Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Washington Redskins stripped of trademarks 4

Submitted by BillCable
BillCable (1464383) writes "

In a major blow to the Washington Redskins, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Wednesday canceled six federal trademarks of the “Washington Redskins” team name because it was found to be “disparaging” to Native Americans.

“We decide, based on the evidence properly before us, that these registrations must be cancelled because they were disparaging to Native Americans at the respective times they were registered,” the PTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board wrote. The panel voted 2-1 in favor of the decision.

Perhaps this move will speed up the inevitable name change which was expected within the next few years."

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Washington Redskins stripped of trademarks

Comments Filter:
  • Without valid trademark registrations, the Washington Redskins have no trademarks to infringe. Now, before they change their name, is the perfect time for entrepreneurs to take advantage of all the money the Redskins organization spent on developing the brand. Quick! Open a Washington Redskins Pizza, Washington Redskins Gym, Washington Redskins Football Jerseys and Souvenirs Shop.
    • by Megane (129182)

      Don't forget the ever-popular Washington Redskin Peanuts!

      Jokes aside, I don't think I have ever heard of trademarks being canceled just because a few people thought they were offensive. If they were truly offensive, they would have simply been abandoned. (Anyone under 40 ever heard of the Frito Bandito?) []

    • by Deadstick (535032)

      Now, before they change their name

      Assuming they do. They're not under any legal requirement to stop using it; they just can't enjoin anybody else from using it. In which case, a business called "Redskins Pizza" could be interpreted as supporting the name, not mocking it.

  • From Washington Post: Native Americans have won at this stage before, in 1999. But the team and the NFL won an appeal to federal court in 2009. The court did not rule on the merits of the case, however, but threw it out, saying that the plaintiffs didn’t have standing to file it. The team is likely to make the same appeal this time.

    And it took 10 years

I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. -- Isaac Asimov