Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Earth Space Science

Apparent Meteorite Hits Managua, Nicaragua, Leaving Crater But No Injuries 107

Posted by timothy from the ok-maybe-it-was-a-gas-leak-or-antimatter dept.
A wire report from AFP says that an explosion heard in Managua last night, and a 40-foot crater evident today, are evidence that the city was the impact site for a small meteorite that struck Saturday night. The photos are not very exciting at a glance, which is a good thing, considering that a dirt crater and no injuries is probably the best outcome if a meteorite strikes the city where you live. From the article: The meteorite appeared to have hurtled into a wooded area near the airport around midnight Saturday, its thunderous impact felt across the capital. The hit was so large that it registered on the instruments Strauss’ organization uses to size up earthquakes. “You can see two waves: first, a small seismic wave when the meteorite hit Earth, and then another stronger one, which is the impact of the sound,” he said. Government officials and experts visited the impact site on Sunday. One of them, William Martínez, said it was not yet clear if the meteorite burned up completely or if it had been blasted into the soil. “You can see mirror-like spots on the sides of the crater from where the meteorite power-scraped the walls,” Martínez said. (The same news, in slightly shorter form, from the AP.)
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apparent Meteorite Hits Managua, Nicaragua, Leaving Crater But No Injuries More

Apparent Meteorite Hits Managua, Nicaragua, Leaving Crater But No Injuries

Comments Filter:

  • Hope they're keeping people away (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    The last time something like this happened in Central or South America (I forget exactly where and am too lazy to google it) there were toxic gasses released from the soil. IIRC, they determined it wasn't the meteorite that had toxins; but that the impact churned up naturally occurring arsenic or something.

  • related to 2014RC? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by jjeffries ( 17675 ) on Sunday September 07, 2014 @08:13PM (#47849133)

    Any relation to the asteroid that got well up into our pearthonal space earlier today?

    • Re:related to 2014RC? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 07, 2014 @08:19PM (#47849165)

      Maybe, these asteroids that we detect are usually followed by a "tail" of smaller asteroids and those are too small to detect but they are the ones that actualy make it through the atmosphere.

      • Coincidence? Or conspiracy? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by mveloso ( 325617 ) on Sunday September 07, 2014 @08:26PM (#47849211)

        Like college age kids, meteors seem to always travel in packs. The Chelyabinsk one was said not to be related to 2012Da/367943 Duende, but it sure is a hell of a coincidence that close flying meteors have an "unrelated friend" that impacts the Earth.

        Maybe we got the ugly friend?

        • That's what I was thinking too--we got hit by something's little brother *again*? But OTOH, there's a whole metric crapload of stuff that passes us close by, check this out: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ [nasa.gov]

          • Or.

            Since we were watching for a meteor flyby, the explosion and crater are difficult to imagine as merely coincidence.

        • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Coward

          The reason why Chelyabinsk and Duende were not related is that according to multiple sources they had different trajectories, all they had in common was that they ended up in the same neck of the woods at the same time. What we should take away from this is that meteorites happen all the time, though still mostly not on camera and not in a densely populated areas. The solar system is still very much under construction.

          • Re: (Score:2)

            by mveloso ( 325617 )

            Different trajectories implies different origins, but I'm sure there's a way to show that they could have had the same origin and got thrown into different orbits...which occasionally intersect with Earth.

        • I don't think it's a coincidence OR a conspiracy. I think that as a comet or multi-part asteroid approaches close to a planet, it breaks up like Shoemaker-Levy 9.

          As it misses, the different fragments get accelerated at different angles around the planet. At that point, they will end up with vastly different orbits, all focused on the same approximate point in space.

          But from a solar-centric perspective, they all still have the same energy, and thus all have the same period.

          So they hold a reunion of sorts

          • Re: (Score:1)

            by Anonymous Coward

            As it misses, the different fragments get accelerated at different angles around the planet. At that point, they will end up with vastly different orbits, all focused on the same approximate point in space. But from a solar-centric perspective, they all still have the same energy, and thus all have the same period.

            You can't have all of those conditions met at the same time. If the angle changes, it will exchange energy and momentum with the Earth and will have different energy in the heliocentric frame. While scattering things in orbit around a single body will have those objects tend to come back to their point of origin each orbit, any non-r-squared forces, whether from atmospheric drag or non-uniformities in Earth's gravity for satellites, or the fact that Sun-Earth-Asteroid is a three body system, will spread t

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by cusco ( 717999 )

          In the case of the previous two, since they were traveling at right angles to each other they were pretty certainly not related. I haven't seen any examination of the path of this new meteor yet.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Nyder ( 754090 )

      Any relation to the asteroid that got well up into our pearthonal space earlier today?

      ya, the asteroid was hired to make a bunch of noise in the space watching community, so while all eyes were focused on it, some of it's buddies decided to sneak in the back door.

      Granted I know they can't see everything, but it's funny how they make a big deal about how asteroids can hit us, and watching one that won't hit us, while smaller ones don't get seen at all.

      Had that hit a populated area, I imagine a lot of peeps would be say, um, oops!

      • Had that hit a populated area, I imagine a lot of peeps would be say, um, oops!

        It hit a populated area.

        • Re: (Score:1)

          by Anonymous Coward

          He probably meant a worst case secenario for a small one like this, like the packed stands of an open air stadium or concert. An event like that would really turn some heads when it comes to asteroid detection.

          Or mayb you'd like something larger, like a tuskunga level event in a heavily populated area that wouldn't raise arguments that it was an attack from another country, so say a small to medium sized city in middle america that has no major stategic assets to speak of so that Faux "News" doesn't have an

  • You could go unnoticed in such a place. Or maybe not.

  • Good thing it didn't hit US. (Score:4, Funny)

    by JWSmythe ( 446288 ) <jwsmythe@nospam.jwsmythe.com> on Sunday September 07, 2014 @09:19PM (#47849425) Homepage Journal

    It's a good thing it didn't hit the US. If I've learned nothing else from Hollywood, I've learned this... If any object strikes another object moving faster than about 20 feet per second, there will be a huge explosion.

    Except for the very very rare incidents which are strictly for comedic value. [youtube.com]

    • Re: (Score:3)

      by GNious ( 953874 )

      I'm glad it didn't hit the US - newspapers would have been screaming "INVASION" or something equally silly for days....

      • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward

        "War against meteorites"

      • The alien terrorists are bombing us. We need body cavity searches at all airports and major highway intersections!

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by geekoid ( 135745 )

      I wish it did. Preferable the capital building,. I don't want anyone hurt, but maybe it would be a wake up call for better funding to watch of objects.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by cusco ( 717999 )

      If it happened in the US there would be an immediate assumption that it was a terrorist attack, even if it just plopped down in a cornfield, and the Pentagon would be invading someone before the first investigators arrived on the site.

      Back in the '80s the Norwegians launched a sounding rocket. All the forms had been filled out, but apparently got lost on some bureaucrat's desk in the Kremlin. The launch path looked like a SLBM coming from the North Sea with a trajectory in the general direction of Moscow.

  • Wasn't a meteorite (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Wilfried Strauch, an adviser to the Institute of Territorial Studies, said it was "very strange that no one reported a streak of light. We have to ask if anyone has a photo or something."

    Local residents reported hearing a loud boom Saturday night, but said they didn't see anything strange in the sky.

    "I was sitting on my porch and I saw nothing, then all of a sudden I heard a large blast. We thought it was a bomb because we felt an expansive wave," Jorge Santamaria told The Associated Press.

    • Re:Wasn't a meteorite (Score:5, Interesting)

      by meglon ( 1001833 ) on Sunday September 07, 2014 @10:41PM (#47849753)
      A light trail, or fireball, comes about from the object heating up and burning off from the friction of hitting the atmosphere. An object moving fast enough will form a bow shock that will punch through the atmosphere and minimize friction. For an object to move that fast, yet make this small of a crater, the object would have to be very small (maybe baseball sized), and most likely have a very steep entry angle (>75 degrees)... but it's very possible.

      Back in the 60's/70's when people actually started thinking about collisions, and considering the damage they could do (as well as how to possibly eliminate a threat like Project Icarus from MIT), one book listed one of the worst case scenarios is a large, very fast mover hitting the oceans, as not only would it cause massive tsunami, it's bow shock could push both the atmosphere and the ocean water out of the way, and deliver a direct strike to the crust at a thinner point cause all sorts of problems.

      • Re:Wasn't a meteorite (Score:5, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 07, 2014 @11:10PM (#47849855)

        A light trail, or fireball, comes about from the object heating up and burning off from the friction of hitting the atmosphere. An object moving fast enough will form a bow shock that will punch through the atmosphere and minimize friction

        The vast majority of the heating and a large part of the resulting fireball and trail comes from compressional heating of air... that exact bow shock you are talking about is what is responsible for that. Basically all of the air in front that piles up because it doesn't move out of the way fast enough compresses and heats very quickly to the point of being a plasma, and can include significant light emission.

  • MOD POINT BUCKET (Score:1, Informative)

    by retroworks ( 652802 )
    Have mod points, but no one says anything interesting? Contribute here to the Mod Point Bucket [MPB] When your mod points expire, we'll owe you.

  • Meteoroid, Meteor, Meteorite (Score:5, Informative)

    by Rootbear ( 9274 ) on Sunday September 07, 2014 @10:45PM (#47849759) Homepage

    Managua was hit by a meteoroid. If anyone saw the bright light of its fall to earth, they saw a meteor. If any part of it survived, that's meteorite. Thank you.

  • .... Dr. Stone [wikipedia.org] and his team.

  • Imperial (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Vlijmen Fileer ( 120268 ) on Monday September 08, 2014 @12:48AM (#47850197)

    "Foot" ?
    Again? Seriously?? When will this braindead imperial insanity EVER stop???

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      USA loves to be called imperium.
      Seriously, /. should attempt to evolve a bit

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by mrgren ( 630298 )
      We'll stop using feet as soon as the Brits stop using stones.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by dkman ( 863999 )
      The Republicans will never let us stop using the imperial system.

      As long as the Republicans are allowed to gerrymander their seats in Congress we won't be able to get rid of them.

      Congress will never pass a gerrymandering law because they are the ones who would need to vote on it.

      Therefore we will ,unfortunately, never get rid of our egregious amount of BS.

      What I would like to see:
      Step 1: Stop gerrymandering
      Step 2: Vote for someone with a clue
      Step 3: Make speed limits and other products have both

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by geekoid ( 135745 )

      The problem with imperial units is that
      before you know it, you're looking down the barrel of a Death Star.

  • If that's a meteor crater, where's the ejecta? It must have excavated ~200 m3 of dirt, which seems to have simply disappeared. None of the plants surrounding it show any evidence of violent impact, "shockwave", or explosion as reported. Maybe there is actually a crater somewhere, but this is just a photo of some sort of sinkhole?

    • Re: (Score:3)

      by tragedy ( 27079 )

      Trees being uprooted by sinkholes tend to be falling into the hole, not away from it. It's hard to see in the photo, but that tree looks like it's had most, but not all leaves blown off it. As for where the ejecta vanished to, it looks like where it vanished to is the area immediately around the crater. We don't have any sort of before and after picture or a picture of another part of the same wooded area, but the part that we can see seems to be all dirt except for where there are taller trees. It might be

      • We don't have any sort of before and after picture

        You can find the "before" picture on google maps/earth of course.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by tragedy ( 27079 )

          I actually took a look at the airport in google maps to see if I could identify the spot. There isn't enough to go on from the article. Some parts seem to definitely have ground-covering vegetation between the trees, but it's less clear in other parts, where it does look fairly brown between the trees. That could just be brown vegetation, however. Overall, the ground in the pictures seems far too devoid of small plants close to the crater. I'm definitely thinking that there's a layer of dirt there covering

      • SpaceWeather.com is "skeptical", says it looks more like a hole dug by a backhoe than a meteor crater.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by tragedy ( 27079 )

          I found a few other pictures looking around and there's definitely a lot of plants angled away from the crater. It might not have been a meteorite, but it definitely looks like there was an explosion rather than just a backhoe digging.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by geekoid ( 135745 )

      Did you look at the impact crater? YOU could easily spread that little dirt over the areas and it would not be noticeable.

      I've seen tree hit by lightning and the near by bushes look un-touched.

  • ... are Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman in holiday in Nicaragua?

  • Please explain to your effing media connections that it is an effing meteor unitl it effing stops...then, it's an effing meteorite... Can these so called effing reporters not learn any effing thing???

Slashdot Top Deals

What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey

Close