Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

+-   First Amendment Ruling Protects Internet Trolls-> on Thursday February 07 2008, @03:26PM I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property

Submitted by I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property on Thursday February 07 2008, @03:26PM
court
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "A recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of the State of California (PDF) in Krinsky v. Doe H030767 overturned a lower court ruling and ruled that the First Amendment right to anonymous speech protects internet trolls, too. Specifically, the ruling said that 'this juvenile name-calling cannot reasonably be read as stating actual facts.' And, even though some of the statements were crudely sexual and accused Ms. Krinsky of being among 'boobs, liars and crooks,' the statements were held to 'fall into the category of crude, satirical hyperbole which, while reflecting the immaturity of the speaker, constitute protected opinion under the First Amendment.'"
Link to Original Source
submission

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
If Robert Di Niro assassinates Walter Slezak, will Jodie Foster marry Bonzo??