Animated Star Wars on Cartoon Network 219
NeoCode writes "There were rumours and speculations first. Now it looks like its a done deal. Harry Knowles, of AintItCool.com has reports on an animated version of Star Wars set after AOTC but before episode 3. This series is produced by Genndy Tartakovsky (Dexter's Lab, Powerpuff Girls, Samurai Jack). The cartoons will be a series of short films. Could this infuse Star Wars with a new life or is this just another merchandising plot? Nevertheless, this could be quite interesting."
Yeah look what good Ewoks & Droids did for the SW universe ;)
Remember the old tv shows.. (Score:1)
and that star wars cartoon they had back in the 80s?
I barly do.
Re:Remember the old tv shows.. (Score:2, Funny)
It is never said in Return of the Jedi.
This has been done a long time ago (Score:5, Interesting)
Starwars... (Score:5, Funny)
Let's hope it's better than Asciimation! (Score:3, Interesting)
Too "cartoony" (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Too "cartoony" (Score:2)
(Ever notice the A-Team van goin by in the streets of the city of TownsVille?)
Umm...different details. (Score:4, Insightful)
Dexter is roughly the shape of a pill. Dee-dee and her friends have all of her limbs extending from a single point. All legs look like they did in the flintstones - like pipes that have a turn and end with a round stub (the turn is where the feet begin).
Almost nobody has any noses, or the noses look very strange. Also, no one has normal looking hands - very few have thumbs, or a full complement of fingers (10 total). The powerpuff girls have no hands and no feet. Samurai Jack is a little better, but still...there is very little detail in the characters. Jack himself has fingers that are apparently glued together, since they never seem to separate. Also, his four fingers are all the same length, unlike human fingers (his thumb is opposable, they show that when he holds a sword).
I would expect a Star Wars Universe to be much more lifelike since its based upon a live action universe, with, at the very least, five fingers on each hand, and the ability to move them the way humans do, and normally drawn noses. I don't expect that it'll happen because I think it costs more.
Which means really, really bad reviews, I think.
Re:Umm...different details. (Score:2)
That's not "details", that style. : )
The PPG, Samurai jack, Dexter, are all done in a very stylised way. (you explained it all, no need for me to repeat)
They do that because it reduces the time it takes to do a frame (time is money), and for more artistic and less capitalist reasons too.
Since those 3 cartoons were original creations, they were done in an "original" style (well, there are a lot of influences, the special blend is unique at least). For Star Wars I would expect that they would be asked to produce something in a style more closely ressembling that of the established characters (wich they can very well do, look at the Justice Friends characters from Dexter and the PPG, they look a lot like their Marvel inspirations). However, I wouldn't mind if they had the "square hand" look and all, its all in style, just because Star Wars is mostly a live-action product doesn't mean that they need to have photo-realistic drawings in an animated production.
and normally drawn noses
I hope you meant "normally" as in "characters from a race with a nose should have the nose drawn in", not in a "looking like the way I'm used for a nose-drawing to look" way...
Kind of fitting for the prequels, really. (Score:2)
"Too cartoony" is how I personally would describe the way the prequels look, with everything but the actors being generated by computers.
Conflict of styles (Score:1)
Luke Skywalker with a squared off head might get a chuckle.
Well The Ewoks were warm and fuzzy and all... (Score:1)
Is it just me. Maybe, becuase SW "NewHope" was just so new to us then. Have we become a jaded mess, filling our time until "The Matrix:Reloaded" comes out?
blurgh (Score:1, Troll)
How many are there? (Score:2)
The Real Ghostbusters comes to mind. That ran for quite some time - several years. Also, Voltron, which was basically a rehash of the old Ultraman movies (they're kind of like Godzilla flicks). MIB has done pretty well as well. Jumanji lasted one or two seasons, which was enough to make money.
Captian Simian and the Spacemonkeys obviously drew its inspiration from the Starwars movies, and that one was on for a while (though you may not have heard about it - it was kind of a small scale cartoon).
Of course, if we open up the category to include series based upon movies, there are a few more, though still not many.
The ever popular Buffy the Vampire Slayer is a shining example of that. And we probably should add Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers, which are really just rehashes of Ultraman mixed with Voltron.
And then there are all of the Spy shows inspired by James Bond: first Get Smart, and then Inspector Gadget, and then young Inspector Gadget (or whatever they called that).
It all comes down to whether or not enough people identify with the ideas in the series to make it work. Just because its live action doesn't mean it doesn't translate into a cartoon or a series.
However, the cartoon or series can't stand upon the concept of the movie to work, just as a sequel can't be a rehash of the first movie and expect that it will do incredibly well (*cough* Home Alone 2 *cough*). It has to have its own new ideas, even if it has the same beloved characters.
Re:blurgh (Score:1)
Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:5, Informative)
It's simple, and I'll illustrate it by the example of Back to the Future. BTTF was a successful trilogy with many fans (among whom I am one), but then they introduced an animated TV show, and did a ride at Universal Studios: Florida, which used a plotline set after (fourth-dimensionally-speaking) all three of the movies. Both of these things added quite substantially to "the canon", as they were all officially blessed by the producers of the original BTTF trilogy.
Every episode of any official "Star Wars" cartoon that's even remotely related to the Skywalker clan or other key figures from the series has the potential to -greatly- complicate the Star Wars "canon", and making another series of movies that fit with the sum of the existing canon that much more difficult...
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2, Insightful)
There've been a lot of Star Wars spin offs and related items (books, video games, etc) that contradict or alter the details of the movies. How could it really make a big difference? These little pop-culture universes are malleable, just like any sort of folk-lore.
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:1)
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2)
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2)
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2)
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2)
Can you provide an example? I find that hard to believe. This is hearsay, but I think that Lucas very carefully goes over the details of anything Star Wars to make sure the details are consistent with the rest of the universe before it gets the official seal of approval.
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:3, Insightful)
This is hearsay, but I think that Lucas very carefully goes over the details of anything Star Wars to make sure the details are consistent with the rest of the universe before it gets the official seal of approval.
Haha, I seriously hope you were joking.
If not, have a look at The Star Wars Holiday Special, novels like The Crystal Star, or pretty much any of the videogames to see any number of contradictions and alterations.
IMO, the only detail anyone at Lucasfilm is concerned with re: spinoff products are the royalty fees.
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2)
(This is slightly paraphrased, since I'm soing it from memory)
Sam Jackson: "We were wondering who we talk to about light saber colors..."
Lucas: "The bad guys get red and the good guys get blue or green, that's just the way it is."
Jackson: "No purple?"
Lucas: "You might get purple..."
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:5, Interesting)
As for complicating the Star Wars "canon" the general rule of thumb for any SciFi universe is to treat extretaneous sources (Books, animated series, etc.) as seperate and inconsequential in the universe. However there are exceptions, there's been a number of Babylon 5 books released drawn up on plot outlines written by J. Michael Straczynski that works nicely within the existing B5 canon, however there hasn't been many major B5 projects since Rangers. If Lucas is willing to write out some storylines for the animated series that fit into the existing Star Wars "canon", it could provide a nice treat for Star Wars fans.
~Noodle
Well, George Lucas is a capitalist running dog (Score:2)
Apparently, all of star wars was designed to make buckets [salon.com] of money [guardian.co.uk]. Interestingly, it's still fun to watch, so I guess Lucas has some kind of talent
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2)
However Lucas is the exception to the rule.
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:4, Insightful)
This series is rumored to involve the Clone Wars, and LFL held a fairly large summit last summer to plot out the war's major events and decide in which medium they'll be covered. Episode III begins with the last battle of the Clone Wars, so there's no danger of something zany happening in the next film to throw out all the events being depicted in the interim. There's already been several post-AotC EU titles announced and released showing war events:
http://www.starwars.com/eu/news/2002/11/news200211 15.html [starwars.com]
SW licensed stories/etc. are different from things like Trek in that they're edited rigorously precisely to prevent continuity problems. It's all meant to be one story (whether it's a good one or not varies from audience member to audience member).
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:1)
What about 'uncle owen'? (Score:2)
Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? (Score:2)
Animated Trek (Score:4, Interesting)
Rich...
Re: Animated Trek (Score:3, Informative)
You can tell Kirk got better at the end (Score:2)
Re: Animated Trek (Score:3, Informative)
These days they break the numbers out by demographics, and look at numbers within various categories. Star Trek appealed to some of the very desirable demographics: college-age people, for example.
Had the studios been using more sophisticated ratings systems, Star Trek would have been seen as a success, and would have been around longer.
steveha
Re: Animated Trek (Score:2)
Although, once again, I could be wrong in my above assumption...
Re:Wrong timeline (Score:2)
lol (Score:1)
appealing to all age groups?? (Score:4, Funny)
Then we got Senator/Princess/soon-Milf/ Amedalla and Pricess Laya. That covers the middle age male crowd.
Then we got Anakin, Obi Wan, Luke, and Han Solo. That covers the middle age female crowd.
Then we got Episode II Yoda whoppin some ass, but then getting really tired. There's a happy senior citizen crowd.
I think Lucas is just trying to appeal to as many people as possible to make as much money as possible. Make something for everyone and everyone will want one.
Re:appealing to all age groups?? (Score:1)
"The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" -Darth Vader
Re:appealing to all age groups?? (Score:1)
Re:appealing to all age groups?? (Score:3, Funny)
Um, no, that's still the 13 year old boy crowd.
humping my childhood (Score:3, Interesting)
(hint:the answer is no.)
I wonder how many people that were in their 20s when the original trilogy came out are at the same level of fandom as the people who are in their 20s now and grew up with the movies.
Re:humping my childhood (Score:5, Funny)
The problem with Episode 1, was that while it really did have a pretty grown-up plot, the grown-up plot was given short shrift so Lucas could show us 21 minutes of Jake Lloyd going "Yippee!", 47 minutes of droids being blown up and chopped in half, 67 minutes of teeth-grindingly annoying Jar-Jar antics and 153 minutes of min-numbing pod racing. The plot, while very interesting, seemed like an afterthought, and was shoe-horned into a couple of short scenes, even though there was much more story to tell.
Episode II was good for pure action, but the lame attempts at characterization dashed any chance of being able to take the characters seriously.
Anakin: "My mother was killed so I became a mass-murderer!"
Amidala: "There, there. That's OK. We all go on a killing spree once in a while. Let's get married and have twins."
Anakin: "For no reason, I don't have a father."
Amidala: "Parthenogenesis is so-o-o-o cute. Can Jar-Jar be our best man?"
Anakin: "I'm just angry all the time."
Amidala: "Hush, dear. We're late for your aqualung fitting."
ewoks (Score:1)
same author as samurai jack (Score:5, Insightful)
Samurai Jack is one of the most peaceful, and exhilirating cartoons I have watched. The director is not afraid of satisfying the modern day attention span. Rather, I find this show to be a truly artistic maverick in company with other more marketable shows. Example: in a given episode of Jack, you can easily find 2-3 minutes of pure silence, which brings out the mood of 2 great warriors resting midway through a battle, or a quiet brook trickling next to a snowy field where our hero is seen in the corner of the screen slowly making his way.
Yet....the show is sorta cooky AND funny at times. Its VERY well done, as emersive as Aeon Flux for sure.
I know the cartoon will be good.
Re:same author as samurai jack[little addendum] (Score:1)
IMHO (Score:1)
Moo.... (Score:5, Insightful)
If they make a Star Wars cartoon, they can make a whole new range of merchandise to keep em going until Ep3 comes out..
I wish they weren't so bloody obvious about it though.
Re:Moo.... (Score:3, Funny)
Spaceballs the Toilet Paper!
Spaceballs the Toilet Paper! (Score:2)
Now, the question... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Now, the question... (Score:1)
Re:Now, the question... (Score:2)
What, can't you read? Even by just glancing at the article description, I can tell you that it will be neo-HB Tartakovsky animation ala Dexter/Powerpuff/Jack. Duh!
This may work (Score:5, Funny)
Luke, I, Darth Vader, am your father! And you shall obey my commands because I am the father (not the son). It is I who you will obey! Obeying my commands is what you will do as the son. I will give you commands, and you will obey them! Ha ha ha ha ha! I do this because I am bad, I am evil, I am the father. I am Darth Vader!
MOD PARENT UP! (Score:2)
If I had mod points, you, sir, would have them all.
I thank God that I was not drinking as I read this, all I can picture is Mojo Jojo wearing a Vader mask. And pulling it all off without seeming out of place.
Incoherence? Star Wars? (Score:2, Interesting)
First we have episodes 4,5, and 6. Taken in their own right they are a coherent plot spread over three movies, holding a single universe intact.
Then add the many, many books and references, written after episodes 4-6. While each stands well in it's own right, very rarely do two seperate authors works integrate into the overall universe. The books have covered timeframes before the as yet unreleased episodes 1-3, after them, in between them, and anywhere else the authors felt prudent. The Star Wars universe has now grown more complex and massive than congruent unto itself.
Then add the role playing games, cartoons, comics, etc. Over 20 years a lot of Star Wars information has come out.
Now we come to the present, where Lucas is releasing episodes 1-3, and in so doing is pretty much ignoring everything other than the episodes 4-6, thus breaking what little (if any) continuity remains.
So I would expect that any efforts to make a cartoon based off the movies would just further complicate and already messy universe.
This seems to me like trying to build a Beowulf Cluster by combining 8086's running Minix, 2/386's running DOS, Mac IIgs's running MacOS, and whatever else happens to have been built over the last 20 years. Doable, but not easy or effective.
Re:Incoherence? Star Wars? (Score:1, Informative)
I guess George wanted the merch money from a million tie-ins, knowing people will gobble it up.
From the Star Wars Literature Compendium [geocities.com]:
"According to the premiere issue of the Star Wars Insider, the only works "canonized" have been the movies and their respective screenplays, novelizations, and radio drama adaptations."
Iopha
Re:Incoherence? Star Wars? (Score:2)
The fact that a completely fictional universe even has a notion of "canon" goes to show just how deep in Lucas' pocket so many fans are.
If he were so concerned about the continuity, integrity, and quality of his little universe to begin with, he would never have allowed all those "non-canonical" profit mines to have been dug in the first place.
You can't have it both ways: Either your art is a thing in and unto itself for its own sake (however stimulating it might be to outside contribution,) or it's a calculated commercial project designed not for any internal continuity or viewer-enlightenment/satisfaction, but only to encourage the sort of fetishism that translates to "spending lots of money on 'collectible' crap." I think Lucas has made it abundantly clear which side of that particular fence he walks his dog on.
Star Wars TV series (Score:1, Interesting)
Star Wars does good film (usually) while Star Trek does good TV (again usually).
Re:Star Wars TV series (Score:2, Interesting)
I haven't seen them SINCE I was a kid, but I loved them back then.
Could be good (Score:1)
Lucas in it for the money, again (Score:4, Insightful)
- Rerelease of the originals with "additional" footage, with a slew of promotional and marketing gimmicks.
- Three prequels, with a slew of promotional and marketing gimmicks.
and now:
- A cartoon version, with a slew of promotional and marketing gimmicks.
Re:Lucas in it for the money, again (Score:3, Insightful)
Were you not alive in 1977? Merchandise has always been part of Star Wars. Merchandising makes money and keeps Pepsi ads out of the Coruscant billboards. More power to them is what I say.
Moreover, little kids like action figures. When I was a kid, I had a ton of them. Was I being marketed to? Was Lucas making money because I liked action figures? Hell yes. But I also got a whole lot of fun out of it, and many fond memories of my childhood, and many entertaining conversations with good friends about the cool stuff we had when we were kids.
And now, because I'm grown up and don't like action figures anymore, it suddenly has to be wrong and evil and George Lucas should die penniless and alone on some street corner for the unforgivable sin of spending his whole life trying to entertain himself and us, and kids today just don't get it and turn down that durn rock and roll music...
Give it a rest. If you're so principled, go make your own movie, with money from your own pocket, and then sell it at a tremendous loss. Then you'll have proved yourself the better man.
Re:Lucas in it for the money, again (Score:3, Insightful)
For him, it's never been about the money. If it were, he would be cranking out Star Wars movies like James Bond films, and there would be 20 of them by now.
The re-release of the films in 1997 was done not for money, but for several other key reasons:
1) to restore the film, because the negative was badly deteriorated (if it hadn't been done at that time, the original negative would not have lasted another few years)
2) to use the trilogy as a test bed for some new effects that he would need to have ready for Episode I
3) as a kind of litmus test, to see if the public was still receptive to the aging franchise (which of course, it was)
The merchandising is an important aspect of the films, as it allows Lucas to stay an independent producer. The money generated from it subsidizes Lucasfilm, ILM, THX, LucasArts, Skywalker Sound, the Ranch, etc...
Re:Lucas in it for the money, again (Score:2)
Why ILM just squeaks by (Score:2)
Nowadays, of course, distance is a bit less of a problem. Movies are shot all over the world, whereas they used to be done almost exclusively in Hollywood backlots. Had it not been for the unprecedented success of the original trilogy though, ILM never would have made it off the ground.
I do agree, absolutely, that money is not Lucas's concern. However, those below him in the power structure most certainly do care about the money. Since Lucas probably does not micromanage the promotional material and licenses, that may be where some of the "moneygrubbing" accusations come from.
Rumors still, right? (Score:2)
from one of the scripts? (Score:5, Funny)
Leia: "HI LUKE!!!!!"
(Luke tumbles from the shock of surprise)
Luke: "Leia, what do you want? I wish you would leave, because you are so STUUUPID. You are dumb and you are stuuupid."
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Obligatory reference (Score:1)
I've got a bad feeling about this...
Genndy Tartakovsky (Score:2)
If anyone can restore the balance, I hope it's him.
You don't need pants for the victory dance... (Score:2, Funny)
I R is good jedi!
Take that, silly weasel!
*sniff... sniff*
This is probably going to be 3d animation! (Score:2)
I hope they use the show wisely because it could get a lot necessary events out of the way so Episode 3 can have a more personal feel.
Plus, it is ALWAYS cool to see things blow up
--Joey
--Joey
Say it ain't so... (Score:2)
Nooooooooooo! I'm going to be victimized with cheesy anime-like fight scenes:
Droid
Droid
Droid
Fire
Fire
Fire
Slash
Slash
Slash
Did I hear anyone say... (Score:2, Funny)
'nuff said!
Animated Cartoon Series as Real-Time? (Score:2)
I work in a bookshop in England. Yesterday our friendly Penguin/Dorling Kindersley rep was in and was going through new books for next year. He showed me the cover for Star Wars - The Worlds of Episode II and told me an interesting story.
Very recently, the head of LucasFilm UK was giving a small presentation to the Penguin Group. She was telling them how Episode III was going to be the biggest thing ever, partly because of it being 'real time'. "You mean, "asked a quizzical rep,"it will only cover 2 hours of Star Wars time?"
No. What she meant was that when Episode III opens in May 2005, the Clone Wars will be just finishing as the film opens. The Clone Wars last for three years. "So the Clone Wars are happening now," she said. Ergo, Episode III takes place exactly three years after AOTC. Cool huh?
The sad thing is... (Score:2)
I suspect that some of the people who worked on the plot and storylines for both episodes 1 and 2 were some of the very same people who wrote for those two shows.
Two cents and in for a pound. . . (Score:2)
But it's only as good as the scripting. And because this is a less important project than the big films, perhaps, PERHAPS, a good writer or two will sneak in under the radar and do something which has apparently become of late truly offensive; A good bit of story telling.
I hope they go for high-end dramatic realism with proper pacing; for all those kids who haven't burned out their attention spans on video games, MTV and E. --The last couple of Harry Potter films, though by no means land-mark works, were still pretty damned good considering. And they were both LONG! --Which just goes to show that slowing things down will not annoy the younger set, and certainly won't annoy the older viewers.
My recommendation to the studio: "You have an opportunity to make good. Please don't blow it."
-Fantastic Lad
Better to do New Jedi Order (Score:2)
Of course, that would be adult anime, not childrens' cartoons which are better suited to the new pre-episode IV world of pablum.
Re:Hi (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hi (Score:1)
Ahhh.. nothing like a Sunday morning drink to get you started.
Re:Hi (Score:3, Insightful)
I'll be finished my first degree (Chemical Physics) in the spring. I rent, but I pay for it myself. I ride a bike because it's cheaper and better for the environment. (Ironic that you work in the Department of...Atmospheric Science, eh?) I love to cook. And yes, you have lost touch with us all.
'Growing up' doesn't have to be about losing touch with your sense of wonder. Heck, it's what will keep me going in the sciences in grad school.
Oh, and for the record, I loved Lilo & Stitch.
Re:Hi (Score:1)
My point? I'm also a complete kid. I love cartoons both new and old, and at 25 am still quite interested in stories like these. What I mean is, lighten up. It's all in good fun, and its not like this is CNN, it's slashdot.
Re:Hi (Score:5, Insightful)
You associate cartoons with childishness. Just because it's animated doesn't make it any less mature than your favourite live-action movie/TV series. There are many serious-minded, dramatic animated features ("Grave of the Fireflies", anyone?), and there are a number of advantages cartoons have over live action:
Virtually-unlimited special effects budget. In animation, you don't have to pay millions upon millions of dollars to show someone jumping out of a huge time portal, or show some horrific monster eat a man whole, or show a squadron of soldiers firing laser cannons. This is as simple to create in animation as anything else.
Character "casting". You don't have to hunt down the perfect actor/actress with the perfect weight, the perfect hair colour, the perfect voice, the perfect skin colour, etc., etc., in animation. You just draw the character the way you want him/her to appear, and there s/he is.
Idealism. The world just doesn't work the way some people want it to. You can't change the laws of physics, every single person you find won't be attractive, etc.. Cartoons work the way you want them to, whether they're realistic, deep, moving depictions of life (like many anime series/movies), or goofy, childish Saturday-morning cartoons (which can be masterpieces, despite their childishness).
What does the fact that you perform the same tasks as any other adult (and some teenagers) have anything to do with cartoons or video games? Seems to me like you've been brainwashed by some of the "intelligent" connoisseur types who associate these things with childishness/immaturity/unintelligence. This same phenomenon can be observed with Pokemon. The Game Boy games (which few who bash it have even played) are actually quite fun, and aren't really any more childish than any other game. What started this whole "Pokemon is for kids, you fanboy losers" thing is the fact that some American corporations saw that Pokemon made money, and they milked it for all that they could. They sold dolls, they sold stuffed animals, they sold cards, they sold McDonald's toys. THAT is why people hate Pokemon. If it had gone on as a regular Game Boy game like any other Game Boy game, nobody would've given it a second thought. Same thing happened to cartoons.
Anyway, video games, Harry Potter, anime, and cartoons are forms of entertainment, no different than your favourite band, your favourite TV show, or your favourite book. If it ENTERTAINS you, it's served its purpose.
Voice acting (Score:3, Interesting)
You don't have to hunt down the perfect actor/actress with the perfect weight, the perfect hair colour, the perfect voice, the perfect skin colour, etc., etc., in animation. You just draw the character the way you want him/her to appear, and there s/he is.
Do you discount the importance of a good voice actor? In some respects, voice acting is harder than traditional stage/screen acting.
Re:Hi (Score:2)
Thats it! You dont fuck with the toons! (Score:1)
No, you just grew up too fast to appreciate the finer (re:childish) details in life.
It doesn't take the whole of earth to be at war (umm, let me think about that one) to just have fun!!! Fuck, whens the last time you flew a kite just because? You with your "College" degree you're so proud of knows the dynamics of how and why and what weather patterns work best with flying a kite. But have you just for the sheer ( sp? I only have a BFA,*smirk*) fun of it!?
Having something that you built, relying on the forces of nature, be higher than you yourself cannot do without the help of a thousand engineers making sure your "College Graduated" ass can even begin to be as high!
Fuck you! If not the simple pleasures in life that we can enjoy than what do we have?
And BTW that car and house you paid for and live in are most likely killing the rest of us, So once again Fuck you!
Cartoons are fucking Fun! Is that so hard to handle
Maybe it's just me but, I might be wrong. Cartoons seem childish. But have you stopped to realize that the people who started watching 'toons at the same time we did are now making them more "us"ish(well not you apparentley, but the rest of us)?!
Re:Hi (Score:2, Insightful)
Generally, the kind that feel the need to let me know about their education, car, and / or family.
Now, try sitting down in front of something like, Samuri Jack, Aqua Teen Hunger Force,Invader Zim or, god forbid, The Powerpuff Girls, have a Coke(tm), and try to enjoy yourself for a change.
You'd be amazed how good things work out, when the creators have a hand in making the animation come to life, and dont just sell out to a studio, and let their characters get whored out in marketing promotions.
Cheerio.
Re:Hi (Score:1)
Re:Legendary sexual manouevres and tricks (Score:1)
Obviously, you're a newbie. The operating word out here is moderation; wait till the Good Guys (tm) come out with their mod points drawn. ;-)
Re:Legendary sexual manouevres and tricks (Score:1)
I'm actually not a newbie; I've been reading SlashDot for years and know how the moderation system works (It's actually rather like school-- it scares the living crud out of me knowing that everything I say will be 'graded' by a bunch of often-overzealous reviewers). I just think that sometimes, moderation isn't enough. I'd love to see Taco rm -f posts like this right out of existence.
Re:Legendary sexual manouevres and tricks (Score:1)
The point you're missing is that I wouldn't want this removed. People have different points of view about what's offensive, and what's not. For example, I fail to see how the post was any of the things you listed, apart from perhaps revolting, but even that's completely subjective. So why should your wishes override mine? The only solution to this problem is to let the community decide what's suitable, and the mechanism for that is moderation. Sure, it was offtopic. But moderation had already taken care of it by the time I got to it.
Re:Legendary sexual manouevres and tricks (Score:1)
The only time we ever delete comments is if the comment contains malformed HTML that is somehow causing Slashdot to fail to display properly. Comments are not deleted on the basis of content. At this point, however, it shouldn't be a big worry. The comment engine is reasonably bulletproof, and it's pretty tough to post a comment that breaks Netscape.
If you posted a comment and you don't see it now, it may have been moderated down below your threshold (see below). If you set your threshold to -1, you should be able to see it again.
Answered by: CmdrTaco
Last Modified: 6/12/00
Re:Legendary sexual manouevres and tricks (Score:1, Offtopic)
My Grudge with Harry... (Score:5, Interesting)
Second, WILL HE STOP IT WITH THE NAMEDROPPING??? Honestly, I used to think it was just a matter of jealousy on the aicn users part that they hated when he'd mention Robert Rodriguez as a friend. Now, however, he states in every article almost how some director called him personally, or how scared the industry is of him. Ugh. So annoying.
However, the ultimate reason why I don't visit AICN anymore has nothing to do with Harry at all.
a) His forums are not threaded. When a major forum with 1000 posts comes, it's impossible to have a CONVERSATION (the responses are 100 posts apart)and it's impossible to read any of the posts towards the bottom.
b) The forum posters piss me off more than anything. These people do NOT know how to enjoy something. AICN forums are simply mediums to pick apart every film's most microscopic (and even if non-existing) flaws and state such claims that Spiderman with organic web shooters "robs my childhood" - THOSE are the guys I want to take a bat to (which is why I LOVED the end of Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back!(
Geeks don't bother me (hense, I'm on Slashdot), but assholes do.
Re:My Grudge with Harry... (Score:1)
Re:My Grudge with Harry... (Score:2)
Wow. Thanks thecrackerman! I was worried for a sec that people who don't visit AICN might not understand what I mean by annoying film geeks who whine and make ENORMOUS protests over such trivial facts. Now I don't have to link them to AICN to show them examples of said activity! And thanks Anon Coward for the Stan Lee-endorsing-organic talk. Geez, some people.
I sometimes wonder what could be accomplished if the same people who spend so much energy debating Spiderman and getting 250,000 signatures to save Farscape could do if they tried to do something to help the real world...
Harry Knowles is a stupid fucker... (Score:1)
Re:My Grudge with Harry... (Score:2)
And yet you post on Slashdot. Riiiight.