Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Backup Your Life on a DVD 336

matt20 writes "I've often wondered what it would take to condense the essence of my life and put it in a searchable format. Well, it looks like that may become a reality. Engineers are working on software to load every photo you take, every letter you write - in fact your every memory and experience - into a surrogate brain that never forgets anything. Here is the article found in New Scientist."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Backup Your Life on a DVD

Comments Filter:
  • redundant (Score:5, Funny)

    by cr@ckwhore ( 165454 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:15AM (#4721988) Homepage
    Sounds kinda redudant to me ... isn't this what the new dept. of homeland security is going to do?
    • Re:redundant (Score:4, Interesting)

      by drxenos ( 573895 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:53AM (#4722188)
      Not to get off-topic, but I heard on the radio this morning that they (dept. of homeland security) are going to create a database of every purchase by every American in their effort to fight terrrorist. scary.
      • Re:redundant (Score:3, Insightful)

        by whovian ( 107062 )
        I have said this before: there have long been records of the youngsters', particularly newborns', foot- and fingerprints. No shit, there was a movement to have even your elementary schoool kids as early as the 1980s in order to "protect your children" against kidnappers, molesters, etc. Now with this department the gov't would probably be able to access that at will, as well as any other database - let alone create a master database.

        There will never be criminals in the US ever again. What a country!
        • Re:redundant (Score:3, Interesting)

          by FreeUser ( 11483 )
          There will never be criminals in the US ever again. What a country!

          Correction.

          There will never be innocents in the US ever again.

          With this kind of information at their disposal anyone can be made to appear to be guilty of just about anything. Add secret trials and a general terror-hysteria to the mix and you get an environment that makes Orwell's vision almost pleasant by comparison.
    • by hunterellinger ( 574250 ) <ellinger@io.com> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @10:18AM (#4722844)
      When I worked on a left-wing paper in the '70s, we used to say that we didn't mind the FBI spies and bugs, but we felt that they should at least be willing to provide us copies of the minutes of our staff meetings.
  • by anonymousman77 ( 584651 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:15AM (#4721989)
    Will it remember where I put my @#$!$ car keys?
    • The part *I* thought was ridiculous about fallibility was, "Much better, says the firm, to junk such unreliable interpretations and instead build a faithful memory on that most reliable of entities, the PC." Granted, I may forget where I put my keys now and again, but my brain's never turned blue and needed to be restarted...though I have suffered some memory leaks. hm.
    • by netsharc ( 195805 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @10:09AM (#4722774)
      Searched the web for my car keys [google.com].
      Results 1 - 10 of about 651,000. Search took 0.37 seconds.

      Which one is it?
  • They're called "books". And unless you burn them, they generally have a 0% failure rate.
  • Oh no (Score:4, Funny)

    by shadowlight1 ( 77239 ) <chris@feyrer.gmail@com> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:18AM (#4721997) Homepage
    Now I'll NEVER be able to forget my ex-girlfriend!
  • by geoff lane ( 93738 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:19AM (#4722000)
    do you really want to commit everything to a nice simple, searchable, disc that can be used as evidence against you?

    • Protect your life disk with CSS and use the DMCA to per^H^Hrosecute the living daylights out of anyone who accesses it without your authorization.

      Simple.
      • You forget, the DMCA is enforced by the government. Good luck if it is the government you want to prevent from accessing it.
      • use the DMCA to per^H^Hrosecute the living daylights out of anyone who accesses it without your authorization

        That won't stop law enforcement. From 17 USC 1201 [cornell.edu]:

        This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, information security, or intelligence activity of an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State, or a person acting pursuant to a contract with the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State. For purposes of this subsection, the term ''information security'' means activities carried out in order to identify and address the vulnerabilities of a government computer, computer system, or computer network.
    • No...

      I am also quite happy in the knowledge that my descendants will not be able to browse through my life after I am dead.
    • but, more importantly, do you really want to remember everything that you've ever done. It would be just like that annoying bastard who deliberately stays sober while everyone else drinks themselves stupid just so they can tell everyone what they did the next morning.
  • by Spazholio ( 314843 ) <slashdot@le[ ].net ['xal' in gap]> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:20AM (#4722005) Homepage
    Ok, so I fork over my money, I've got this shiny new DVD with the sum total of my existance on it. Aside from being horribly depressing, so what? What can I do with it? Store it for safekeeping in case of a terrible car accident which leaves me without my memory? No problem! A quick hard reboot with disc inserted (yuck) and I'm better?

    Seriously though, aside from being incredibly cool, what's the use of this thing? To pass on to relatives after you're gone? Nefarious use in our legal system? Coaster ("Don't put your drink on the table, use Aunt Jenny instead...")?
    • The point is, that is it would searchable. One example would that you could record every telephone conversation / meeting you were ever involved in. Combined with voice recognition this would allow one to very quickly recall any conversation you'd ever had.

      In effect, it would extend ones memory. This could only be a good thing.
      • by Anonymous Coward
        Yeah, great.

        And with all my phone conversations in storage, it would only take one court order for some secret government anti-terrorist unit hell-bent on administering some starchambered justice on a mere hint of suspicion to go through all my calls.

        Oh, when the Homeland Security Office kicks in they probably won't need even court orders anymore.

        Just go through all the populace. We're bound to find a few terrorists in there.

      • In effect, it would extend ones memory. This could only be a good thing.

        Yeah, right, and I drink becase of all the good memories beer enhances...

    • Seriously though, aside from being incredibly cool, what's the use of this thing?


      What about historians? Imagine if we had a version of this that belonged to Stalin, Hitler, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, etc?

      Not necessarily for public consumption at the time, but everything that person had ever lived through. It would be fascinating.

      -- james
    • by chrisos ( 186835 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @09:24AM (#4722391) Journal
      I could actually refute all the assertions my ex-wife used to make, where she used to say things like:
      "But you said X on that Saturday night eight months ago"

      (Where X was the last thing I would ever say/admit/believe.)

      Be warned, women in high places will never alow this technology to be used by men, there is a potential for blokes in arguments to be proven right! ;)
      • I could actually refute all the assertions my ex-wife used to make

        Any male who gathers evidence preemptively to use against a female (unless she's an adversary) is just digging his own grave. Just roll over like you're supposed to; you'll be happier. You can know you're right all you want, just don't try to prove it.
    • From what I understand, your physical existence could be restored, but not your memory. It does bring up the interesting topic of how your brain stores memories. If those truly can be backed up, it could just as easily be erased or altered. "I know kung-fu." Creepy.
    • Well with security cameras on every high street, everyone being able to capture you with the video camera built into their mobile phone, all your web presence recorded on the wayback machine, your boss monitoring all your work-based phone and email conversations, and the department of homeland security monitoring the rest, you might as well face the facts: everyone else is recording every step in your life, why should you not get a copy.
  • But. (Score:5, Funny)

    by AUsBandit ( 601113 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:20AM (#4722007)
    What if I forget where I put the dvd?
  • by Marc2k ( 221814 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:20AM (#4722009) Homepage Journal
    It is part of a curious venture dubbed the MyLifeBits project, in which engineers at Microsoft's Media Presence lab in San Francisco are aiming to build multimedia databases that chronicle people's life events and make them searchable.

    Anyone want to take bets on how fast MyLifeBits will be selling off your personal info? True if you doubt Microsoft's dubious motivation and believe they're working for the greater good, this still brings a new meaning to 'single point of failure'.
  • by Gheesh ( 191858 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:21AM (#4722010) Homepage Journal
    Since I have no life, mine could probably fit into a 3.5" floppy
  • Hmmm... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by NTSwerver ( 92128 )
    Engineers are working on software to load every photo you take, every letter you write - in fact your every memory and experience - into a surrogate brain that never forgets anything.

    I presume you must have to add stuff to this 'archive' manually? What happens if you forget? I know I probably would.
  • Now I'll Never have to remember names again! thanks, umm...
  • Woohoo! (Score:4, Funny)

    by HugoQuixote ( 32615 ) <(astromoose) (at) (gmail.com)> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:22AM (#4722015) Homepage Journal
    Does this mean I'll be able to bring out extended special editions? Deleted scenes could be amusing... Out-takes and a gag reel! Woohoo!

    I could get my folks to do Director's Commentary... ^_^
  • by tcyun ( 80828 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:22AM (#4722016) Journal
    Just saw a similar article [bbc.co.uk] come through the BBC. To quote: "Microsoft researchers are working on ways to create a 'back-up brain' that will do a much better job of containing and cataloguing every picture you take, document you write or conversation you record." The program is called MyLifeBits.

    ...and a link to Gordon Bell [microsoft.com]'s work page.

  • Not very useful for people like me who are lucky to take 1 photo a year.. I think I've got a grand total of a few dozen photos from when I was born to now (that's 22 years, no wise cracks please! :P). Email might be a little better, but considering my best reply time is in the order of 2-4 weeks, I don't get a whole lot of that either.. Tell me when they can download my real memories, then I'll be impressed. -Nutter
  • Read the EULA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Max Romantschuk ( 132276 ) <max@romantschuk.fi> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:22AM (#4722022) Homepage
    I for one would read the licence agreement on such a thing really, really carefully...

    Imagine... All the information submitted to the system becomes copyright of Organization X...

    Or am I just being paranoid?
    • I would also be concerned about the DRM measures. I've often thought about variations on this idea and wonder what restrictions copyright holders would try to place on your "memories".

      If everything I see or hear is perfectly copied and recorded for playback will they try to place restrictions on what is recorded, on what is played back, or even on what I can see or hear? What if I start to rely on the digital memories or they even become somehow melded with my own biological brain? Where will they draw between a digital copy and my own thoughts? Will songs and movies and such be blacked out or made fuzzy? Who owns and controls (and polices) the copyright on the items in an augmented mind?

      And what are the implications for advertising and product placement? Perhaps to waive costs, companies will mark items or use intelligent software to change or update ads or brands stored in your digital memory database (the billboards, commercials, and products you've driven by, seen, or used and recorded to "memory") or worse, they may try to insert ads in your video memories that never existed ("Buy Widgets Now" plastered on the wall of your dining room).

      By necessity, such scenarios would either be outlawed, cause the end of copyright as we know it, or create the beginning of the thought police era.
  • "Imagine being able to run a Google-like search on your life," says Gordon Bell, one of the developers.

    It's called encyclopidiac memory, all they need is a way to give everyone what some of us have naturally, and it's done. :-)

  • by Anonymous Coward
    No doubt with this being a microsoft driven development they will plant false memories of Windows 95 being a stable and enjoyable OS to use.
    Oh and probably that billg invented the internet.

    Where did you want to go to yesterday?
  • by Memetic ( 306131 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:24AM (#4722028) Homepage Journal
    How long after this becomes avaliable will the first supeona for full access be issued - for example in a divorce court, patent dispute antitrust case...
  • by krazyninja ( 447747 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:24AM (#4722031)
    Taken from the article=> ....build a faithful memory on that most reliable of entities, the PC... .
    Umm....Why do I feel that was one sarcastic comment in the article???

  • i think it was arther c clarke that came up with this, apart from the cool ness factor what on earth would be the point, i suppose you could use it to download yourself into a robot /cyborg thing, and if you died in a road acidnet they could "download" you into a new body, but it just seems to be a bit of a gimic at the moment, whoo lookat me i'm on a dvd sorta thing.
  • Screw That (Score:3, Funny)

    by Knunov ( 158076 ) <eat@my.ass> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:25AM (#4722037) Homepage
    There was a night in Tijuana I wouldn't choose to remember at gunpoint. Last thing I want is a surround-sound, THX enhanced f'ing DVD of it.

    Knunov
  • I already rely way too much on search engines for my computer life, now I'll be able to do it in real life, too? Pretty soon I won't remember anything anymore, I'll just know how to look it up...
  • Dear God, I can just imagine my wife going back four months to pick out the exact wording of something I misspoke, and then playing it back. Men of the world unite, we must stop this now! *g*

    Just kidding. This looks like some really interesting technology, but I can't help think that the investment of time you'd have to make outweighs the benefit.
  • Security risk? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by BoysDontCry ( 595839 )
    What if someone steals my DVD? Ack!
  • WOW! A microsoft solution capable of recording all our actions for a year!

    We all knew it was going to happen someday, Microsoft would own our memories. Can you imagine the DCMA violations trying to break the compy protect to view your own memories? What type of lawsuits are we going to get into when we just claim to remember doing it, and no we didn't reference the MyLifeBits database?

    The media would have fun with this. We could have "Truman Shows" playing back the MyLifeBits database files 24x7. Imagine the pirated copies of the next serial killer, or thrill seeker.

    Don't you love technology.
  • You can't fit all of alt.binaries on a DVD. Who are they kidding?
  • by tcdk ( 173945 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:30AM (#4722067) Homepage Journal
    The letter combination DVD isn't to be found anywhere in the article.

    There's talk about 1000gb harddiscs, but not DVDs.

    One of the stupidest headlines on /. in a while...

    As to the idea it self: why? I don't need to excatly what or how I said something to my friends or family. In fact I dont want to...

    One good idea, that they don't mention, would be automatic transscription of the audio conversations, thrus making them searchable. Now, that would be nice...
    • There was an article here a few years ago about a BT researcher who estimated you'd need 15 petabytes to store your life's experiences. For some reason I can't figure out how to get the search engine to show me anything older than a year... maybe somebody can find a link to it.

  • Be sure to check out todays Tom Toles.. Funny stuff. Here. [yahoo.com]

  • Hmm... I guess someone smoked a bit too much cannabis thinking about this one. They need to invent a DVD medium that won't rot. Sometimes CDROMS and DVDs get a fungus that renderes them unreadable. I've got a DVD with my family photo albums, even mpeg2 movies, and a backup of my resume and my wife's. But.. you need a backup of that because I had a cdrw disk rot on me.
  • Microsoft ... (Score:3, Informative)

    by the bluebrain ( 443451 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:31AM (#4722076)
    I have to appreciate the way the article has a hair-raising exaggeration ...
    • [...] in fact your every memory and experience [...]
    ... right next to Our Old Friends ...
    • [...] engineers at Microsoft's Media Presence lab [...]
    For those who can't be bothered to read the article (my advice: don't), a short summary: in a couple of years (like, five) 1-TB hard drives will cost ~USD300. A new trademark, "MyLifeBits", which is basically a (gasp) *searchable* database can be filled with everyPhotoYouEverTake, everySoundYouEverHear, everyTextYouEverRead (yadda yadda) as a kind of, er, diary. (For the yougsters: a "diary" is a private, dead-tree blog).

    No word on how you are supposed to get the information in there ... which would sort of be the interesting bit, dontchathink?
    What is this? MS anti-FUD?

    (no, actually I'm having a *great* day)
  • by Inexile2002 ( 540368 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:31AM (#4722077) Homepage Journal

    and instead build a faithful memory on that most reliable of entities, the PC.
    Seriously?

    Do the guys at Microsoft seriously consider the PC to be a most reliable of entities? Man, you think after years of running Windows you'd know better.

    As for the database, that sounds like it would be an enormous amount of work to keep up, and wouldn't be that useful day to day unless you were carrying it with you. I forget to take pictures, how am I going to remember to upload the pictures I actually take? And has anyone ever gone back and reread their old email...BORING... unless you're narsisistic who cares what you posted on /. two years ago.

    This thing sounds good in theory, but in practice people just are not taking that many pictures or writing that many memorable letters. This will be a product for the vain, the famous and the rich who don't know what else to spend their money on.
    ------
    • As for the database, that sounds like it would be an enormous amount of work to keep up

      It would be self-limiting. Once you started on this project, you wouldn't be able to do more than a set amount per day, or it would take too long to enter into the database.

      Monday - went to swell party after dinner, but had to leave at 10PM so I'd have time to enter into my database what a good time I was having before I left.

      In the end, only people with no life would have time to put in their life.
  • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Already done (Score:3, Interesting)

    by yndrd ( 529288 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:38AM (#4722110) Homepage
    I've already done this. I have a CD (which friends refer to as "the football") on which I have backed up scanned images of my birth certificate, medical records, school records, every photo I have (2000+), every development project I've worked on, every short story/paper I've ever written, and a database in which I store daily entries of my activities.

    Yes, it sounds obsessive compulsive, and maybe it is. I do it because I like to have my life backed up in case of household disaster. Also, I've found that having that data with me all the time is very helpful--I carry a floppy with it so I can open anything I'm working on and save it.

    Another reason I do it (especially the log/database) is that I don't like the idea of not knowing about my own life. I found the days going by in a blur before I kept track of things.

    The only drawback is that I'm relying more and more on this CD instead of memory, which may be reducing it.
  • by krugdm ( 322700 ) <slashdot@ikCOBOLrug.com minus language> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:38AM (#4722122) Homepage Journal

    In the compliance lab I work in, anything we do needs to be documented to prove that it happened. We always joked that we need miner's helmets with little cameras attached that always film what we do. That's what this looks like...

  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:39AM (#4722126)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • If you think existentialism is full of bs and believe people have "an essence", recording everything in your life on DVD simply doesn't cut it. It might be a really good simulation, but without the "essence" it's not really you. Unless of course you're talking about Emeril's essence, which is much cheaper than recording your life on DVD and is generally available at your local supermarket.

    On the otherhand, if you are an existentialist and believe people are the sumb of their experience, then recording every waking moment would be equivalent to capturing you. But then again, I doubt the engineers are thinking of these philosphical issues.

  • When are they going to build a computer that keeps all that data intact for longer then the average human life span? Given how computers are cycled through every year or so this may not be so reliable because of backup failures, upgrades, and acts of god. I won't even go in to the ability of Microsoft developers to make something so precious and valuable safe, secure, and free from marketing exploitation. :D
  • I use The Brain [thebrain.com]. It's the only way I've ever found of organizing all of my thoughts, emails, bookmarks, files, pictures, programs, etc. into a cohesive, useable unit. In my opinion, it's really how personal computers were meant to be used. I recommend everybody with a ton of bookmarks, sticky notes all over the place, and a ton of flagged emails to take a look at it and play with it for at least 10 minutes. What it does is really amazing.
  • Is it just me, or does this seem like an article you'd read in The Onion? It's obviously impractical at this juncture; one terabyte or two or three isn't nearly enough to fit a whole life's worth of information. It'd be interesting ot have all your personal data and stuff in one place, and being able to index-search your gradeschool papers might be fun for an afternoon... but what about when I'm trying to remember what that girl smelled like or how I felt when...

    This seems akin to the article about President Bush wanting the Army to use Windows XP so we could have flying soldiers. Plus, as it's been mentioned before in this thread, isn't the Dept. of Homeland Security alread doing this for us? Should these DVDs be available as a tax-benefit? I'm in the military, does this mean that mine will be classified?
  • by dabadab ( 126782 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @08:43AM (#4722144)
    OK, so they have some database, that can store various files and you can search it - AFTER you tag it.
    And that's the problem: adding meaningful comments to all the little tidbits.
    I have bought a digicam a little more than a year ago: I have taken approx 2000 pictures since that. I could put together some little scripts that search the JPEG's EXIF tags for comments but I can not be bothered to type it in. No way, that's not something I want to do. Easing/automatating this process is the thing that should be addressed (which is, I do realise, is far from trivial), but it's not dealt with.
    Then I have all the emails I have ever sent or received (minus SPAM). Grepping it is something that is useful but it can be frustrating to remembering the exact words, then realizing that a synonym was used or there was a typo: so there is also space for improvement, but this project does not seems to address this problem.
    So, to have the obligatory SP reference, this project seems to be supposed work like this:
    1. Throw all the stuff you have into a database
    2. ???
    3. Have your whole life easily searchable
  • I mean, I've been doing this for years, on CD's though. It's called incremental backups, and I do one every few months. All my recent documents, pics, etc, go to CD (now DVD-R since I got a burner). The nice thing is, I keep what I only keep what I need, or what I know is "clean". I wonder how bad it would be if some nasty letter you wrote but never sent gets archived. What happens later if someone gets a hold of your "memories" and other data?

    For reference I have most of my college career backed up on CD. I can go back and read class papers and read up on all the other stupid stuff I did over the years. As of now I already plan to sort through all those CD's and condense them all down to DVD. So, why is this software useful to those of us who already make use of such methods?
  • Based on what I understood from the article they seem to think you could record someone's life by just recording everything he outputs or sees. Then, consider hundred million people who experience exactly similar events in their life and accidentally happen to output also the same content. Is their life similar? Not in my opinion. To my map someones life you should also be able to for example know what he/she feels like, etc and that may not be reflected in the output - atleast not in a form understandable for anyone else but the person him/herself. Stupid title.
  • Another idea... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by NTSwerver ( 92128 )
    I think it would be a lot cooler, albeit impractical with current technology, to actually record *everything*, i.e. everything you see, everything you hear, etc, from when you're born. You'd need a huge ammount of storage though:

    Quick approximate calculations just for recording what you see at PAL resolution (720x576@25fps):

    1 frame of PAL = 1.2MB
    25 x 1.2MB = 30MB = 1 second
    30MB x 60 = 1.8GB = 1 minute
    1.8GB x 60 = 108GB = 1 hour
    108GB x 24 = 2.6TB = 1 day
    2.6TB x 7 = 18.2TB = 1 week
    18.2TB x 4 = 72.8TB = 1 month
    72TB x 12 = 873.6TB = 1 year
    873.6TB x 70 = 61,152 Terrabytes (61.2 Petabytes)

    Damn, that's a lot of storage!
    • Re:Another idea... (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Junta ( 36770 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @09:17AM (#4722343)
      Of course, that is assuming you are just treating the data as still frames, not taking advantage of using the similarities between frames to save space. Also, a great deal of time is spent sleeping, and unless you are recording dreams (which can be too abstract for video to record), that time can be cut, as well as blinking. Let's assume 1400 kbit/s (Mpeg4 coding looks acceptable to me at this rate for everything, on average would preserve more than you can remember at any rate...

      1400*60=100320kbit/min
      *60=6,019,200 kbit/hour
      *24=144,460,800kbit/day
      *365.25=52,764 ,300,000kbit/yr
      *60=3,165,858,000,000kbit
      =~360 TB

      So to record 60 years of concious, non-blinking time at 1400kbps, you just need 1024 disk arrays like I have at my house...
    • However, the information we store in our brains is much less than that. We don't remember what we see frame by frame, we remember things as sequences of relations and leave out insignificant details. A day's memory, as represented in the brain, could easily be stored in the megabyte range.
  • Factoid [compaq.com] could remember every place that you went, every person you saw, where you put your car keys... This could hit hard storage for you. Never again would your recall of "what was a I doing on that day?" or "have I ever met this person before?" be an issue.
  • by giminy ( 94188 )
    I backed up my life on a perishable dvd [slashdot.org]. Damn you Atlantic, Damn you all to hell!!!
  • While analysing the pacing of internal-monologs in Joyce's Ulysses, I calculated [robotwisdom.com] that 70 years of transcribed thoughts should fit in 37 gigabytes.
  • Pentagon (Score:3, Funny)

    by program21 ( 469995 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @09:11AM (#4722301) Homepage Journal
    How long before Bush is pushing for some law that requires the gov't to be given a copy of every one of those made?
  • Dear diary (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jmcwork ( 564008 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @09:17AM (#4722345)
    First of all, this seems like a multimedia digital diary. Neat idea, but how many people actually keep a diary or journal and keep it up to date? Next, the article makes it sound simple when they talk about recording your "every memory and experience" as if you just plug into something like in the movie "Brainstorm". How do they accomplish this one? If this technology existed I am sure we would have heard something about it (at least here on /.)!
  • by crovira ( 10242 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @09:23AM (#4722383) Homepage
    That's what Pointdexter's about to discover. These guy too. That my brain can store a 100 terabytes of data is almost immaterial if its all undifferentiated.

    Running a Google search engine on an ever growing mass of data data is not enough.

    The data has to be corelated. The engine has to understand, (read that word again, understand, an AI problem,) what its looking at and the appropriate level of granularity to use when parsing the data when extracting the memes it contains.

    Our computers are damn near deaf, dumb, blind and stupider than cockroackes and we're having systemic, Korzibskian semantic anomalies and pattern recognition failures as it is.

    I'd be happy when one has the information processing capacity of an annoying Pomeranian. It'll be about as useful too but I'd be happy.
  • But, imagine getting a scratch on this. If you think it sucks when your favorite CD skips, or your LotR jumps because of a scratch; think about what happens when your memory skips.

    On second thought, it'd be like getting drunk and forgetting what happened, only much cheaper! Bring on the memory DVD!

  • by mbourgon ( 186257 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @09:31AM (#4722454) Homepage
    A system like MyLifeBits was first suggested in 1945, when presidential technology adviser Vannevar Bush hatched the then farsighted idea of an infinite personal archive based on the emerging digital computer.

    Hmmm, sounds like the Farleyfile.
    (copied from Jerry Pournelle's page [jerrypournelle.com]): Big Jim Farley was a New York Tammany Hall politician whose success was partly due to the "Farleyfile": a collection of facts about everyone he ever met. If you went to see Big Jim, by the time you got into his office he knew your name, your birthday, the names of your spouse and children, and what you liked for lunch. It was all on file.

    Also, there's a program (Lifesigns?) that's based around a chronological history of data (there's a PC version, and there was a Newton version). You don't go searching for "Letter about Enron", you remember that it was 7 or 8 months ago, and look at email then. Clever premise, loved by all the people who adopted it. Never could get the hang of it myself.
  • I'm just wondering how they are working on a system to archive memories and experiences when the neurobiologists still only have inklings as to how and where the very, very simplest things are learned (I'm talking classical conditioning learning), and have NO idea how or where things like memories (as most of us know them) are stored.

    But I guess technology must be moving faster than the underlying science.
  • by Junta ( 36770 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @09:47AM (#4722556)
    The writeup makes you think they are sucking memories out of the brain and capturing them to disk. Simply not true. There is nothing at all revolutionary about what they are doing. They are basically designing a sort of journal or ultimate blog. Non-computer related experiences must be fed in and probably commented on (photos, etc). Some computer experiences may be captured automatically (this wasn't very clear, the article was more hype than substance), but nothing too difficult. The 'revolutionary' part they are claiming is the organization and search engine, and maybe some of the computer-auto-capture stuff (again, I can't tell if this is a claim or just an example..). This is not worthy of a Slashdot story, its just another blog...
  • Microsoft argues that our memories often deceive us: experiences get exaggerated, we muddle the timing of events and simply forget stuff.

    Yes. Now Microsoft can make us 'remember' things as they 'really' are. Remember that trial that we THOUGHT was against Microsoft for monopolistic practices? Well, it was ACTUALLY against Linux for being commie bastards. See how our memories decieved us?

    Oh. And your brain is now covered by the DMCA and digital rights management. Don't try to remember anything without paying for it first.

    'These people we're stealing the music, replaying it in their MINDS! Clearly, this theft must be stopped so I...I mean artists...can get the money they deserve. See, these people have in their back-up brain. Artists need compensation.' - RIAA, coming soon!
  • This a eastern philosophical concept that every action and thought of a sentient creature is recorded (where?). This record is then used for karmic "justice" in future lives. This idea is not unlike Christian Judgement Day where your entire history is replayed instantly in God's mind when he decides to admit you heaven or condemn you hell. A talented psychic can supposed "read" the akashic record.

    An variation of the "akashic record" is that "time" is an illusion of material reality. In an alternative reality all events are simultaneous. Therefore all events relating to soul's incarnations are operating together. This hypothesis bypasses the issue what is the cosmic "recording media". Interestingly, some western physicists don't believe in the independent existance of "time" too.
  • surrogate brain? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Grackle ( 570961 )
    The description "surrogate brain that never forgets anything" strikes me as overblown. It's more a big personal library. It's not remembering anything, just storing and retrieving information in response to human input. Of course, I'm sure that the hyperbole isn't hurting news coverage of this project -- and probably helped the story make it into /.
  • It's Rudy Rucker's Lifebox! See "Saucer Wisdom" for Rucker's prediction-- people backing up their brain stuff on a box similar to this.

  • Will really busy people get a two-disc collectors' edition, possibly with commentary from their mother and ex-significant others?
  • There's +s and -s for recording my life, but what I want is editing power. I'd like to forget the stupid comments I made in meetings. I'd like to forget that 1800 number from an ad in the 1980s! Most of all I'd like to delete/edit out all the negative comments in my life.

    Of course the possible abuses of this kind of tech are too numberous to mention. Why would we need prisons if we could edit the criminal mind?
  • by Havokmon ( 89874 ) <rick&havokmon,com> on Thursday November 21, 2002 @10:32AM (#4722966) Homepage Journal
    Now my wife can say "I'm going into JCPennys, I'll meet you in an hour", and I won't have to try and remember what she was wearing when I sneak up behind a brunette to pinch her butt!

    "That was close honey, that chick's butt looks just like yours."

    At least generally I can tell which one is her, by the three orbiting satellites.. (children)

  • Hopefully the interface to this will be kept private, or someone will write a Brain Googlism [googlism.com] program. I can see it now..

    My boss is an insensitive clod.
    My wife is a skanky nagging whore.
    My secretery is not.
  • This sounds kinda familiar [imdb.com]...
  • She did a sequence of short stories (not too many) focusing on a group of sysadmins in training to admin huge data banks of a central computer, where everyone, regardless of age, class, etc., could access the computer and keep diaries, notes, etc. It's been a couple of decades since I read them, but as I remember much of the stories focused on ethical responsibilities of the admins similar to lawyer-client confidentiality or the sanctity of the confessional.
  • I think... (Score:3, Funny)

    by tsa ( 15680 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @11:25AM (#4723449) Homepage
    One floppy should be enough for everybody.
  • ... until we are all REQUIRED by law to use this system, and regularly submit our updates to the Office of Homeland Security.

    No problem, right? Surely you have nothing to hide?

    "Do you remember the Americans,
    where did they go"

    - Steve
  • by Ted_Green ( 205549 ) on Thursday November 21, 2002 @01:36PM (#4724671)
    It's paramount to silly.

    "The motivation? Microsoft argues that our memories often deceive us: experiences get exaggerated, we muddle the timing of events and simply forget stuff. Much better, says the firm, to junk such unreliable interpretations and instead build a faithful memory on that most reliable of entities, the PC."

    Yes, let's junk our minds and rely on computers instead! After all, we all know that computers are exactly like human brains only better! Haha, I will now power up and defeat you with my powerfull... hands!.. ...
    I have no idea why I just said that.
    Likewise, I have no idea why this is inovative or impressive. People have been doing this for years.. with photos, diarys, letters and such. This, much as the artical says, is just a large database.

    And frankly, I completely disagree with their premiss that having such accurate data on our past will give us a more true picture of what we were. We can only see the world through our own eyes, even if we have a perfect time line of what we *did* it still isn't likey to change how we'll think about our actions. We're still tainted by our own predjuices and momentary feelings and everything else, that relationship one had a year ago is still going to seem like a silly thing, and we're still going to say "oh, I wasn't really in love with her" even if we can see exactly what we did...

    Besides, for the important things (well, what I consider important anyways, I'm sure as hell not going to suggest any of you need believe what I do) there's somthing to be said for just a memory. Sometimes a remembered smile between friends during a metor shower is more special than a video tape of the whole night.

"The vast majority of successful major crimes against property are perpetrated by individuals abusing positions of trust." -- Lawrence Dalzell

Working...