Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Government

+ - Activists Seek Repeal of Ban on Incandescent Bulbs 2

Submitted by
Hugh Pickens writes
Hugh Pickens writes writes "Daniel Sayani reports in New American that Senator Mike Enzi has announced that he plans to introduce legislation to reverse the ban on incandescent light bulbs which is scheduled to go into effect January 1, 2014. "CFLs are more expensive, many contain mercury which can be harmful even in the smallest amounts, and most are manufactured overseas in places like China," says Enzi. "If left alone, the best bulb will win its rightful standing in the marketplace. Government doesn’t need to be in the business of telling people what light bulb they have to use." Faced with a phaseout some consumers are taking pre-emptive steps stockpiling incandescent bulbs, although according to a poll by USA Today, most Americans support the U.S. law that begins phasing out traditional light bulbs next year and, despite some consumer grumbling, say they're satisfied with more efficient alternatives. Nearly three of four US adults, or 71%, say they have replaced standard light bulbs in their home over the past few years with compact fluorescent lamps or LEDs and 84% say they are "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with CFL's and LED's,"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Activists Seek Repeal of Ban on Incandescent Bulbs

Comments Filter:
  • The ban was stupid. They should have simply put a 100% federal tax on sales of incandescent bulbs. Then folks could still use them the few places that a CFL doesn't make sense.

    • by russotto (537200)
      With a 100% tax, they'd still work better, be more reliable, and _provide better value_ than a CFL.

If Machiavelli were a hacker, he'd have worked for the CSSG. -- Phil Lapsley

Working...