
MAD Cartoonist Don Martin Dies 151
inbred writes "Don Martin, longtime Mad magazine cartoonist who drew an assortment of wild-haired characters, punctuating the grotesque action with wacky words like SPLOP! and POIT!, has died. He was 68."
Someone had to... (Score:1)
Don Martin and Mad vs. Cracked... (Score:1)
I remember seeing an issue of Cracked in a grocery store in 1988 with the headline "Don Martin is Cracked!" I surprised me because I always knew him as a Mad artist.
I eventually found out about his dislike of Mad's copyright policies. I also noticed that for a few years after Mr. Martin switched to Cracked, Mad did not reprint any of his material in any of their "Super Specials" (large compilation issues containing popular past material). Maybe they were unsure if they could still use any of his old work?
It's always seemed to me that while Cracked has been more creative with their subject material (except for the stupid Cracked Monster Party series), Mad's humour and material has always been of a higher quality than Cracked's. Don Martin made some good contributions to Cracked when he joined them, but overall, I think even he started to slip into the Cracked rut. All of my favourite Don Martin cartoons are from Mad, none from Cracked. His better material is definitely from his Mad years. Maybe Mad has stricter quality control...?
What do you think folks? Was Don Martin better being "mad" or "cracked"?
P.S. I know Don Martin never contributed to it, but has anyone ever read Crazy magazine...?
Re:Cracked Magazine. (Score:1)
(I'm the same guy that posted the comment "Don Martin and Mad vs. Cracked," which was rather critical of Cracked, above...)
I didn't care for Cracked when I read it, but I will definitely agree that Mad fell into a rut in the mid-1990s, and is probably still in it. I remember seeing Mad TV and then reading a few issues of Mad shortly afterward and thinking, "Bill Gaines (Mad's former publisher) must be turning in his grave..."
Cracked has ventured into some territory that Mad has been afraid or unwilling to touch, often with very good (and funny!) results. Their recent parody of Pokémon with the cover featuring Pikachu puking on Ash was hilarious. ("When searcing for Pokemon in the grass, beware of obstacles...there might be Pokepoo hidden in there.") When I was in high school and the New Kids on the Block were popular, Cracked trashed them mercilessly while Mad ignored them completely except for the occasional short article here and there, usually published in a cowardly manner. Same thing for the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Dick Tracy, and Street FighterII. Cracked's poems are some of their true gems. When has Mad published any funny poetry? Mad has a formula, and does like deviating from it very much, which is unfortunate. Notice how Cracked has taken to publishing parts of their magazine in colour now. I wish Mad would do that!
Cracked, while being more creative as I pointed out, has often had it's share of problems with "bang for the buck." Whenever I pick up an issue, I only read about 10% of the magazine. There's that one article that's featured on the cover, and maybe a few others that are good, and the rest is fluff. Sometimes Cracked parodies things that are old or aren't popular anymore. This is a good example of the "fluff."
Cracked also has a problem with its artwork. Don Martin is very good, as well as John Severin, who I believe is one of the best humour magazine artists ever, but Cracked has a lot of extremely poor quality art. I was really disappointed that their Wild Wild West parody was drawn by Walter Brogan. He's terrible! His "artwork" is messy, disorganized, and very difficult to follow. And Mike Ricigliano? His "Spies and Saboteurs" are cool, but anything else by him is funny...for a few minutes.
When you analyse both magazines for a few issues, you start to discover that they really sell into totally different markets. Mad is meant for tennagers and young adults, while Cracked is meant for younger people, probably around junior high school age. This explains why I liked Cracked then but don't like it now.
One other thing... The face of Mad's mascot, Alfred E. Neuman, is instantly recognizable anywhere, and can be put on any head or body, while Cracked's Sylvester P. Smythe must always have blond hair and a wimpy look to be discernable. (Which makes me wonder...what ever happened to those back covers where they put his face on a celebrity's body?)
Back in early 1990, Cracked rented a 1-800 number and asked people to call and vote for whether or not they should keep him or not. The first issue to advertise the 1-800 number had the headline, "Should We Kill Sylvester?" Back then, I didn't have the money to call the number (it wasn't toll free), but today I would for sure! Today, whenever I see Sylvester's stupid mug in the upper-left corner of the mag's cover, for some reason, I get really angry and want to kill him! Arrghh! He makes me so mad!!
SYLVESTER P. SMYTHE MUST DIE!!
Sorry...
So what did he DIE OF again? (Score:2)
Only one way to honor him on Slashdot - (Score:3)
Better URL (frames etc) (Score:3)
Farewell... (Score:1)
Great material (Score:1)
Re:TV show (Score:1)
Veeblefetzer! (Score:1)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Don Martin create the veeblefetzer [tuxedo.org] name/character? That's the first thing that pops into my mind when I think of Don Martin.
Martin was never one my favorites, though he did have funny stuff. I really liked Spy vs. Spy, Aragones' "Marginal Art", and Mort Drucker's great caricatures in the movie parodies. And of course Al Jaffee's fold-ins ("The Almighty Dollar??" say Bart and Milhouse...)
I knew Mad was going downhill when Dave Berg stopped doing "The Lighter Side of..." with a single theme for the entire segment and instead had a different theme for each piece.
Holy SHPLORCHT!!!! (Score:1)
Re:Farewell... (Score:1)
Re:(Offtopic) Running "Totally MAD" in Linux? (Score:1)
Since the images on that CD are probably stored in a known format, I'm wondering how hard it would be to make an open reader for the data of the CDs... to me, it's prohibitively expensive for just an idle hacking project but it's probably possible.
Re:Two types of cartoonists (Score:2)
Garfield was a very good strip in it's first 5 years. The perspective and setup was unique. Then Jim Davis was hit with "moichendizing". The cartoon show, tons of toys and books, etc. At that point, the strip began showing signs of being 'tired'. It's still going, almost 20 years later, but it's obviously nothing groundshaking now.
The same thing has happened to Scott Adams and Dilbert. Popularity and the TV show have really screwed up the fresh look of the comic.
I'd argue that we didn't see this with Bill Waterson or Gary Larson because they only allowed their work for books and the occasional promotional items; both were able to stay fresh for much longer, and rather than draw out and get repetitive, they quit the business on time.
Cracked Magazine. (Score:2)
Cracked magazine was always a little more respectable - in more ways than one. And I think Don Martin recognized Cracked's valuable qualities; which helped lead to his future with Cracked Magazine. I'll always love Don Martin's gift to my life - he gave me the knowledge that despite simplistic drawings a good bag of humour can make everyone laugh.
Thanks Don.
Joseph Elwell.
There goes one of the great ones... (Score:2)
Adieu, Don. You'll be missed, but never forgotten.
What an incredible bummer :-( (Score:1)
His straight cartoons were always a riot as well. I particularly loved the befuddled surgeons - wondering how to begin a brain operation, not noticing "Insert thumb into slot A and pull" notation on the patient's neatly perforated skull. Or when an organ flies out of the patient's body - "better save that, we might need it later."
And, who could forget his portrayal of Elvis, "Shmelvis Parsley in 'Singing Wings'"? The list goes on and on - it's no wonder I turned out the way I did, thanks in part to this man's warped sense of humor. Don was truly brilliant, he will be greatly missed.
* Disclaimer: I may have spelled a couple of these wrong, it's been years after all.
--Indigo
A gravestone would be better, I think. (Score:1)
I'd advise against using religious symbols or vultures or anything like that. But an obituary icon would make sense to me.
J.
Re:Only one way to honor him on Slashdot - (Score:2)
--
Go ahead and make my MODERATION day..... (Score:1)
Anyway, finally! real "News for nerds stuff that Matters."
I must admit, Mad Magazine probably "fsked" me up as a kid more than smoking pot or anything else.
I still, to this day, want to fold the back end of most magazines to see if anything happens....
All my National Geographics have a strange "threefold" on the back end....
Speaking of National Geographic..... do you remember the first time you became a man? *wink*
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
GLITCH! (Score:2)
Cheers, Don, and thanks.
Re:Great talents - where are they? (Score:2)
Reid Flemming
Steven
Flaming Carrot
Most of these are relatively defunct, but they all reek of true, timeless, awe-inspiring greatness.
A belated THANK YOU to MAD !! (Score:1)
I was born in 1961, and not until 1994, in one used book store, I saw an old copy of MAD magazine, published in 1961 which reminded me that "1961" can be REVERSED and still becomes "1961" !!
Man, I realized how STUPID I was, when it had to take me THIRTY THREE YEARS of my life before I notice what the MAD magazine has noticed the year I was born !
So, this is a VERY BELATED THANKS to all who have contributed to the success of MAD. You have convinced me that there _ARE_ geniuses behind the COVERS OF MAD !!!
Blukka blukka blort blort...sniff...sob... (Score:1)
Goodbye, Don. Thanks for all the laffs.
Yes, there is... (Score:1)
not the boots. (Score:1)
Seriously tho, that is sad to hear. He and Sergio were a couple of the best Mad cartoonists. Time to pull out a few dusty old copies of Mad and have a read..
_______________________________________________
Re:Two types of cartoonists (Score:1)
Dilbert creative? Please.
\end{boggle}
Two types of cartoonists (Score:2)
The repetitive strips always use the same gags, and have been around for what seems like forever. Marmaduke. Ziggy. Peanuts. There won't be any earth-shattering ideas, nor anything to shock you. The same-ol', same-ol'. They'll always be popular, because they provide comfort from what you read on the front page.
The creative strips are far more rare. They entertain by their newness, by innovation. The Far Side. Calvin and Hobbes. Dilbert. The creative cartoonists tend to burn out -- Bill Waterson and Gary Larson both couldn't handle the pressure.
Jim Davis won't ever run out of new ideas -- he has all the ones he'll ever need. I hope, though, that Scott Adams hangs around for a few more years.
Here's to cartoonists.
--------------------
Not true, thankfully (Score:1)
There is good work being done today, stuff that will definately be considered classic material in the future.
Consider the following:
Note too that all of the "classic" artists you mentioned had their own influences who they probably felt they were unworthy to be compared to.
In short, don't overlook the possiblity that the "good old days" are happening right now.
Jon
Kaptain Klutz Lives (Score:1)
Zontar The Mindless,
MAD Magazine CD-ROM (Score:1)
Oh yeah, it came with a roll of mad toilet paper too! haha, great!
Has all the cool spy vs spy, edge art, and my favorite the army guy who makes all the peace signs.. (Ops showing my age)
I just did a quick search for Don Martian, shows a list of his cartoons.. All his "DAY" cartoons, the caveman cartoons. Damn, what a shame.
-Brook
(Score:2)
I'm sorry. What I meant to say was 'please excuse me.'
what came out of my mouth was 'Move or I'll kill you!'
I've only read one Mad... (Score:1)
Re:A MAD pioneer is gone.... (Score:2)
A MAD pioneer is gone.... (Score:2)
Martin's quirky (but very funny) style of cartoon work was truly unique and was a major mainstay at MAD until he had that unfortunate falling out with MAD back in 1988.
He will be seriously missed.
Re:A MAD pioneer is gone.... (Score:2)
Re:Yes, there is... (Score:2)
Sluggy is one of the very comics left (online or not) that is willing to do story arcs that lasts often for several months at a time.
Re:Some of his stuff. (Score:1)
-- ----------------------------------------------
Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!
Sad Day (Score:1)
A sad day for a great man... whacky as that may be....
Re:Cracked Magazine. (Score:2)
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Re:Great talents - where are they? (offtopic) (Score:2)
I knew I forgot something - I really meant to put Vernor Vinge on that list, too.
But if you really meant that there were some authors - Asimov and Heinlein - whose stuff you thought was great without any exceptions...then you actually liked those last Heinlein novels?
Surely even the greatest of authors may be responsible for one or two complete turkeys, though these tend to be forgotten.
I admit it's hard to find something particularly awful from Asimov but that's surely because (i) his output was so enormous that it's hard to find the room to remember the least good of his stories, and (ii) his writing seems fairly uniform in its mediocrity by today's standards.
I'll amend that insofar as to say that he did write some stuff which really sticks in my mind - the short story The Last Question and the novel The Gods Themselves. I also thought his later Robot and Foundation novels got better as the stories converged.
You know it only just occurred to me that The Last Question anticipated F J Tipler's Omega Point Theory by several decades.
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Re:new catagory please (Score:2)
Nice flame, man!
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Re:Aw, jeez... (Score:2)
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Re:Aw, jeez... (Score:3)
He was my favourite too. Here are some more Don Martin sound effects, from some Don Martin Sound Effect Stickers I got with an issue of Mad Magazine way back in about 1975 (they've stayed fresh in my mind all that time):
Sound of treading in a rather moist dog turd - GLITCH!
Sound of being hit in the face with a frying pan: PWANG!
Sound of a springy saw blade bent back then released to smack you in the face - FOINZAPP!
Sound of being poked in the eyeball with a lit cigarette - SIZAFITZ!
Sound of someone drilling into your forehead with a power drill - BZZOWNT!
Sound of being hit in the face by a large wet fish - SPLADAP!
Sound of being being poked in the eye by one of those thin metal rod-type towel rails that stick out from the wall - SHTOINK!
...and my all-time favourite
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Re:Great talents - where are they? (offtopic) (Score:3)
I think this must be the result of a combination of viewing the past through rose-tinted glasses and not knowing what to look at in the bookshop.
For starters, Asimov wrote great science fiction - real page turners - but in retrospect it was just traditional pulp. It lacked any kind of sophistication and didn't really demand much from the reader. Heinlein was truly the master in terms of story (eg. The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathan Hoag) but this reputation was won solely on the strength of his output back in the so-called Golden Age. As he aged, his stories and characterisations were increasingly saturated with self-indulgence, saccharine sentimental and sexual fantasies. The rot started to set in around the time of Stranger In a Strange Land and Time Enough for Love. By the time he wrote Number of the Beast his style was hardly recognisable and that book is about enough to make anybody puke. I didn't even bother reading Job at all.
The advent of "New Wave" sci-fi in the seventies meant lean times for those of us who liked good hard science fiction stories, with a traditional narrative structure (a beginning a middle and an end). NB I'm generalising so please don't flame me OK? The likes of Philip K Dick didn't appeal to everyone, some of these stories tended to be a bit too abstract for pulp fans.
But in the eighties and nineties Hard Science fiction enjoyed a resurgence. You may not like the bleak worlds portrayed by "cyberpunk" authors like William Gibson but science fiction has largely moved on from there by now. A lot of science fiction these days has a more optimistic tone.
There is no basis of fact in the suggestion that there is no more good Science Fiction being written any more. I'd particularly recommend you have another look at:
Orson Scott Card - not just Ender's Game, one of my favourites was a book called Hot Sleep, now out of print but re-written and re-released as The Worthing Saga
Kim Stanley Robinson - Red Mars. A truly wonderful book describing the first colonisation of the red planet in stunning detail, it actually makes it believable.
Greg Bear - Eon and its sequel Eternity. Lovely, traditional hard Science Fiction.
Greg Egan - Diaspora. Beautiful story and characterisation. Was developed out of his short story Wang's Carpets which makes up one chapter of the book (the idea behind it will blow your mind, guaranteed).
Peter F Hamilton - The Reality Dysfunction &c. Traditional Space opera at its best.
Stephen Baxter - Voyager and Titan. Totally credible very near future space exploration. Like K S Robinson he's researched NASA's stuff very thoroughly and it pays off. he also did The Time Ships, a fairly convincing sequel to HG Wells' The Time Machine authorised by Wells' estate.
Iain M Banks - all of the "Culture" novels, particularly Use of Weapons (although that particular book does play around with the narrative structure a bit, for a very good reason).
Michael Marshall Smith - Only Forward and Spares. Very unusual stories. A bit like Iain M Banks.
Ken Macleod - The Star Fraction, The Stone Canal and The Cassini Division. Actually The Star Fraction wasn't released in the US because it goes on about leftist politics a lot. You can get it from amazon.co.uk if you're not boycotting Amazon.
Neal Stephenson - I'd better mention Snow Crash and The Diamond Age before I get drummed out of Slashdot...I'd probably have mentioned them anyway but it's a bit hard to be sure when you just know someone's waiting to jump down your throat
NB. I don't mean this to be an exhaustive list of my favourite contemporary Science Fiction by any means. But if you read all the above I'm certain you'll find that more than a few of them will excite you, and make you want more.
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
New moderation category please (Score:2)
Re:Two types of cartoonists (Score:2)
The dinosaurs used to be multidimensional (for a comic, anyway) characters.. now the one dinosaur is just used for wedgies.
The garbage man used to be a semi-regular... bye bye.
The boss originally was fairly intelligent... just abusive. This was before he had pointed hair, of course.
Dilbert used to be a brilliant MIT-educated inventor, being more productive in his lab than Woz himself... now he spends all day writing memos and eating donuts at meetings.
And, of course.. Dilbert used to have glorious puns. nope... have to make room for yet another moronic decision made...
Irony (Score:2)
Does anyone else see the irony here?
Thank heaven for Sergio! (Score:2)
As for Sergio, I'm glad he's still around. He put out a wicked parody/kick in the nuts version of Blair Witch last month, and I laughed my ass off on every page.
Essay Topic: Compare and contrast Don Martin and Sergio Aragones comic stylings with respect to dialog vs. sound effects. Sergio's were silent movies, while Don's were silent movies with somebody behind the screen doing insane sound effects.
SHTOINK!
Pope
Re:What a shame... (Score:1)
See Goats [goats.com], Sluggy Freelance [sluggy.com], User Friendly [userfriendly.com] (though that one's not restricted to the web..)
there are a lot of other "hobby" strips out there - ComicSites [comicsites.com] lists bajillions of them.
Of course, I miss Bloom County, Peanuts, Calvin and Hobbes, the Far Side..... But so do we all..
Re:instead... (Score:1)
Re:Yes, there is... (Score:1)
--
Re:Great talents - where are they? (Score:2)
It used to be that people only ever got noticed because they had talent, or at least, it was more like that than it is today.
These days, there is so much shit crammed into your face it's hard to get away from it and find something interesting.
Know how I find interesting things? My friends.
Interesting music, Interesting booze, interesting sports, interesting.. everything.
Re:new catagory please (Score:4)
Many readers here I bet are 25 or under....
And lots of the people we grew up looking up to are starting to get rather old.. so it serves to let us know that we are mortal, and that soon we will be those icons for the generations to come.
Re:What a shame... (Score:1)
Snicker - Readers of MAD have missed him for 12 years since he left MAD for Cracked in 1987...
Re:Let us all observe a moment of silence... (Score:1)
>Where would Breathed, Larson, Watterson, et al. be today without him?
Say, what is Berke Breathed doing these days? Haven't heard a peep since he finished with Outland.
ObDonMartin: Thanks for all the laughs. We'll miss ya.
Re:Farewell... (Score:1)
Don Martin, wherever you are right now, Keep on Flortzinooglizing.
Re:Let us all observe a moment of silence... (Score:1)
Where would Breathed, Larson, Watterson, et al. be today without him? Just the onomatopoetics alone should enshrine this guy in the cartoonists' hall of fame (is there one? Where!?).
Just my $0.02. We'll miss ya Don.
#include "disclaim.h"
"All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak
Re:Every Mad Magazine is available on CDROM (Score:1)
Exactly how Windows-centric *is* this collection, anyway? Is there anyone who has it and has had a look through the file system?
One of the reviews on the amazon.com page you link to complains about the low image quality. Well, that's the way it goes, I guess -- as someone who has worked with scanned artwork before, I can assure you that it's damn hard getting pages with richly detailed, shaded artwork and crisply-printed black and white text to compress well. Let's hope that by the time EC produced Totally Mad II or whatever, wavelet compression [slashdot.org] will be patent-free. :)
Re:Let us all observe a moment of silence... (Score:1)
The first thought that comes to mind is the National Cartoonists' Society [reuben.org]'s Reuben awards, although those are more geared toward newspaper comic strips than to comic books and magazines. More general in scope is the Michigan State University comic art collection [msu.edu], which is about as definitive a collection as one point on the globe can be.
Re:Farewell... (Score:1)
Oddly enough, my parents just shipped me all my books from their attic, and in was "Don Martin Cooks Up More Tales" which I forgot I even had. [but loved as a child].
Guess I'll have to read it again and reflect....
We'll miss ya Don...
Ender
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
Re:New moderation category please (Score:1)
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
Now how about you stop making half assed assumptions about people you don't know. Maybe you should be paying more attention to your own life.
The Karma Police Strike! (Score:1)
*Three* types of cartoonists (Score:1)
I do like the premise of your idea, however.
Sad (Score:1)
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
After you complete your education -- another seven or eight years, I suppose, on daddy's money -- don't forget to memorize this phrase: "Would you like fries with that?" -- it's the only education *you're* ever gonna use.
BB
I love MAD!!! (Score:1)
-=Omicron=-
Re:Now all we need to know is... (Score:1)
All original content.. (Score:1)
Re:Great material (Score:3)
"There's always been physical suffering in comedy," he once said. "Even ancient clowns kicked each other in the seat of the
pants or hit each other over the head. It's the same thing in our time, just a little stronger."
The cartoons had a vocabulary all their own. "SHKLIP" was the sound made when construction workers tossed concrete at
each other. "SPLOP" described a surgeon throwing body parts into a doggie bag. "FAGROON" came from a collapsing
skyscraper.
His license plate read "SHTOINK."
"Is it funny? That's the only test I know when it comes to cartooning," Martin once said. "Not whether it's sick, or whether
it's going to ruin people's values or morals. You only have to ask a simple question: 'Is it funny?'"
His twisted approach influenced generations of younger cartoonists.
"Don Martin was the one who really stood out," "The Far Side" cartoonist Gary Larson told The Miami Herald in a story
published in 1990. "I really always loved his work. He was such a great artist."
Martin left Mad magazine in 1987 after a falling-out with its publisher, the late William Gaines, accepting a job at Cracked, a
competitor.
Martin chafed at the tradition that Mad, like most publishers, retained all rights to reprint and profit from his work that it
used, paying him on a free-lance basis. But he put out paperbacks of cartoons not published in the magazine, eventually
selling more than 7 million copies.
Martin drew despite a degenerative eye condition that forced him to undergo cornea transplants, wear special, highly
uncomfortable contact lenses and use a magnifying glass while drawing.
"He was a shy and retiring sort of guy, considering he drew a comic strip that was crazy," said a longtime friend, Laurence
Donovan.
Martin was born in Clifton, N.J., and began his undergraduate work at the Newark Institute. He earned a fine arts degree from
the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts. He began submitting drawings to the fledgling Mad magazine in the mid-50s.
Lest we forget his greatest tribute to Geeks (Score:1)
MAD cartoonist. Of all his characters perhaps his
most endearing and nerdy was Joe Fonebone. High-water pants pulled crotch tight and white socks/dark shoes. The prototypical nerd. Around my house my children understand what "looking like
a Fonebone" means whenever I hoist my pants up too much!
RIP Don.
Aw, jeez... (Score:3)
Great talents - where are they? (Score:1)
I'm not sure if this means that there are fewer people who truly stand out in their areas of expertise, or if the truly talented are simply being drowned out in the flood of information available in our media-rich environment today.
For example, I read Science Fiction but I haven't found any single author since Heinlein and Asimov that I'll buy and enjoy everything they produce. The fading away of the Peanuts cartoon is another example. There are hundreds of cute cartoons out there, but very few are as timeless as Schultz's creations. The Cat in the Hat series is yet another example. How can the average person pick the jewels out of the many "merely shiny" stones all trying to grab a moment of our attention?
Where are the Great Talents going? This passing is the latest loss that seems irreplaceable today.
Re:Great talents - where are they? (offtopic) (Score:1)
I didn't say there aren't any talented writers, I said there are no writers out there that I will buy and enjoy EVERYTHING they write. It's not too fun reading someone putting words in my mouth that aren't even close to what I think or write BTW...
Niven/Pournelle are the closest I've found to that ideal, but they just don't quite make it plus it seems that their production has dramatically tapered off in the last decade.
I've read many of those you mention and I like some of their stuff, but not all of it.
News for nerds. Stuff that matters. (Score:1)
And for many nerds who grew up on Mad Magazine, Don Martin is an instantly recognizable name. Obviously the name means nothing to you, but clearly it meant something to someone otherwise it wouldn't have been posted.
While I'm not against a separate category for obits, I find it ludicrous that you think the world revolves around only what you think is important. Have a little perspective. If the story means nothing to you, then move on.
---
Why was this moderated down as redundant? (Score:1)
Just asking...
---
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
- Xandis
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)
While I wouldn't argue against a seperate catagory which you could filter if you choose, I disagree that obituaries are pointless. Mad magazine was a favorite of mine as a geek child. While this story leaves me with a little sadness, it is important to remember those who have affected your life. Even if it is in a small way.
Re:Cracked Magazine. (Score:1)
Try reading the link from the story. (Score:1)
Some of his stuff. (Score:4)
The site is here: http://members.tripod.de/mad_2/donmar tin.html [tripod.de]
Funny stuff.
GLORP! (Score:1)
Don Martin site (Score:2)
I can't help thinking Mad was where I learned the word "Plotz". I hope Don would prefer that in a headline.
Re:Not true, thankfully (Score:1)
What a shame... (Score:2)
Among readers of MAD, I have no doubt that Don Martin will be missed.
Don Martin the Magazine? (Score:1)
Don Martin & Don Knuth (Score:1)
Re:Don Martin and Mad vs. Cracked... (Score:1)
For the record, I didn't think it was much good.
Rich
Re:TV show (Score:1)
Every Mad Magazine is available on CDROM (Score:3)
Favorite Sound Effect (Score:1)
Let us all observe a moment of silence... (Score:4)
BOINK!
Okay, moments up. You may all resume your normal, crass, undeserving lives.
Re:Only one way to honor him on Slashdot - (Score:1)
That would be Prohias (whose first name eludes me). Spy vs Spy [vs Spy] always were among my faves in the old Mads ... :)
Re:new catagory please (Score:1)