Monster Garage's Robotic R/C Car Challenge 98
KMan writes "According to Roboteq Discover Channel's Monster Garage will be airing an epsisode where the challenge will be to build an R/C controlled car (full sized/real deal). 'Details' on how to build your own R/C car can be found at Roboteq along with airing time info for the Monster Garage episode."
So I don't need to buy cars from... (Score:3, Funny)
It's been done before (Score:4, Informative)
Though the linked video file is no longer there.
Re:It's been done before (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It's been done before (Score:4, Informative)
http://tlc.discovery.com/fansites/junkyard/episod
http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/S/scra
It's been done before! (Score:5, Interesting)
Original Source (Score:2)
(you can see the name on the side of their truck)
Here's a TechTV interview [techtv.com] with them.
And your server is zippy :O)
so whats robotic ? (Score:4, Insightful)
is there anything robotic about a RC car/Boat/plane ?
its like those TV shows battlebots/robotwars that are simply glorified radio control cars, can a radio controlled device really be called a robot ? or is it just another way to make RC seem "cool" if you add the word "robot"
Re:so whats robotic ? (Score:3, Insightful)
its like those TV shows battlebots/robotwars that are simply glorified radio control cars, can a radio controlled device really be called a robot ?
I've always thought they could improve that show by including both unlimited and autonomous divisions. Admittedly, a well armed autonomous robot is dangerous, but surely there's some way to manage it with a combination of kiss switches and willingness to let it go until it runs out of whatever powers it if necessary.
Re:so whats robotic ? (Score:5, Funny)
If there's anything more dangerous than a well armed, autonomous robot, it's a well armed, autonomous robot that can only be deactivated with a kiss.
Be prepared to duck and weave...
Re:so whats robotic ? (Score:2)
My (perhaps eternally) unbuild Battlebot was going to incorporate a lot more onboard intelligence than is normally seen. If nothing else, it would hopefully cut down on "driver error" losses (of which I saw many), but I was still going to refuse to call it a robot on general principles.
However, writing this post led me to try to find an authoritative definition for the term 'robot'. The following is typical:
"A robot is a machine designed to execute one or more tasks repeatedly,
TELEOPERATION (Score:2)
While not autonomous, it is still a subset of robotics.
Sorry (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:Sorry (Score:1)
Or, on a more constructive note, full sized radio controlled cars would be good for, say, a (ahem) demolition derby. Or the military, like ground based drones. (If they don't already have them.)
But other than that, I don't see a point, and naturally some danger, with these things, I would not want to see one driving down my street. I don't think I'd even want to drive one, even with cameras you don't have th
Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:4, Interesting)
I understand that it is part of his whole "bad boy" persona, but he's just been a complete dick lately. Whenever anyone stands up to him, I find myself rooting for them, even though they get labelled the "bad" guy.
My Monday night viewing is narrowing down to Monster House and American Chopper.
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:5, Insightful)
1. He was always an ass, but you just liked it before.
2. The producers are running out of ideas, and it's getting to Jessie. During the PT Crusier show he kept harping of the fact that the idea (from the producers) sucked.
3. They're starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel for show talent. On shows where there is good talent with good personalities, Jessie isn't an ass.
All of these make Jessie more of an ass.
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:2)
Sometimes Jesse tries to be big man and talk about how this is his "job" when people aren't being as serious as he'd like. Well, if he's going to take that attitude, he should be more professional all the time instead of being a total tool when he's cranky. The Delorean Hovercraft build is a prime example of him just not being professional at all. If this is his "job," he should be a part of it all the time o
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:1)
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:2)
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:1)
TV anyone?
Internet?
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:5, Insightful)
Stupid announcer voices, graphical effects, and corporate sponsorship? Terrible.
Its amazing that Discovery got it so right with American Chopper, and so so wrong with Monster Garage. The ingredients are the same, there's just a distinct lack of trumped-up bullshit in American Chopper.
It seems like every third episode of Monster Garage Jesse is saying something that translates to "The Producers of this show are morons," and I think he's right. Remember the skate-board-ramp-RV episode? The producer gets into a whining match with one of the skater/builders that pretty clearly illustrates what a waste the producer is. And remember, he has artistic control... if he left that in, imagine what he's edited out. The crew from the two hearse shows (a dysfunctional group of people if I ever saw one) said similiar things about the producers, and most of them were hollywood types that should be used to that kind of nonsense.
Monster Garage has a lot of great aspects to it, but the "artistic input" of the producer and who ever else has their hands in the pie sure destroys it.
--
lds
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:2)
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:1)
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:1)
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:2)
It would be too ironic to see his resume on Monster.com.
Re:Jessie's involvement in the show (Score:1)
Lately my attention has turned more towards "American Chopper" with drama and all.
Been done (Score:5, Insightful)
At least in the Junkyard version, the two teams fought the RC cars Battlebots style, and Mythbusters strapped a set of rocket engines to it!
Don't get me wrong, Monster Garage is a good show, but sometimes it's a little overhyped.
=Smidge=
Re:Been done (Score:1)
Re:Been done (Score:2)
And on Junkyard Wars they did it in 10 hours as opposed to a week.
I like Monster Garage, but this is a lame project.
Re:Been done (Score:1)
And with junk (well, duh!) and fewer people instead a pile of cash and lot of freebies. Yeah, they supposedly cut back the freebie to just one item, but I still have to wonder if that's really true.
Overhyped? (Score:2)
The only hype I see here is coming from the person that posted this to Slashdot.
Discovery Channel are not hyping this episode more than any other... it's getting the exact same "next week on monster garage" television advertisments.
I would agree that some of the monster garage challenges aren't too awe-inspiring... but I'd rather watch the lame shark cage pontoon episode again than watch Friends or SurvivalShowOfThe
"KITT, buddy - I need you!" (Score:4, Funny)
Hmm. Am I the only one who thinks this might be a backdoor pilot for a Knight Rider revival?
already been done on junkyard wars (Score:2)
Video clip (Score:5, Interesting)
...that becomes... (Score:2, Funny)
Monster Garage - More Info (Score:4, Informative)
Shark-jumping [jumptheshark.com]
How 'Monster Garage' Works [howstuffworks.com]
Twisted metal mind [canoe.ca]
Almost-related ramblings of a software developer [marksanborn.com]
Re:Monster Garage - More Info -D'oh! (Score:2)
Sorry, I effed up the last link's URL and forgot to include one:
Almost-related ramblings of a software developer [ketnerlake.com]
Why is Jesse James so popular? [marksanborn.com]
Doc Brown (Score:2, Informative)
HowTo convert RC Car to a Robot (Score:4, Insightful)
http://web.mit.edu/tas/www/traxx/rt_main.htm [mit.edu]
Re:HowTo convert RC Car to a Robot (Score:2)
A real example of automotive robotics would be active suspension, a so-far failed technology which woul
Re:HowTo convert RC Car to a Robot (Score:2)
The difference between a robot and a remote-controlled toy is that the robot has a goal (pick this thing up) and it decides how to do it, whereas you control each action of a robotlike toy.
The way rege
Re:HowTo convert RC Car to a Robot (Score:2)
Now, let me address ABS and regenerative braking once more. ABS means Antilock Braking System. Braking is slowing you down. Antilock means without the wheels stopping before the car does. Regenerati
I'm not satisfied until... (Score:1)
Monster Garage is a Joke (Score:4, Insightful)
Lost interest in that worthless show when then converted a Mustang into a lawnmower. Hanging chrome plated non-functional mower blades from the car doors is suppose to be cool? Caught one of the later shows where they tried to drive a couple backhoe blades off a pair of hydraulic pumps using a little tiny fan belt coupled to a car motor. Seems they could figure out why the fan belt kept braking. Jesse was there the whole time and didn't catch on. Makes me wonder how real his bikes are. Don't count on Monster Garage for any useful inspiration.
Re:Monster Garage is a Joke (Score:2)
I thought I remembered hearing that the lawnermower episode was the pilot. I was wrong. It's the forth episode [discovery.com]. (Although I believe that car was the first "idea" the producers came up with.)
I gave up interest in the show when it became crystal clear that the first rule ("When completed, the monster machine must appear to be stock.") was completely and totally ignored. In fact, none of the rules seem to actually appl
Re:Monster Garage is a Joke (Score:1)
And since jessie builds motorcycles why don't they use motorcycles as the base for a few projects. The only time I saw a motorcycle in monster garage was during the Terminator 3 truck episode and then the bike(triumph) was only a prop.
Junkyard Wars (Score:1)
This would be great for NASCAR (Score:1, Redundant)
The cars are so hobbled by aerodynamics rules and sometimes even restrictor plates that you don't get racing, you get single-file drafting and a ton of pit strategy, and neither is exciting racing. Co
Re:This would be great for NASCAR (Score:1)
Now that would be cool. I've been much of a racing fan, but I just might watch remotely piloted race cars. No safety restrictions, just raw unchecked competition.
Imagine screaming machines racing around the track at hundreds of miles per hour with the drivers on the sidelines. If there is a wreck then would be parts flying everywhere through the air and no one would get hurt.
Then someday a touring test of sort
Talk about dangerous ... (Score:4, Insightful)
R/C equipment fails. Even in a standard sized R/C car or plane, things can and do go wrong. Planes can fly miles away before they run out of gas, and cars can end up doing doughnuts at full speed until they hit something or flip over.
With a full sized car, the consequences of a failure will be much worse. Imagine losing control of your car and having it go to full speed, straight ahead -- merely being on a test track won't be enough, as the car could easily plow through fences, barriers and even buildings. And you'd have no way to stop it.
I'd strongly suggest that nobody attempt this without extensive experience with both R/C stuff and with modifying full sized cars. And I'd also suggest installing a kill switch of some sort that will immediately kill the engine, and have this switch controlled by a different R/C transmitter on a different channel entirely, with a different battery -- just in case.
Also, the picture shows a Futaba 6X transmitter -- be aware that by default transmitters like this are on the 72 mhz frequency band (in the US), and that the use of the 72 mhz band for controlling ground vehicles is *illegal*. Instead, you're supposed to use the 75 mhz band. Most R/C car transmitters have at most three channels, so people building this sort of thing will be looking at airplane equipment for the extra channels, but you need to be aware that you can't just use any old equipment you find -- you'll need to special order 75 mhz equipment from the manufacturers to be legal (yes, it is available and it doesn't even cost much more. But it is rare, and it's unlikely you'll find it in somebody's attic unless they're into large R/C cars or robots.)
Re:Talk about dangerous ... (Score:1)
Re:Talk about dangerous ... (Score:2)
Yes, and if you have PCM equipment this is built in. However, it's not enough. If the battery gets pulled loose, your servos will all freeze right where they were, and your failsafes will never activate. Or if a big bump cracks your receiver PC board, same thing. Or if your car rolls over and crus
Re:Talk about dangerous ... (Score:1)
The failsafe commonly used to protect against this (Such as the Schumacher Nitro XTR [racing-cars.com] is a simple spring attached to the servo arm. If power is suddenly lost the servo will just get pulled back to the throttle close position, or whatever. Simple but effective.
Re:Talk about dangerous ... (Score:2)
Re:Talk about dangerous ... (Score:2)
Still, a full sized car is much much more dangerous than any battlebot allowed by the BattleBot rules, and requires much more care. Merely relying on your PCM radio to protect you from disaster *is not enough*.
There is a TV series about this! (Score:2, Insightful)
Can't find much info about it, but it's mentioned here! [freeserve.com]
Great fun to watch when someone's put in a fair amount of effort...
Fun show, but... (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:Fun show, but... (Score:2)
What I don't understand is why the producers allow him to get away with this. I wonder if he still gets paid for not showing up on his own show.
Not a robot... (Score:1)
http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee192
Now, thats more like it. Yes, it does not have a camera to emulate vision. But, it is much closer to a robot than a crummy computer controlled R/C car.
Darpa Grand Challenge teams probably all did this. (Score:1)
The Red Team has taken serious safety procautions that this Monster Garge thing seems not to address. There are E-Stop buttons all along the perimeter of the car, and the E-Stop mechanism isn't just an electrical cutoff, but also a huge brake on the drivetrain which engages if power is cut. I would advise anyone trying to build one of these things to use
Yes, I submitted instead of previewing. oops. (Score:1)
JunkYard Wars (Score:2)
I have this weird beleif that the fellas on Junkyard wars might be a little more bright to hvae thought of and accomplished this goal in 10 hours, instead of having all the time in the world to work on it.
Re:JunkYard Wars (Score:1)
I was gonna post about this very point, that it was already done on JY Wars and done in 10 hours, using mostly "junk" albeit finely picked over and amassed "uber junk" but junk nonetheless.
Balloon Chase Vehicle (Score:4, Insightful)
Existing vehicle systems are pretty well set up for this in the modern American land-yacht. All that effort to isolate you from actual vehicle dynamics mean that they've presented you with controls that are pretty much just servo inputs. (Yes, there is a mechanical link in most cases, but they're servo-assisted)
Steering and brake are both heavily boosted, and throttle doesn't require much force.
We were talking about this fifteen years ago...doesn't seem like much of a challenge now.
-Z
Re:Balloon Chase Vehicle (Score:2)
Besides, if it's just instructor and student (as it often was), you didn't have a chase crew (they only show up for paying customers).
So we'd have one guy hitchhike back to get the van.
Besides...this is
-Z
Comments from one of the builders (Score:1)
Hopefully that site allows direct links to UBB threads...
Rich W was one of the builders on the DeLorean hovercraft episode, and also behind the monster GT40. He has some interesting insight into what really went on during production, and also into Jesse's frame of mind. I thought there were some other threads on that same board where he went into greater detail, but this is the only one I can find.
It would be interesting if the MG producers asked him back
Lame show, lame star (Score:2)
Hmm.... (Score:2)
Junkyard Wars... (Score:1)