Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media

An Offer Tivo Owners Can't Refuse 485

An anonymous reader pointed us to this little tidbit. The BBC paid Tivo (company slogan: "TV Your Way") to force owners' boxes to record some new program they wanted to push, which looks incredibly exciting. UK Tivo owners seem a little upset.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

An Offer Tivo Owners Can't Refuse

Comments Filter:
  • Oh no! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Pentomino ( 129125 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:41PM (#3581688) Homepage Journal
    Does it force you to play them?

    And what's stopping stations from turning off the commercial-skipping feature through similar bribery?
    • Re:Oh no! (Score:4, Insightful)

      by GregGardner ( 66423 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:45PM (#3581722) Homepage
      And what's stopping stations from turning off the commercial-skipping feature through similar bribery?

      Oh that already happened years ago. NBC, CBS, and ABC are all early investors in Tivo, the PVR without the 30 second skip. (OK, it has a 30 second skip, but you have to "enable" that feature, it isn't on by default).
      • by cybrpnk2 ( 579066 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:15PM (#3581887) Homepage
        From the TiVo FAQ [tivofaq.com]:" In 2.5, there is a unofficial, undocumented way to turn on 30 second skip. This will turn the "skip to end" (->|) button into 30 second skip. However, this means you will lose the current functionality of that button, including skip to tickmark while in RW/FF. To try it, enter the following sequence of buttons: Select-Play-Select-3-0-Select. The code will toggle 30 second skip off/on so enter it again to switch back if you don't like it. Also, after any reboot, the button will revert to original standard functionality." This seems to work best if you do it when a prerecorded program is being played...
    • Re:Oh no! (Score:3, Insightful)

      by reaper20 ( 23396 )
      No but these "special feature" programs take up space.

      My US Tivo had a 30 minute BMW commercial in the Showcases that I didn't know about. It sat there for a long time until I realized that I was getting shorted 30 minutes. (I record as much as I can).

      Next thing you know, a good idea (Tivo), gets consumed by a bad idea (forced infomercials) and it sucks for everyone.

      Look at how much of the web is now unusable due to lack of content and nothing but advertising. Usenet used to be one of the best sources of information, now its one big spamhole ... I don't want that happening to my Tivo, especially considering how much I paid for my box AND the monthly fee.

      • Re:Oh no! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by reaper20 ( 23396 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:49PM (#3581744) Homepage
        PS - A huge clue grenade gets lobbed to whoever believes that

        It does not take up any of your recording capacity - it is stored in a seperate reserved space. You still have 40 hours of recording capacity on a standard TiVo.

        Why isn't that space mine to begin with?
        • Re:Oh no! (Score:5, Insightful)

          by aafiske ( 243836 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:06PM (#3581842)
          Because Tivo wants to make a profit and not be sued out of existence by TV companies. The description in the article sounds like a non-disruptive way of letting TV folks promote their shows.

          Anyways, you paid for 40 hours of recording time. You have 40 hours of recording time. Tivo doesn't owe you every inch of recording media in the box.

          It sounds like a better plan than death by legislation.

          (side thought: Maybe in the future shows won't battle for a good time slot, they'll battle for Tivo priority. 200k for a two-day guaranteed time span on everyone's tivo, 25k for a 4 hour span, etc.)

          • (side thought: Maybe in the future shows won't battle for a good time slot, they'll battle for Tivo priority. 200k for a two-day guaranteed time span on everyone's tivo, 25k for a 4 hour span, etc.)

            I don't understand that. They're just competing for bytes on your Tivo's HDD that way.

            Now, if they could find a way to force you to watch downloaded programming, then they'd pay. Big time.

      • Re:Oh no! (Score:3, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward
        If you had followed the third link, you'd find that the stuff TiVo pushes on you doesn't get counted against the 40 hours because they reserved a portion of the hard drive for that kind of crap.
      • Look at how much of the web is now unusable due to lack of content and nothing but advertising.

        *caugh Toms Hardware caugh*

        ~Wx
        • Re:Oh no! (Score:5, Funny)

          by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:34PM (#3581957)
          > Look at how much of the web is now unusable due to lack of content and nothing but advertising.
          >
          > *caugh Toms Hardware caugh*

          Don't you mean:

          Next -->

          *cough*

          Next -->

          Tom's

          Next -->

          Hardware

          Next -->

          ?

          Next -->

          :-)

      • Next thing you know, a good idea (Tivo), gets consumed by a bad idea (forced infomercials) and it sucks for everyone.

        Gee, it's a good thing that I didn't buy the special "Got-A-View" option when I got my Tivo. I didn't get the special chair with the leather straps that you seem to have received with yours.

        Either that, or you're way off the mark when you use the word "forced."
    • Re:Oh no! (Score:5, Informative)

      by Draoi ( 99421 ) <{draiocht} {at} {mac.com}> on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:49PM (#3581743)
      Does it force you to play them?

      No, it doesn't. The thread [tivocommunity.com] mentioned above, covers this in detail in TiVo's response ....

    • Re:Oh no! (Score:3, Insightful)

      by ocie ( 6659 )
      My question would be does it keep you from recording something else in that time slot?
      • Re:Oh no! (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Colol ( 35104 )
        No, it doesn't. If you're actively watching live TV, it will ask to change the channel. You tell it no and get on with life. If you have a recording scheduled for that time slot, the scheduled recording will be recorded and the content will not be.
        • If you don't want this stuff to be recorded, you can uncheck the channel on which it arrives in the "Channels You Receive" list.

          The only problem with this is that TiVo delivers its stuff through the Discovery Channel, which is one of the few channels on most cable systems that has stuff you might actually want to watch. It'd be better if they used one of the many channels you can do without...something like Lifetime, HGTV, or QVC.

    • by Glorat ( 414139 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:32PM (#3581946)
      No it doesn't force you to play it. It doesn't even force you to *record* it. It will only record it if it's doing nothing else. It does not take up any recording space allocated to the user. In fact the only intrusion is that you get an extra choice in your menu of recorded programmes

      Now, this is a scheme for them to make money with minimal intrusion. I honestly can't see anything wrong with this as it is not intrusive in the slightest

      Again, read the article
  • I think a million Tivo subscribers returning their boxes would be a fine educational example for Tivo, BBC, and any marketroids who read about this and thought "oooh...now that's a way to increase our market share".

    Really. It's a piece of electronic equipment with a power switch. Turn it off and send it back.

    • Actually... the funny thing is that mine doesn't have a power switch. :-P
      And seriously, is it that bad?
      Reading the links tells you that it doesn't (or shouldn't) interfere with anything that you are watching or recording. One of the features i like the most about my TiVo is that it's always trying to record something even if i haven't set that time aside for something else. I can't see how it's a bad thing that TiVo gets more money to record something when the unit would otherwise be doing nothing else.
      I mean come on slashdot drones, TiVo needs to make SOME amount of money to keep themselves alive.

    • by Artifex ( 18308 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:19PM (#3581901) Journal
      I think a million Tivo subscribers returning their boxes would be a fine educational example for Tivo, BBC, and any marketroids who read about this and thought "oooh...now that's a way to increase our market share".

      And what would they learn from that? Tivo owners have already paid for the box, and will not get the money back. The only loss of income Tivo would face would be from those customers who were paying for their listings monthly, instead of ponying up the "lifetime" fee. I'm sure this would be offset by the amount of free hardware they could refurbish and resell to ohers, and collect new listing fees from... besides, if these are a large percentage of the original Tivo boxes, and not the Series2, it could speed up them killing off support for the original boxes.
    • by cpeterso ( 19082 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:30PM (#3581938) Homepage
      What is the big deal? Doesn't your Tivo already proactively record shows without your permission, shows that it "predicts" you might like? Nobody complains about Tivo doing that. Tivo and the BBC are now just influencing that existing algorithm (with cash money). This stupid BBC show is now just another OPTION on a list of choices. It's not like you are forced to watch this show against your will. This is not A Clockwork Orange or something..

    • If you are put off then it is their loss and they will change. But if you read the article, you'll notice that in their "attempt to increase market share" they have made sure it is as uninstrusive as possible and are willing to compromise by listening to customers demands.

      If you still can't stand them, you are of course free to cancel but IMHO, it would be for a very trivial reason
  • by waytoomuchcoffee ( 263275 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:46PM (#3581724)
    The "little upset" link wasn't; it just explained that the program "does not take up any of your recording capacity - it is stored in a seperate reserved space."

    If it doesn't take up space, and will lower the overall cost of the unit by allowing another revenue stream for Tivo, and you don't have to watch it, and it doesn't interfere with the rest of your programming, why is this news? Am I missing something?
    • Because this is the truth of the matter. Like the Ocsars thing, and various other TiVo promos that happen from time to time, this takes up none of the user space on tivo. The user isn't forced to watch it. What's the big deal?

      As a TiVo owner, I'm amazed at what I get for $12 a month. I'd never give it up. If TiVo can generate more revenue by doing something that has no negative impact on the users (and in this case possibly a positive impact), why not?
    • You're absolutely right -- it's a little clip that goes and lives in TiVo central (usually "Showcases" or someplace similar).

      It won't be recorded if you're watching live TV or already recording something else. It doesn't eat into your storage space, as it's stored in the TiVo's reserved space.

      What this is is another fine example of Slashdot posting articles mindlessly and submitters submitting articles mindlessly.

    • If it doesn't take up space, and will lower the overall cost of the unit by allowing another revenue stream for Tivo, and you don't have to watch it, and it doesn't interfere with the rest of your programming, why is this news? Am I missing something?


      Well I think it's pretty damn annoying and presumptuous for one. And it's probably just the start. I don't really wanna sit down and see the annoying "Would you like to change channels to record our spam or stay on the current channel?" prompt everytime I sit down. I turned off the auto-recommendations just because of this.

      Oh and uh, the cost doesn't seem to be going down [slashdot.org] any either.
      • Well I think it's pretty damn annoying and presumptuous for one. And it's probably just the start. I don't really wanna sit down and see the annoying "Would you like to change channels to record our spam or stay on the current channel?" prompt everytime I sit down. I turned off the auto-recommendations just because of this.

        FWIW, this stuff usually comes through at zero-dark-hundred. Unless you're a night owl, you'll never see it switch over to record this stuff. As for the "suggestions" feature, it's tracked down a few movies I wouldn't have otherwise known were on (Fahrenheit 451 [imdb.com] and Colossus: The Forbin Project [imdb.com] come to mind as a couple of examples). It beats browsing the listings every week.

        (I didn't particulary care for the Lexus promo TiVo ran a while back...I have zero interest in rice burners [riceboypage.com] and wouldn't buy one even if I had Bill Gates' fortune. I think the Beeb doing a promo of one of its shows through TiVo is a better use of this capability than ads for products that don't have much to do with TV or entertainment.)

    • If it doesn't take up space, and will lower the overall cost of the unit by allowing another revenue stream for Tivo, and you don't have to watch it, and it doesn't interfere with the rest of your programming, why is this news? Am I missing something?

      You're missing a hell of a lot. I'll pay. I'll pay extra. I'll pay for a box that does what I want it to do, because I don't want to be bothered. Sound like your typical MS customer? Wrong. I said I don't want to be bothered. MS, like Tivo, does a lot of bothering. Don't track, don't spy, don't record what the networks think I want to watch, don't crash. Be an appliance; do what I paid for. It's my box- remember that. Nobody srews with my VCR or alarm clock, why should my PVR allow intrusions?

      I'm asking again: Anybody know of a PVR that does what you want it to do?

      • by drix ( 4602 )
        Sure thing. [sonicblue.com] Only problem is, they're currently being sued by every major network for providing the capabilities that they do. This is instructive, for there's a fundamental rift in the philosophies of TiVo and SonicBlue--TiVo seems more than willing to work with the TV companies, while SonicBlue is content to ignore them (to a point). Which is why the ReplayTV 4000 has the following feature, which can only be described as heretical in the eyes of your average network TV exec:
        Play back recorded shows with Commercial Advance® and you'll enjoy commercial-free TV. You'll still have the choice to watch recorded shows with the commercial, if you really want to, and you can still use QuickSkip(TM) to manually jump over them in 30-second increments
        It will also offload perfect MPEG2 copies of your recorded programs over its Ethernet connection. Why not just drop the pretense and bundle a Java VM and LimeWire with it? :) Commercial skipping, recall, is exactly the thing that TiVo has resisted for the past four years, even though the technology is obviously readily available to do it.(SONICblue claims 96% effectiveness in blowing away all commercials whatsoever, automatically--no 30 second skipping, nada). It's also what SonicBlue is getting sued over. Don't forget that SONICblue is fundamentally the same company that brought you the first Rio PMP300 over the loud protests of RIAA. That's the mentality over there.

        TiVo, on the other hand, seems to be striving much harder to finding some middle ground between pleasing the consumer and pacifying the behind-the-times TV companies. So you get innovative little deals like this. Admit it--no matter your ethical reservations, it's a pretty smart way to make some extra cash, which by all accounts they're in need of right now. But in the end it's clear that the ReplayTV-style DVRs will win out. We're learning time and again that this type of technology just doesn't go away. It didn't with the VCR, it didn't with personal MP3 players, it didn't with CD burners, it didn't with DeCSS, and it won't with felt-tip pens [slashdot.org] (ahem). You can already buy the ReplayTV 4000 now, and it's increasingly likely that the networks' "you must spy on your consumers" edict isn't going to stand either. The cat isn't going back in the bag.

  • by solios ( 53048 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:48PM (#3581729) Homepage
    I stopped watching TV because the ads enraged me. Ditto radio. I've been keeping an eye on the Tivo on the off chance television ever becomes economical (eg- I can get sci fi without having to get 37 other channels I never watch). And now they're essentially spamming their userbase- what next? A hard drive full of Golden Girls and The O'Reily factor?

    Fuck that- if I want unrequested, unwanted bullshit in my space, I'll go check my hotmail account. The fact that Tivo is doing this violates the basic concept behind why the boxes are selling at all.

    If TV were actually configurable, it would be a simple matter of dropping the offending network from your selection of channels. But it's not- users have the illusion of choice. Much like cokeheads- you can have it cut with ephedrine or vitamin b. Or asprin. But you can't have it pure.

    Screw these guys, I'm going home. :P
    • I stopped watching TV because the ads enraged me. Ditto radio.
      /snip/
      ...if I want unrequested, unwanted bullshit in my space, I'll go check my hotmail account.


      And you still check Slashdot?

      --dialing numbers-- "Hi Pot, this is Kettle. You're black." --dialtone--

    • by foobar104 ( 206452 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:19PM (#3581902) Journal
      One: I stopped watching TV because the ads enraged me.

      Two: I've been keeping an eye on the Tivo on the off chance television ever becomes economical (eg- I can get sci fi without having to get 37 other channels I never watch)

      Does anybody else see the irony, here? For somebody who seems to want his entertainment for free or very little cost, you sure do bitch a lot about commercials. You can't have it both ways, man.
  • ah (Score:2, Funny)

    by nomadic ( 141991 )
    Et tu, Tivo?
  • by Anomolous Cow Herd ( 457746 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:48PM (#3581737) Journal
    I mean, yeah, the stuff is there on your TiVO, but it's not like it takes up recording space or anything. All it does is sit at the bottom of the main menu for a couple of days. It doesn't even get in your way if you're trying to record something else. It's all quite rationally explained in the third link in the article (which I just know 2/3 of slashdotters won't bother to read).

    I fail to see what the big hoopla is about, or why this is even posted to Slashdot. After all, this isn't even the first time that this has happened.

    • How does it not take up recording space? if it's video, it takes up space. They do things like this in the US TiVo. Just the other day there was some Cheryl Crow video that MTV put up there. I didn't watch it, no biggie. And while it doesn't take up much space, it must take up some.
      • Did you even read the article? It records these paid-for spots using the Tivo's reserved space. This is not userspace stuff - it's exclusively for the Tivo's use.

        It makes absolutely no impact on the amount of space you have available to record your own stuff.
    • It doesn't even get in your way if you're trying to record something else.

      And having a Pepsi logo tattood on your forehead, would never get in your way, either. You would never even notice. It would cost you nothing. Pepsi might even pay you to do it. So why don't you? There's no downside, right?

      • And having a Pepsi logo tattood on your forehead, would never get in your way, either. You would never even notice. It would cost you nothing. Pepsi might even pay you to do it. So why don't you? There's no downside, right?

        And this has what to do with anything? Nobody is requiring-- or even asking-- you to be a shill. Are you just opposing this practice on moral grounds, or something? If you have a TiVo, chances are you enjoy it enough that you hope TiVo doesn't go out of business. So why begrudge them the extra revenue? (If you don't have a TiVo, of course, you need to just shut the fuck up right now. This goes without saying.)

        In fact, I'd go so far as to say that this is the best form of advertising I know of so far. I don't have to watch it if I don't want to, and it goes away if I ignore it. And it's not intrusive; no bells or gongs, just a menu item with a gold star by it.

        Basically, dude, I think your post was just meaningless FUD.
    • I fail to see what the big hoopla is about, or why this is even posted to Slashdot.


      I believe it was posted out here to illustrate a point. Actually, two. The first being there are too many whiny, immature vocal types in the Linux community. The second being too many of these whiners cannot tolerate anyone making a cent off of Linux, unless it's IBM or VA.

      Everyone cheered TiVO and Philips for choosing Linux. Hey, I even bought one just because it ran Linux. TiVO has been way more than cool to the Linux community, supporting the TiVO hackers. Participating on the tivocommunity boards, telling the hackers where "not to look", even ensuring that TiVO upgrades didn't botch guys like me that added more drives. They have honored opt-out of user tracking, and they made it easy to opt-out. I was not put on hold when I called to opt-out, was not questioned at all why I wanted to opt-out, and was greeted by a friendly person on the other side.

      TiVO was never really about making PVR's. Their motive was to be the first player in the emerging TV-on-demand market. The fact that their stuff runs on Linux is good for Linux. The more the big guys adopt, the more they will expend resources to develop Linux. What's good for Linux is good for my server farms.

      So what if TiVO duped a broadcaster into buying ads from them. Who's going to watch it anyway? Kudos to them for finding a way to get these fools to part with their cash. And if you're whining about the space (which is in the reserved portion), go get a bigger drive and put it in your TiVO. They're cheap. Probably costs less than you could make if you spent your time making money instead of whining.

  • by Crayola ( 250908 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:49PM (#3581739)
    Perhaps they're getting more mercenary in the UK, too. We just got a letter from Tivo that they're ending the 1-800 number soon. The closest local number is a toll call for us, and last time they encouraged us to use it, we ended up with a $60 bill for local toll from 100 minute long calls for programming updates.


    Makes me wish we had a satellite dish PVR instead. At least then we wouldn't be dependent on phone calls to keep our PVR working.

    • If you have cable, the soon-to-be-rolled-out software can gather much of its program data through a late-night recording, thus decreasing the need for calls to update program data.

      Also, if you haven't checked already, it's often cheaper to make long-distance calls out of state than it is to make long-distance calls in state. You may be able to halve or better your long-distance by making it dial somewhere else.

      It's also possible (though not pretty) to use calling cards, or if you're feeling hackish, to use ethernet to use your PC's internet connection.
  • I've been thinking about picking up one of these new recorders, but hadn't decided which yet. I do NOT like that TiVo think's it's ok to grab that kind of control over MY property.

    I think I just made up my mind, unless anyone has any strong pro-TiVo or anti-ReplayTV information?

    -
    • Well it depends a lot on your preference of UI and what features you hold dear. I have a DirecTivo and it rocks. Here is a small breakdown on DirecTivo vs. ReplayTV:

      DirecTivo:
      -Dual Tuners (record 2 shows at once)
      -Costs $99 for new DirecTV subscribers
      -Easy to use Interface (Yes, my Linux-running friends, this is a Good Thing)
      -Direct digital MPEG2 recording straight to disk, results in ONLY high quality recordings which not only look better, but take up less disk space

      ReplayTV:
      -Commerical skip
      -Local LAN Replay-to-Replay streaming
      -Internet Video sharing with friends

      I would suggest going to a local electronics store and playing with the interfaces and seeing which one you like more. I had my Tivo first so the ReplayTV interface drives me batty. I might feel differently if I had purchased a ReplayTV first, I don't know.

      ReplayTV and Tivo both have vibrant online communities (Replay's [avsforum.com] and Tivo's [tivocommunity.com]) where you can find all kinds of information, good and bad, about the various models. The Tivo community is HUGE with literally hundreds of knowledgeable people (including several Tivo employees) contributing hacks and help constantly.
  • Apparently, tivo notes that from day one there was a reserved section of the harddrive for this "feature." So that this recording won't take up any of your 40MB available for recording shows. It also states you are never forced to watch this promo, and that if you had something else scheduled, or were watching tv at the time (it will prompt a viewer and the viewer can say yes or no, in which after a minute goes by it assumes yes, but can be still stopped later) It won't record the show. Obviously this is a form of money making from TiVo? But I don't see where the downfall is?
  • Fairly innocuous (Score:4, Redundant)

    by RollingThunder ( 88952 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @05:51PM (#3581760)
    Really, it appears that the Tivo unit goes out of its way to NOT cause a problem. As the summary post stated, it doesn't use your own storage space, it doesn't pre-empt your own desired recordings, and it asks to change the channel if you are currently watching something.

    The last one seems to be the only annoyance, if you were in the can, you may come back to find it on a new channel, but I think Tivo did a decent job of trying to make this a painless "grab" of promo items which aren't even forced on you - just automatically made available to you. The only way it really could be made any more painless is multiple channel tuners, so it could grab the show off the 'backup' no matter what you're doing in the first place.
    • Well, it would also be nice if you could:

      1) Opt out of these in the future
      2) Manually delete them in case the extra menu item annoys you that much.
    • by FeriteCore ( 25122 )
      It obviously does use your space unless they somehow magicly enlarged the available storage in the unit to create the extra space.
      • It obviously does use your space unless they somehow magicly enlarged the available storage in the unit to create the extra space.

        That's basically what they did! When the hard drive was originally partitioned, a chunk of it was set aside for user content; that's the 40 hours or whatever that you were expecting to get. A different chunk was set aside for stuff like network showcases and, yes, promos. This is space that you never had access to, and that could never have been used to store user content.

        Basically, it wasn't "yours" to begin with, in that sense.
  • isn't that all this amounts to?
  • It does not take up any of your recording capacity - it is stored in a seperate reserved space. You still have 40 hours of recording capacity on a standard TiVo.

    Big Deal. Lots of companies do crappy little things like this. Your Tivo hasn't changed, functionally. Complain when you come home some day and find your kids watching pr0n you didn't ask to recorde...

    -Sean
  • This is disgusting behavior by both companies. What gives them the right to decide what everyone will watch? What if Penthouse paid Tivo to force everyone to record porn all night? And what's up with the show not being able to be deleted the file for a week?

    Is there a warning on the box that says it'll do this?

    Travis

    • This is disgusting behavior by both companies. What gives them the right to decide what everyone will watch? What if Penthouse paid Tivo to force everyone to record porn all night?


      For free? Where's the nearest electronics store, I need a tivo! :)
  • It does not take up any of your recording capacity - it is stored in a seperate reserved space. You still have 40 hours of recording capacity on a standard TiVo.

    I would be interested to know where this space comes from, and if it is hackable to add to the 40 hours.

    The Dossa & Jo promo contains some bad language and is unsuitable for younger viewers. Parental controls are not effective so be careful.

    Doesn't this interfere with my choices as a parent? If I don't want my kids to watch this, am I SOL? Sounds like a recipe for pissing off lots of people. Really fast.

    BTW IANAP (I AM NOT A PARENT)

    • Re:Tivo Secrets! (Score:3, Insightful)

      by GutBomb ( 541585 )
      you could simply make sure your kids don't watch it. i mean, if it is on BBC, i don't imagine that you have your parental controls blocking that channel to begin with, and they could just sit down and watch it when it was live. how is that different? simply monitor what your children are watching... jeez. people make me sick. wanting the government or electronic boxes to parent thier children for them.
  • tivo has downloaded a car commercial and most recently a sheryl crowe video/advertisement. the only difference between this and uk stuff is that uk is actually recording a broadcast show, whereas the US ones were downloaded through the phoneline during the nightly update. it shows up on the main menu as another option, but does not clutter up your now playing menu. also, the uk discussion group states that tivo will not override any existing show recordings to record these specials. i presume it will override your thumbs up preferences though.
    • lol... no it was not downloaded over the phone line.. it would take weeks ;-)

      TiVO in the states recorded show (car commercial) at 2 AM when you didnt have anything set to record...
  • Mine got some Mariah Carey video on it. I can't delete it, because it's on the main menu screen. Thank god I'm not forced to watch it. This is the kind of BS I always knew would eventually happen.
  • by gengee ( 124713 ) <gengis@hawaii.rr.com> on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:08PM (#3581850)
    While not exactly the same as this, I noticed recently that at around 2:30am, my Tivo asked if it could change the channel to record "data which was part of the Tivo service".

    Curious, I agreed. TiVo tuned in to the Discovery channel, where a rapidly-changing full-screen barcode was being broadcast with a small text box in the center that said the broadcast was part of the TiVo service.

    After Tivo was done a few minutes later, I noticed Sheryl Crow's new music video was prominently displayed in "Now Showing".
    • I noticed Sheryl Crow's new music video was prominently displayed in "Now Showing".

      Well, if it makes you happy, it can't be that bad!

  • I got my TiVo for $100 on a promotion for the summer olympics in Australia, and then I added a 40 or 60GB drive (I can't remember). So I have been using a TiVo for some time now, and I can't imagine watching TV without it. I am pretty sure the last time I watched live TV was in September.

    Additionally, my life is as ad free as I can make it. Banner ads are filtered out, or at a minimum the animation is disabled, so all I see is the first, usually nonsensical, frame. Now that I have a CD player in my car, I don't listen to FM radio, and even when I did, I would change the channel or turn it off when an ad came on. So of course, I use the TiVo to skip all of the commercials that come on.

    Those two things being said, I am not entirely opposed to TiVo using the reserved space on the recorder (space that doesn't count against how many hours the recorder came with, or how many shows I can record) to record promotional items. Assuming, as was the case this time, the TiVo isn't recording anything else, I don't really care if it decides to grab some show because the BBC, or whoever, paid them.

    What I am opposed to, of course, is having the TiVo force me to watch it, or even be in my face about telling me it is there. TiVo used to have a thing where an ad would come up on the screen the first time the TiVo button was pushed, after the ad was recorded. People complained this was annoying, so now TiVo just seems to put an extra line on the main menu, saying Sheryl Crow video, or whatever.

    The forced message was bad, because they say, you only see it once, and it only shows up sometimes, but how soon is it until I have to flip through 5 pages of banner ads before I can get to the menu? And then what, forced 30 second commercial spots before I can watch a show? I currently don't mind paying $12/month for the TiVo service, but that type of forced behavior will cause me and many others to investigate other means of loading scheduling information onto the TiVo. Very simple, abuse your customers, lose your customers.

    Now, in the case of this BBC show, I think it would have been more reasonable for TiVo to have everybody record the show as one of TiVo's recomendations. Hopefully it would still be stored in reserved space, as it wasn't a true recomendation. Then people would see it on there list of shows, and watch or not, and like it or not, based on the shows merit.

  • by nick_davison ( 217681 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:12PM (#3581871)
    As the moderator posts on the TiVo boards point out, the recording is made to a reserved part of the system, so no space is lost, and does not interrupt any other recording the users may have been doing. So, in that respect, it's not actually as offensive as it sounds.

    What does strike me as dubious is, "The Dossa & Jo promo contains some bad language and is unsuitable for younger viewers. Parental controls are not effective so be careful." (quoted from Gary Sargent, a moderator at TiVo).

    What they are saying is, "Regardless of how you try to protect your children's viewing habits, we will disable your controls and make whatever content we feel like accessible to anyone who uses the box - and this may well be your children who are in from school before you." Not only do they disable the parental controls, due to the nature of the TiVo unit, they also make [potentially] adult material available outside of the carefully regulated UK "watershed".

    So, how long before a TV channel wants to get viewing figures up on some late night porn dressed up as a documentary and a nation comes home the next day to find their kids happily watching away at 5pm?
    • So, how long before a TV channel wants to get viewing figures up on some late night porn dressed up as a documentary and a nation comes home the next day to find their kids happily watching away at 5pm?

      My prediction? A bunch of really happy kids and perplexed parents.
    • You're jumping the gun just a tad.

      It's almost certainly an oversight that's being addressed right now, number one.

      And number two, "parental controls" aren't foolproof anyway. The only effective parental control is... drumroll please... a parent! Many programs out there still don't have a rating listed. I could think MASH is objectionable and not want my (non-existent) children to watch it, but it's not rated, and thus not blockable.

      Even if you go the double-bladed method of using the V-chip in your TV, you get no further than going on the TiVo's guide data alone. If there is no rating broadcast or in the guide data, your children could be watching porn until the cows come home.

      Deal with it. Lock up the power cords or the TV if it's that big of an issue.

      Honestly, though, today's children hear and see far worse things in school than they do on television. Everyone needs to give up on this "oh, my innocent little children" bit and get with the times.
  • First of all, while this incident happened only in the UK, TiVo has been doing this sort of thing in the US for some time now. Just a couple of days ago I had some Sheryl Crow thing on my TiVo. I didn't watch it, so I couldn't say what it was. After a few days, it disappeared by itself.

    That's kind of the point, really. You're not required to watch this content. It's recorded for you only if you're not already recording or watching something else. And it goes away by itself if you ignore it. Why all the uproar? What less intrusive or obnoxious form of advertising can you imagine?

    Are you gonna make be break out the Simpsons quotes on you?

    To stop those monsters 1-2-3
    Here's a fresh new way that's trouble free
    It's got Paul Anka's guarantee...
    Guarantee void in Tennessee!
    Just don't look!
    Just don't look!
    Just don't look!
    Just don't look!
  • by Nindalf ( 526257 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:33PM (#3581949)
    File under "High-tech product obeys manufacturer over owner."

    You laugh now, but wait until your flying car automatically lands at a McDonalds every hour during any long trip. A feature they didn't tell you about when you bought it. In fact, one that didn't exist when you bought it...

    Thank you, I'll take the product that you can't reprogram remotely. The one that works for me.
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Apparently "must see" has taken on a new meaning. What's next? Armed thugs coming to your house to keep you from changing away from NBC on Thursday nights?
  • by Jasn ( 106824 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:34PM (#3581958)
    Two repetitive points seem to be coming up from defenders of the "enhanced content," and I thought I would bring the usability issue to bear.

    Argument 1: "It's coming from reserved space, so it doesn't affect your existing programs."

    What if I have a 15 or 30 hour box (at basic), and some event (vacation) means I'm having trouble juggling just a few things I wanted -- in the meantime, space is "reserved" that could have been provided for my use (remember me, the one who bought the product for usability's sake).

    In that sense, the reserved space affects my regular space, and that of anybody who purchases the box, because only so much "space" fits in a given box. If it's about making for both happy users and a healthy company, the money from people who prefer the "extra" space rather than reserved space may outweigh the (payoffs from networks minus lost subscriptions from angry users).

    Argument 2: It doesn't pre-empt live television.

    Mostly wrong, though it doesn't seem to pre-empt scheduled recordings. I often pause a baseball game and leave the room to take a phone call, for example, or leave it playing knowing that I can go back 20 minutes or so to catch Barry Bonds' record-tying home run.

    On 60 seconds notice, a forced program changes the channel and loses the previous program buffer. Goodbye, user option to review what they might have missed, all because they weren't on guard with the remote to respond "yessir" or "nosir" to the equipment they own. Remember that is one of the prime selling points of the product, at the moment.

    • if you pause it it starts recording what you were watching. you stated yourself that it will not record the promo if you are already recording something...
      • by cybermage ( 112274 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @07:24PM (#3582172) Homepage Journal
        if you pause it it starts recording what you were watching. you stated yourself that it will not record the promo if you are already recording something...

        Actually, you misunderstand. TiVo is always recording a 30-minute buffer of the current channel. This 30-minute buffer is also outside the 30-hour space because of this. If you pause live TV, it doesn't begin recording. It's always recording. In fact, you can rewind live TV. Pausing live TV just stills the last image on the screen, and "bookmarks" your place in the buffer. If you leave it paused for more than 30 minutes, it'll unpause and start playing the buffer from the beginning (the spot you bookmarked)

        I believe that if the TiVo is paused when it wants to change the channel, the default is 'yes' if you scheduled a recording, and 'no' if it's making a suggestion. Don't know how it handled this situation for the promo.

        My main point is that there's a difference between the live buffer and an actual recording. TiVo is recording the 30-minute buffer 24/7; and, to be clear, it's always the last 30 minutes of the current channel. If you change channels, the buffer is wiped instantly.
    • The reserved space doesn't come out of your record space.

      When the box says it's a 15 or 30 hour box, it's a 15 or 30 hour box. You are guaranteed 15 or 30 hours for recording -- the reserve is always reserved, and is not figured into that number. There's no wool being pulled over your eyes, and it was never promised for your use.

      Argument two, I can't respond to as I haven't ever had anything paused when something was scheduled. However, it would seem the TiVo's common sense would dictate if you've got the buffer paused, it shouldn't touch the channel.
  • Couple of points (Score:5, Insightful)

    by twilight30 ( 84644 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:35PM (#3581966) Homepage
    Feel free to disagree and mod down if you like, but this is bollocks. It would be bad enough if , say the commercial channels -- ITV, C4, C5 or Sky -- did this. But having the Beeb do this is much, much worse.

    For you non-Euro-resident readers, the BBC already collects a gigantic toll from the population at large ('the license fee'; currently UKP112 for a colour TV [tv-l.co.uk] ) for its budget, in exchange for what is generally regarded as among the best programming anywhere. While I have supported the BBC strongly in the past, this kind of activity essentially is extremely unethical for a number of reasons:

    1. It cannot be erased until 7 days have passed.
    2. Viewers not recording other programmes had no choice in avoiding it.
    3. Parental controls were seemingly ignored. Given its content fair warning in advance couldn't be too much to ask of either the Beeb or Tivo.
    4. Claims over lowered priority and user choice notwithstanding, this advertising still takes up HD space.
    5. Most objectionable to me personally: The BBC is subsidised by the public purse, however indirectly, and to force programming on people who have not asked for it is really taking the piss.


    The BBC, through its joint ventures in the UK (particularly publishing and radio), North America and elsewhere, is already blurring the distinction between public monies (the license fee) and private finance to an unhealthy level. With this latest effort they lose a little more of their hard-earned reputation of objectivity in pursuit of coin, and more importantly, give the British public less of a reason in future to pay the fees.

    Regardless of however small the payment was in the grand scheme of things, this was wrong. To think of it another way, 100% of the British television public paid for only a small subset of viewers (less than 1%?) to receive something that they probably didn't want. How is that acceptable?

    • is that $112 per tv or 112 per tv per year?

      It kind of sucks but i have to admit that probably the best english language tv in the world has come from the BBC - Blackadder (my name sake), Faulty towers, Monty Python, Hitchhikers guide, red dwarf, etc.

      • by twilight30 ( 84644 )
        The latter, in pounds, not USD. So that'd be around 150 USD per tv, per year. I no longer live in the UK, so I can't (off the top of my head) give you exact figures, but I used to work in the advertising industry (yes, I was an evil marketroid once) and we had a huge bunch of tidbits to mull over.

        Some interesting things I remember:
        • Three years ago, the total figure collected was just under 2bn pounds.
        • Apparently the UK used to charge a smaller fee for radio receivers.
        • This point above leads me to another: TV viewers in the UK essentially subsidise all of the Beeb's output, regardless of medium; there is no consumer choice as to where the tax (calling a spade a spade) goes. So your TV fees provide for radio, and TV, but also subsidise advertising and publishing costs for CDs from the Beeb's archives, magazines and newspaper promos.
        • While the commercial companies are generally not allowed to be completely in-your-face about 'synergy' and cross-media advertising, the BBC is exempted from this restriction. So you have the Radio Times (like TV Guide, but published by the corporation) advertising all sorts of radio and TV programmes on BBC Radio One, BBC One/Two (TV), and their digital satellite channels, as well as promoting the endless videocassettes and DVDs they produce. It's really quite disheartening.


        Don't get me wrong. As I said above, I do have a strong emotional attachment to that objective Beeb reporting and its fine dramas. I just don't see how a more commercial Auntie serves the people it ostensibly has responsibility for.
  • by Controlio ( 78666 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:44PM (#3582003)
    TiVo has been toying around with this ever since the 2.5 software came out in the US. TiVo uses these recordings for good as well as evil.

    In the 3.0 software, TiVos will now download a large chunk of their data from these special programs. TiVo does this by buying a late-night paid programming slot on the Discovery Channel. The actual show looks like a screen full of CC data, and there is a major upside to receiving these datacasts. They significantly shorten the length of daily phone calls. Bonus. (Not to mention that the 3.0 software on Series 2 units unofficially supports update-over-internet...)

    As has been stated over and over, the special recordings don't take up usable space. A portion of the MFS filesystem is flagged as Reserved, and this is where the data goes. TiVo downloads a promo, it runs its course, and disappears. It also will never switch to record the show if you have something else set to record in the same time slot, so it's not even very intrusive. And in the US (not sure about the UK), the time slot is early in the AM when you're not likely to have programs scheduled to record anyways.

    Regardless, the promos aren't that intrusive, don't take up recording space, and don't interfere with your recordings. Plus, Embeem has created a script to remove the ads [tivocommunity.com], which has been around for quite a while, so you can remove the ads yourself if you're horribly offended.

    So long story short, this is not a crisis situation. You're not forced to watch the ads, and its easy to ignore them. Hell, you can even remove them yourself with a little trickery. What's the big deal?

    If an extra menu item in TiVo Central with an icon next to it is enough to make you refuse to buy or even return your TiVo, ESPECIALLY since Embeem offers you a script to remove the menu item yourself, feel free to take your TiVo back to its point of sale. It just means less complaint postings in the TiVo Forums [tivocommunity.com] for the rest of us to wade through.
  • TV licence (Score:3, Interesting)

    by SmileyBen ( 56580 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:49PM (#3582021) Homepage
    As a Brit, and a TV owner, what I want to know is why the BBC is spending licence-payers money on this sort of thing? What does trying to force people to watch programmes they don't want to to do with quality broadcasting?

    And yes, I know they weren't forced to actually watch it - but surely it isn't appropriate for them to be spending this money telling people they were wrong when they looked in the Radio Times and went 'nah, I don't want to watch this'...
  • Hypocrites! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by psicE ( 126646 ) on Friday May 24, 2002 @06:51PM (#3582026) Homepage
    First, no one's forcing you to watch the show. It simply appears as an option on the menu. You can ignore it as you wish. It's far less intrusive than the average banner ad; and ads don't stop you from viewing Slashdot. It's even less intrusive than Google text ads!

    Second, the extra space on the Tivo was not something that you knew about when you bought it, and it did not affect your purchase of the Tivo in the least. When you buy one, you know that it's a sealed box. If someone wants to make a PVR libre, I'd be glad, but Tivo reserving a very small amount of space is completely normal for a corporation.

    Finally, a number of people think it's bad that the program had "bad language" but that it overrode "parental controls". Talk about control. What gives you the right to decide what your children can watch? Tivo has a program downloaded to your box... but it doesn't override your schedule... but it doesn't record if you ask it not to... but it doesn't force you to watch it... but it doesn't take up any space... And you're outraged! But your children are being explicitly denied the right to watch a TV show, solely because it has some "bad language" (which isn't bad - would you rather your kids fist- or gun-fighting than swearing?), is completely fine. Listen to yourselves!
  • by banuaba ( 308937 ) <drbork@ho t m a i l.com> on Saturday May 25, 2002 @01:55AM (#3583211)
    Tivo does this in the states too. On a Tivo remote there's a button that looks like taht retarded little square tivo thing (I think it's supposed to be an evil mutant TV set) You push that button to get to the main menu. Then you can select "Now Playing", which is the stuff that you have recorded manually (plus the stuff that tivo suggests based on your veiwing profile), and there's a "Showcase" selection, which is where stuff like "This month on HBO" and the Sheryl Crow preview is located. This information is seldom longer than 1/2 hour total length, and is considered part of the 2 gigs of space that tivo has for 'system' stuff. Tivo isn't decieving customers, it's using advertising as an alternate source of revenue, and it's opt-in advertising, for chrissakes. I'm not forced to watch these updates, I usually don't even know that they're on my tivo, and I don't care.

    But I've turned into a tivo zealot as of late, so take this with a grain of salt.

...there can be no public or private virtue unless the foundation of action is the practice of truth. - George Jacob Holyoake

Working...