More Junkyard Wars 102
A reader writes: "Junkyard Wars is quite possibly the only thing on TV that is cooler than Battlebots (I loved the one where they build a hang-glider).
Wired reports that TLC has taken registrations from potential teams, and is going to do another season."
Battlebot (Score:1)
-
Me! Me! (Score:4)
CueCat Controlled Junkyard Battlebot? (Score:1)
I've been reading too much CueCat stuff all over the Web, and just saw a Battlebot article. Sorry about that ....
Very cool contest. (Score:1)
teams? (Score:1)
i mean really, who do you think will make a better cannon?
(the team of officer's projectiles kept fusing to the inside of the barrel, eventually propelling the barrel, instead of the projectile)
Link to main site (Score:5)
http://www.junkyard-wars.com/ [junkyard-wars.com]
anyone want to start a slashdot team on it?
maybe not... nothing would get done, only people talking about how to get linux to run on it.
Damned popular in the UK too (Score:4)
What Next? (Score:1)
I've seen cannons, floating cars, cranes, boats, planes, and tracter pulling.
What's next? Midget tossing machines? That would be the ULTIMATE fun machine to build in 10 hours or less! And What Is The Deal With ALL The Engines Starting!?! My 1986 licensed and street legal VW rabit doesn't always start and use it as a daily driver.
Further proof... (Score:3)
My favorite highlight of last season's Junkyard Wars was the all-terrain vehicle that had a cannon that shot a boat anchor to winch itself out of bogs. Slap THAT sucker on the front of your Battlebot and the Gold Nut is yours, hands down!
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
An absolute must in my ever so 'umble opinion.
Tim
Re:teams? (Score:1)
Case in point, the episode where they had to build the amphibious vehicles the teams were a bunch of UK Navy nuclear engineers, and the other, a bunch of hobbyist motorcycle mechanics.
Guess who won? T'wasn't her Majesty's finest, their craft wouldn't even steer in the water. It was sad watching them flounder.
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
Hmmm... (Score:3)
--
Re:What Next? (Score:1)
-
Re:Link to main site (Score:1)
-
Re:Me! Me! (Score:2)
Double J. Strictly for the . . .
Re:teams? (Score:1)
Re:Link to main site (Score:1)
Double J. Strictly for the . . .
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:2)
Is this going to be a link up with this US based show prehaps or are they just going to pick some random stateside folk and claim they somehow represent the country?
There are a few good links at the bottom of that page [scrapheap-challenge.com] to Channel 4's site, the production company's site, a mailing list etc...
It is certainly one of the best shows on TV a the moment, but please can we have more of the massive machines of destruction (as in the Demolition [channel4.com]Aerial Bomber [channel4.com] shambles).
Anyone wanting to know more about the UK series, which is at least vaguely similar to the US show being discussed, should probably start at The Channel 4 Site. Good site, same the Javascript is broken and they seem to like realplayer a little too much for me.
Re:What Next? (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:2)
I ment to say the Demolition [channel4.com]Aerial Bomber [channel4.com] one was not so hot.
They was more to it (pleas for machines of mass destruction rather than tiny models) but it all got lost in the wash. And to think I bothered to preview, next time I'll read it. Anyone who saw the building bashing and the target bombing shows will know what I was tring to get at... no contest.
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
I like this show, but TLC never reruns it (Score:3)
I found it in time for the last three or four shows. I would love to watch it again from the beginning to see what I missed. CBS is rerunning the whole Survivor saga so I don't know why TLC doesn't do the same for Junkyard Wars. If they are lacking the room they can please drop the Christopher Loser show. I want to see a boat made from a car, not a cabinet door made from chicken wire.
Also, this brings up an interesting tagent, why is it that no network seems to understand the value of continuity? How many times have you wanted to start watching a show, but felt it wasn't worth the bother since you had missed so much and wouldn't understand it? Why is it so damn rare that you ever see a marathon of one show running in the proper airdate sequence. I think right now down in Australia, one of the networks is running non-stop Simpsons episodes in this fashion.
I pray for the day that devices like TiVo and ReplayTV make it possible to truly have an entire channel dedicated to a certain show. I just pisses me off that even when such a device becomes practical, there is the little matter of it taking me ten years for all of the various episodes to show up on the air so I can record them.
I'll quit now before I get further off tangent. By the way, has anyone else notices that 90% of the work seems to be done in the last 15 minutes? It starts out and they are drawing on the board for an hours...so see breaks for lunch...by the time you get to the final hour there is like 50% completion on the project. A little careful editting and suddenly the damn thing is complete. I think it's a bit faked myself because a lot of the competitions end up being pretty close...which some of those contraptions are so horrid you would think the competition would be an absolute blowout.
- JoeShmoe
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
Re:I like this show, but TLC never reruns it (Score:1)
That's actually the best way to go - planning is EVERYTHING. Without a good plan, the execution will fail. Just ask Digital Convergence!
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
Scrapheap Challenge (Score:1)
New Zealand viewers (Score:1)
TnT (Score:1)
TROLL Meets K-Ho v2.0 (Score:1)
[intro]
[Taco]
I reckon you ain't familiar with these here parts
You know, there's a story behind that there sid
Twenty weeks ago, two karma whores took this whole thread over
Moderators couldn't stop em
Quickest damn flamewars I've ever seen
Got modded down in cold blood
That ol' inchfan there was their lil' home away from home
They say the ghosts of TROLL and K-HO still live in that thread
And on a quiet night
You can still hear the footsteps of Signal11 and Ol' Shoeboy
[Signal11]
I don't post, I float in the grits wrapped in some toast
I'm not a real slashbot, I'm a troll linking to goats
I translate when my post is read through a Cuecat and a noise is bred,
picked up and transmitted through Shoeboy's head (AAHHH)
Trapped him in a sid, possessed him and hoist his thread
Till the K-HOness flows through his blood like poisonous lead
Told him each one of his bots is dead
I asked him to come to the steelcage, he made a choice and said
[Shoeboy]
+2 hard? yo I done post first!
We can get in two threads and deliberate at each other
To see which one'll swerve first
Two blind slashbots panic, whose mental capacity holds
That of a thread on top of nine other comments
Kissed the cheek of the da RMS
Intelligence level is lower than JonKatz sellin'
Dismissal, I'm not a fair man, disgraced the race of a unix admin
Intercepting flamebait wit my bare hands like a patriot
One thread sliced without words, I buried the AC corpse
In my past life when the Red Hat mounted the First Post
And stayed over-worked, its like the zealots and newbies
Collaborating, attemptin to take over the earth
[Signal11]
Cuz this is what happens when TROLL Meets K-HO
We hit the trees till we look like (-1: Insightful)
He's K-HO, and I'm TROLL like Steve Segal
Above Karma cuz I don't agree wit Hemos either (shit, me neither)
We ain't eager to be feeble
So please leave me wit the keys to your PT Beetle
I breathe mdma in three lethal amounts
When I stab myself in the knee with a diseased beer mug
Releasin rage on anybody in penis-bird range
Cold enough to make the topic change into something lame
(He's insane) No I'm not, I just want to eat lunch and I'm pissed off
Cuz I can't write a decent flame...
[Shoeboy]
The disaster of threads
I'm 1337 enough to commit suicide and survive long enough
To mod my post after I'm dead
When in trolltalk it's funny
actually my flavor's similar to a llama
Cuz I serve any stranger wit karma
I spray a hundred, man until the story changes
While slippin comments at point blank range like they was punches
Piss on a zealot and burn it, murder you then come to your funeral
Use a server for hobby, strangle your distro then confirm you
Whippin slashbot ass, throwin trolls crackin jokes
Wit my posts wrapped in gause, dipped in FUD and rants
I'm blazin AC's, at the same time amazin AC's
Somehow AC's ain't that eye-brow raisin to me
From all of angles of us,
crash a Mac bad enough
to trigger a
And bust till flamewars errupt
[interlude]
*phone rings*
Hello? (momo) Aiyyo what's up?
(we're comin to get you..)
VLAD! THEY KNOW IT'S US!!
[momocrome](cameo)
I used to be a loudmouth, remember me? (uh-ah)
I'm the one who burned your sid down (oh)
Well I'm out now (shit), and this time I'm comin back to blow your sid up
And I ain't gon leave you a trolltalk to fall back on
Give me two fat flames and three fuck-yous
And you won't see me like 1337 kiddies in comp.newsgroups
And when I go to AOL and I'm gettin ready to leave
I'ma put card numbers in a file and charge people to see
[Shoeboy] (Signal11)
Cuz this is what happens when TROLL Meets K-Ho
And we hit the trees till we look like MySQL
He's K-HO, and I'm TROLL like Steve Segal
Against karma, see you at Kiro5hin for the sequel
(We'll be waitin) See you in hell
Goats.cx, Raymond da Eric S,
See you on AOL for the sequel (bye bye)
TROLL Meets K-HO, what? (till next time)
[Taco]
And so that's the story when Signal11 Meets Shoeboy
Two of the most cumbersome individuals on slashdot
Made Eric Raymond and Richard Stallman look like Karma Whoring thespians
It's too bad they had to go out the way they did
Got flamed in the back comin out of that ol' crunchtime
But their spirits still live on till this day
Shhh...[posts] wait, did y'all hear that?
[Footsteps and wind blowing]
-=(V)0(V)0cr0(V)3=-
Up Up and Away (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:2)
In the UK it's been going for at least 3 years now, and by far the scariest one I've seen so far is the glider/plane one. Funniest is a toss-up between the live cannons (yes, with ammo and everything) and the demolition ball/crusher program. This week in the UK apparently it's miniture submarines.
The only problem I see is that soon they're going to have to start repeating the tasks, as we've already had in the UK everything from energy-efficient cars through hovercraft sand yachts. I just hope they can come up with more ideas.
I also think that in this series, it's started getting a bit naughty in that some items the teams are using are obviously planted by the production team - this week there was a whole host of radio controlled toys (I've never, ever seen a radio controlled toy being sent to the scrapyard), and one time just "happened" to come across a new roll of Mylar in the locked boot of a car which was just the right stuff to make their 30 foot long helium baloon. It would be pretty boring if they were only able to use real materials found on the scrapheap, but if they have to resort to other materials, perhaps they should just own up and pay some sort of penalty? Just seems like a cheat to me.
The other program that I think could be improved a fair bit is Robot wars. Surely it would be far more entertianing if there was some sort of intellgience built into the machines in a corewars style so they were truly independant robots, rather than just the big radio-controlled cars with pneumatic pumps on the front that is the current "thing" in the UK version at the moment.
This looks /so/ staged (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
Try these links for the Best of Scrapheap challenge.
http://www.choicesdirect.co.uk/cgi-bin/ChoicesDi rect.storefront/1170493668/Produc t/View /71 245
http://www.blackstar.co.uk/video/item/7000000058 536
My Particular favourite was the trebuchet, it got hammered by a simple catapult, but still.
Junkyard Wars Marathon on Thanksgiving on TLC (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
I said WHO WANTS TO TOUCH ME, DAMMIT!
Let's make a list (Score:1)
What I want to see is a list of shows in a similar vien to Junkyard Wars, Robot Wars, Battlebots, etc. Post your list of the best wacky shows that are CURRENTLY on TV (or at least get re-run now and then). Hopefully we'll all benefit by finding out about a show or two that we missed out on.
I can't wait for my Tivo to arrive now...just taping Robot Wars from my local PBS station last semester was bad enough...
So lets see those lists! (Feel free to include non-tech wacky shows like Lumberjack Challenge, etc)
Re:TnT (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
I'm sure there's still plenty of scope for thinking up new things to do - I can think of a half-dozen off the top of my head, no problems at all.
Re the Robot Wars point, no. In a word. The idea of Robot Wars is that anyone can do it - all you need is a remote control, a couple of hundred quid, a local scrapyard and an idea, and you can build your own robot in 6 months easily. The moment you introduce intelligence and autonomous robots, you're limiting who can enter, simply by virtue of the fact that heavy-duty electronics for that is expensive, complex and requires serious software skills. No schools, for starters - too complex and too expensive. No individuals like Rex Garrod - it'll take you 6 man-months to build the thing, and another 12 man-months to get the software sorted, which is too long for most folk. Few amateurs - it's expensive to buy DSPs, and even more expensive to buy a programmer for them!
And of course, there's the "interest" factor. Most autonomous robots are crap at what they do, and two robots wandering aimlessly around the arena is not good TV. It might be interesting if you've made the robot, or if you're into AI, but it certainly isn't entertainment. To get two well-programmed, well-constructed robots, which can put up a decent fight, ready to go in 6 months is a task only a university engineering department or a company can meet. I'm personally a bit disappointed that it's already getting quite commercial (some teams have spent a couple of grand on their robots), so adding this is just going to screw it up.
By all means, try a feature for them. They had a feature not so long ago for walker robots, which basically failed. But competing for the top prize - I doubt it. Plus, I doubt an autonomous robot could compete against a human, so it's unlikely.
Grab.
Re:What Next? (Score:1)
It's different in hot countries - in Italy for example, cars just don't rust, so if you look after the engine then it can last just about forever, so in places like that the engine will be the first thing to go.
Grab.
When is it on ? (Score:1)
Reminds me of.... The A-Team (Score:1)
Sorry.... I'm a child of the '80's. --mk
Re:Link to main site (Score:1)
What challenges would you like to see on the next series? - if you post any ideas on the Junkyard discussion [greenspun.com], there is a much higher chance that the production team will see your suggestions (they don't look at Slashdot much!)
Cheers,
andy.bell@rdfmedia.com [mailto]
"The fiercest and, frankly, ugliest show on television" - Robert Llewellyn
Battlebots (Score:1)
lcase
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
There. Happy?
Re:teams? (Score:1)
Again, simplicity won out. When you only have 12 hours (or something like that) you can't plan things out too much.
Other Creative Outlets - Somewhat Offtopic (Score:2)
As a side note, the two major cps programs out there are Destination Imagination [dini.org] and Odyssey of the Mind [odysseyofthemind.com] The programs are pretty similar. Take a team of 7 or less kids or college students, give them an open ended problem to solve, and have the present the solution on a Saturday competition. The presentations generally include technical portions, as well as a skit, about 10 minutes in length, along with scenery and the like. The competition also include an on the spot portion, where you're given a problem to do in about 10 minutes from beginning to end. Again, creativity is highly stressed. Not exactly geek culture, but I strongly encourage people to go check out either program and volunteer to help out as a judge or something.
Re:This looks /so/ staged (Score:1)
So what if it's staged? I dont think it was ever presented/advertised as reality tv. It was meant to be entertaining - and it is.
So, it might be staged, it seems convenient that there are always enough barrels around when they need something to float, or there are ALWAYS working engines when they need one.
Nobody ever advertised Bugs Bunny as reality TV and Bugs still kicks ass! People hung up on the reality TV will ruin the shows meant as entertaining. (yes, I watched survivor and was bored stiff)
I've grown sick of the world and its people's mindless games
Re:Battlebots (Score:1)
All of it? Not really, but a lot of it does, yes. This is mainly because the networks here are afraid of taking a risk.
British TV tends to be more 'on edge' than the typical network show in the US. Cable channels take a risk here and there, but never go all-out. Why do you think TLC showed the original BBC version of the show? It cost them a lot less than making it. They were able to see what kind of numbers it would put up.
I just hope the US version is just as good as the original. I fear they might change the show a little and screw it up.
I've grown sick of the world and its people's mindless games
Re:Reminds me of.... The A-Team (Score:1)
--
Re:Battlebots (Score:1)
--
Re:teams? (Score:2)
Y'see, if you make a floating crane it has to be _very_ stable and well balanced, or it'll capsize. Theirs wasn't, and very nearly did.
I'd actually contend that the buoyancy tank system would have worked better _if_ we had intelligent people running it. As it was, if you remember the challenge, they panicked and took a stupid decision for how to maneuver the tanks. Meant they had to pump for ages, slowing them down and breaking the pump... Stupid, as they had ballast on the tanks which they could have gently released to raise them as opposed to pumping extra air in.
Fundamentally, though, simplicity and bikers will normally win. Simplcity gives you less to build and less to break, while bikers are used to building strange contraptions from scrap and the like. Look at any trike for proof
Re:teams? (Score:1)
Re:Battlebot (Score:1)
Re:I like this show, but TLC never reruns it (Score:2)
I also agree with JYW being a bit staged. Remember the amphibious vehicle episode. They were still plugging away and fixing up the next day. And in nearly every episode there was still someone welding/tying/painting while the commentater had called time and was explaining that there time was up. OTOH, if they didn't allow that last fixup, the show would be fairly boring.
My fave (Score:1)
New Ideas (Score:1)
Perhaps producers could vary it a bit by giving teams free access to materials in the junkyard as well as limited access (say --pick 5 items) from a cache of useful materials that are very unlikely to be found in a junkyard. That sort of approach could substantially increase the variety of things that could be built.
Re:Other Creative Outlets - Somewhat Offtopic (Score:1)
How creative can it really be with the experts already having plans drawn up. Just plain vanilla engineering.
I bet it would be much more creative to have a divergent group of people with no experts in the given project. The time may have to increase.
Re:CueCat Controlled Junkyard Battlebot? (Score:1)
The Real Story (I've been on the show) (Score:5)
Is the yard "salted"? Depends on what you mean by "salted".... They do make sure that a grand excess of random parts to make do are available. But there's no pre-defined set of detail plans; I've seen what the "experts" planned out for us in one of our Challenges: there were three different ideas, each one on one sheet of lined notebook paper, no details, no dimensions.... and our result looked like nothing on any of these three "expert's plans".
Some of the most "fun" challenges have been where a critical part is intentionally _purged_ from the 'heap- the challenge becomes to construct that critical mechanism from random iron, and get it to work!
Improvization is absolutely key on the 'heap. I can't emphasize this enough. With ONE exception (safety-related equipment), you will NOT find ANY of your key parts "brand new, in box, with doc set" on the heap. What you will find are numerous broken vehicles, trashed appliances, industrial and construction junk, and machine-shop cutoffs/remnants, which may or may not have been placed on the heap because of the challenge, and may or may not have a functional whateveritis you were looking for. (we know that they in general do _NOT_ clean the 'heap out of helpful bits, because we found previous challenger's machine parts on the 'heap )
The "Experts" are people who've worked with purpose-made machinery in their area of expertise for literally decades. Back in their shops, they have all the proper parts, the right tools and alloys, testing equipment, CAD software, the whole shebang. In short, they have the tools, they have the technology. BUT NONE of that is available on the Scrapheap. The Experts themselves have to learn to scavenge and improvise; anything you can't find or manufacture yourself does not exist, even if you have half a dozen of them back in the stockroom at the company (yes, I've seen an expert nearly tearing their hair out in just this situation).
Bearings have to be scavenged; we ripped some out of a Moped. Need a bigger bearing, with a strong shaft? Use a steering knuckle and CV joint off that crashed Citroen. Box girder? If you can't find cutoffs from someone elses project, cut them out of that shed roof. Heavy electrical cable? Scavenge it from one of the big junked excavators.
The ONE EXCEPTION - wherever safety on the set or British safety law (the equivalent of OSHA) is involved, new parts and tools are always salted. For example, safety valves are always new, freshly tested, with certification papers up in the Director's cupola. If you manage to scavenge a safety-related part that isn't one of the certificated ones, an assistant director will let you know- and won't let you build using the unsafe part- they'll send you back out onto the heap with a hint on where to find the safe part that does the same job.
We aren't allowed to change our own grinding wheel or cutoff disks, for the same reason (they have to be spin tested before use, in a safe area). Explosives and high-flammability materials (and fuel tanks) are likewise covered and there are a platoon of Britain's Finest Firemen standing by for the whole day, as well as paramedics and an ambulance, Just In Case (and my thanks to them!).
By it's nature, the show can be dangerous and everyone on set, contestant or not, has to be on gaurd all the time. There hasn't been a serious injury yet (sprains and strains, that's all), and everyone on the show works to keep it that way. Even if it messes up continuity (and you can see this occasionally, where safety gaurds get added to a machine after "TIME" is called) a safety issue trumps any other consideration of the show.
Hope this helps...
-Dr. Crash (Captain, NERDS, season 3)
Re:Let's make a list (Score:2)
Help a brotha out (Score:1)
I stream all my media, what is the holdup of full broadcast of TV stations via the internet? This is that same problem I have with BattleBots - I want desperately to see these programs, but I dont own a television.
Is anyone aware of a URL (ftp/wrapster/gnutella/freenet) where the full shows (BattleBots, Junkyard Wars, ScrapHeap Challenge) are contained? Has anyone recorded and digitized the programs?
Help a fellow geek out - someone please please please provide a link to any or all of these programs in their entirety
Computer JunkYard (Score:1)
Imagine you're brought in, and first thing in the morning told your job is to build the best machine you can for ... a car mp3 player, a C compiler, graphics design, etc. Give each team a 28.8 modem and ISP account to allow some downloading of s/w but not enough to do serious downloading of large programs.
Just think of the fun. Maybe allow each team to bring in 3 CDs or something. You know, an OS, some basic s/w, maybe some docs.
I know of several companies in my town (~200,000 people) that would have enough junk lying around to make this interesting. If nothing else, it would give the companies something to do with a bunch of the old stuff that's lying around.
Re:Battlebot (Score:1)
I enjoyed Robot Wars (a BBC show) on PBS much more for that reason, and because they had obstacles and stuff like that. I thought the house bots were a bit unfair at times, but overall Robot Wars is a hell of a lot better than Battlebots.
But that's just my opinion, I might be wrong.
Cable. (Score:2)
On a random note -- the Minneapolis/St. Paul area apparently only has about 50% penetration with cable. IIRC, most areas are much higher (70-80% or something).
--
Ski-U-Mah!
Slashdot wars (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
I think you'll find the TRANSATLANTIC CHALLENGE is actually a task in itself. The contestants have to cross the Atlantic Ocean in a craft which must be fashioned from items scavenged from the scrapheap/junkyard.
Haven't seen Junkyard Wars yet, eh? (Score:1)
I'm always suspicious of US remakes of UK programs (Score:1)
I have quite a few doubts that the US version of Scrapheap will fare any better.
Crappy TLC web site (Score:1)
Re:Battlebot (Score:1)
---
Re:Help a brotha out (Score:1)
I work in the streaming media biz, and although I think it's admirable that someone would limit all their viewing to streams, be realistic - there's still no substitute for tv, and that won't change until people think about 56k modems the same way we think of 300 baud externals today. Maybe once broadband is the norm, tv and streams will converge. Until then, the boob toob is the only way to get all the tv programming you want.
Maybe a /. team? (Score:1)
Re:I like this show, but TLC never reruns it (Score:1)
Most of the episodes I saw ended with major failures for at least one team (both had problems in the last episode). The cannon that wouldn't fire, the amphibious vehicle that spun in circles, the glider that didn't... I'm amazed that anything they build actually works long enough to win a competition.
Re:Hmmm... (Score:1)
Dumb as a bag of hammers (Score:1)
IMHO:
I thought it was really dumb. I didn't like the Mad Max / Judge Dredd spin, and the pretense that the parts are all "found" is annoying. The little informational bits they insert are less educational than yer average "Schoolhouse Rock" cartoon.
Maybe they count on the audiance being drunk, and thus unable to actually notice how lame it all is.
Another particpant opens his big mouth. (Score:4)
TLC is planning to show more episodes of the british show in the late fall and early winter. (the schedule isn't final yet, so I can't give a more exact date). In Jan/Feb, they will broadcast an Americanized version of the show. No they didn't dumb it down. Its the same crew, same pile of junk, and comparable challenges. The big difference will be in the accents of the contestants and they replaced Robert with an American comic.
Yes, it is a real pile of scrap. On the other side of the wall from the set, are Cockneys in large cranes, that end in claws, literally tossing cars thru the air. Like a good yard, the stuff is partially sorted, on one side is a pile of wood and other construction debris (the wood is "experienced" most of the plywood had clearly been a concrete form in its first life). Next comes ex plumbing, and electrical conduit. Cars in various degrees of flattened are piled forming the odd aisle, then the ventilation/hvac stuff. Off to the other side starts some of the more serious industrial scrap. there is a 20 foot pile of very rusted 1-2" wire rope, next to what must have been a large liquid storage tank (20' diameter, guessing from the curve in the 8' square sections of 1" plate steel) There is the twisted remains of some conveyor systems (a great source of chain and bearings), and other large machines, including what looks like the yard's now-deceased former car crusher. Closer to the workshops, are some of the more unusual vehicles, including a well tagged ex- tourbus, and some military surplus truck based device that seems to be a large collection of hydraulic bits.
Even when parts are seeded for a particular purpose, there is no guarantee that they will attach to anything else. To use one of the already broadcast shows, "power pullers", there were apropriate tires in the pile. There were no differentials that fit said tires however, and one of the challenges to using the good (lugged) tires, was how to get them to mate with the differential you found.
-dp-
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)
Several people have posted links, but unless you have a multi-system TV and VCR, you'll be unable to watch the tape as it's in PAL format. Play it in an NTSC VCR and you'll get garbage. Now, if it was on DVD and you had a region-free DVD player...
_/_
/ v \
(IIGS( Scott Alfter (remove Voyager's hull # to send mail)
\_^_/
Late November in the US. This weekend in the UK (Score:1)
Re:Hmmm... (Score:1)
kc.
Mac Flinging (Sorry to you Mac heads) (Score:1)
--
They know the problem in advance, and its the same (Score:1)
Here is a list of the shows, and what got built (Score:1)
While they re-use basic themes, the details change in a noticable way. For example, they have done an underwater show each time. First year, it was making the diving gear. The second was salvaging a sunken car. This year, we built submarines.
Every year, they have built a projectile weapon. The first year, they had siege engines, the second, cannons, and this year a different projectile challenge. Each year a boat gets built, the first it was just a boat, the second an amphibian, the third year, it had to put out a fire. The car for the first year was a pulling tractor, the second a MPG marathon machine, this year, they are steam powered.
They do welcome suggested challenges. One I offered up was "loudest noise you can make with wood", thinking of a wood fired steam boiler explosion going up against a wood fired turbojet engine, or a giant organ pipe (reed) powered by the entire team sitting on the bellows.
Re:teams? (Score:1)
They get selected based on 'leadership potential' and 'team working ability' rather than technical nouse. That's why they destroy and misuse so much equipment they are given, and are incapable 'feeling' what will work. Sometimes it helps, they use it in way's the designers never thought of. Often they just break it.
Not really surprising they made such a hash of it, or that they thought to try to cheat and use grapeshot for the last shot. Its the type of people they are.
I wonder... (Score:1)
How to find a running junkyard engine. (Score:1)
After all, one of the options offered to someone with a blown engine is a transplant from a junkyard. - The reason that you don't see many in a running yard, is that they do remove the good ones, and sell them. Since this "yards" "employee's" are the teams of scavengers, we get to remove them. The usual yard you have visited, has had the good stuff picked over by the yards employee's, the stuff they let randoms paw thru is stuff they are done with. If they let you at the unfiltered incoming stream, you would see a lot more functional stuff.
And not all the engines work. If you are lucky it fails in the workshop, while you have time to fix it. (you always test it in situ. Even with a "no prisoners" approach to removal, its going to use up a not insignificant amount of precious time. You want to know that it stands a chance of working before you invest any of that rare substance in it)
If you are like many teams, it (or its gearbox) will decide that it has had enough, while on course. The tractor pull was decided by transmission failure, Bowsers walking machine fell victim to welding too close to the ignition system. (blew the condensor, the points cooked during the challenge). The string trimmer engine in the most recently aired (in the UK) bomber competition did not want to run, and it took some serious persuasion to convince it otherwise.
-dp-
Our machine looked nothing like the experts vision (Score:1)
I think he did. (Score:1)
Has everyone forgotten Survival Research Labs, who put on shows in SF, and elsewhere?
Re:Reminds me of.... The A-Team (Score:1)
-Face
Transatlantic Challenge. (Score:1)
And the Great Egg Race (Score:1)
Survival Research Laboratories (Score:1)
Has everyone forgotten Survival Research Labs, who put on shows in SF, and elsewhere?
I haven't. SRL [srl.org] invented this stuff -- in...guess when? 1978. And he (Mark Pauline) continues to innovate.
From the bio page [srl.org]
/.ers probably won't get over their obsessions with mentally-deficient jock humor, though, so expect continued stories about watered-down, apolitical SRL rip-offs.
Re:Another particpant opens his big mouth. (Score:1)
> and they replaced Robert with an American comic.
Now I must say, that's a damn shame. He was a great host. It's not like he has a hard to understand accent. I think it would have been perfect to have him do the American version as well.
Re:When is it on ? (Score:1)
When they showed one single run of the British show, they didn't run it under it's original name, NOR under it's Americanized name. They put it "inside" one of their other 'techie' shows... I mean, you'd watch TV and it would say "Junkyard Wars", and there'd be no hint of anything else, but when you went to the TV schedule, it was under one of TLC's regular weekly show names..
Did my explanation make sense?
Sure hope they don't do that next time, or it will be impossible to watch for in the schedules, one will just have to hope they catch the commercials or keep an eye out on certain newsgroups and such...
Hmmm, maybe slashdot will announce it!
Re:Modern day "Great Egg Race" (Score:1)
A version for slash-dot (Score:1)
Re:teams? (Score:1)
Good idea, error in the execution...
Red Dwarf Wars? (Score:1)
Re:Damned popular in the UK too (Score:1)