Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

+-   Judge refuses to sign RIAA 'ex parte' order-> on Thursday May 29 2008, @05:03PM NewYorkCountryLawyer

Submitted by NewYorkCountryLawyer on Thursday May 29 2008, @05:03PM
court
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The RIAA just can't get enough of going after University of Maine students, but it appears that the judges in Portland, Maine, may be getting wise to the record company lawyers' antics. RIAA counsel submitted yet another ex parte discovery order to the Court ('ex parte' meaning 'without notice'), in BMG v. Does 1-11, but this time the judge refused to sign, pointing out that there is no emergency since there is no evidence that records are about to be destroyed (PDF). This is the same judge who has previously suggested the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions against the RIAA lawyers, accusing them of gamesmanship, all of which prompts one to ask: 'has the stupidity of the RIAA lawyers attained even greater heights?'"
Link to Original Source
submission

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
A committee is a group that keeps the minutes and loses hours. -- Milton Berle