Yggdrasil ships Linux Open Source DVD 102
JWhitlock writes " ZDNet reports that Yggdrasil Computing has released a Linux DVD Archive. It's a DVD9-ROM with the FTP archives of Metalab.org and GNU.org. It's all freeware source, no binaries, 8.3GB compressed, over 23 GB uncompressed. It has no distributions on it, so you have to have Linux first. From the website:
"...you must be running Linux kernel 2.2.14, 2.3.28 or later in order to access files located more than four gigabytes into the DVD. Aside from that, your standard CD-ROM and iso9660 ("isofs") filesystem support that you use for accessing CD's will be sufficient to access this DVD. "
You can only get it direct from their website" Remember the old infomagic set? That thing blew me away thinking "A whole gig!", but thats nothing compared to this stuff.
I can't wait to rip this with DeCSS.. (Score:3)
Pretty neat concept (Score:1)
Dirty words (Score:5)
CD-ROM (Score:2)
It also includes DVD-mastering software (Score:4)
The really neat thing seems to be that Yggdrasil is also releasing the software they used to create the DVD to the community, according to the press release. They compare it to the past release of mkisofs and cdwrite that led to the move of Linux distros onto CDs; can anybody who remembers back that far comment? Was it really impossible to burn DVDs under Linux prior to this?
Infomagic 'a whole gig'? (Score:2)
Aah, back then it also ran with 4 MB RAM, which can't be said of most distro's nowadays (not that I blame them
Yggdrasil Computing (Score:1)
What about their DVD software? (Score:2)
Re:CD-ROM (Score:1)
Yggdrasil is still around? (Score:2)
Still got 'em! (Score:1)
I have to keep them, because it's the only place left to find "Abuse" since crack.com went the way of the bit-bucket.
Best Linux Game EVER!! I wonder how useful this DVD could be! ;-)
ghost site (Score:3)
Included items. (Score:4)
2 GB of hello kitty trash can icons.
A 3.8 GB collection from the "best of swap space 1998" awards.
11 GB of lazer sounds.
1.2 GB of the most realistic surround sound fart ever recorded.
120k text file explaining why you should get a high speed internet connection so that this shit isn't out of date as soon as you put the disc in your drive.
Yggdrasil (Score:2)
Their claim to fame was their live filesystem. You could mount the CD as the basis for a full Linux system. Add a bit of actual disk space for tmp and home, and you were in business.
Has anyone bothered to release this on CD yet? (Score:1)
Re:It also includes DVD-mastering software (Score:5)
It might depend on the access method. What we have here is a giant ISO 9660 file system (the format common CD-ROMs use) to access the DVD. This seems indeed not to have been possible due to a kernel limitation in Linux.
They describe the making of the DVD here [yggdrasil.com], the really interesting link BTW.
The natural format for such a large optical disc would be UDF of course. I am not sure if this is also on that DVD (or if dual ISO 9660 / UDF discs are possible at all).
Re:Dirty words (Score:2)
Re:Dirty words (Score:1)
Production mastering a little different... (Score:2)
Production DVDs are double layer and the pressing houses want the data fed to them in a just-so format on a DLT. What Yggdrasil has done is make a program to master that tape for you without needing a Windows box and expensive commercial software. For a DVD writer, I suspect that the traditional tools work just fine.
Okay, here's the question... (Score:1)
I can leech any source I want from
metalab any time.
Why would I need 20 gigs of source most of
which I will never use.
( yes I didn't think too much before posting, but hey, this is slashdot, why would I )
Out of date. (Score:2)
Open Source moves faster then anything out there. Getting a copy of win98 might last you 4 years, a copy of Gnome is only good for about 4 weeks.
-Jon
Re:Why? (Score:1)
There's a little misunderstanding... (Score:4)
Re:Dirty words (Score:1)
All in all, tho, I'm going to buy that DVD, even if it DOES mean buying a dvd-rom. ;)
Re:Yggdrasil (Score:1)
My first distro was Yggdrasil's first public Linux release - still got it, too! Damned good days...
I should boot it up on my 700mhz PC now, see just how usable it is with a processor that's about 200x faster than the old 486 I used to use
Welcome back! (Score:1)
The first Linux book that I bought was Yggdrasil's Linux Bible - I'm glad to see Yggdrasil back on the map.
Woohoo! (Score:1)
Now, for my next trick, a new release of Arena! (Score:3)
By the way, if you look carefully at the DVD page, [yggdrasil.com] you'll see that there is actually a way to get the DVD "for free," assuming that either:
(Does anyone else remember the bad old days when, rather than the relatively modern thing of arguing about whether Slackware was about to set up horrendous and rapacious licensing, or the newbie thing of arguing over the same thing for Red Hat, that the flame wars were over the peculiar way Yggdrasil had created for pulling programs automagically off CD on demand so that you'd only have the stuff you actually used on your hard drive? Boy, there were flame wars back then...)
Re:Still got 'em! (Score:1)
In fact it looks like Debian [debian.org] has a page for it. [debian.org]
Limitations (Score:2)
Too bad it's not bootable, or this would be the ultimate rescue disk.
My mom is not a Karma whore!
DVD drives are only about a hundred bucks. (Score:3)
Go get one.
You don't have to run MPAA movie DVDs on the thing if you don't want to. (Er, actually you can't very easily, can you?) But you can then access all the stuff that's becoming availale on DVD-ROM, like this Yggdrasil basket of goodies, or SuSE's now-up-to-6-or-7-CDs-or-1-DVD distro. (And maybe even stuff like Brittanica's DVD encyclopedia if it doesn't require some wierd proprietary Windows-only reader software.)
(Now, if only the price of DVD writers (and blanks) would come down so that I can afford to back up all those gigabytes of cheap hard drive I have.)
No, no, no. It ain't ME babe,
It ain't ME you're looking for.
Re:Why? (Score:1)
I for one do not find this irrelevant and just because it contains certain keywords does not make it unworthy.
As for the comments about CmdrTaco..... you can keep him, I'm not a big fan either.
Doesn't SUSE have a DVD out (as opposed to 6 CDs) (Score:1)
Does anyone know how they made it (pay a company or made it themselves?)
Re:CD-ROM (Score:2)
Re-read what it said:
your standard CD-ROM and iso9660 ("isofs") filesystem support that you use for accessing CD's will be sufficient to access this DVD
The DVD uses the ISO9660 file system, which is commonly used on CDs. There's no reason (to my knowledge) why you can't use iso9660 on DVDs (then again, there's that UFS thing or whatever, but i don't know much about that)
Re:Out of date. (Score:1)
People out there who aren't yet using either CVS or CVSup or CTM or even rsync, you're missing out.
The Linux kernel is an example of a popular project that is using very old technology for distribution.
Re:DVD drives are only about a hundred bucks. (Score:4)
Is is possible to actually get it on CD? (Score:1)
Re:CD-ROM (Score:1)
HH
WHy Yggdrasil distribution failed (Score:2)
Anyone who tried to pronounce "Yggdrasil" chocked to death.
Oh yeeaaahhh, smooooothe (Score:1)
---------------------------------------
Less than $70, actually.... *BUT* (Score:2)
I spent less than $50, got a DVD-ROM, and didn't pay "the man" a cent. Sounds good to me!
Re:CD-ROM (Score:1)
Re:Limitations (Score:1)
>you don't want to pull over a slow connection.
Precisely; this is great for those folks who want/need the source, don't particularly care if it's *the* latest & greatest, and don't mind downloading much smaller patches over said small connection.
I like places like cheap*bytes for this reason; I can, if I'm way behind on something, get a CD with the source I want and just run a couple of (hopefully small) patches. But that's just me.
Hahaha....ummmmmm (Score:1)
"sex on tv is bad, you might fall off..."
Obligatory rewrite of troll's post: (Score:3)
Re:Limitations (Score:1)
HH
Re:Doesn't SUSE have a DVD out (as opposed to 6 CD (Score:1)
SuSE has their professional [suse.com] version (7.0), at newly updated RH like prices, available with 6 CDs & the contents of the CDs on one DVD.
They have personal [suse.com] edition available as well, for what used to be the pr ice [digitalriver.com] as the whole thing.
Lastly they have an update [suse.com] version which will save you a couple bucks but you lose the manuals.
A comparison [suse.com] is here.
Hmm.... (Score:1)
It is becoming more and more transparent, your reasoning for putting such Linux related articles in the news section is no more than an agenda of making Linux look good and doing it as publicly as you can in your little space on the web. Slashdot gives users the CHOICE not to see Linux articles, you CmdrTaco, do not.
Slashdot, may have a bias, that is well known, but there is also a thing called ediquette. It dictates that Linux articles do NOT go in the news section, but in the Linux section. This is so those who for some reason on another, don't want to see every Linux related release can skip over it and read about thier favorite Corporate conspiracy theory, or whatever they are interested in. CmdrTaco, you should respect Slashdot's own posting sections, rather than push your personal agenda.
Oh yeah, I willing to bet some "moderator" will moderate this DOWN as a troll, just like they did with my last (albiet, not as coherent and well written) post [slashdot.org].
Gotta love that Plug and Play Linux cover art (Score:2)
Thus, it is the first book about UNIX with a picture of one on the cover.
Axel
Re:Dirty words (Score:3)
CD-ROM cannot read a DVD (Score:2)
For instance, a single DVD can be 2-sided and have 2 layers per side. CDROM's aren't made this way, and therefore can't read ANY DVD.
Re:Obligatory troll comment: (Score:1)
Re:Hmm.... (Score:1)
Re:Yggdrasil (Score:2)
I didn't spring for the massive compendium of paper documentation that was sold alongside it though...
Umm... (Score:1)
Re:Gotta love that Plug and Play Linux cover art (Score:1)
Re:Less than $70, actually.... *BUT* (Score:5)
Well, there is that. Mine predates those (it was what, anything manufactured after January or February of this year?) but yes, the newer ones will probably have them (or not be able to play DVD movies at all).
Hmm, now if some off-shore DVD manufacturer were to incorporate, say, DeCSS-derived firmware rather than a CCA-licensed version, they'd save the CCA tax and be able to undercut competition. CCA of course would probably try to get the things halted at the borders, it'd make for an interesting court case.
No, no, no. It ain't ME babe,
It ain't ME you're looking for.
Microsoft W2K3ME - only 23 Gigs! (Score:1)
Today Microsoft released Windows 2000 Third Millenium Edition (W2K3ME for short). It features all kinds of interesting software, and takes up only 23 Gigabytes of disk space. However, users have complained of suddenly getting filesystems unaccesible to others Micro$oft OSes, and are reporting strange phenomena, such as files called "vmlinuz" and the explorer renamed "Gnome". Microsoft has not yet responded.
Re:Infomagic 'a whole gig'? (Score:2)
hypo
i write bad music
www.distortedsound.com
Not a dvd-9 (Score:1)
It's news because it's a technical advance (Score:1)
OT:Backups (Score:3)
(Now, if only the price of DVD writers (and blanks) would come down so that I can afford to back up all those gigabytes of cheap hard drive I have.)
Speaking of backups, I found a great service the other day that's finally allowed me to back up lots of storage. Connected.com [connected.com] allows unlimited online storage ... for only $15/month. I think it's only Windows only, but I upload a tar/gz from my Linux box periodically. It does specifically say that it's not intended to be abused by huge amounts of multimedia content. :)
It also does a good job of comparing the contents of files, so if you have a database or a mail file, it will only upload the blocks of the file that actually change.
Highly recommended. My mother-in-law is even using it over a dial-up modem, and it works great.
--
Re:DVD drives are only about a hundred bucks. (Score:1)
Re:Less than $70, actually.... *BUT* (Score:2)
Fond Memories (Score:1)
Mine was the original Yggdrasil release (and how can you not like a company with a name straight out of the same mythos that spawned Thor, Odin, Asgard, Loki, etc?). It installed reasonably painlessly (had to rebuild the kernel to get the old sound blaster working right, but that was just one of those i/o address things IIRC). It worked *great* after that and the kernel rebuild was a neat experience. Gave me a bulletproof (mostly) multi-tasking OS with support for sound. I even got an earlier X version working on it, though at the time I was a command line maniac. It even read my FAT drives from DOS.
And the installation was quick and mostly painless, unlike OS/2 2.1, which never could install even with hours of help from IBM in Florida. Unlike Windoze 3.1 which installed but ran like a dead sloth and often blue screened.
The Yggdrasil distro was good for its time. And their was a gal at their tech support, handle of manx@yggdrasil.com IIRC, who was one of the friendliest, perkiest and most helpful tech support people I ever dealt with.
Only one time did that distro ever freak me out... when I saw (for the first time, never having heard of one before) the words "kernel panic" come across my screen late one a.m. after doing some rather obnoxious things with some registers I shouldn't have touched. Even this was a valuable learning experience that opened up new doors for me.
I'm glad to see they aren't dead. As somebody said, compared to these guys, the latecomers that dominate the market today are "newbies".
-----------------------------------------------
"VIsual editor? *THAT'S* what it stands for? Were they on drugs?"
Re:Limitations (Score:1)
I meant to imply that it might boot into something useable, at least a stripped linux distro, an appropriate compiler, and access to the hard drives' file systems.
Granted, that would introduce platform dependence, but it would still be nice to have.
My mom is not a Karma whore!
Re:Infomagic 'a whole gig'? (Score:1)
Re:Yggdrasil (Score:2)
[sunsite|metalab].unc.edu [unc.edu] has reference to MCC Linux 2.0+, circa 1996. i recall it also being onr of the earliest distros.
--
Re:Gotta love that Plug and Play Linux cover art (Score:1)
Re:ghost site (Score:1)
fun fun.
Re:Yggdrasil (Score:1)
Downloading the A series through a "Free" shell account 1500 miles away. Only to be retrieved by a 1200 baud overnight.
I took me ~3 weeks to get all the SLS disk sets, and about $300 in phone charges.
Regardless, I thought it was the best thing ever.
FREE *NIX AT LASTS
Re:Hmm.... (Score:1)
Re:It's news because it's a technical advance (Score:1)
The Move Towards More Bulldrek (Score:1)
Re:Hmm.... (Score:1)
to quote the origional post,
"ZDNet reports that Yggdrasil Computing has released a Linux DVD Archive."
It belongs in the Linux section.
Re:Hmm.... (Score:1)
I personally no longer consider this a bad thing, but slashdot *is* CmdrTaco's "personal agenda" as you put it. It's only by his choice to have other editors that it has become something more.
You're not necessarily being a troll. Just realize that bitching isn't necessarily the best way to change things, perhaps taking the site a little less seriously would be.
Ahhhh.....Yggdrasil (Score:1)
no it is not. (Score:1)
The fact of the matter is, cmdrtaco, is prolly the worse of the editors next to Hemos. they both remind me of Bob Costas.
---
Solaris/FreeBSD/Openstep/NeXTSTEP/Linux/ultrix/OS
Re:CD-ROM (Score:2)
I am not wrong, I am not an idiot. It's all in how you interpret the quote I posted.
Think of it like this:
"(CD-ROM and iso9660) ("isofs") filesystem support", not (CD-ROM) and (iso9660 filesystem support).
Not difficult, though I can see how it wouldn't make sense if you interpret it wrong.
Re:CD-ROM cannot read a DVD (Score:2)
Read my reply to the previous post. I appreciate your attempt at being helpful/informative (possibly karma whoring), but it's misguided.
Sorry if this sounded hostile, but I just get so frustrated with Slashdot nowadays.
Is it just me? (Score:1)
Personally, I do. I even keep a text file called `unclean' which lists things that aren't packaged. There's RPMs everywhere [and utils like RPMFind, Helix Update, and autoRPM to help you get them]. While DEBs are a little less popular, most Debian folk I know would prefer to apt-get software than compile it.
I generally use tarballs in an emergency, of when there's something [typically pre 1.0] I really want that nobodies packaged yet [which hasn't been for eight months].
Having a database of exactly what's installed on my system makes upgrades and finding packages off the net extremely handy. The pre and post install scripts of nearly all RPMS sort out libraries and other stuff. Security stuff is also much easier when you have a list of what's on your system, anhd can upgrade without breaking something else.
So why do other people prefer to use tarballed source? The vast majority of newer Linux users don't know C41, and why this isn't necessary to hack a makefile or type `./configure', tarballs are still very complicated. Especially when they don't compile.
This isn't a troll - its a query.
What's so hard about it? (Score:2)
They were my favourite distro until they stopped being a distro. Too bad, they always did neat stuff.
Typo corrected verson.... (Score:2)
I respect peoples right to make their own decisions, but don't most of the newer Linux folk simply download packaged binaries [or packaged
source] thse days?
Personally, I do. I even keep a text file called `unclean' which lists things that aren't packaged. There's RPMs everywhere [and utils like RPMFind, Helix Update, and autoRPM to help you get them]. While DEBs are a little less popular, most Debian folk I know would prefer to apt-get software than compile it.
I generally use tarballs in an emergency, of when there's something [typically pre 1.0] I really want that nobodies packaged yet [which hasn't
been for eight months].
Having a database of exactly what's installed on my system makes upgrades and finding packages off the net extremely handy. The pre and post install scripts of nearly all RPMS sort out libraries and other stuff. Security stuff is also much easier when you have a list of what's on your system, and can upgrade without breaking something else.
So why do other people prefer to use tarballed source? The vast majority of newer Linux users don't know a language, and while this isn't necessary to hack a makefile or type `./configure', tarballs are still very complicated. Especially when they don't compile correctly.
This isn't a troll - its a query.
Re:Yggdrasil (Score:1)
I never ran Ygg. I started with kernel 0.97pl4 way back, and I think I scratched most of that system together myself. On a 2400 baud modem. Uphill, both ways.
Re:Hmm.... (Score:1)
Obligatory rewrite of troll's post: (Score:1)
* They're marketing this not at hackers / developers, but at Linux users per se. There's an interesting schism developing between those running the OS for quite some time who enjoy the hacking aspect opposed to more recent converts, who prefer `Software that Doesn't suck' and just want a stable, easy to use operating system for their workplace or home. Yes, both contribute - personally, I run and help out at installfests, give talks and be treasurer to my local LUG.
* The point this raises is that Yggdrasil are looking at Linux as it was in 1995, not now. The reason for the initial interest in Linux is its freeness, the long term rise in poularity comes from its stability, and the increased accessibility of more modern distributions. Red Hat's packaging system [which may not be superiour to debians, but was earlier] accounts for its now massive market share.
* By the way, kiss my ass
Not really... (Score:2)
It's news for several reasons... (Score:2)
Yggdrasil produced a DVD disk of everything on the Linux and GNU software repositories- while you can pull it off of the 'net, and with xDSL and Cable, it's easy to do so, it's nice to have a DVD or CD of a static image for when you've not got a networked situation.
Yggdrasil handed us an application that allows you to make that magic DLT formatting that a pressing house will only accept to make production DVDs.
Re:CD-ROM cannot read a DVD (Score:1)
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Baldur's Gate! Also relevant for people who dual-boot for games. But yeah, there aren't too many.
___
Re:CD-ROM cannot read a DVD (Score:1)
Re:Bad idea (Score:1)
Ummm, some of this looks old? (Score:1)
Re:WHy Yggdrasil distribution failed (Score:1)
Ah, yes. I believe I first saw this in Knightmer's .sig:
<\\swing> and if we're playing old distributions... whatever happened to :)
Yggdrasil?
<joost> \\swing: everybody who tried to pronounce it got their tongue in a
knot and choked
  -- #debian
--Phil (And you should see the source file for my
Re:It also includes DVD-mastering software (Score:1)
Re:no it is not. (Score:1)
Umm... correct me if I'm wrong. (And I probably am.)
If I recall correctly, Andover gave CmdrTaco & Co. full artistic freedom when it comes to
Besides, I like Taco's style. And I like Hemos, and CowboyNeal, and all the other editors we all like to pick on, too. Maybe even JonKatz.
Lighten up!
Re:Less than $70, actually.... *BUT* (Score:1)
With an Ultra SCSI DVD drive, the other 13 Ultra160 disks you have can continue to chug away at full speed.
Re:Not a dvd-9 (Score:1)
Re:What's so hard about it? (Score:1)
No. The pronunciation is:
ig-dre-sil
where the `e' in the middle syllable should be a `schwa' that I can't type right now...
It's the tree of life, a giant ash (æsc) that joins the home of men to the home of the gods.
KR.
Not really. (Score:2)
So, no, they've not been completely in limbo.
--