Are you serious? Maybe the majority of users don't have userContent.css customizations. But a significant minority do. And consider who evangelizes firefox. You guessed it. It's the power users. Take that away and there's very little reason for any user to pick Firefox over Chrome. Mozilla is losing ground and they can't figure out why and your post shows what the problem is. If Mozilla goes out of their way to alienate users like me (and the GP), they're going to slide into irrelevance.
If Mozilla goes out of their way to alienate users like me (and the GP), they're going to slide into irrelevance.
Take that away and there's very little reason for any user to pick Firefox over Chrome.
Welp, then just go use Chrome and hasten the inevitable, fork your own browser, or heck just head over to IcyPaleWeaselMoon with it's whooping 0.02%, JS engine straight from 2006, tab instance security that is non-existent, and tasty single-threaded browser (mmmm, loving it when all my webpages share the same memory space)! The endless whining from folks who contribute zilch towards a code base they continually hate on gets old fast.
But a significant minority do.
AKA, nobody.
And consider who evangelizes firefox.
Clearly not because all I ever hear from the "power users" is
Chrome is running internet police mode for a while already. In latest build they blocked *.eml downloads or something that looks like scripted downloader in other webmail. Normal user would be unable to do anything about it as even whitelisting website does not disable that block.
> AKA, nobody. Hello from nobody. userContent.css is the best option for dealing with brain dead web designers who think that web users should be unable to copy any website text. Even if I need to copy and paste account number to pay for services on that site or get their address or product id or name.
userContent.css (Score:3, Insightful)
Mozilla can just fuck right off. They're pulling this shit at the same time they're planning on removing userContent.css support.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
OMG what are you and, well literally no-one else, going to do that happens?
Re: (Score:4, Insightful)
Are you serious? Maybe the majority of users don't have userContent.css customizations. But a significant minority do. And consider who evangelizes firefox. You guessed it. It's the power users. Take that away and there's very little reason for any user to pick Firefox over Chrome. Mozilla is losing ground and they can't figure out why and your post shows what the problem is. If Mozilla goes out of their way to alienate users like me (and the GP), they're going to slide into irrelevance.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
If Mozilla goes out of their way to alienate users like me (and the GP), they're going to slide into irrelevance.
Take that away and there's very little reason for any user to pick Firefox over Chrome.
Welp, then just go use Chrome and hasten the inevitable, fork your own browser, or heck just head over to IcyPaleWeaselMoon with it's whooping 0.02%, JS engine straight from 2006, tab instance security that is non-existent, and tasty single-threaded browser (mmmm, loving it when all my webpages share the same memory space)! The endless whining from folks who contribute zilch towards a code base they continually hate on gets old fast.
But a significant minority do.
AKA, nobody.
And consider who evangelizes firefox.
Clearly not because all I ever hear from the "power users" is
Re:userContent.css (Score:1)
> Welp, then just go use Chrome
Chrome is running internet police mode for a while already. In latest build they blocked *.eml downloads or something that looks like scripted downloader in other webmail. Normal user would be unable to do anything about it as even whitelisting website does not disable that block.
> AKA, nobody.
Hello from nobody. userContent.css is the best option for dealing with brain dead web designers who think that web users should be unable to copy any website text. Even if I need to copy and paste account number to pay for services on that site or get their address or product id or name.