The Joys Of Porting 89
Gambit Thirty-Two writes "Old news, but Sendmail has ported their MTA to Linux390." And in other news: sitz writes "It would appear as though some madman has port apache to WinCE <Insert witty beowulf comment here>. It's only been tested on a couple of platforms (including the Jornada 720, and is 'based on the WinNT port, with lots of dirty modifications'. That's still pretty swanky. I've also set up a mirror of this site, which will be up for a couple of weeks." Update: 08/27 15:19 PM GMT by H : Yes, the Sendmail story is a dupe - somebody didn't read my story before posting his. *grin*
Old News (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Old News (Score:1)
Re:Old News (Score:1)
The Joys of Redundancy... (Score:2)
Previous Story (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Previous Story (Score:1)
Come on, Slashdot, this is a new low.... two duplicate stories in a row!
What the hell is this about? (Score:1)
Sendmail (Score:1)
"Sendmail for Nerds, Sendmail that matters"
The problem with this news report is clear... (Score:1)
too late again! (Score:5, Funny)
BTW: does anyone have any info on getting an abacus to use wireless ethernet? I thought linksys made an adapter, but I can't seem to find one at BestBuy...
Re:too late again! (Score:2)
Best Buy can't help you, but don't abandon hope - just search pricewatch on "up down up up up dot up up down up B."
Re:too late again! (Score:3, Informative)
I can't find a good article on it, but you could use the sounds made from the abacus as a modem. Granted, it'd be a slower connection but it would be wireless to several feet. The sounds made by an abacus are more digital than analog so you could send an audible digital tone (a series of clicks) and use a speaker on the Betamax (long live beta!) to recieve the signal. Just set up PPP on
Re:too late again! (Score:1)
The gauntlet has been thrown down. I'm sure this would make a Slashdot story.
Yet another dumb port (Score:1, Troll)
Re:Yet another dumb port (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Yet another dumb port (Score:2)
What may even be cooler is if someone could put a zoomed in portion of the graphic your editing on the Pocket PC screen and the full size one on the regular CRT (of course this is while it's connected via active sync) and I edit the zoomed in one and see the changes on the full sized one....cool eh? I think someone did this with one of the color pda's out there, but I am not sure which one.
The point (Score:2)
Re:Yet another dumb port (Score:2)
Re:Yet another dumb port (Score:2)
Re:Yet another dumb port (Score:2)
I mean... No, no, that's exactly what I mean...
SQL Server for WinCE (Score:3, Funny)
One day I was browsing thru the cds and found, "SQL Server for Windows CE"
Re:SQL Server for WinCE (Score:2)
Plus, if you just just want to develop and learn ADO against SQL, just use it (it's downloadable somewhere on the microsoft MSDN site).
Re:SQL Server for WinCE (Score:2, Informative)
Basically, you sync database data to the PDA. You write apps for the PDA that use and/or change this data, and when you sync, it syncs the database both ways.
Someday... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:how much of a difference would it make.. (Score:1)
Bluetooth (Score:1)
Slashdot having trouble posting? New servers WINCE (Score:1)
Porting is cool and all, being able to run anything on anything is neat. But sometimes if you look at ports you have to just ask yourself.... why? And what's the deal with a beowulf cluster of wince devices? You would be better off just making a beowulf cluster of 486 dx 100's or older Pentiums, and you could probably make it 2 or 3 times as big. It's interesting to see stuff ported to WINCE Devices since the hardware is so different, but how decent a server platform is WINCE really?
Anyway. I guess it's kind of cool, but more than anything else, it's more of a 'hobbyist/fun' appeal, than having any real world application. I mean I doubt you'll find any 'mission critical' apps running of a wince device. Of course with what I've been reading about
Napier bones prior port (Score:1)
Going... crazy... (Score:2)
Second Verse, Same As The First! (Score:1)
Please make that much of an effort next time.
Stupid question time... (Score:2)
stupid answer (Score:2)
It might be useful on an Agenda, if it had a cellphone or wireless to a local net. Information from rounds, sales calls, what not, could be formated and displayed as HTML to those interested. A webcam might also be interesting. Why not? Also useful would be SMTA. Breaking that last mile looks like fun that way.
At first I thought it was lame... (Score:4, Interesting)
It isn't about the general type of web server that we know and love. It's about a portable transaction platform!
Imagine that you are a salesman, contractor or other individual who travels and does business with many different people in many different places. If you had a 802.11 (I don't think bluetooth will make it) enabled Jornada or iPaq, then you could cary a web-based transaction server with you, wherever you go. You wouldn't need a fixed IP, nor a constant broadband link to the internet.
You could hop on to your client's wireless LAN, or establish a peer-to-peer link to make your transaction server (e-business whatever) appear local to your clients. They could do business with you, and you take your web-site and data with you when you leave. In this way, you could use a near universal interface (web browser) to handle customer interactions, without having to scrawl all of the information in by a flaky pen-based interface.
This would be a very cheap way of doing business, with less threat of being cracked by some script kiddie.
-- Len
Re:At first I thought it was lame... (Score:2)
You could possibly build a really cheap Apache box (Score:1)
A DC'll run you 79 bucks. The keyboard and mouse, another 40 or so.
How stupid is IIS CE? (Score:2)
News? (Score:3, Interesting)
And for those of you naysayers out there, no, there isn't a paper manual for my engine, just the (poorly) encrypted XML version on CD.
Wait a sec... (Score:1)
Re:Wait a sec... (Score:1)
Server on a PDA (Score:2, Interesting)
My initial reaction to the various servers ported to PDAs was "Why???". But the more I think about it, the more potential I see for it.
The biggest gain would be the elimination of proprietary synchronozation software/protocols. Right now, if I want to access my address book from a PC, I have to hookup the cradle (which requires a free serial or USB port, assuming your machine has functional USB support) install the sync software/drivers (assuming you're running the right OS) and then synchronize (which copies everything to the PC, which might not be a good idea if you're sync'ing to a machine at work).
Instead, say my PDA was running a mini-LDAP server that was acting as a front-end to my address book. Outlook, Outlook Express and Netscape Messenger all support LDAP, so any of them would have immediate access to my address book.
Of course, this all assumes your PDA is capable of Ethernet or 802.11.
An FTP server running on a PDA would be perfect for moving files. A web server would be able to serve up your notes, todo list, etc as HTML, complete with editting forms.
One snag I see is that you might not be able to run multiple servers on a PDA at once. In that case, you would need a universal protocol to piggyback everything on top of, such as SOAP running on a web server, then you would just need some SOAP based APIs, and software that could understand them. Hmmmm.