Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

+-   New Opt-Out Clause Makes CAN-SPAM Worse-> on Tuesday June 10 2008, @01:04PM snydeq

Submitted by snydeq on Tuesday June 10 2008, @01:04PM
security
snydeq writes "Three years of mulling, and the FTC has made the CAN-SPAM Act effectively worse, writes Gripe Line's Ed Foster. Chief among the offenses in the FTC's updated rules is an even worse approach to opt-out procedures. Now, in scenarios where multiple marketers use a single e-mail message to spam you, 'only one of the senders — the one in the From: field — need be designated the official sender who is responsible for honoring opt-outs,' Foster writes. Translation? 'Other "marketers" who used that spam message, not to mention the spamming service that actually provided the e-mail address list, don't need to honor opt-outs. So try as you might to get yourself off a list, the real spammer can just keep changing the designated sender in the From: field and legally keep on spamming you.' The irony of the CAN-SPAM moniker gets thicker."
Link to Original Source
submission

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
To be a kind of moral Unix, he touched the hem of Nature's shift. -- Shelley