Junkyard Wars Wants You! 377
Dan Messinger writes "Bring On The Junk! Junkyard Wars is looking for new contestants to compete on the 2003 series. Teams of contestants are given ten hours to build a machine to solve a specific challenge using parts they salvage from a junkyard. In contrast to previous seasons, this year we are looking for individual applicants who are skilled at putting together sophisticated machinery and not afraid of getting their hands dirty. Successful candidates will possess a strong background in engineering, fabrication and a good mechanical 'know how.' Junkyard Wars wants applications from people of all ages, races, creeds, colors, sexes, religions, and sexual orientations, as well as people with physical disabilities. We are especially interested in applications from women and/or people of color, as previous crops of contenders have been underrepresented among these groups. Lots of kids watch Junkyard Wars and we want to show them that anyone can grow up to be the world's greatest mechanic or engineer! If you think you match the description or you know of someone who does - please log onto our website and apply: you will find the application forms as well as all of the information that you need regarding applying. Application deadline is February 28, 2003."
PC! (Score:5, Funny)
I've been saying for years that we need more hispanic lesbians building robots on TV. Count me IN!
Re:PC! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:PC! (Score:3, Funny)
But hey, I'm a bit kinky...
Re:PC! (Score:2)
Toolbelt? Hispanic lesbian? No, you can't attend wearing a strap-on.
Sounds like fun (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:3, Interesting)
1. Diversity
2. ???
3. Profit!
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:2)
Why does diversity ALWAYS mean race (btw, I think Asians are getting pretty close to losing any preferential treatment, the other minorities have a little resentment towards them because they have been so successful), ethnicity, sexual orientation, handicap status etc?
Diversity for Junk Yard Wars should be something like we need more people with Electrical backgrounds, machinists or something like that.
Also, how are they going to check to see if you are gay? Seriously, how many gay men know a lot about building stuff? Are the various interior decorating shows actively seeking more straight men? No, of course not.
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, put down your taco for a second and get a job, maybe then you'll understand.
Did that bother you? Maybe now you understand why making generalizations about people is a bad thing. Come on people, this is after school special 101, grow up.
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:2)
No it didn't bother me (tacos are awesome, though I am not mexican).
I was mostly joking, but how many effiminate(which I do realize is different than being gay but they are often related) men have you seen on junkyard wars, or working in professions like engineering etc.
Generalizations are a bad thing? Is that not a generalization?
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:2)
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:2)
The company (RDFMedia.com) is based in London, and the FCC doesn't give a poo about how many minorities you have on your show, anyway.
However, Cathy Rogers (the creator of both Junkyard Wars and Full Metal Challenge) is head of the LA office of RDFMedia.com, the office that is in charge of the production of the two shows. Also, she is a total babe.
Re:Sounds like fun (Score:2)
I guess it would be ok if they kept the same "format" where they have 10 hours to build their machines then "The next day, they race!" I don't think I'd like this "random team" business though... sounds kinda... ripoffy (if that's even a word, which it probably isn't)
Underrepresentation? (Score:5, Insightful)
Those groups are "underrepresented" among engineers!
Re:Underrepresentation? (Score:2, Informative)
Also, more hot chicks wear I work would be great (*damn* did I say that out loud?)
[0] Unless you believe that only white males are genetically predisposed to becoming capable engineers, in which case, well
Re:Underrepresentation? (Score:3, Funny)
what's an "I work" and how do you wear one?
Re:Underrepresentation? (Score:2, Funny)
Jesus, thats one of the dumbest things I've ever typed. *where*, *where*, *where*
I am an idiot.
Re:Underrepresentation? (Score:2)
Re:Underrepresentation? (Score:2)
"Brain Sex:The Real Difference Between Men & Women"
Anne Moir, Ph.D. and David Jessel
Of course you might also pick one alternative as the only truth and call anyone who disagrees with it a moron.
Re:sometimes I think to myself (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:sometimes I think to myself (Score:2)
2. I don't know about anyone else, and I'm certainly not making a generalization about a female engineering population from a school that I've never attended, but at my college, there were quite a few girls/women/females/other non-objectional term who were attending strictly for their MRS degree.
So societal, parental, whatever, there were very few serious engineering students at my school. Companies too have a difficult time finding them to hire. For example, my sister (Industrial Engineer) was getting actively recruited, signing bonuses, the whole nine at a time when male engineers were getting dick-all.
Why So Few Gay Engineers? (Score:5, Funny)
Those groups are "underrepresented" among engineers!
Yeah, tell me about it. In my engineering classes, out of about 300 students, we only had two gay guys. Two! And they were both in aerospace engineering.
It was really annoying, because anytime I needed fashion advice, I had to walk all the way to the arts buildings on the other end of campus and start asking random people in the hallways.
In my experience, there are only two kinds of people who can drink harder than engineers: mariners and gay people. I think it would be utterly terrifying to meet a gay marine engineer.
Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? (Score:2)
Where have you been? The entire steel industry is gay. Aerospace too, and the railroads.
(Sorry, couldn't help myself.) Besides, the real gayness is found in the Electrical Engineering department.
Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? (Score:4, Funny)
The best part of that show (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The best part of that show (Score:2)
Lisa [channel4.com] -- note that the show is called "Scrapheap Challenge" in the UK.
Translation: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Translation: (Score:2)
Never Fails (Score:4, Insightful)
TV Magic! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:TV Magic! (Score:5, Informative)
A lot of teams finish with spare time on their hands... not a lot of spare time, but I've seen at least 30 minutes before. They usually lose.
The majority do finish in the "nick of time"... or don't actually finish at all and are welding/constructing during the hour of tinker time on competition day.
A rather large number of the machines don't work at all, or fail during the tests... I wonder if they'll ever do hydroplanes again since they've yet to have a single one work out of two competitions (or maybe more... don't recall - most of them floated and moved, but none actually hydroplaned).
Read the forums though... the ones where the teams actually participate in them. There isn't any behind the scenes help in construction. Sorry to burst your cynical bubble.
Re:TV Magic! (Score:2)
I forget which team it was (I think it was the Mules or something... forget their full name) but I was really disappointed when their motor died in the hydroplane competition because their machine was really cool... built from the helicopter blades and stuff, and I really really wanted to see it go and win... they were an awesome team.
Just like real life! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:TV Magic! (Score:3, Insightful)
Looking for your keys? They always seem to be in the last place you look. That's because you stop looking for them when you find them.
Re:TV Magic! (Score:2)
After nine hours the team has probably done all of the planning they need in order to build their machine. The impending deadline forces them to stop their 'is this the best way to do things' discussions and actually turn out a product.
Re:Never Fails (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Never Fails (Score:2)
Great show but wrong place to solicit (Score:5, Funny)
Overweight all-talk do-nothing airchair warriors.
If you had some sort of porn watching or complaining challenge - then this would be the place.
Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit (Score:2, Funny)
As a skinny pale all-talk-do-nothing airchair warrior, I am deeply offended! Stereotypes like this are hurtful and counter productive but... hmmm... one more sentance and I might be doing something.
/me crawls back into his seat
Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit (Score:2, Insightful)
Overweight all-talk do-nothing airchair warriors.
If you had some sort of porn watching or complaining challenge - then this would be the place.
Are you suggesting -- PornYard Wars? What a great idea! Take two teams, make them construct a video camera and film the best porn movie, all in 10 hours. The hosts will, of course, stack the junkyard with cheesy second-rate jazz musicians for the background tracks. They also might place creative costumes in inconspicuous places -- skimpy bikinis, schoolgirl uniforms, nurses uniforms, tennis outfits, etc.
The male/female ratio would definitely need to improve for this show to take off, though.
You're posting this on the wrong site... (Score:4, Funny)
But HW is probably a little too "RL" for the
Now, if it were **LEGO** wars, or involved building video game consoles out of discarded kitchen appliances we could talk.
Great show though. Engineering r0X0rz!
Coming soon to TLC ... (Score:3, Funny)
Overclock-Your-Toaster Wars!
Run-Linux-on-(anything) Wars!
Underrepresented.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Underrepresented.. (Score:2)
i wanna see the slashdot squad... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... (Score:2)
Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... (Score:2)
Contradiction (Score:2, Funny)
"...as well as people with physical disabilities..."
What about people with no hands?
This IS slashdot... (Score:5, Funny)
Hands dirty? The poster does realize that this is slashdot, right?
Perhaps he ment to post that they were looking for someone to bitch on the sidelines in the upcoming season...
Re:This IS slashdot... (Score:2)
Real Engineers (Score:5, Interesting)
And on the diversity front; yes, engineers as a group are a lot more white and male than the population and even many other professions, but that doesn't mean we don't value diversity. We just don't have much time for a 'token' anything. I hope they can find a couple of competent participants that are not white males to spice up their show, but it will flop if these people don't add something to the teams they are on.
The question I have is whether participants are paid. I would volunteer in a heartbeat if they made it worth my while, but I don't have time to just contribute my valuable time to their money making operation. I also think the concept could be a lot cooler if it wasn't so much of a race as a true engineering competition. You could still factor in time as a bonus for shorter time taken, but rushing through things rarely makes for good engineering.
You could also downplay the 'wars' part of it and mix in some footage of a wide variety of wild and weird engineering feets, projects and competitions. Highlights of the 2.70 contest from MIT would always be good for a side story. For those who don't know the reference, '2.70' is the course number for a mechnical engineering design course that features a design competition where you get a box of parts and a goal, and teams just go at it. It has been featured on some programs in the past (Scientific American is one such program AFIAK). Just a thought.
Wow, just like Mad Max (Score:4, Funny)
Trends (Score:2, Offtopic)
With the actual problem in Middle East (and possible consequences [idleworm.com]) maybe the next war will be really a Junkyard war.
Re:Trends (Score:2)
Correct me if I'm wrong.. (Score:5, Funny)
Create a gameshow called IT Storage Wars.
Premise: Nerds will be unleashed upon ridiculously aged hardware with a copy of putty.exe, 5 1/5 floppy disc, Linux distribution on a USB-pen, and a wrench to build enterprise-level application servers complete with clustering and a backend database.
I think this could be a winning combination.
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. (Score:2)
Wow (Score:5, Funny)
And yes, I'll be applying. Heh.
Re:Wow (Score:2)
I just hope that he's still getting snail mail spam.
Wonder if they will... (Score:2, Funny)
*Mental Picture*
Ok, guys.. You got 10 hours to build a PC that will run Quake2 in 60 FPS or more. Good luck !
Re:Wonder if they will... (Score:2)
And to make it more suitable to this crowd, the challenges would be to build a computer out of crap in the yard in ten hours, then use it to get on slashdot, and the team that makes the most SOVIET RUSSIA, Natalie Portman/grits in pants, "is dead", and FP b1tc#3z! 3y3 0\/\/n3rz J00! posts in two hours wins.
Come on now (Score:3, Informative)
Can't they come up with a better solution then this? At the very least make the application an interactive PDF and at most make it a Web Form.
But because they are using word they have to post an e-mail address stating that if you can not open word to e-mail someone about it.
Not very technically saavy they seem.
Re:Come on now (Score:2)
Talk like Yoda you do much?
Seems to me they have to raise the bar a little bit for these entries, else they'll be bombarded. Granted, they're soliciting, but there's a difference between holding your cattle call at 8:00am on a Thursday in a SoHo loft and Noon on a Saturday in Central Park. You'd be surprised at how many time-wasting wannabes and poseurs the simple requirement of licking a stamp and dropping an envelope into a box eliminates.
I fowarded this to my dad (Score:4, Interesting)
when he was a professor, his students hated him because he made them think (imagine that) and he frequently gave them assignments that were much like this show (the one I recall best was they were given a remote control car, assorted kitchen appliances, tin foil, wood, tennis balls, a 286, and some other stuff and were supposed to make a robot that would roam about a gym and retrieve various objects that were placed there. nobody completed the assignment and most didn't even try)
I told him about this show once and he was quite excited - had never seen it - I don't think he watches tv. he wanted me to tape it for him, which to me is like asking me to carve it out of stone for him - I don't even own a VCR.
Now I see that they sell VHS tapes of the show, so I guess now I know a present for him.
I agree with another poster on here that my fav part of the show was the cute brit host girl that is now on that show with Henry Rollins.
Re:Which show with Henry Rollins?? (Score:2, Informative)
The premise is basically that a couple dozen teams from around the world (there were teams from Argentina, Germany, China, Chile...) get $3000 and 30 days to build a do-anything vehicle. Then they're all shipped to a decomissioned nuclear power plant where they compete in different games, including steep hill climbs, swamp racing, a 'roller coaster' with see-saw platforms and steeply banked turns, bowling, and something loosely based on soccer (football).
Each episode has 3 teams competing against each other, and the two teams with the highest number of points at the end of the episode get to Sumo wrestle each other with the ground covered in tires, soapy water, barb wire, and caltrops.
The winner of the first season was a British beast of a machine with 8 wheels and two engines. They beat out a Quebec team with a good tracked design (they nearly got second place in the soccer game with a thrown track!), which seemed to have mechanical problems in the final Sumo match.
It's not as good as Junkyard Wars, but with what they learned in the first season, any second season should be better.
Re:I fowarded this to my dad (Score:2, Interesting)
The grade wasn't based on successful completion, but about how they approached the problem - I don't think he expected anyone to actually finish it - but what disappointed him was that nobody even tried.
For that project, just to show them it *could* be done with what he gave them, he did one by himeself about halfway through the semester and walked them through it showing them the thinking process (this was an advanced class, not a 101).
Even after all of that, many didn't even bother with an attempt at it.
His version used infrared sensors, a webcam, a few servos, kitchen tongs, and the remote controlled car - with the 286 motherboard connected to that back. It was setup to run a loop (in forth) that would scan the sensors, figure out what was around, move the steering servos accordingly, and then move forward or backward by running the motors for a fixed amount of time. Then it would check the sensors again and repeat.
IMO it was and is a shitty school and he deserved to be somewhere better.
He had a few students that liked him and worked well with him and they went on towards their PhDs at CalTech, Princeton, and MIT. The rest just complained to the deans that he didn't do cookbook labs (he was an analytical chem professor).
He worked with Bob Ballard and designed his own JASON project on site (via the web - which was just getting big (1995) he setup a remote controlled car that drove over a plexiglass platform which had holes in it (and the car had a webcam mounted on it, pointing down throught he plexi). Under that plexiglass, about 5 inches down, were common household objects spread out on a table - and then that entire deal (under the plexiglass) was covered in sand.
From the web page, you could log in and gain control of the vehicle for a time limit (I think 1 min) and then you could move it around - press the right button, the page would submit and you would move a unit right. You would see on screen what the car "saw" through its camera. Then you could press the "blow" button (forget what it was called) and it activated a compressed air hose on the vehicle that would blow the sand away that was under the car/plexi.
The desired result was that you could go in and uncover part of the buried scene - much in the way that Ballard works when he goes on his dives (Bob Ballard is the man that discovered the wreck of the Titanic).
This project brought much attention to the college and allowed many elementary schools to compete against each other and chat via the web page - there was additional content that allowed them more to learn about the process.
My dad also worked for NASA in the summers and represented the school...
But, because of all that he did and the fact that his students felt he didn't do enough cookbook labs, he didn't get tenure.
He left, they shut down the JASON project that was there, and he stopped working with NASA.
Then he moved to Biotech and made 5x his previous salary the first year.
After 5 or so years with that, he got laid off and he travelled Canada living out of his car and writing two books for a year.
Not sure what he is up to now - last I talked to him he was at a conference in LA that discusses biotech automation and he was talking with a friend out there about a job.
I have a lot of respect for him, but then, I'm biased
Pet Peeve #1 (Score:3, Funny)
please log onto our website
I tried, but I couldn't find the blank for my userid and password. Perhaps your site is broken.
Wish it were for Scrap Heap (Score:2)
hmm (Score:2)
And why did they drop Kryten? He was deadly!
The beginning of the end (Score:5, Funny)
Will this show suck?
To bad they don't want (Score:4, Funny)
Then they'd have come to the right place.
Why does this come into play? (Score:2)
Re:Why does this come into play? (Score:2)
An Insightful Slashdot Poll..? (Score:2)
Caucasian
Black
Asian
Hispanic
Middle eastern
Native [Australian/American/etc]
Mixed
Cowboynealean
I am... (Score:3, Funny)
Research Triangle Team (Score:2)
I grew up on a farm with a well-equipped shop and was always putting things together. I've also got an degree from Cornell Bio. & Ag. Engineering. Proficient in all sorts of mechanical and electrical systems.
If you're local, and feel like trying this - I'm all about digging through junk piles to get random shit built! email: cyrus_yunker at ncsu.edu Include in subject 'slashdot'.
Re:Research Triangle Team (Score:2, Informative)
"Unlike previous seasons, competitors will be chosen this year as individuals, not as complete teams." (Their emphasis, not mine)
I think I liked the team concept better.
Re:Research Triangle Team (Score:2)
Junkyard Wars Wants You? (Score:3, Funny)
You want Junkyard Wa....
Never mind.
I nominate Maxwell Hall (Score:3, Funny)
Plywood Guy is an "exercise in the magic power of plywood and drywall screws. He crouches! He stands! He stores potential energy!"
tone
Junkyard wars " M$ Internet Edition" (Score:4, Funny)
Contestants must take code snipets from Real M$ applications and make some thing that REALLY functions and DOES what they planned it to do, and it won't cost a fortune to build, and can be done in a matter of 10 hours.
I'm sick of this crap (Score:2)
You know what else? I also have a disability, and am apart of hte growing amount of identified geeks out there who have been diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome. Probably won't make for good TV, but fuck it....I had to get it off my chest.
I'm sick of all these fucking jokes about lesbian builders. This is serious!
Re:I'm sick of this crap (Score:3, Insightful)
So you'd like people to be put on the show based on the color of their skin? And you don't think that devalues people of color? I mean, really: Do you want to be on the show because you've earned and deserve it, or do you want them just handing it over to you because your skin is the right shade of grey?
If you have the skills and abilities to get put on this show, then get there based on those skills instead of pulling out the race card.
Nominate the fundie fartbags (Score:2, Funny)
What about me? (Score:2)
I have no arms, but can rebuild an engine with my feet, I wonder if I'll make the cut.
I'm putting together my team.... (Score:3, Funny)
Junkyard Wars is in decline... but can be saved. (Score:5, Insightful)
1. THE HOSTS: In the old says we had Robert Lewellyn, who was perfect. He was funny, had clever insights, and joked around with the teams. Who can forget his impersonation of a V8 engine? The show brought Cathy onscreen as a foil for him, and that worked out fine too -- they played well off each other. Then we got George Gray. Who was about 50% as fun and interesting as Robert (but still acceptable). Now they've hit rock-bottom with Tyler, who offers no ad-lib humour, no insights, nothing -- all he does is yell -- and a generic hollywood talking head chick who doesn't even have as much personality as Tyler.
2. MACHINE BUILDS: There was a time when it mattered if your machine worked or not, and if you really tried. Teams came up with brilliant designs, and there were failures, but they had to work at least a LITTLE. And teams did things that were ambitious. On one of the old British shows, a team actually built a demolition machine with a hydraulic claw. And it WORKED! Yes, they eventually had some hydraulic problems and their radiator sprung a leak, but when have we seen anything that great in the last three seasons? Nowadays we have things like "Mega Wars", where teams get two days to build an all-terrain amphibious vehicle, and in those two days, two of the teams manage to do nothing more than strip down an existing truck and hook some empty drums on for flotation in the water part of the challenge. Or we get challenges like the Hydrofoil, where the competition is a boat that can't hydrofoil vs. a boat that can't move at all. It's a disgrace.
3. TEAM CHARACTERS: The Bodgers, The Long Brothers, The Techno Teachers, even the original Orange and Yellow teams were full of interesting, likeable characters. We all loved Anne, Nosher, Dick, and the rest of the old crews. We cared about them and rooted for them.
In contrast, the teams that won the last two US seasons have had one thing in common: they're both comprised of obnoxious, cursing, unlikable jerks with no personalities. Our only hope in watching their progress through the season was that they'd lose and we wouldn't have to see them again.
Let's face it: when we're against the teams, we're against the show.
4. SPORTSMANSHIP: In the old days teams would trade with each other if they needed something. Nowadays they just steal it. Back then, teams joked around and had a good time. Our kids could watch the show and learn how to be a good sport, that there was such a thing as friendly competition, that winning wasn't everything. Now the teams mock each other's failures, openly berate the experts who try to help them, jump on each other's stolen stuff and are all-around poor sports. We can't let our kids watch the show anymore. It sends them the wrong message.
5. FAIR PLAY: I don't think it's news to anyone that season 7's team won by cheating. Twice. And the last US season was "won" by a big cheat-off in the demolition final where both teams just ran their trucks into the walls because neither of them could make even their basic machines work. What a disappointment.
What can JW do now?
If you ask me, it's a simple matter to address these five issues.
1. HOSTS: Put Robert and Cathy together again. Period.
2. BUILDS: Talk to your experts before challenges. Make sure they have interesting ideas to present. Talk to your teams. Make sure everyone knows that their machines need to work. Do more creative editing if necessary. Find more good challenges. Ice racers, with 4-wheel drive, 4-wheel steering and homemade studded tires? Pipe sleds that need to travel inside big pipes and be invertable, with wheels top and bottom? Pole climbing machines? OK, my ideas aren't all gems, but that's 2 minutes' work off the top of my head. I'll bet Cathy & co. can do a lot better than I can -- or than what we've been getting lately.
3. CHARACTERS: Rather than making everyone on the team required to be a welder, pick teams that are going to be fun to watch and who demonstrate some imagination. If necessary, bring back teams from previous seasons. Why not? We liked them before. We'd like to see them again. Particularly some of the early teams, whom new viewers might have never seen at all.
4. SPORTSMANSHIP: This springs from #3, but is something you can enforce too.
5. FAIR PLAY: Make the rules clear and stick to them.
Making these changes would cost the show almost nothing, and would in my opinion save the show. Longtime fans would be thrilled to see a new golden age of JW, and new fans would be won over.
Cathy Rogers and Bobo (Score:2, Funny)
I wonder if Cathy Rogers liked my Junkyard Wars entry tape from a couple of years ago. Bobo hates cans. And sometimes garlic cloves, too. [glowingplate.com]
Re:Cathy Rogers and Bobo (Score:2)
Re:Not trying ot be mean... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Not trying ot be mean... (Score:3, Funny)
There do exist some disabilities which preclude some people from doing some activities. For instance, I am not well suited to bearing children, since I'm male.
Re:Not trying ot be mean... (Score:2)
Re:Not trying ot be mean... (Score:5, Insightful)
The UK version (Scrapheap Challenge [channel4.com]) doesn't always have working machines. In the last series a car tossing trebuchet collapsed in spectacular fashion on the first attempt to hurl a Mini through the air. It is also common to see teams sitting, in true British stereotype fashion, wth a cup of tea at the end of the building time, having finished half an hour early.
Pedantic explanation of Scrapheap/Junkyard (Score:5, Informative)
There are basically two programmes:
Just to confuse things though, when Discovery Channel in Europe shows the programmes the use Scrapheap Challenge as the title regardless of which version the programme originally came from.
Both SHC and JW are filmed in the same place. Last series this was in the US. This series its moved back to the UK. As you say, "foreign" rubbish is imported if necessary to make people feel at home.
Am I the saddest man on
Re:Pedantic explanation of Scrapheap/Junkyard (Score:3, Informative)
And, conversely, it's all "Junkyard Wars" on the US version of Discovery Channel, regardless of the original program.
Am I the saddest man on /. for knowing all this?
No, just a true /.er.