data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e57ba/e57ba3dc4d6d16cc510f6703743ea980ca4f642a" alt="Television Television"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75bbe/75bbea2b645399526281828e064d03a8a5dc22d1" alt="Media Media"
Simpson's Cast On Bravo This Sunday 278
droopus writes "So, what does Dan Castelleneta look like? (He's a kinda weasly looking bald guy.) See Dan, Hank, Harry, Yeardley, Julie, Nancy and the rest of the Simpsons cast this Sunday at 8PM (EST) on Inside the Actors Studio on Bravo.
According to the website:
"In anticipation of the landmark 300th episode of The Simpsons, James Lipton sat down with the series' accomplished ensemble to meet the actors behind the voices in order to discover how they have managed to create such a wealth of believable and beloved characters."
I saw a quick preview, and seeing that thin, weasly bald guy go "Aggggggh, donut" was alsolutely hilarious. Watching Nancy Cartwright morph effortlessly from Bart, to Nelson, to Ralph is waaaaay cool. My TiVo is set for this one.
One hitch: it's on at the same time as the usual new Sunday Simpsons episode, so Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show at midnight so fans can record both."
writers (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:writers (Score:1, Informative)
Re:writers (Score:2)
Re:writers (Score:2)
Re:writers (Score:2)
Homer's Paul Krassner Intro (Score:2, Interesting)
Last year Dan/Homer introduced Paul Krassner at a speaking engagement in LA. Krassner wanted to put it on an album but after reviewing the material, Fox declined. They don't seem to restrict him from posting it on his web site. Check it out. [paulkrassner.com] Unfortunately it is in Real. You'd think Krassner would distribute it in Ogg Vorbis.
I thought they reported this here, but a cursory
Re:Homer's Paul Krassner Intro (Score:2)
Re:writers (Score:2)
Same Time (Score:3, Funny)
Real fans know what they look like (Score:2, Informative)
First Informative Post (Score:4, Informative)
Re:First Informative Post (Score:2)
Oh wait. You dropped the word 'on' and added a link. I guess you're ok ;)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Waaaa! I don't get Bravo! (Score:2)
I didn't realize there was a need to delineate the two.
--Joey
Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... (Score:2)
Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... (Score:2, Interesting)
I believe the DirectTivo variant has had two tuners for a while. Since the dish receiver and Tivo are in the same unit, it made a lot of sense to go ahead and throw in a second tuner.
For a stand-alone unit, this is a bit more difficult. My (now dead, first Philips version) Tivo didn't even have *a* tuner, unless you count tuning in channel 3 or 4 for the RF input. But even so, and even with two, only one could be your cable box/dish receiver, the other could potentially be an antenna or (non-pay channel) cable input... though certainly possible.
My next PVR will most likely be a DirectTV w/Tivo built-in for just this type of reason (plus just being able to channel surf while something else is recording would be nice).
Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... (Score:2)
Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... (Score:2)
Writers on 'Inside the Actors' Studio'? (Score:1)
I'd rather see Will Farrell interview them. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I'd rather see Will Farrell interview them. (Score:2)
--nude [slashdot.org]
Will Ferrell, Scrumtrulescent! (Score:1)
Re:I'd rather see Will Farrell interview them. (Score:2)
In any case, it was, as Mr. T(ea) would put it, "A DELIGHT! HA HA HA HA!".
-gleam
F. Murray Abraham (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Nancy Cartwright? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Nancy Cartwright? (Score:2)
Re:Nancy Cartwright? (Score:2)
I think I'm having a ``Poochie" flashback...
``You look like you have something to say Scientology... do you?"
``Yes, I certainly do..."
Ha-Ha (Score:2)
Notice... (Score:3, Funny)
Hank Azaria (Score:1, Offtopic)
-calyxa
Re:Hank Azaria (Score:2)
Hank Azaria had a big part in Birdcage... (Score:2)
Re:Hank Azaria had a big part in Birdcage... (Score:2)
Anyway, he used his normal voice in that movie.
Plus there was "Tuesday's with Morrie", a poignant TV movie with Jack Lemmon, 2 years before his death. That was played completely seriously.
Who doesn't know what the cast looks like? (Score:3, Funny)
That's who.
Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:1)
She looks like Dr. Ruth.
Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:3, Informative)
Eh, why are we listing stuff. This is the Internet, it's all in the Internet Movie Database [imdb.com]
Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:2)
Seriously, thanks.
Marge Costume (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Marge Costume (Score:2, Informative)
She was an actress on Herman's Head series... (Score:2)
Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:2)
Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:2)
Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith (Score:2)
Dan Castellaneta (Score:5, Informative)
Married With Children fans will remember him from the "Dance Show" episode, where Peg went dancing with Marcy and had a flirtation with a gay guy, whose husband (Castellaneta) went complaining to Al.
Incidentally, how stupid does Bravo have to be to put this on in that slot? Why not Sunday at 10 pm?
Re:Dan Castellaneta (Score:5, Informative)
The best parts were when he would put on the costume and talk in his Homer voice, and the jury of Homer Simpsons was a nice touch, too.
imdb [imdb.com] says it was an episode in 1992.
Re:Dan Castellaneta (Score:2)
for what it's worth, that reality show, "high school reunion" is also all grads from my high school. I'm kind of ashamed to admit that, though.
for that matter, ernest hemingway was a graduate, and ray kroc (founder of mcdonalds corp) was a drop-out. Yay.
-gleam
Well, no kidding... (Score:5, Interesting)
Because of this, and other dirty deeds done by the cult of $cientology, I personally boycott The Simpsons, JAG, Dharma & Greg, South Park, and other TV shows and movies that employ $cientologists. (And yes, my local affiliates and the networks know why I don't watch their shows!)
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:2)
http://www.scientology.org/scnnews/scn_new.htm [scientology.org]
"kirstie alley opens church of scientology mission in wichita"
"travolta fever"
"faith in scientology keeps him going"
"on the record: isaac hayes"
"bart simpson's voice credits her recent career success to scientology"
"straight, no chaser"
"eduardo palomo says that a book gave him his success"
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:2)
Sound like a plan?
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:2)
Here here! (Score:2)
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:2)
That has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. Believe me, most religions are just as much cults as Scientology is. Do you boycott every show that has a non-atheist on board?
Dinivin
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:2)
Further, I don't care what the cast members of The Simpsons believe in becuase I still believe it is "The Best Show... Ever."
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:2)
In regards to your specific comments about the show, our research shows that one person cannot make a difference, no matter how big a screwball he or she is.
Re:Well, no kidding... (Score:3, Insightful)
Um... where was I...? Boycotting is a proud American tradition. There is nothing wrong with boycotting any product for any reason (sane, insane or completely mental). It's a form of free speech and is part of our American Way!
When, of course, you force others to join you against their will (e.g., jamming the TV station signal) does it become wrong.
If the poster wants to boycott anything related to clamheads, then let him or her. Of course, you couldn't pay me to miss out on all those "Welcome Back, Kotter" reruns.
I boycott all states who have drunken philanderers as Senators.
Re:Since when? (Score:2)
Because the tradition of free speech extends to the freedom to say stupid, immoral, countercultural or downright insane things.
Are you saying it is RIGHT to boycott WB because they have too many shows featuring African-Americans? Is it right to boycott Outback Steakhouse because they make donations to the Special Olympics and you think that the mentally retarded should be euthanized?
It's not right, but you have the right to do it, if you so choose.
If you're for free speech and the freedom to pursue your preferred religious faith, then it becomes problematic if you suggest that believers in a certain faith should not be allowed to obtain a certain kind of employment.
The fact of the matter is, the original poster, however misguided he or she might be, is exercising his or her rights, and is not infringing on anyone else's rights. "Problematic" != illegal.
We should use _our_ rights of free speech to inform the poster that his or her motives are questionable, which is what you have done.
Damn kids these days. (Score:5, Funny)
Excuse me, I'm just going to sit here and yell at the kids to get off my lawn now.
Re:Damn kids these days. (Score:2)
Hermans Head! Wow, that was a great show. Hank Azaria as his dirtbag friend. All those nutty people in his head. Truly an original and funny sitcom. Herman getting a date with the real Marsha Brady.
Also remember Flying Blind with Tea Leone and some other guy? About a jewish kid who falls in lover with a goy redhead model. Really funny show. Fox in its ealy years, such fond memories.
Puto
Re:Damn kids these days. (Score:2)
A couple of great links about the show:
A Complete Overview [eyrie.org]
A Big Resource [tvtome.com]
Surprised they are going to do the voices (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone know if they actually had to get permission to do the voices for this ep of actors studio?
Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices (Score:4, Funny)
Ages ago I worked for a pop-media magazine. I was friends with a reporter who did an interview with Dan Castellaneta, and at the end he persuaded him to do answering machine messages for a few of us on the tape he used for the interview.
Sad thing is, it was almost impossible to get people to believe it was the real Homer! Everyone thought it was a passable fake but nevertheless obviously a fake.
Anyway, that's public, isn't it?
Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices (Score:2)
Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices (Score:3, Interesting)
click [paulkrassner.com]
Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices (Score:2)
Well, considering that two of them were on Late Night with Conan O'Brien several weeks ago, I'd say whatever restrictions that might have been placed on them, has since been lifted.
Conan had them adlib Homer getting examined by Dr. Hibbard.. Well, I can say one thing... impressionists should NOT be allowed to ad-lib!
Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices (Score:2)
That wasn't Hank, it was Harry Shearer who had previously worked with some "Panel" members on Frontline.
From memory he did an answering machine message for Glenn Robbins
DirecTiVo owners get both at once (Score:4, Informative)
My brush with Nancy Cartwright, Scientologist... (Score:5, Interesting)
I happened to be on the sreet on opening night and was witness to what followed. There was a large rent-a-crowd of local Scientologists gathered in front of a stage setup on the street, with many more inside the theater they had rented for the evening, in addition the street was packed with the usual Friday night revelers who where all totally perplexed. All of a sudden the loudspeaker came on, and Bart Simpson's voice blared out "Hello, Sydney!" The the video hookup from inside went live and she appeared on the screen, welcoming everyone to the opening. Shortly after Kate Cebrano (tubby Aussie songstress and devout Scientologist) came on stage to annouce the big opening, blah blah blah to the bafflment of the most non-Scio crowd present, then she and the tuxedo wearing tanned yank Scio out from head office began the countdown to the "grand opening". Drums rolled, they hit one - I should mention at this point thaty it had been raining - nothing happend. these two fuckwits are standing on a damp stage in front of what looks like a two story paper mache science project while the only sound is the passing traffic and the noise of hundreds of cinema goes trying to push through the crowds of the faithful to get to their movies. After much running around, swearing and thumping the pyro guys get TWO roman candles to sputter to life as Cebrano and captain Dickhead from LA clap and go "woo.", and the local devotees clap wildly on queue. You know, with so may OT-III's and above present I'd have thought their Thetans could have put on a better lightshow - but what the fuck do I know, right?
Anyway, the point is: Nancy, you got busted going "Bart" to promote your "Church". Betcha thought no-one stateside would ever find out, huh?
Re:My brush with Nancy Cartwright, Scientologist.. (Score:2, Interesting)
I never knew that it was a Scieno propaganda tool but now that I think about it the volcano makes sense. The only time I saw something on the screen was the banner advertising Dianetics strapped over it when the screen stopped working.
The show rocked (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The show rocked (Score:3, Insightful)
I suspect the clips over the voices were required by Fox, because they had little relation to what the actors were saying.
I notice that not only did Julie Kavner leave halfway through (right after the Marge segment actually) but she is the only one we never saw do one of her voices. There must be a reason for that...but she had the best off the cuff comment with the "I have more than one G-Spot" comment. Loved when Dan said "yeah, where is it Marge?"
I also liked that they had a Simpsons writer there, and that they showed the classic Ranier Wolfcastle/James Lipton interview where Lipton, after being shot by McBain says "it's an honor to eat your lead."
The clips were annoying, but it seemed like nearer the end, they just said "fuck it" and showed the characters doing the voices. The Bart - Moe phone calls were just brilliant.
Except it was Amanda Hugankiss not Kissandhug.
It was great (Score:2)
Marge: Let me just put it this way ... I have more than one g-spot.
Moe: Moe's tavern, home of the world's smallest large-screen TV.
James to Apu: How much would two dollars worth of gas be? Apu: That's four twenty. (An obvious Phish reference if I've ever seen one (and I have)).
Very enjoyable, they should do another one. I wish they had shown the actors doing the lines more, rather than covering them up with Simpsons clips. (steepling fingers) Excellent.
Simpsons and Christianity (Score:2)
http://news.christiansunite.com/religion/religion0 0940.shtml [christiansunite.com]
Re:haha! (Score:2)
Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show at midnight so fans can record both.
My gripe has been answered, please ignore my idiocy.
Re:James Lipton Is My Cousin (Score:2, Interesting)
Oh, that's exactly why I enjoy watching him...I find it hilarious to see Lipton saying things like "your performance in That Famous Movie was absolutely awe-inspiring" while ignoring true interviewing opportunities, such as when Jack Lemmon admitted to having been an alcoholic at the same time he portrayed one. Lipton just stared blankly at him, and changed the subject after the ackward silence.
Could be worse...he could have made the whole interview about that, and then advertise it as "Jack Lemmon tells his deep, darkest secrets"
Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... (Score:2)
Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Dont you see getting 2 of the same unit somewhat redundant, when 1 can read the signal? WHat I'm suggesting is a 'smart tuner' that could read multiple channels and possibly record many of them at once. After all, every channel is going down that nice coax from your antaenna.
Oh well. Food for thought, stuff that might matter.
Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... (Score:3, Insightful)
Because the required bandwidth would be obscene. That, and I don't believe we even have any existing technology to simply capture a collection of mixed radio signals and somehow (digitally or analog) store them...
But think of the amount of information contained in each signal. Even if you ignore everything but the video, how do you store all of the detail for 100+ channels (or even just a few)?
Those are only a couple of problems with the theory... I'm sure there are many more, but that's the obvious reason.
Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... (Score:4, Interesting)
Sounds like what radio telescopes do, and what SETI@Home analyses.
That said, the bandwidth is obscene (as you mentioned), the TiVo hasn't got the processor power to handle that much data (even the lowest scale cable subscription). I didn't do the calculations but I'm pretty confident that even if the TiVo did have the processor power, the hard drive would not be able to write more then five or ten channel's data at a time. And even if it could, the amount of data would overwhelm even a hacked TiVo with a hypothetical terabyte of hard drive space. (I don't think they've been hacked that high but I could be wrong.)
Guestimate such a drive at a thousand hours (1 Hr. = 1GB or so; it's not perfect but who cares?) and call the cable subscription about 70 channels at the least (that's what I get here w/ Basic Only), and you're looking at a whole 14 hours of storage. (Coincidentally that's how much my 1st-gen TiVo stores of just one channel...
You could certainly build a machine capable of doing this but I'm guestimating you're getting into the tens of thousands of dollars to aquire the processor power and the massive RAID-like array needed to compress the stream to a decent size, not to mention the price of the memory bus that can move that much data around. Again, radio telescopes do this stuff so I know it must exist somewhere... but if it's rare enough, the fees associated with the fact that it's a custom solution every time could start pushing you into the hundreds of thousands or millions+ to build a box that just eats the cable signals and stores some decent amount.
(You can shuffle some of the cost by changing the specs of the system, such as needing less processor power if you don't compress, but then you need to spend more on the drive array to up the throughput. If you're on a DirecTV service, all the data is already compressed but you're still going to spend a lot of money on that drive array.)
In conclusion, do not hold your breath expecting to see this in consumer electronics anytime soon.
Someone proposed this in the last 2600... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Someone proposed this in the last 2600... (Score:2)
Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... (Score:2)
Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... (Score:2)
So even if those were just 1's and 0's coming at 750 MHZ, you simply can't write that fast to your hard drive.
But it's actually some analog stream that you'd have to convert to digital form, and I don't know what type of overhead that involves.
Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... (Score:2)
That copper coaxial carries a hell of a lot of crappy content, 24/7. Storing it digitally in a form that you could pull a decent image out of would take much I/O.
The problem with digital, see, is it likes to get it right, every time. Analog is much more forgiving, and will let you manipulate it as much as you like, giving up some quality every time. With digital it's all or nothing.
One problem with your theory (Score:2)
Because you'll never want to. When will you want to watch 75+ channels of crap? It's bad enough that you can record one channel at a time!
Re:PARENT GOATSE.CX POST (Score:1)
Me no function beer well without
Re:"fans" ? (Score:1, Funny)
Wow (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Entertainment Weekly's Article on 300 episodes. (Score:2)
Re:Entertainment Weekly's Article on 300 episodes. (Score:2, Funny)
Have you considered applying to be a slashdot editor ?
Re:Canada? (Score:2)
Re:Bravo in the UK (Score:2)
B) The show I mentioned is on barely-watched Bravo, not Fox.
C) The Simpsons needs little promotion: it's Fox's biggest show ever.
D) Notice my relatively low five digit
E) Moron.
David Cross, not Bob Odenkirk (Score:2)
David Cross: The Pride is Back [imdb.com]
Re:MORONS (Score:2)