Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Verizon

+ - Verizon answers John Doe subpoena BEFORE it was due-> 1

Submitted by
NewYorkCountryLawyer
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "Verizon has just committed serious misconduct, by taking it upon itself to answer a subpoena 5 days before its answer was due. In a bittorrent movie downloading "John Doe" case, Malibu Media v. Does 1-13, in Central Islip, New York, on Long Island, a John Doe defendant had, back in April, moved to quash the subpoena (PDF), which was returnable May 12th. The Court, on May 10th, issued an order staying enforcement of the subpoena, and directing Malibu's lawyers to notify Verizon immediately. Unfortunately, the stay order wasn't worth the paper it was printed on, since, it now turns out, Verizon had turned over the John Does' names on May 7th, a full 5 days prior the date its response was due. Apart from wondering what gave Verizon the right to deprive the Court of its authority to review a subpoena prior to its return date, one might also wonder why it took the plaintiff's lawyers 10 days to notify the Court of Verizon's misconduct."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Verizon answers John Doe subpoena BEFORE it was due

Comments Filter:

Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.

Working...