+ - The Curious Case of Increasing Misspelling Rates o->
Submitted
by
Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "The crowd sourcing nature of Wikipedia might imply that its content should be more "correct" than other sources. As the saying goes, the more eyes the better. One particular student who was curious about this conducted rudimentary text mining on a sampling of the Wikipedia corpus to discover how misspelling rates on Wikipedia change through time. The results appear to indicate an increasing rate of misspellings through time. The author proposes that this consistent increase is the result of Wikipedia contributors using more complex language which the test is unable to cope with. How do the results of this test compare to your own observations on the detail accuracy of massively crowd sourced applications?"
Link to Original Source
Link to Original Source
The Curious Case of Increasing Misspelling Rates o More Login
The Curious Case of Increasing Misspelling Rates o