NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "Angered at the RIAA's "gamesmanship" in joining multiple "John Does" in a single case without any basis for doing so, a Magistrate Judge in Maine has suggested to the presiding District Judge in Arista v. Does 1-27 that the record companies and/or their lawyers should be fined under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules, for misrepresenting the facts. In a lengthy footnote to her opinion recommending denial of a motion to dismiss the complaint (pdf)(footnote 5), Judge Kruvchak concluded that "These plaintiffs have devised a clever scheme to obtain court-authorized discovery prior to the service of complaints, but it troubles me that they do so with impunity and at the expense of the requirements of Rule 11(b)(3) because they have no good faith evidentiary basis to believe the cases should be joined." She noted that once the RIAA dismisses its "John Doe" case it does not thereafter join the defendants when it sues them in their real names. Arista v. Does 1-27 is the same case in which student attorneys at the University of Maine Law School, "enthusiastic about being directly connected to a case with a national scope and significance", are representing undergrads targeted by the RIAA." Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Magistrate suggests fining RIAA lawyers 0 Comments More Login /
Get More Comments