data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4aa7/f4aa70d35160f984c066a905e3d574b637b2d802" alt="Music Music"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75bbe/75bbea2b645399526281828e064d03a8a5dc22d1" alt="Media Media"
RIAA nominated for "Internet Villain of the Year" 197
Joey Patterson writes "Slyck reports that the UK's Internet Industry Awards organization has nominated the RIAA for its Internet Villain of the Year award because they support "'right to hack' proposals and other unworkable solutions to curb copyright abuse"." Congratulations to them on being nominated for this prestigious and appropriate award ;)
Only nominated? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Only nominated? (Score:3, Insightful)
For those who post without reading the article (Score:5, Interesting)
BBC Watchdog: 'for a report on the important issue of spam that was more intent on vilifying ISP's than educating consumers'
The Home Office: 'for the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security (ATCS) Act and continued delays associated with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA)'
Oftel: 'for (amongst a host of other things) failing to ensure expedient local loop unbundling by BT which has hindered both competition in the telco sector and the development of Broadband Britain'
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA): 'for supporting "right to hack" proposals and other unworkable solutions to curb copyright abuse'
Telecommunications analysts: 'for their substantial contribution to the meltdown in the telecommunications and Internet sector'
That really is a nasty group of suspects, but we might want to add:
John Poindexter: 'for attempting to destroy world-wide privacy.'
The United States Congress (both houses): 'for (among too many other offenses to list in detail) passing the PATRIOT Act and other privacy-invading and security-compromising legislation that will be completely ineffective in stopping terrorism.'
Re:For those who post without reading the article (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:For those who post without reading the article (Score:4, Insightful)
Then again, maybe not...
It's gonna suck in a decade or two when the entire computer industry has moved to a a free country and talking about moving out of the US to get a job will get me thrown in jail as a terrorist.
Re:For those who post without reading the article (Score:2)
A pox on both your houses!
Hmmm. I hope you don't have to be dying for that quote to be appropriate
Re:Only nominated? (Score:2)
They've got the wrong award choice! (Score:2)
Re:They've got the wrong award choice! (Score:2)
I swear to God, I hit preview, and it looked right! How did those two "away"s get in there? What's up with the Italicization?
Tune in next week to find out!
Why not? (Score:1)
Re:Why not? (Score:3, Funny)
Spell checking is wonderful (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Spell checking is wonderful (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Spell checking is wonderful (Score:2)
Maybe that's the British spelling of villain.
new villians on the block (Score:1, Funny)
Re:new villians on the block (Score:5, Funny)
Nah. After the collapse of the communist bloc, they had their names legally changed to "Jack Valenti" and "Hillary Rosen."
Re:new villians on the block (Score:2)
Re:new villians on the block (Score:2)
"boris and natasha are going to be pissed."
Re:new villians on the block (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:new villians on the block (Score:3, Funny)
Awww Bullwinkle, that trick never works!
Presto!
(click) RRRROOOOAAAARRRR!
No doubt about it, Rock. MS audio stinks.
Re:new villians on the block (Score:2)
What... no voting? (Score:1)
well I hope they "win" the award. They've certainly gone out of their way to piss off many of the Internet's users.
Oh, and Merry Christmas everyone!
Oh, they'll just sue (Score:1)
They'll just sue all the web sites reporting it as violating electronic copyright, just liek Wal-Mart did with Black Friday sales.
Re:Oh, they'll just sue (Score:2)
Re:Oh, they'll just sue (Score:2)
evil_of_RIAA evil_of_MPAA (Score:2)
They're both evil though... but the sludge of the RIAA tends to float at a lower level...
I'm going to congratulate them... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I'm going to congratulate them... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I'm going to congratulate them... (Score:2)
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:1)
Just look out at the ocean on a cloudy day and tell me how blue it is.
Re:In other news... (Score:1)
Yeah (Score:1, Redundant)
But in reality... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:But in reality... (Score:2)
Then the average joe hears about the RIAA (probably for the first time) and that they are evil. Sounds like a great introduction to me.
Doug
The RIAA won't win this because... (Score:5, Funny)
1. It doesn't have a handlebar moustache to twirl
2. It doesn't shoot its own henchmen to prove how evil it is
3. It may be incorporated, but it isn't corporeal enough to die of impalement, the default method of bad guy death since the heyday of 70's action films.
Re:The RIAA won't win this because... (Score:2, Funny)
No, they just convince their henchmen to shoot themselves...Generally up with drugs so they OD, but you catch my drift.
Re:The RIAA won't win this because... (Score:5, Funny)
4. No volcano fortress.
5. Hillary Rosen doesn't carry a cat to stroke.
6. No sharks. But they DO have lawyers with 'frickin laser beams' attached to their heads.
Re:The RIAA won't win this because... (Score:2, Funny)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re:The RIAA won't win this because... (Score:2)
Re:The RIAA won't win this because... (Score:2)
Whats the prize johnny? (Score:3, Informative)
To: RIAA (Score:2, Funny)
I hope this little award shows just how much very you're appreciated. Merry Christmas and have a happy New Year.
Santa Clause
P.S. I still haven't seen any royalty checks for "Santa Got Run Over By a Reindeer."
FAKE! (Score:1)
Re:To: RIAA (Score:3, Funny)
The Night Santa Went Crazy by "Weird Al" Yankovic
Down in the workshop all the elves were makin' toys
For the good Gentile girls and the good Gentile boys
When the boss busted in, nearly scared 'em half to death
Had a rifle in his hands and cheap whiskey on his breath
From his beard to his boots he was covered with ammo
Like a big fat drunk disgruntled Yuletide Rambo
And he smiled as he said with a twinkle in his eye,
"Merry Christmas to all... now you're all gonna die!"
The night Santa went crazy
The night St. Nick went insane
Realized he'd been gettin' a raw deal
Something finally must have snapped in his brain
Well, the workshop is gone now he decided to bomb it
Everywhere you'll find pieces of Cupid and Comet
And he tied up his helpers and he held the elves hostage
And he ground up poor Rudolph into reindeer sausage
He got Dancer and Prancer with an old German Luger
And he slashed up Dasher just like Freddie Krueger
And he picked up a flamethrower and he barbequed Blitzen
And he took a big bite and said, "It tastes just like chicken!"
The night Santa went crazy
The night Kris Kringle went nuts
Now you can hardly walk around the North Pole
Without steppin' in reindeer guts
There's the National Guard and the F.B.I.
There's a van from the Eyewitness News
and helicopters circlin' 'round in the sky
And the bullets are flyin', the body count's risin'
and everyone's dyin' to know, oh Santa, why?
My my my my my my
You used to be such a jolly guy
Yes, Virginia, now Santa's doing time
In a federal prison for his infamous crime
Hey, little friend, now don't you cry no more tears
He'll be out with good behavior in 700 more years
But now Vixen's in therapy
and Donner's still nervous
And the elves all got jobs
working for the postal service
And they say Mrs. Claus,
she's on the phone every night
With her lawyer negotiating the movie rights
They're talkin' 'bout - the night Santa went crazy
The night St. Nicholas flipped
Broke his back for some milk and cookies
Sounds to me like he was tired of gettin' gypped
Wo, the night Santa went crazy
The night St. Nick went insane
Realized he'd been gettin' a raw deal
Something finally must have snapped in his brain
Wo, something finally must have
snapped in his brain
Tell ya, something finally must have
snapped... in his brain
How to let people know the RIAA is evil? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:How to let people know the RIAA is evil? (Score:2, Funny)
But Hillary Rosen is already on their website.
Re:How to let people know the RIAA is evil? (Score:2)
This award sponsored by... (Score:3, Insightful)
ts.com [ts.com], who "is Europe's leading online ticketing service, enabling venues and promoters throughout the sporting, entertainment and travel industries to sell, market and distribute their tickets directly from their own websites.".
Anyone want to take bets who won't be getting a lot of contracts with RIAA member-backed acts if the RIAA wins this one?
And the award goes too.... (Score:1)
Hillary Rodam: Thank you, thank you, I really appricate all of the hard work that I put in to do this and I would like to thank all of my financial backers for making this possible...
Dennis Rodman: (Hey, I can see down her shirt from up here) psst.. you know what this ceremony is for right??
Hillary Rodam: Uhh, Yeah... This is my supreme ruler award ceremony
Dennis Rodman: (oh boy she's loaded) UH YEAH, supreme ruler lets go back to my dressing room and I will give you the real award.. this is part on stage is just for all of the people watching on TV.
Hillary Rodam: oooh, you got any vodka there
Dennis Rodman: Uhh, yeah whatever you want baby... I got it all, here let me show you...
Fade out with audience applause and standing ovation.
Re:And the award goes too.... (Score:2)
What the fuck?
The award goes to whom, agian? (Score:2)
Re:The award goes to whom, agian? (Score:1)
Re:And the award goes too.... (Score:2, Funny)
$perl -pi -e s/Rodam/Rosen/g parent.post
I couldn't agree more (Score:1)
In other news... (Score:1)
In Soviet Russia (Score:5, Funny)
Oh,
Wait a second, that's this country, never mind.
Re:In Soviet Russia (Score:2)
Congrats... (Score:2)
The RIAA? Evil? nahhh.... (Score:1)
In response... (Score:2, Funny)
Happy Holidays! (Score:2)
muhaaaaa! (Score:1)
good (Score:1)
an idea whose time has come? (Score:5, Insightful)
However, ultimately, the success of a business depends on it's customers. If we buy RIAA CDs, even as used products, we support their methods. If we go out, find other music, and purchase those non-RIAA CDs, we support an alternate model that depends on quality and personal customer service, not mass appeal and copy protection. There is no way to legislate the RIAA from destroying the right of fair use anymore than there was a way to legislate Wal-Mart from destroying main street. In both cases, the presence of customers determines success.
If it were only that simple (Score:5, Insightful)
It has been my experience that many independant/small artists get there first "distribution"(usually self made) from small 'used' music stores. If we didn't buy Used stuff from them, they wouldn't be able to support themselves as a Business, and then there would be even fewer outlets for independent/small artists to become 'known'.
OTOH it has also been my experience that artist who complain about the riaa's methods would happily accept a contract with them. If the people creating the content won't bite the bullet and use alternative means so they don't get screwed, how can the consumers be expected to boycott?
the only way to fix this is to create a music production/distibution company that doesn't enforce the draconian methods on the artists the current music companies do, and to entice signings by giving a higher percentage of sales, and not lovking them into more then 2 or 3 records per contract.
Of course that means:
a)low to no signing bonus
b)musicians will have to actual have a track record of sales before they become rich.
c)Huge start up capital.
I consider both a and b to be good for music and consumers, but not to enticing to the big name musicians.
*Bold added by me
Re:an idea whose time has come? (Score:2)
You overestimate the terrori^WRIAA. Britney Spears' label is Zomba, who is not a member of the RIAA.
RIAA gets money from plenty of other places than just CDs. If you buy blank music CDs or any CD burner, they get a "royalty." If you listen to the radio, they get royalties from a compulsory license. If you buy from a store that plays music, the RIAA also gets your money from a compulsory license. Look at how the system is set up. Compulsory licenses or "royalites" on digital media always get funneled through the RIAA. This needs to change too.
the limits of the law (Score:2)
And there's a substantial part of the problem: With the money they are spending in Washington, they decide what those laws will be.
They own the ones who rule you; in other words, nothing they do is illegal, or to put a finer point on it, by the time they're ready to do it, it will be legal for them to do it. It's as easy for them to change a law is it is for you to pick up a dagger.
I Would Like to Nominate... (Score:1)
An idea for the trophy: I've seen novelty gift catalogs that have what's called the "Horse's Ass" award, and the trophy is exactly that: The backside of a horse. For wanting to hack our machines and launch DoS attacks against us, they deserve nothing less.
Could they also be awarded... (Score:1)
Take away the copyright idea, seriously. Now kick out all the millionaire's (or get them to take on the task of creating this new system). Create new companies (or convert old ones) that can be mediators between the public and the artists. These companies would help the artist produce, CD's and merchandise, and work on setting up concerts and shows, etc. (Isn't this sort of what the music companies now do?) I guarantee CD's would both fall in price dramatically, but at the same time sales of CD's would far exceed what it is today. (I think people have been saying this for a long time now) Sure, many would trade mp3's, ogg's, CD's. (Just as they already do) Yet the only artists this new system would hurt are the extremely rich ones. Imagine that, more equality among artists, wider selection of music, and simply more music.
This award. (Score:2)
This must be the first award anyone has ever given them...
Damn! (Score:2)
--average internet script kiddie
The REAL villain of the year... (Score:4, Funny)
2002 (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe in 2003 the girl and boy begin sneaking around to date behind the father's back (via limited direct distributions direct from the artist's website?). How long until the couple are enagaged (using the Internet to directly market the music?)? The question is, will the father walk the daughter down the aisle or will the couple elope?
In 2002, the public began to dislike the RIAA. I predict wedding bells by 2006.
Re:2002 (Score:3, Interesting)
I think what everyone needs to remember is a rather funny quote "remember even your closest friend will sell you out for the price of a extra value meal". They'll go to battle destroy each other, and the bottom feeders are looking to pick up what pieces fall. Many people are still there to make great albums or movies, but in the wake of Britney Spears and NSync along with "The Hot Chick" and "Analyze That" these aren't things that will "make history" or even be remembered in 3 years, but look at Lord of The Rings or quite a few bands out there today Incubus, Foo Fighters, and many more.
People will get tired of the bullshit, and when that time comes, change will come. The MPAA and RIAA are fueled by lack of alternative entertainment, as is true for even the computer world. But as has been proven in the past, you can only be king of the hill for so long before you get knocked off.
Good Post BTW
Maybe the RIAA should be informed? (Score:1, Informative)
Senior VP, Communications
Recording Industry Association of America
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#300 Washington, DC 20036
I am sure she will love to hear about her organization's public image.
award of ... (Score:1)
Anyways, three cheers for the RIAA getting a stick up their ass. What goes around comes around.
And merry christmas everyone!
A Humble Suggestion (Score:5, Interesting)
Yeah, we can joke. We KNOW one of the nominees will be CowboyNeil. But in all seriousness, perhaps this is another way Slashdot can do some good. Have people suggest villains, send the reasons why, and the most popular and best-explained ones go up.
Sure, it may seem silly, but today, on the net, a little spectacle and some humor can break down barriers and make a point.
Music Sales down 13% (Score:1)
Sadly the nomination resulted in an indictment (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This is getting silly (Score:5, Insightful)
Ok, I'll bite and reply to the troll...
Piracy is wrong. I agree with them on that. But trying to get legislation passed that would allow you to hack, cripple, and even disable networks and computers that you just think might have copyrighted material on them is worse than piracy in my opinion.
By your (And the RIAA's) logic, since I own the copyright on this post, and I'm pretty sure it is on your computer since you are probably reading it, I should now be legally allowed to hack your computer and bring it down because you have my copyrighted material on your computer. See why we don't like the RIAA now?
Hi, please read the comment. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hi, please read the comment. (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't have the link available right now, but if you'd like, I can bring it up in a few hours.
Oh like there is any difference.. (Score:2)
Re:Thank you. (Score:1)
"Wanky Groupthink" could be the best/newest industry buzzword since .NET
PS. I'm not a troll, its a joke people! But you really should TM that :)
Re:This is getting silly (Score:5, Informative)
Re:This is getting silly (Score:1, Offtopic)
They are evil for: (Score:5, Informative)
2. Grossly inflating their statistics and numbers to boost their reputation. Got a 5x CD burner? It's 5 CD burners according to the RIAA. The mainstream press (i.e., CNN) doesn't know the difference and reports the bogus numbers. They also inflate their losses, neglecting to tell us they cut their production during the same period.
3. Supporting digitally "protected" CD's that aren't guaranteed to work on your CD player with no recourse if you were stuck with unusable disks.
4. Driving scientists and researchers out of the US, due to their threatening to sue researchers who wish to expose security vulnerabilities in copy protection (Felten vs. RIAA).
5. Harassing manufacturers that make digital recordings more portable, like in the Diamond Rio(RIAA v. Diamond).
6. Harassing ISP's like AT&T and Optimum Online (successfully) for allowing P2P networks to exist.
etc. 7.
Re:This is getting silly (Score:5, Insightful)
Pardon me for speaking for many on /. but:
We don't think they're evil, we think they are greedy. Most of the RIAA's actions toward computer and consumer electronics technology have been driven by a desire to control their customers. Many of the industry's business plans were built around locking in customers to pay-per-use media distribution schemes or straight CD sales.
Recently, they've tumbled to the fact that campaign contributions can cause legislation to skew in their favor. They've "requested" laws that make fair use illegal, and require that disabling technologies be embedded in any consumer device. Essentially, they've asked the U.S. government to create a "safe" market for them.
There's a precendent for this: RCA attacking, then coopting the whole television thing out from under Farnsworth (television's inventor).
The RIAA's actions do little to prevent piracy. For example, the measures asked for only apply to the U.S. electronics market, and the most serious piracy happens overseas, in China. China's suppliers will not manufacture devices for that market that include crippled features when it is cheaper to manufacture and sell devices with all the features enabled. The manufacturers would be forced to add the technology to sell in the U.S., but they'd simply raise the price a notch or two to compensate.
The RIAA's moves are bad for consumers, and especially bad for computer-literate folks like those at /. Evil? Perhaps not, but very, very greedy.
Re:This is getting silly (Score:2)
You contradict yourself. The RIAA's membership consists of record companies who want to sell me their products. This is not evil. However, to do so and THEN try to control what I can do with the product I now OWN violates the First Sale doctrine in that they are now trying to assert control over MY property without even having a potentially-unenforceable contract with me like an EULA. This IS evil.
Actually, it goes somewhat farther than that. They are asking Congress to give them powers that exceed the powers of law enforcement agencies (under the Berman Act) AND to then to pick up the costs of enforcing their purely private rights via criminal prosecution under the DMCA.
I do not support "piracy" (although I see no connection between copyright infringement and piracy (which is a crime of violence and victimization)). However, I do, and always WILL, oppose the RIAA's and the MPAA's attempts to leverage their position as content VENDORS into making themselves America's secret police.
Oh, BTW, Merry Christmas and
Re:This is getting silly (Score:1)
Re:This is getting silly (Score:2)
I would call that Evil.
Plus the assumption that everyone is a liar, thief, and copyright infringer, unless proven innocent.
Re:Slashbots are idiots (Score:1)
Of course not. Why would you assume I condone piracy in any form, simply for voicing an opinion contrary to yours?
Your assumption aside, the idea that this is 'their rightful property' is interesting. I'd suggest, rather, that the original work should be the artist's rightful property. If I buy a recording of that work, I should have reasonable rights to do what I please with it (time-shift / location-shift / make backups). Reasonably, I have no right to sell copies for a profit over the internet, (or give them away for that matter). But the RIAA should have no right to dictate that a music CD won't play in a computer. They should have no right to require me to buy a crippled device. They should have no right impose damaging restrictions on the consumer electronics industry.
But then, that's being reasonable.
Re:This is getting silly (Score:5, Insightful)
Even if it was the secret service, they still need a warrant from a judge. The new law would give the RIAA Jurisdiction to be cop, judge, and jurry over the internet.
Re:This is getting silly (Score:2)
Re:This is getting silly (Score:3, Funny)
I went through the check out lane, paid for my purchase, had the player in my cart and looking at the receipt on my way out the door when a kid on a power trip in a yellow tee-shirt comes up to me demanding to see the perfectly visible receipt. I said no and continued walking towards the door and he took the damn DVD player out of my cart and said "then you don't get this!"
Talk about pissed...I did end up showing him the receipt, got MY Dvd player back and headed straight for the return counter. Of course, the lines there were long, and I just said fuck it and left with the player.
The power trip the kid at Best Buy today was on is the same power trip that the RIAA is on. It's about control and subjugation to their will.
Re:This is getting silly (Score:2)
And what would be wrong with a simple "paid" sticker placed on the box by the cashier who cheerfully accepted the money instead of forcing every single one of their customers to prove their innocence with a gruff "I need to see your recipt" at the door?
The point is there are many ways to solve both the RIAA's and Best Buy's perceived losses through theft. Treating everyone of your customers as a potential thief may certainly be one, but certainly not the only or best method.
Re:This is getting silly (Score:2)
Re:This is getting silly (Score:2, Interesting)