Rick McCallum Answers "Why No Star Wars DVD?" 132
Anonymous Coward writes "Producer Rick McCallum answers the question, "So many fans want Episode I and then the Classic Trilogy on DVD. It doesn't make sense to us that you aren't going to release at least Episode I. What's going on?" at the official Star Wars site. " The answer is fairly predictable-Lucas hopes to do "something special" and doesn't have the time right now. I like the use of the word "exploit" in the answer - kinda what the VHS - DVD switch feels like.
Lucas is just being slashdot friendly. (Score:1)
Why don't you people appreciate it when you are being helped?
Why can't he just be honest? (Score:1)
What is the best movie that George Lucas ever made?
Answer: American Graffiti.
Is it available on DVD?
Answer: Yes.
I guess he didn't feel the need to do anything special for that one.
It's ok for him to hold back on a DVD release. It's his film and his choice. But I wish he'd be honest and say why he's doing it.
DVD and HDTV relationship (Score:1)
Since HDTV is being introduced quite soon (in theory),
and since DVD as it is currently configured does not approach the picture quality offered by HDTV (and is not properly configured to play movies true widescreen and not letterboxed),
and since I still don't think there is a final standard on how to attach cable, vcrs or DVD players to HDTV TVs,:
Does it make sense to spend large amounts of money on a DVD collection that in 5 years will be qualitatively superceded?
I'm personally holding off till the whole HDTV issue is resolved.
Their afraid (Score:1)
And, strictly speaking, the only real reasons to see what happens with the encription thing, or to drive up demand. Or they are having problems converting the digital format used in the theatres to DVD (unlikely, as they can just go to high res analog then through standard DVD encoder systems, and that doesnt explain why they arnt releasing the trilogy on the format).
If they are holding out cuz of encription, give it up I say. sure dupe factories may spring up, but their easy to squash, and users wont be sending DVD-class data through the net anytime soon, even with DSL and cable (would take many days for a whole DVD (4.7 Gigs), as the movies are already highly encripted, plus, having more than a few movies would strain harddrive capacities)
Re:George Lucas's cash cow (Score:1)
the fact that shit movie [geocities.com] was released shows how much contempt lucas has for his fans. that movie was pathetic. i can't believe i waited 20 years to see that shit! it's even more insulting that you can't even find the original versions without that annoying stupid eyecandy!!! what self-indulgent arrogant ass he is! personally, i don't see what the fuss is over this. this movie should be buried along with all the kiddie crap he ruined the other movies with.
"The lie, Mr. Mulder, is most convincingly hidden between two truths."
Re:George Lucas's cash cow (Score:1)
Let him take his time!
Of course, if they come out and all we get is some bare-bones bullshit like that rip-off Stanley Kubrick Collection...KILL HIM.
--
"Something special" (Score:1)
Can't remember where I heard this from, so no guarantee on the authenticity of this information.
I heard an interview with some computer graphics guru (in Vancouver? I'm fuzzy on this) who has been working for Lucasfilm lately. If memory serves me correctly, he said he was working on Obi-Wan Kenobi's death scene in Episode 4 for a future re-re-release of the classic trilogy. Guess that could count as "something special" for George...
But, like I say, I'm fuzzy on where I heard this. Anyone else hear this, or am I just suffering from sleep-deprivation-induced delusions?
________________________
There will never be the "Original" SW on DVD.... (Score:1)
he re-edits it with more special effects and
crap like that (even more so than the special
editions). Fans will never see the originals
on DVD, and from now on in Film History, Greedo
shoots first, and misses.
Why his waiting is the right thing to do... (Score:1)
"He's doing it for the money."
False. If he were doing it *just* for the money he would release something now to get people to buy the cheap, get-it-out-the-door, at-least-it-is-DVD, shut-up-and-buy-it-luser copies only to purchase the later, better, boxed set with all the features put into it.
He's not.
People are actually whining that he isn't taking advantage of their willingness to buy cheap products only to be "forced" to buy something better later on.
"It's about control. He wants to control the product."
Bingo. It is also about how Lucas has proven that he tries to do the best he can in the game they've made. But here he has a choice. Make the last two movies and get them out, THEN work on a complete DVD set with a lot of features that the fans would demand so he has to do it once OR pause production on the films (which the fans won't like) to put out mediocre DVDs (which the fans won't like) then get back to the movies, get them out, then work on the DVDs the way he wants them to be and release them, at which time the fans will complain that he is taking advantage of them.
Screw that. Screw the fanboys who are whining that they don't have their DVDs now. Shut up because he's doing you a favor. Sure that boxed set might be $200CDN ($140 US, approx.) but rest assured that just like the last few boxed sets they will be available individually as well.
However, for those of us who do appreciate quality let me tell you what we might get. Instead of spending $20 for each of the 6 movies ($120 right there) and then turn around and buy the boxed set for, say, $150 ($270 so far) in a few years we spend $150 once. When it does come out chances are that he might do what the people who made Stargate did, put both the theatrical and Director's Cut (in this case, SE) on the same disc. That means, unlike the VCR tapes, we have the choice of which of the originals we want to see. Meanwhile we'll also most likely get a LOT of "making of" material, a few commentary tracks, etc.
So you people whining and bitching about what he is doing, ask yourself which you REALLY want to pay for? $120 in throw-away discs over the next 2-3 years, a delay in the movie production schedule only to spend another $150 or so later on, or spend $150 in 2-3 years and get a quality product?
Me, I'm willing to wait. Hell, say it is 3 years away for a release of the boxed set that is only ~$4.25/month to tuck aside to cover it.
He must not be thinking straight (Score:1)
"I can only show you Linux... you're the one who has to read the man pages."
Oh well... (Score:1)
--
WTF is wrong with you folks (/. & readers)? (Score:1)
I'm simply disgusted at the lack of consistency in /. content recently. Directly below this story is another story about the 16yr old cracker of the DVD CSS.
Make up your mind /. - I personally refuse to buy any DVD until the DVD-CCA no longer exists, and I'm free to watch them on whatever OS I please.
Re:George Lucas's cash cow (Score:1)
'These are not the discs you're looking for.'
Lay off the jedi mind tricks, Rick.
My thoughts exactly. (Score:1)
All this "he's just a greedy bastard who only cares about money" is crap. He went through a lot to get control over the whole franchise, back in the day, because he didn't want anyone else mucking it up - he had a vision (maybe that's a bit of an extreme term here, but you get the point) for the story/stories, and didn't want the studios goofing it up. Cut the man some slack.
Re:Oh, not this AGAIN. (Score:1)
:-)
P.S. Moderators - this is a joke. Not a flame, not a troll, but a joke. I'll say it again, only slowly this time.... j....o....k....e....
--
Re:Yes! It's all about HDTV (Score:1)
--
Yes! It's all about HDTV (Score:1)
Re:DUH! (Score:1)
Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
Yeah, but you're missing the point... (Score:1)
The problem is this: I'm sitting in a theater opening night for the show. (For reference, I'm not the biggest SW fan out there. I don't own any videos, but would buy 4, 5, and 6 on DVD when I get one.) Waiting in the line and then later in the theater was a blast. People got up front (as we had a good three hours until 12:01) and started doing SW trivia for gummybears. It was an amazing mood that was only ruined by the movie itself...
I know expectations were high, but I don't think anyone took Lucas on his word when he said PM was made for 10 year old boys. The only 10 year old kid in the place was the only one laughing at Jar Jar's fart jokes. Myself, I was cringing, thinking "OMG, I can't believe they made SW into this!" Much of the rest of the movie was very cool, but between JJ Binks himself, and Anakins' inability to realistically deliver a line, much less form a bond with the princess, I'm not concerned anymore about knowing the ending. Any sort of realism is already lost for me. The special effects are great, but I'm not worried about either the VHS or DVD version of PM, as it won't be a part of my collection. Just needed to get that off my chest, so no need to start flaming. thanks.
That's why people release "Collector's Editions" (Score:1)
Things just happen (Score:1)
Of course, I rather enjoy having a DVD player, the quality is better and I find it more convenient than trying to hook up a VCR through my tv card. Plus, there are plenty of other movies to rent while waiting for Lucas to come to his senses.
6 CD Set (Score:1)
But I believe that it would be benificial to Lucas to release the new episodes on DVD when he finishes the last 2, He could offer 6 cd collector sets, or the separate ones at the same time with out having to worry about starting up production again when they are all completed
Re:Not just money (Score:1)
I've read in articles that George Lucas views film making as a collaborative process, which is why he focuses on producing. Directing is just one part of the process. Producing lets him get involved on many levels, and his ego doesn't demand that his name be at the top of the movie poster.
Re:Star Wars on DVD is a non event (Score:1)
-----------------------
Special Features?! (Score:1)
HELLO?! A good movie doesn't need special features to be sold. I have yet to hear of a DVD that sold like crazy just because of the special features. And here I was thinking that I wanted to watch a movie.
I would rather wait.... (Score:1)
If we take what Rick said at face value then I would rather wait. I would rather an Episode I DVD with amazing extras and cool commentary by George Lucas then a rushed DVD which basically got the go-ahead from Lucas but no input from him and the people involved in the making of the movie...
Josh
Re:Were you exploited by color TV? (Score:1)
Re:Not just money (Score:1)
freeing Lucas from having to rely on the studios' funding and thus free from studio control.
I think this stems from his early days in the film industry. Just as any person has a 401k or a couple of mutual funds to help them later in life to be able to live comfortably so does lucas. In this case he is a film geek and likes to produce films. Because of this when a film is made it is usually a big affair and costs a great deal.
He does this because early on when he did films and such he was under a large number of constraints. Suppose you grew up in an Amish community and had to follow all the rules and such. Would you like it very much? I guess not. He's just preventing what he had to go through in the past from happening again.
Given that, it seems reasonable that Lucas really IS just waiting for the DVDs until HE can do them himself, and he doesn't have time right now. If it were just a question of money, he'd shill it out and get them on the market
quickly, because they'll likely be the best-selling DVDs ever made.
Does this mean that he will simply create a new movie or just do a really nice official dress up for the DVD? I am really doubting that DVD is the best possibly format. Is there anything going down the pike in the near future that can hold more data theoretically or produce better quality? Somehow even in 10 years DVD may be replaced with something else.
Re:"Something special" (Score:1)
Don't buy the tape! (Score:1)
Clearly their thinking is that everyone will buy the tape, and then a year or two latter they can sell the movie again on DVD.
The only way to influence Lucasfilm is for DVD owners to NOT buy the VHS tape.
Re:OTOH... (Score:1)
What bother's me is we never hear what Yoda wants to do with the boy. Give him back to slavery? Put him in 'protective custody'? Just let him wonder the streets of Coriscant? With the Sith making thier reapearance simply forgeting about someone like that would be deadly.
DUH! (Score:1)
Original (Score:1)
Plans for DVD (Score:1)
To me, if they are planning on adding really special features to the DVDs, it's worth the 5 or so year wait. Lucas wants to release one definitive DVD set. Once the DVD set is released, there will no longer be any new Star Wars movies or any modifications to the existing ones.
At least... (Score:1)
George Lucas's cash cow (Score:1)
Well there's no conspiracy at work here, I assure you.
No, there's no conspiracy here, it's just the sheer greed of a man who's already got sh*tloads of money and wants more, more, more :) We'll have to wait for each episode to come out on VHS first, then the box set, maybe even a director's cut boxed set if we're lucky before we even get a hint of the DVDs and the amazing features that they'll contain (hopefully a shoot Jar-Jar game :)).
Don't buy the VHS. (Score:1)
Re:The Truth Unveiled (II) (Score:1)
Re:just like the Beatles on compact disc in 1987 (Score:1)
I just watched all the "White Rabbit" scenes from The Matrix and that's pretty much an "extra" in the sense that they're trying to convey. Behind the scenes special effects need editing, too. If this is truly the reason for the delay, I say they can take their time.
?Conspiracy,? eh? (Score:1)
Well, i, for one, am sure that there?s absolutely no ?conspiracy? here at all! I?ve been an ardent fan of ?Star Wars? since the first time i saw it. It?s my favorite movie! I can?t think of anything better than ?Star Wars?, except fnord maybe MS Front Page.
use Microsoft it is good
"Cogito ergo es... I think, therefore you is." -The King of the Moon's Head,
CRAP! (Score:1)
(spaces and stuff inserted for the Purposes of Explanating Something that Probably don't need it...)
...type type type...
& lt fnord & gt use Microsoft it is good & lt/fnord& gt...
dum dee dah
all that & lt & gt stuff becomes "<" and ">" in the comment field...but i don't look at that, i just see that it looks ok in the preview itself...
click "submit" and abracadabra! my cutesy little "< fnord >" goes poof like the do-nothing html that it is...
The Moral of the Story? "if yer playing about with phony HTML up in this [expletive deleted -ed.], click 'back' before ya click 'submit'... folks submit far too often and easily these days anyhow..."
score Gremlins and ?Conspirators? : 1
Eric Cartman from the Evil Dimension : 0
*waaaah!*
PS. yeah, i do in fact know that "Explanate" is not a word
"Cogito ergo es... I think, therefore you is." -The King of the Moon's Head,
Re:It's all about money (Score:1)
the original version of the trilogy. And dammit, it worked on me.
Re:It just gives the pirates more time... (Score:1)
But I don't have a VCR.
I sit here and wonder, "What the hell was I thinking?"
Anyway, I don't have a VCR, so if they aren't out on DVD then I can't watch 'em. I dunno if I am serious about buying pirated copies, but the fact that there is NO WAY to send feedback to LucasFilm pisses me off. Really what I want to do is go to the Skywalker Ranch and piss on the mailbox. Sigh.
MODERN STAR WARS IS LIQUID MANURE!!! (Score:1)
Anyway, we all know that right now Star Wars basically sucks, and is simply a money making machine.
George Lucas will come out with a DVD edition of every Star Wars movie everytime his business needs more $$$.
Rumor has it that there will be a remake of Return Of The Jedi on DVD that will show the Ewoks having their way with an unconscious Princess Leia on the Moon of Endor. They will be on sale at 7-Eleven will for $9.99, and will come with a special certificate of authenticity with a hologram of Jar Jar Binks.
Re:Were you exploited by color TV? (Score:1)
I don't care if Lucas releases Star Wars: TPM or not on DVD. I'm staying away from a product that essentially enslaves me to a particular region/particular players.
To the DVD control association, my finger. Oh yeah - don't come after me - I'm not mirroring DeCSS. I'm just being rude. :-P
Re:Were you exploited by color TV? (Score:1)
Re:OTOH... (Score:1)
OTOH... (Score:1)
Re:CD Vrs Tape (Score:1)
Re:It's all about money (Score:1)
Here's how it works: You release the first DVD as the 'first time on DVD!' Then a year later, remaster it for no real reason and release it as the 'see it again for the first time' version. Six months after that, add some new footage. Release this as a 'Special Edition.' A year after that, drag your feet in moving to the next new medium and do one final DVD release as the 'see it for the first time for the last time' version.
'Now your journey to the dark side is complete.'
Boycott? No... but I'm still not buying the VHS. (Score:1)
Re:How many times will this get reported!? (Score:1)
Star Wars on DVD is a non event (Score:1)
The reason? Because the DVDs that will almost certainly appear to drum up interest in Episode 2 and will reappear at regular intervals for years afterwards. There's no hurry to snap them up because they'll be issued ad nauseum for as long as Fox can screw the money from the unwashed masses. Previous campaigns suggest that Fox may play on consumer fears (in a Disneyesque sort of way) that they should be bought now or "they'll be gone forever". It's hogwash of course designed to drum up hysterical panic purchasing.
Besides, I question what the quality of the first DVD releases will be like. Remember Titanic? Rumours abounded that James Cameron was crafting an 18Mb work of love, director's commentary special edition and so on but in the end it turned out to be a non-anamorphic featureless piece of trash (nice sound though). So Fox knows that they can release any old crap at inflated prices and people will buy it.
I would be surprised if the Star Wars DVDs were any different.
So I can happily wait. Maybe things won't happen anything like this, but I don't hold out much hope.
Re:Be charitable towards Lucasarts (Score:1)
Re:Not just money (Score:1)
The obvious (American) example is Terrance Malick: he's directed 3 films in, oh, 30 years or so (Badlands, Days of Heaven, The Thin Red Line).
All three are great American films (although Days of Heaven is one of the greatest).
I could also point to, say, Welles or Von Stoheim to make a similar point.
Next...
Re:Not just money (Score:1)
It always astonishes me why people say stuff like that -- "Quite possibly the worst movie I have ever seen" -- and then just sorta leave it at that.
Aren't you at all curious (I'm sure you're not, but I'm curious why you express no curiosity) about why some people consider it one of the best films of the 1990's?
Ah well. Nevermind. It's a complex film. It's not for everyone.
Re:Not just money (Score:1)
But with certain films -- and Malick's films are good examples -- the critical response of the reviewer to the film usually says more about the reviewer than it does the film. (In the case of 'The Thin Red Line' the comparisons are usually between it and Saving Private Ryan -- and those one like one despise the other.)
I hold Ebert in high regard, but I'm mystified by some of his "great films." Likewise, I can't figure out why he thinks a film like 'A Taste of Cherry' is such a long, boring film. [It's long but fascinating: made even more so because of its context]
But of course: everyone is entitled to their opinions.
Sure, I'm curious about why people don't like something, but I'm more curious about why people who don't like something aren't at all curious why people *do* like something -- especially when the original critic holds something in such high esteem.
Having taught English for years, I've become numb to the "I think it sucks" comments. They mean nothing, and, as I say, usually -- but not always -- say more about the critic than about the text.
(Just as, in the same way, I'm suspicious when people say 'Citizen Kane' is *the* great American film. It's a good -- most certainly a great film -- but if you think it's the greatest, then you surely don't know American film -- or, worse yet, think it so for the wrong reasons. And, yes, I said "wrong reasons".)
Re:DVD and HDTV relationship (Score:1)
With a properly produced DVD, you are technology-proof for many years. Here's why.
On an anamorphic widescreen disc, the maximum resolution is 480 lines. Throw in a progressive scan DVD player, and you now have a 16x9 enchanced 480P image, which happens to be one of the DTV formats. Having personally seen such a setup, I can attest to the fact that it is absolutely stunning. While not an HDTV image, it certainly does a good job keeping up.
The biggest reason is that the idea that HD-DVD will be commonplace in 5 years is false. Technologically, yes, I imagine it will be possible. But look at the issue at hand. Luca$ won't even allow his movies on a 480 line DVD. Do you expect he's going to allow what is essentially a perfect High Def master of his movies in the hand of Joe Sixpack? Absolutely not. Dash in a bit of the DeCSS situation, and you now have the recipe for delay.
Aside from the MPAA/DVDCCA issues, DVD is a good investment for now and the future.
DTV != HDTV (Score:1)
Just a quick question. Where did you see a reference in my post to 480P as an HDTV image? DTV stands for Digital Television, and 480P is definately a Digital Television format. As for your definition of HDTV, that is also incorrect. An HDTV needs to support at minimum 720P or 1080i. 16x9 support is NOT required as a part of the HDTV standard, although any set-top box will deal with the letterboxing issues associated with downconversion.
Re:Were you exploited by color TV? (Score:1)
When Episode One is released, everyone will buy it. George Lucas realizes this, and he knows that if he only releases his product in VHS, everyone will buy it in that format. Then, when the product is released again, in DVD format, everyone with a DVD player, who most likely already owns the VHS version, will line up to pay for another copy.
The blood-sucking that this man does amazes me.
Re:It might be worth the wait (Score:1)
Lucasfilms is going ahead and releasing it on VHS for those of us who *can't* wait what, four, six years for all the movies. This way, he makes everyone sort of happy at least. The impatient people get their movie quickly, and those who want to wait for all the DVD goodies get *good* stuff, not just some slapped-together disk.
CD Vrs Tape (Score:1)
It's all about money (Score:1)
Hey, I've got the music in LP and CD, so clearly this strategy works.
Re:Not just money (Score:1)
It always astonishes me why people say stuff like that --"It's a complex film. It's not for everyone."-- and then just sorta leave it at that.
Aren't you at all curious (I'm sure you're not, but I'm curious why you express no curiosity) about why some people consider it one of the worst films of the 1990's?
Ah well. Nevermind. It's a horrible film. It's not for anyone.
Re:Not just money (Score:1)
I am about 95%accurate at judging if I will like a movie or not (and how much I will like it) from watching the preview. That translates to me not paying much attention to what reviewers have to say. Which leads me into the answer to your question.
The simple answer is that I don't value the critic's opinion anyways, so I don't care that he liked/disliked a movie that I felt differently about. Now, if I value the person's opinion then I am most likely going to try to look at the movie from another angle. While many people turn to critics to get an idea of how good a movie is, when its all said and done they don't really care what the critic thought about the film. They only care what their own opinion is. Most simply want someone to tell them to see or not to see a film. That way they can blame someone else when they go see a bad flick. I always wondered why critics don't revistit films that they loved that most people hate. I have a feeling that many of their egos wouldn't care for that.
As for The Thin Red Line, I did not care for it. It's been a while but here's what I remember I thought about it. I found the cameo's distracting and in some cases very poorly acted. I never felt any urgency, it felt like summer camp most of the time. This was *the* bloodiest battle of the war, but they seemed to spend most of their time sitting around. None of the characters really gave me a reason to care about them. I enjoyed Nolte and Penn's perfomances, but I wouldn't say that I liked their characters. The battle scenes were weak, especially compared to SPR. The photography was generally quite good. I felt that the inner monologues tended to not stay in character, they all seemed to echo the main characters thoughts and not their own. Well, that's all I remember off hand.
I've always heard that Citizen Kane was great because of the way the story was told. Personaly I feel that Star Wars is the greatest movie of all time, for the simple reason that no other film has had such a profound effect on such a large audience for as long as it has. Of course it all depends on how you define "great", Star Wars isn't even my favorite "Star Wars" movie and there are many movies I enjoy more, but that does not deminish its greatness to me. [ramble off]
Give him a break (Score:1)
Re:OTOH... (Score:1)
Re:6 CD Set (Score:1)
Cry all you want about your crappy DVD's! (Score:1)
Re:DVD and HDTV relationship and new viewing specs (Score:1)
Re:Cry all you want about your crappy DVD's! (Score:1)
As for me... I first worked with HDTV in 1992, my college prof. shot sporting events in the late 80's on HDTV Cameras (with TAPE). So I'm pretty familiar with what it can and can't do As for the American's we'll all be switching whether we like or not. The FCC has decided.
Re:DUH! (Score:1)
Everybody knows Lucas is a cheap bastard with no intent on the happiness of his customers. All he cares about is the billions of dollars he makes. When the Star Wars TPM comes out on DVD if you want it you will have to buy it in a huge Star Wars collectible set. This is bound to cost upwards of $200 CAN, just another billion in Lucas' pocket.
Let's face it, Lucas is a control freak. I have a feeling that even if he did release a stripped-down version of the DVD now, he'd come back in four years and release a chock-full-of-stuff version later.
And then people would complain about THAT, saying he did it for more money ;)
But Lucas is a control freak, and you know what? I'm happy! Yay! I want the best quality! I can wait. Patience is a virtue. yada yada.
:)
-me.Lucas Mucas.... (Score:1)
Re:WTF is wrong with you folks (/. & readers)? (Score:1)
Patience Will KILLLLLL You! (Score:2)
"I like the use of the word "exploit" in the answer - kinda what the VHS - DVD switch feels like."
I like to use the phrase 'consumer driven obssessive dork' when people whine about not being able to buy some entertainment now, RIGHT NOW! OH GOD I NEED IT NOW! If I don't have the DVD version RIGHT NOW MY HEAD WILL EXPLODE AND IT WILL BE ALL LUCAS'S FAULT!!! AHHHHH, Killing spree!!! Killing spree!!!
Seriously, if you want, no NEEEEEEED to own it, and you want, no NEEEEEEED to have the DVD version. Get a freaking clue already! Exploit my ass.
Re:Not just money (Score:2)
Of course, he's not doing that, and just waiting so he can release them once and only once and he still gets slammed.
Just as everyone gives Rob a break for not releasing his code on a timely basis, people should give George Lucas the same break. After all, if he released them now, you'd just have to buy them again when he really did release them as he originally envisioned them being.
Re:Not just money (Score:2)
Ahh... this old explanation. Look at this page [imdb.com] on the IMDB. Now look at the number of films he's directed versus the number of films he's produced. A "film geek" would not have gone from 1977 to 1999 without having directed a single movie. Sure, he wrote some stuff (along with other people), but that's being a writer, not a film geek. And sure, he's produced a lot of stuff, but that's being a business man who likes movies, not a film geek.
Compare his record to Steven Spielberg [imdb.com], a true film geek. He's _directed_ no less than 18 films in the same period Lucas made 0.
Lucas is a business man, not a filmmaker.
Re:OTOH... (Score:2)
Of course, maybe this is why Yoda resists letting him into the club at first? He senses something not quite right with the kid, can't put his finger on it, and comes up with some other excuse to deny Leeson's request to take him on as apprentice.
Of course, you can always come up with some plausible explanation for this kind of this. That's what keeps the SW newsgroups full of this kind of crap.
(barely on-topic, better moderate it down just to be safe )
It might be worth the wait (Score:2)
Especially if Lucas actually does want to release a good set...The Shining in the Kubrick Collection is terrible; it has mono sound and no letterbox format. :( If Lucas puts the trilogy on DVD with the option to view it in letterbox (widescreen) or in pan-and-scan (edited), I'd be happy. If Lucas adds the option to view the Special Edition changes or to turn them off, I'd be VERY happy. I'll wait for them to come out.
Besides, we want II and III to be good. Then again, I suppose there's no guanrantee they will be with Lucas's full attention...
Let's Boycott! (Score:2)
I have heard a lot of comments (on previous
Dolby 5.1
Spanish Subtitles
Chapter Selection
I for one will buy the VHS version ASAP. I will then buy the DVD version IF it has enough special features to justify the purchace. If it does not, I will wait till VHS is obsolete before I get the DVD.
Thoes of you who will boycott want it on DVD now. But, would it be worse to buy the VHS now and then a Directors Cut DVD in a few years, or buy the DVD now and then buy the Directors Cut DVD AGIAN in a few years.
Re:OTOH... (Score:2)
to a story that we already know how it ends...no movie would have satisfied everyone).
Tell me why did people go for that? Seems that it really would spoil the end and just cheapen the movie. Suppose you know that every fairy tail ends with people "living happily ever after" (yeah right); dosn't this in some way cheapen the fairy tail? I would have been quite entrigued if for example you don't implicetly know that Darth Vader is really this Anakin person. In fact from that movie only you can imply that in fact he will be quite the model of good and truth. At any rate his approach is flawed because basic human logic and memory can cheapen the whole thing. I guess the only thing that really makes it is the fact that it uses a lot of computin' thingees
Re:DUH! (Score:2)
in a huge Star Wars collectible set. This is bound to cost upwards of $200 CAN, just another billion in Lucas' pocket.
A couple of things:
1. Exactly how much is $200 CAN in USD at the current exchange rate I might have a better understanding of the kinf of cash you are talking about.
2. Possibly however not everyone actually hates to buy all that stuff or to buy all that gear. I suppose that if you bought one and then kept it in good condition you might be able to sell it as antique or maybe you just like crazy SW crap. I mean if you are the type of person who has a Darth Maul double edged light sabre then this would be your pot of gold.
I'm glad. (Score:2)
It just gives the pirates more time... (Score:2)
The delay just gives the pirates more time to pillage the DVD market.... SW:TPM is already on sale in DVD form in Hong Kong and places East (I've seen a copy that a friend brought back with her from her last jaunt out that way).
Then again, Lucas probably isn't too badly concerned with profits lost to piracy; they'll be minimal due to how slowly the DVDs will trickle in to the US, and what few losses he'll incur will be dwarfed by the extra profits gained by releasing to VHS first -- impatient consumers will quickly gobble up the tapes, then repurchase the film when the official DVD is finally released.
So I have to ask the question: who is really the pirate here?
-- WhiskeyJack
Re:DVD and HDTV relationship - AMEN (Score:2)
Why is this news? (Score:3)
I blame society... (Score:3)
The Truth Unveiled (II) (Score:3)
Well, Lucas is still hard at work writing Episode II: Jar Jar's revenge. When asked by a reporter, Lucas explained his approach to the movie.
"I've been working on making sure that there will be a lot of hype around the movie," said Lucas, "I'm expecting to do a lot with Mace Windu this time. He's a badass Mofo. Also, Sideous' new apprentice will be 10 times as cool as Darth Maul, not to mention Boba Fett and the entire army of Darth Maul clones!" Lucas smiled a bit and then continued, "That hype will get them into the theater, of course, but I'll be sure to piss them off when they realize that half of the movie is just more of Jar Jar Binks acting like an idiot! I can't wait to see the faces on all those people who payed for a ticket to see some action, and instead got Jar Jar!"
When asked about the Original Trilogy on DVD, George Lucas explained his actions to hold back. "Well, we're still waiting for the generation PI players to come out so we can implement some radical changes to the series. First and foremost, I plan on releasing the super-special edition of the first trilogy. This way I can add Jar Jar to those movies as well. Then I can implement my DIVX enhanced type PI features in those DVDs as well, and force people to shell out five bucks per viewing to eliminate Jar Jar entirely from those movies. This is where I wanted to go originally back in 1977, but the technology didn't allow me to do such a thing. Now, thanks to the technology that the generation PI DVD players will provide, I can suck even more money out of these geeks!"
(Due to recent instances of 1337 hax0rz doing evil things with DVD encryption, the status on the release of the PI generation of DVD players is currently in the air. Until then, Lucas will release at least three more different "versions" of the original trilogy and TPM on VHS, which he expects you all to buy.
"You ever have that feeling where you're not sure if you're dreaming or awake?"
It would be nice.... (Score:3)
I think it would be a truly wonderful thing if the answer to that question was: "Because the DVD consortium is unfairly restricting the use of that format". But, unfortunately, that's not what they said. A lot of the posters here feel it's a trick for money, and that could well be the truth. However, Maybe our small case can be heard. It's probably unlikely, or even impossible, for Lucas to go against the will of the MPAA, but it would be nice for a public figure in the movie industry to let people know what they think. I would love to be able to buy a DVD with a clear conscience. Hey, I can dream, can't I?
Be charitable towards Lucasarts (Score:3)
The excuse is that George Lucas wants to spend time on it himself. Any really greedy corporation would just churn out a generic DVD with virtually no features, and then release a "Special Edition" at twice the price after a year, then release a special Boxed set with "Special George Lucas Edition" extra features after Episode 3.
It is conceivable that George Lucas genuinly doesn't want to release a half baked product.
Finally, please remember that as he is the creator of Star Wars, he deserves the right to release it as and when he wants. Even if you disagree with it. No-one is forcing you to buy the video.
Were you exploited by color TV? (Score:4)
* Nobody's forcing you to buy them. I don't know of many movies these days being released on DVD only. They're all DVD and VHS. (Excluding a few old ones like Cannibal Women and the Avocado Jungle of Death, which you would be hard pressed to find at all, if not for DVD.) VHS will be around for a long time, and if it's all you want, stick with it.
* The image and sound difference is amazing. Watch the same movie in VHS and then DVD. You'll be shocked at what came out of your TV.
* DVDs have lots of cool things you don't find on VHS tapes, and they're still pretty cheap. (I've been buying them for ~$20, and I haven't been scouting for deals.)
As it is, if I'm being exploited, EXPLOIT ME MORE!!!
Hmm. Sounds familiar. (Score:4)
Does this sound familiar to anyone (*cough* Slash source *cough*). Maybe Lucas should open source the work on the Star Wars DVD's.
Skippy
just like the Beatles on compact disc in 1987 (Score:4)
We all want to see Star Wars on DVD, and of course we all want it to be a good transfer, but I don't buy George Lucas explanation. He isn't a Zen master who must wave his hands over the equipment to give a good transfer. If they can make truely excellent DVD transfers of other movies they can do the same thing with Star Wars.