More Super Cool Overclocking 55
octools.com has a followup to a story we linked there a couple of months ago where they submerged a motherboard in nitrogen cooled flourinet, and overclocked the hell out of the chips. Well, they're back with an extensive photo documentary of
the sequel where they try to take it below zero, and clock things over a gigahertz. You probably shouldn't be trying this at home, but it sure is fun to see on a Web page.
Re:Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!!! (Score:2)
-David
Re:Who Cares? (Score:4)
That said, this article was obviously done just for the sheer geek of it and power to them. The advances in cooling could easily be used in future production machines.
If you have to ask "Why overclock?" then you are obviously not the type who takes every new toy in your home apart as soon as it comes in the door just to see how it works and how you can screw with it.
Gotta cool it all? (Score:4)
IANAOC. Seems they had success when everything was uniformly cooled with the Flourinert and dry ice. Problems arose when they used the Liquid Nitrogen on JUST the processor. So, the CPU could go faster than the support chips which were not similarly cooled? Maybe the video card, though now running with the same bus speed as the LN-cooled CPU could not operate at those speeds without also being cooled to LN temps. They mentioned:
CPU could handle it okay, but the rest of the system was breaking down. Gotta cool the WHOLE thing, or else your system is only as fast as your slowest link.
So, for MISSION: SUBMERSIBLE 3, I'd like to see them try immersing the ENTIRE RIG in LN, with good-sized heat sinks on the CPU, video card... everywhere and THEN see how it worked. The major concern I'd have would be they migh be encountering a race condition between components that would never arise at conventional speeds.
Offtopic, but here's an idea of what they could have done with the LN when they were done with THAT experiment. (I attended a party in college where we actually DID this. IIRC, It was some time around 1979 or 1980.) Use the excess LN to freeze some vodka in ice cube trays! The vodka will easily freeze at those temps... voila! VodCubes! Take a couple VodCubes, drop 'em in a cup of collins mixer, wait for the VodCubes to stop dancing around on the comparitively hot collins mixer, and enjoy your vodka collins! Looking back, I wish we had tried it with orange juice -- could have called it a frozen screwdriver!
Re:Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!!! (Score:1)
I wonder which continent the moderator lives on.....
Re:Halfbaked (Score:2)
Limitations on overclocking (Score:4)
The problem is with propagation delays. Basically, when one part of a digital logic circuit goes high or low, this change takes time to propagate to the rest of the circuit. This is a very small delay, but when you have a circuit as complicated as, say a Pentium III, it can become important. There are small gaps in between parts of the circuit being in different states, and as the clock rate is pushed higher and higher, these gaps become smaller and smaller. If the clock rate is pushed too high, different states of the circuit will overlap, essentially causing it to malfunction. It should be noted that a circuit or portion thereof does not change states (0 to 1 or 1 to 0) instantaneously; this is what allows the overlap that ends overclockability. Propagation delays also explain why, for example, you can't push a C64 to 200 MHz. The circuits in the CPU weren't designed for speeds like that.
=================================
Hot Carriers will burn these people (Score:1)
But at reduced temps, especially LN2, hot carriers are generated very efficiently and will degrade those hard working MOSFETS much faster than normal.
Eventually the CPU will stop working...and where's the cost savings in that ?
The countermeasure is to lower the core voltage, but then you won't get quite as much of that coveted blazing speed!
What about HEAT PIPES (Score:1)
Why aren't heat pipes used more. They make much more sense than water cooling a computer and are virtually unbreakable.
Re:Cook em if you have them. (Score:1)
Cook em if you have them. (Score:1)
What will they think of next.
No sig, to lazy to make one up.
Re:Limitations on overclocking (Score:2)
Re:Chips have operational temp ranges. (Score:1)
Lack of electrons/holes? (Score:1)
Re:Not enough free electrons? (Score:1)
But what if they PAID for those electrons?
Re:Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!!! (Score:2)
Didn't samba [arcmusic.co.uk] come from Brazil?
Re:Who Cares? (Score:1)
Re:Chips have operational temp ranges. (Score:1)
--
Re:1 Gig G4 (Score:1)
--
"Stop it, Ford," he said. "You're turning into a penguin."
Re:Here's what REALLY happened (Score:2)
Well, I guess that time is a measure of distance and (relative?) velocity (i think??). So, if things stop moving (atomic level) like they (are supposed to) do at zero, how can you mesure time? Plus the buttons on the stop watch probably get too cold :)
I believe that their computer had actually jumped forward in time!!!
So that's why the Delorean and the flux capacitor had the fog comming off it! It was LN-cooled and over-clocked!
Not enough free electrons? (Score:1)
I guess that's why semiconductors are sold with a min and max temperature where flawless operation is guaranteed
(BTW: Min. Tcase of Celeron 266-533: +5C
In case you missed the point completely.... (Score:3)
This may be a bold comparision, but if Sir Edmond Hillary's accomplishment was posted on
Re:Challenge and cost effectiveness... (Score:1)
The moral of this story... (Score:2)
--
Thanks (Score:1)
cost (Score:3)
Here's what REALLY happened (Score:3)
Some scientists think that as you approach Absolute Zero, time starts to slow down, just like time slows down as you approach the speed of light.
So based on the extremely low temperatures, and the extreme amounts of electricity involved. I believe that their computer had actually jumped forward in time!!! Those strange characters on the screen were really future space alien types trying to communicate! How else could you explain this line here:
The screen suddenly turned alien into us
Next: the supercooled backpack. (Score:3)
If I have thick enough gloves, I should be fine.
This plan has several added benefits: I can always have supercooled Pepsi with me and if I say an extremely attractive female and start to lose control of myself, I can just dump my backpack over my head and be cooled off.
crack... crack...
Is it so hard (Score:1)
1 Gig G4 (Score:1)
Re:Gotta cool it all? (Score:1)
Re:Halfbaked (Score:1)
People were yelling about that the first time around, but you can't just say that the LN is colder than Flouronert's freezing point so it will freeze.
For example, the radiator in you car uses air as the coolant. But once your car has been running, the antifreeze's ambient temperature will be higher than the temperature outside on a cold day. If your car was running all the time and kept in a heated garage, you could use straight water in the radiator in sub-zero conditions.
Granted, in this case there was a pretty big difference between the two temperatures, though :)
Nitrogen??? Wee noo need no steeeking Nitrogen! (Score:1)
This attempt seems impressive, although I was a little stricken by the fact that they were bothered when they finished the first part (before the LN2) that they thought they needed the Nitogen.
If I were them...I would have tried for a higher clock speed before switching to L2. They were running at -48 degrees Celsius, and at 1035mhz....they could have probably overclocked that thing to 1100 or more, and still not broken -20 C.
I was also suprised they didn't attempt overclocking the GeForce they had on the system, since it was also running below freezing temperature, they probably could have clocked it up QUITE a bit.
In any case, I don't think I'll be needing any SuperCool solutions for some time...I'm quite happy overclocking my Celeron566 to 875 and keeping my GeForce256 SDR to 145/190.
-Julius X
I agree (Score:1)
By the way, trying to load up CMOS with a non functional CPU sounds like a bad idea. "It don't work, captian, what should I do?", "Turn it up Scotty!". If it cant read the keybord, what can it read?
Please see this article: (Score:1)
http://danpedo.dk/english/decept.shtml
Half Life overclocking (Score:2)
Re:overclocking (Score:1)
Well, where I am going to school, many of the experiments require liquid helium. That's at less than -269C, or 4Kelvin. I would like to see a computer submerged in that. Of course, since the LN2 appeared to be too cold for these people's system to operate, I imagine LHe would completely kill the computer. It would still be fun...
Chips have operational temp ranges. (Score:1)
So what I did was to use a hairdrier to heat up the chips and then switch on. Simple.
I suspect that the problem these guys are having is that they're cooling too much of the mobo - I doubt if anything other than the CPU needs this amount of cooling.
I'd like to know if they've tried running this MB/CPU at room temp after this experiment, I wouldn't be surprised if it was working.
----
Re:Lack of electrons/holes? (Score:1)
Re:Lack of electrons/holes? (Score:1)
> create the free electrons to conduct.
No, see my post#22 "Not enough free electrons?" below
Re:Cook em if you have them. (Score:1)
Besides, you are confusing ionizing radiation with non-ionizing radiation. Either your post was made out of ignorance, or it was a really bad joke.
-----------------------------
What I think really happened (Score:2)
See, every overclocker knows that semiconductors have a maximum temperature at which they will operate reliably. But few realize that there is also a minimum rated temperature. I don't remember the exact ranges, but mil-spec parts are rated for a much lower minimum temperature range. I seem to recall that one of the minimum ratings (probably the "regular" one) is -50C. So the dry ice/flourinert may have been the perfect mix after all, with the pour temperature of the flourinert keeping everything (except the 3-D card which they weren't overclocking anyhow) at the perfect temperature, and keeping the cool temperature snug against all the important parts.
Too bad they didn't try to see how fast they could clock it at -46C before trying the LN2. Maybe they can do that for the sequel.
Re:What about HEAT PIPES (Score:1)
-----------------------------
Re:Halfbaked (Score:1)
Johan V.
Re:Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!!! (Score:1)
No, they're not. hence the reason that i said "why does all this come from Autralia or NZ" (or similar).
And while we're at it - count yourself lucky! Most we don't have general access to Cable, or ADSL - most of us are still using a 56.6K Dialup!
-----------------------------
Who Cares? (Score:1)
I am like you. I do want more speed. But it isn't worth the trouble. If I have a real speed need, I just wait a few months for the next boost in speed. I can play all my games, I can use all of my current software, and I have no real need for more speed at this time.
Caveat: More speed for the sake of more spped is silly, but more speed because it is a challenge is cool. I'm just against overclocking as a way to improve speed. If you do it, it should be for the geek challenge of it. Or because you want to Raise Your Middle Finger to the Man (TM).
John S. Rhodes
Industrial Strength Usability [webword.com]
Unimpressed (Score:1)
"But Doctor, if they take away my head surely I'll die?"
overclocking (Score:1)
Good luck to this guy. He does some interesting work, and while LN2 won't be on EVERYONE's overclocking list, I'm looking forward to seeing what this guy can do in the future.
Frozen coffee? (Score:2)
Halfbaked (Score:1)
why is it? (Score:1)
Re:Who Cares? (Score:1)
Doing what they did, you have to agree it does sound like they did it for the geek challenge of it, and not to play games faster.
Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!!! (Score:2)
GO AUSSIES!!!!
----------------------------------------------
Re:Who Cares? (Score:1)
John S. Rhodes
Industrial Strength Usability [webword.com]
Challenge and cost effectiveness... (Score:1)
If you can buy a celeron 366 for almost nothing and put together a nice cooling system you may be able to achieve the speed of a significantly more expensive CPU...
Josh
Re:Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!!! (Score:2)