LucasFilm Auctioning Star Wars Memorabilia 144
Captain Chad writes: "LucasFilm has donated some items to eBay's "Auction for America". They include a lightsaber used by Ray Park (Darth Maul) and a stormtrooper helmet used in The Empire Strikes Back and in Return of the Jedi. Check out the list of auction items! I think some of the bids will get astronomical. Would anyone be willing to give me a few hundred thousand dollars so I can get the lightsaber?"
hmmm... (Score:4, Insightful)
So.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:So.... (Score:2, Insightful)
To American charities? None. I do however volunteer my time and services to local charities (here in Canada), when I have the time.
And what difference does it make if I donate a million dollars or none at all? Donations are one thing, but buying something where part of the proceeds goes to a charity is something totally different. You benifit and the charities benifit.
I rather like the idea when a corporation announces that a certain percentage of the profits on a product or on a certain day are donated to a charity. It lets lots of people participate, while still getting something out of it (since deep down, we're all selfish).
Re:So.... (Score:1)
Which is exactly what's happening here. What's your problem with it?
Re:hmmm... (Score:2)
Give to charity under your own name, with the amount you can afford. Don't be led in by this garbage.
Re:hmmm... (Score:2)
Re:hmmm... (Score:2, Insightful)
Lucasfilm can't really donate "some of the revenues from the films", I'm sure almost all of that money has already been spent. Sure, they could donate some proceeds from ongoing liscensing--"Buy a Jar-Jar Binks doll to Help America"--Bleck. I think it's much cooler to offer relatively unique items then to be yet another company funneling off pennies here and there.
Re:hmmm... (Score:2)
Sounds great and all... but why not donate some of the revenues from the films (which we already pay a hell of a lot of money to go see anyways) to these charities... why auction off only one or two things which can only be attained by the rich?
So you would like to donate to charities, and you'd rather have the burden placed on the general populace rather than a rich elite few? I take it that you're not in support of graduated income tax brackets either, are you?
So a few rich people grab up the uber-cool light saber. Big deal. At least that money is going to be used for some good, rather than sitting in their bank account. Or at the very least, these are the kinds of people who might pay millions for a baseball or something - you might as well use their money, and it's obvious that they're more than happy giving it away this way.
Re:hmmm... (Score:1)
I'm not saying exclude the rich charity donators, I'm simply saying include the not-so-rich (general populace, as you called it) donators as well. I don't know how many movie tickets to starwars episode one were sold, but I'm sure if even just $0.05 of each ticket went to a charity, it would end up being a hell of a lot more money than what 2 people buying 2 studio props for say $100,000 could raise. Do you see my point? I'm not saying get rid of the option to spend an insane amount of money on one or two things (for the rich), but you can raise a lot more money if you take in very little from a whole lot of people.
I'm not rich, hell I usually live pay-check to pay-check... I can't donate lots of money to charities, but I'm quite happy parting with $0.50... It would however, cost more for a charity to process my $0.50 donation than its worth. But if that small donation comes from hundreds or thousands of people at once, through a corporation taking a small percentage off of a ticket (or product, or whatever), then the charity gets to tap into people like me who can't donate a lot, but still are quite willing to donate a little. And there are a lot of people who will glady donate a little.
Re:hmmm... (Score:1)
By that logic, I guess everyone should give everything they make to charities.
Or is Lucas a special case in some way?
Re:hmmm... (Score:1)
Re:hmmm... (Score:2)
Not. This is all second-hand crap, not history. The history is in someone else's private collection.
Re:i think it is only in america (Score:1)
hmmmm (Score:1)
Certainly would cut down on the time to commute!
how much this stuff could bring in... (Score:1)
never thought i would see... (Score:3, Funny)
good work people!
Re:never thought i would see... (Score:1)
Make your own lightsaber? (Score:1)
-nateo http://www.jesush.com/nateo/
Re:Make your own lightsaber? (Score:5, Informative)
Are you talking about these guys [starwars.com]?
Or these guys [tripod.com]?
Or possibly even these guys [wordsmithdigital.com]?
Re:Make your own lightsaber? (Score:1)
Re:Make your own lightsaber? (Score:2)
At any reasonbly big science fiction convention, you can get either passive sparkly plastic blades or "light kits" that use single-ended neon bulbs inside a plastic sleeve for the blade. These look fantasic. Of course, they're fragile.
Warning!!!! (Score:4, Funny)
;->
Re:Warning!!!! (Score:1)
Interesting philosophical question: Do you read ACs?
Re:Warning!!!! (Score:1)
-
Karma 50 (38)
Re:Warning!!!! (Score:1)
Re:Warning!!!! (Score:2)
hello, Mr. Karma 49 here with an exciting offer for you... earn up to $5000 a month working at home!
Expensive (Score:3, Insightful)
Auctioning kit models - weak. (Score:1)
$8000+ for a helmet? (Score:5, Funny)
Well that -- and the armor never seemed to protect the actual stormstrooper from anything. Not even a damned Ewok with a rock.
Re:$8000+ for a helmet? (Score:2, Interesting)
Really? For you, maybe, but people have different value systems. This prop was used in 1980 -- surely there are a few middle-aged rich guys and film buffs who would pay much more to touch and own a piece of their childhood happiness.
Re:$8000+ for a helmet? (Score:1)
...because, as every well-educated consumer knows, happiness is in the things we own.
Re:$8000+ for a helmet? (Score:1)
Re:$8000+ for a helmet? (Score:1)
Re:$8000+ for a helmet? (Score:2)
It's much more amazing if we notice that the Darth Vader Helmet is much more cheaper ($2000-)
Ok, auctions are unpredictable, but 4 times more is a very significant difference.
Re:$8000+ for a helmet? (Score:2)
What's surprising... (Score:1)
The Storm Trooper helm is currenlty recieving an 8,865$ bid. Where as the second Item is the Darth Maul stunt light-saber, weighing in at 5,101$
I'd rather have a stick I could swing around and hit people with, wrather then a helmet that's going to suffocate me.
Info about Auction for America (Score:2)
Re:Info about Auction for America (Score:2, Interesting)
Ok - so its a bit cynical - but why arent people still talking about the fact that the red cross has more money than they know what to do with...
I'll bet that if we looked at how much money was raised for those families (who many were well to do investment types) they have enough damn money already (especially now after all this)...
What about the insurance for the WTC - has anyone stated what that covers...
Why dont we actually do something that will have an impact with all this money that we are raising? Where is it going - some monument? how much could that possibly cost? Who is keeping an eye on the people collecting this money?
I know that I for one will hear about the millions upon millions raised in the name of terror relief - but I can assure you that i will not see any effect this money may have.
(I have sympathy for the people who have suffered due to 9/11 - however I have no compassion for people who take advantage of these tragedies for greedy unscrupulous causes)
Re:Info about Auction for America (Score:2, Interesting)
Insurance? Some of the papers I read at the time seemed to indicate that only one of the two towers was insured at all. Never heard anything else about that, though - perhaps the gov't supressed the media again.
Re:Info about Auction for America (Score:1)
Huh? (Score:1, Redundant)
Why is the Stormtrooper helmet currently $3000 more than the lightsaber?
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Huh? (Score:1)
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
The lightsaber is from a crap-fest.
Tim
Auction the right to choose Jar Jar's future (Score:5, Funny)
Helevius
Re:Auction the right to choose Jar Jar's future (Score:1)
Forget about the Sith Lords (Score:5, Funny)
#incluide "voice-distortion.h"
"Princess Lea, now you will see the true nature and power of the Dark Side of the force."
"No, Lord Vader! We are just a peaceful planet of granola eaters and tree huggers!"
"Yes, watch as the Empire unleashes the ultimate weapon....the Slashdot effect!"
Really, this is amazing, we've Slashdotted eBay.
no we didn't (Score:2, Informative)
Re:no we didn't (Score:2)
There are a toal of 15 graphics associated with most of the auction items.
The only image necessary for this auction is the one that has the actual picture of the item which is the one below that is not named with a number. For this particular auction it is 41KB in size while the total of the rest of the unnecessary images are 98KB of useless junk and this doesn't even count the rest of the page
8KB 66x180
27KB 242x180
3KB 16x180
27KB 276x80
2KB 66x52
4KB 242x52
1KB 16x52
4KB 276x52
8KB 66x518
41KB 242x518
2KB 16x518
2KB 66x51
4KB 242x51
1KB 16x51
5KB 276x51
Re:Forget about the Sith Lords (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Forget about the Sith Lords (Score:2)
Really, this is amazing, we've Slashdotted eBay.
Actually, not eBay. The only problem on the site was with the images of the auction items, which are *not* hosted by eBay. They are hosted at http://208.55.221.157 , which seems to be owned by Transrow [transrow.com], an auction company services company. They are responsible for verification of bidders.
Taken from the Darth Maul lightsaber description:
So, eBay was able to withstand the /. effect! :-)
Re:Forget about the Sith Lords (Score:1)
Yeah, the popularity of Star Wars items is limited to
-Russ
Lucas, You Genius (Score:4, Funny)
(Of course, I'd want the first one, as we all know the second one is not yet fully operational.)
Re:Lucas, You Genius (Score:1, Offtopic)
Anyway, to catch you up, the Emperor surprised Luke with the fact that his friends were walking into a trap, since the battle station was "fully armed an operational". I'm not sure what that badly animated leech or whatever it was on the side of the Emperor's face had to do with it.
Anyway, Han was a little behind getting the shield down, and Lando realized that it was a trap, since the Rebel's sensors were being jammed. He was too late though, and a lot of brave rebels died at the hands of the Empire with their big green blaster. (BTW, the colors of the blasters always seemed wrong to me. The sabers made sense. Bad guys red, good guys blue, youths green. What gives with that?)
Fortunately, Han got the sheild generator down and Lando was able to blow up the second Death Star just as Luke escaped with Vader's (now Anikin again) body.
You should watch it again. It is on VHS now, so you can fast-forward through all the cutesy Ewok crap.
-Peter
Re:Lucas, You Genius (Score:2)
Usually I avoid this sort of mistake by recognizing a joke by the fact that it's funny.
I guess I'll have to come up with a new strategy.
-Peter
Re:Lucas, You Genius (Score:2)
(tongue inserted firmly in cheek) No way. That first one had that clearly-labelled 'self destruct' button on it. Version 2.0 eliminated this design flaw, the subsequent failure of ground-based security through gross management incompetance was the only reason for its destruction.
This new weapon system represents the most awesome destructive power in the universe. Fortunately, they put a button right here that will blow the whole thing up!
How will we find this button, sir?
That's the best part! They built a trench that leads right to it. Just drop in, fly to the button and fire. You can't miss!
But why would they build something like that?
Beats me! Isn't is great, though?
Hey, give them a break (Score:1)
Anyway, the Death Star didn't really need to be tough, it was supposed to engage capital ships at long range. The Empire didn't consider small, one man fighters to be any threat, or they'd have had a tighter defense mechanism.
Re:Hey, give them a break (Score:1)
Re:No, no, the 1st Death Star was hacked (Score:1)
But then, why did the designers also put this port at the end of a long trench, lined with defensive turbolasters? Seems like they did anticipate that smaller craft might come close to the surface enough to put guns all along?
Another thing, why such a tiny (2 meters) port? Something as large as the Death Star must have a colossal reactor core and generate a huge amount of heat. We're supposed to beleive that all the excess heat is exhausted to the surface by a thermal port only 2 meters wide?
Also, why did the torpedoes make a 90 degree turn on ther way into the exhaust port?
Also, why am I trying to poke plot holes into a movie 25 years old that was basically just a lot of fun to watch?
Death star on auction (Score:1)
Act now! Vader helmet cheaper than Stormtrooper's! (Score:3, Informative)
That's the power of a direct link from Slashdot's front page!
Re:Act now! Vader helmet cheaper than Stormtrooper (Score:3, Funny)
OTOH, maybe a lot of guys are like me, and couldn't sleep with that thing in the house.
-Peter
Re:Act now! Vader helmet cheaper than Stormtrooper (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Act now! Vader helmet cheaper than Stormtrooper (Score:2)
Just search Goggle for "Don Post" "Star Wars" helmet, you'll see a variety of Star Wars helmet replicas that you can use for your next Halloween costume (I have Boba Fett's helmet in my collection).
FYI... other notable Auctions for America... (Score:2, Informative)
- ILM [ebay.com]
- Universal Home Video [ebay.com] (they sold props from The Mummy Returns, including the Book of the Living, the Book of the Dead, and the Scorpion Bracelet... unfortunately most of the auctions have since expired but there were at least 20 pages of props up for bidding)
- 20th Century Fox [ebay.com]
My feeling on these auctions is hey, it's all for charity, so if you have money to burn, why not do it for a worthy cause instead of for yourself?
Re:FYI... other notable Auctions for America... (Score:1)
As far as the kits go, Lucas has always been one that has kept all sorts of props and stuff from ILM with him for preservation. He doesn't want them to be either lost or hidden by some collector.
Mostly Just Kit Models... (Score:4, Informative)
Everything else seems to be a professionally-built kit model. They all come with certificates of authenticity, but what they authentically are doesn't seem to be to be all that unique.
It should be remembered that for the newer movies, authentic models will be rare indeed since they're using a great deal fewer of them in favor of CG.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mostly Just Kit Models... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Mostly Just Kit Models... (Score:1)
Oh, well.
They used to sell the Darth Vader helmet (Score:2)
Yummy (Score:1, Funny)
Heh. (Score:3, Funny)
Emperor: My bidding is on your helmet, and I won. Hand it over.
Vader: But I need this to liiiive...
You want to see MY identification? (Score:5, Funny)
We will give you 5,000 now -- plus 15 when we reach Alderan.
All I want for christmas (Score:1)
The one thing I've always wanted to know what happened to is Jabba's favorite decoration: The carbon frozen Han Solo. Where is this thing? I've always wanted to hang that on my wall and _really_ freak out the neighbors.
Rich
Re:All I want for christmas (Score:1)
No, that just *screams* coffee table.
Replicas are available (Score:1)
princess leia's golden bikini! (Score:1)
christian.
Re:princess leia's golden bikini! (Score:1)
:b~~~
Erm... (Score:1)
Fiction vs. Reality (Score:1)
Where the hell is the open-source community?!? (Score:2, Funny)
Checking Sourceforge...
GNU lightsaber: Nope.
KDE front-end for hyperspace navigation: In alpha release.
O'Reilly's "The Force In A Nutshell": Delayed.
PHP/MySQL admin interface for Death Star: Again, no dice.
And you people still wonder why the Empire runs on Microsoft?!?
Dammit! (Score:2)
The Power of the Schwartz (Score:2)
George Lucas is known for being the first filmmaker to make big money with merchandising rights. Before the original Star Wars, merchandising was just to promote the film, not a moneymaker in its own right. Lucas owned the merchandising rights to the original Star Wars, but not the movie itself. Merchandising made him enough money that he was able to own and produce all his later films. Today, some films seem to be more oriented towards shipping merchandise than selling tickets.
Only one light saber? (Score:1)
How the fsck am I meant to make a beowulf cluster of these [krayup.com]?
Signed collectibles (Score:3, Funny)
Reminds me of the 'old' adage about Bill Gates: that if while on the way to work in the morning, he stopped to pick up a $100 bill lying on the sidewalk. He'd actually LOSE money, because he makes more in those few seconds than the bill is worth. As to why he's walking to work in the first place...
Re:Signed collectibles (Score:3, Interesting)
-Legion
Re:Signed collectibles (Score:2)
Good for charity and all, but... (Score:1)
It belongs in a museum!
Wait... wrong Lucas franchise...
Re:Good for charity and all, but... (Score:1)
the original trilogy belongs in a museum, if we were ever to lose that, then a fairly significant bit of 20th century pop culture would be lost, but as to the pieces of plastic used to make the movie? who cares? i understand the coolness for fans, but i can't see justifying putting darth vader's helmet in a museum.
$1500 for a Store-Bought model? (Score:2)
I mean there is a certain thing to be said for them to be painted & detailed by actual ILM modelmakers, but the least they could have done was actually have them be authentic ILM models and not the historically-badly-made-and-badly-manufactered AMT kits. I have a few of the Star Trek kits that AMT makes and they are so badly done that there are actually entire websites devoted to giving instructions and selling parts so that the pieces will actually fit together properly!
Sheesh.
Re:$1500 for a Store-Bought model? (Score:1)
>get a really nicely painted AMT/Ertl model that
>you can buy in any Kay-Bee Toy Store is quite
>funny
Ummmmm....it's an "Auction for America" - a *charity* auction. They're *donating* these items for a good cause, and people are buying in the spirit of *giving* to a good cause.
"You're nuts Mr Leno, that's just a cruddy motorbike - paying several thousand dollars to do the same thing any public transport system could do for fifty cents is really funny".
Sheesh.
DD.
Nat (Score:1)
effective lightsaber? (Score:1)
Other ideas (Score:1)
I shall open the bidding... (Score:1)
Re:This is horrible (Score:1)
Yeah! I've already bid on the 5th amendment... From now on, all you clowns have to incriminate yourselves, but not me... moooahhaha
Re:This is horrible (Score:1)