Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Almighty Buck Bitcoin Social Networks Technology

New Digital Currency Bases Value On Reputation 100

Posted by Soulskill
from the for-everyone-who-wanted-to-rep-grind-in-real-life dept.
An anonymous reader writes: If digital currencies are fundamentally different than physical ones, why do they work in the same way? That's a question being asked by Couchbase co-founder J. Chris Anderson, who's building a currency and transaction system where reputation is the fundamental unit of value. "Unlike with bitcoin—which keeps its currency scarce by rewarding it only to those who participate in what amounts to a race to solve complex cryptographic puzzles—anyone will be able to create a new Document Coin anytime they want. The value of each coin will be completely subjective, depending on who creates the coin and why. 'For example, the coin my disco singer friend created and gave me at my barbeque might be what gets me past the rope at the club,' Anderson says. A coin minted by tech pundit Tim O'Reilly might be highly prized in Silicon Valley circles, but of little interest to musicians. 'It's a bit like a combination of a social network with baseball trading.'" Anderson isn't aiming to supplant Bitcoin, or even challenge the money-exchange model that drives society. But he's hoping it will change the way people think about currency, and open up new possibilities for how we interact with each other.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

New Digital Currency Bases Value On Reputation

Comments Filter:
  • Trade is so BORING. (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 19, 2014 @10:59AM (#47488781)

    As bases for society go, trade is really not much more interesting than theological obligation as a way of running society.

    Now we actually have the technological power for it, it would be nice to re-visit voluntary centralised management according to need, where artificial scarcity is discouraged rather than encouraged. (Not to be confused with Stalinism, which was just state capitalism and managed to combine all the worst aspects of both Marxism and the free market under a single owner.)

  • by ColdWetDog (752185) on Saturday July 19, 2014 @12:33PM (#47489275) Homepage

    For a quick introduction to this concept, pick up a copy of Neal Stephanson's Confusion [nealstephenson.com].

The world is moving so fast these days that the man who says it can't be done is generally interrupted by someone doing it. -- E. Hubbard

Working...