (and totally ignoring the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens as a result of said war).

    I vote Democrat because I believe it’s better to pay billions of dollars to people who hate us rather than drill for our own oil, because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher.

    Last I checked, we'd rather reduce our dependence on oil altogether (By jump-starting the wind and solar industries in the US), but big oil and coal has been lobbying like there's no tomorrow to prevent that.

    I vote Democrat because I believe it is okay if liberal activist judges rewrite the Constitution to suit some fringe kooks, who would otherwise never get their agenda past the voters.

    No worries, the conservatives engage in plenty of this too, especially in cases involving the 2nd ammendment and abortion rights (Hobby lobby decision was decided by 5 men who were conservative Catholics).

    I vote Democrat because I believe that corporate America should not be allowed to make profits for themselves or their shareholders. They need to break even and give the rest to the federal government for redistribution.

    Dude, you are crazy. No company should be able to avoid paying taxes through financial sleight of hand, but really, you think GE is paying too much tax for the benefits of being an american corporation? Apple?

    I vote Democrat because I’m not concerned about millions of babies being aborted, so long as we keep all of the murderers on death row alive.

    As opposed to that other party, who preaches the sanctity of life, but is giddy to kill inmates.

    I vote Democrat because I believe it’s okay if my Nobel Peace Prize winning President uses drones to assassinate people, as long as we don’t use torture.

    Guess what? Most humans don't think that anyone should either engage in torture, or send drones to kill other humans. Shocking! One of two is a reasonable start, and we're working on the other one. At least we don't have Bush/Cheny in charge any more, they were fine with both.

    I vote Democrat because I believe people, who can’t accurately tell us if it will rain on Friday, can predict the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don’t start driving a Chevy Volt.

    You do know the difference between climatology and meteorology, right? It's like the difference between socialism and communism (or patriotism and fascism, if you swing that way.) The later is a tiny subset of the former.

    I vote Democrat because Freedom of Speech is not as important as preventing people from being offended.

    Aw, here you're just trying to stir things up. I'm pretty sure the courts have a well-used system in pl

"Spock, did you see the looks on their faces?" "Yes, Captain, a sort of vacant contentment."

Working...