Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Media Privacy Technology

Smart Billboards 313

djdanlib writes "The New York Times ran this story Sunday about the Mobiltrak smart billboard system. It works by detecting what radio station you're listening to as you pass by a billboard, then displaying advertisements targeted at that station's demographic. It's kind of like a real-time Nielsen Ratings system for radio. And it's entirely passive, requiring no special hardware in your car - it receives the faint tuning signal generated by your radio." We've mentioned these before.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Smart Billboards

Comments Filter:
  • Oh boy... (Score:5, Funny)

    by wrinkledshirt ( 228541 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:08AM (#7724131) Homepage
    Is the Howard Stern show still on the radio these days? That could get dangerous.
    • Re:Oh boy... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by TWX ( 665546 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:22AM (#7724231)
      "Is the Howard Stern show still on the radio these days? That could get dangerous."

      How about the flip side? I listen to NPR a lot, and if enough people are listening to non-corporate radio, it'll be really interesting to see what kinds of ads are displayed.

      Of course in Phoenix, almost all of the corporate stations are running extremely frequent ads for adult stores like "The Castle Boutique" and "Fascinations", or ads for participating in medical studies, so the content could get rather lewd or strange if these advertisers take to the billboards...
      • Re:Oh boy... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by gfxguy ( 98788 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:39AM (#7724346)
        Are you claiming there's no advertising on NPR? I guess plugs for sponsors don't count for some. They do for me, however.
        • Re:Oh boy... (Score:2, Informative)

          by IM6100 ( 692796 )
          Garrison Keillor used to have a whole routine set up around the fact that he could mention who sponsored his programming, but that he wasn't supposed todisclose what they produced or turn it into a commercial. He used to joke around for a minute on Prairie Home Companion about 'This Program brought to you by Cargill' and then guess (wrongly with humour) about what products Cargill might possibly produce.

          Now, Keillor and his ilk just rattle out a whole ditty for each corporate sponsor, written by that spon
      • Re:Oh boy... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by JUSTONEMORELATTE ( 584508 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:50AM (#7724419) Homepage
        How about the flip side? I listen to NPR a lot, and if enough people are listening to non-corporate radio, it'll be really interesting to see what kinds of ads are displayed.

        Wow, I must be further left-of-center than I thought. NPR isn't corporate radio?
        To answer your original ponder about what kind of ads, how about ADM, Saab, Keane, etc. They're still ads, they're still for-profit corporations paying money for their ads to be placed on advertiser-supported broadcast radio.
        Pledge drives support the operations budget of the local re-broadcaster, not NPR.

        --
        • by TWX ( 665546 )
          We're not sitting there with ten minutes of bombardment from your local automobile dealerships advertising $10,000 for your trade, commercials for anti-depression medication, ads from your local nightclubs talking about the ladies that'll be there Thursday night, etc...
        • Re:Oh boy... (Score:3, Insightful)

          by Enzondio ( 110173 ) *
          Pledge drives support NPR as well because local stations have to pay to get NPR programming, thus they support NPR with funds obtained (in most cases anyway) primarily from pledge drives.

          It's indirect, but it's still support.
          • The corporations are steering more of the content [npr.org] as well. Someone in Redmond must have gotten irked by the thought of not having control over the radio content.

            Seriously, what if the majority of riders are listening to truly non-commercial stations like student stations e.g. ones with voice id's like "WCBN 88.3 FM - at the far left of your radio dial" or "Radio Free Ann Arbor". Would the billboard show an ad for a state or city park or a free concert? Or just tell people to bike to work?

      • Re:Oh boy... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by dillon_rinker ( 17944 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @10:01AM (#7724504) Homepage
        Yum - federally funded radio! I can see the ads now:

        "Vote for this politician, who is just like the other one, except for his stance on the death penalty!"

        "Support our drive to change this wholly irrelevant government policy! Ignore the $=power equation, and the fact that you=$0!"

        "Vote! Cloak the government in the mantle of legitimacy!"

        "Vote twice! Cloak the government in the Mantle of Legitimacy +2!"

        Corporate sponsorship is fundamentally no different from federal sponsorship. Both sponsors want you to be a good sheep. Both hold up the threat of mutton to encourage you to permit your fleecing.
    • Is the Howard Stern show still on the radio these days? That could get dangerous.

      It could get worse. I spend most of my driving time listening to (and using) a CB radio.
  • by Space cowboy ( 13680 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:08AM (#7724136) Journal
    Talk about blipverts...

    Simon
  • Hacks? (Score:5, Funny)

    by AbbyNormal ( 216235 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:10AM (#7724151) Homepage
    Finally a way to get back at all of those stupid SUV driver!

    Stuck in bumper to bumper traffic...SUV cuts you off.

    Broadcast message to billboard: "Man in Silver SUV with license plate 12345 has no pants on, is currently drinking, and likes to beat small puppies".
  • Schism. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Smart Billboards, Dumb Advertising.
  • The google link (Score:5, Informative)

    by Albanach ( 527650 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:12AM (#7724157) Homepage
    here [nytimes.com]
  • If my radio.. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kautilya ( 727754 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:12AM (#7724159)
    Umm..if my radio isn't on will I get a message.."Switch on your radio stupid moron! I am not getting any signal. I gotta play some ad for you"
  • by BubbaTheBarbarian ( 316027 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:13AM (#7724165) Journal
    Just a general Q and O...
    How well would these wok in high traffic areas? I could see something like this in Kansas or some other place where you have time to hit the reciver, change the ad and such, but in a high traffic area?...would it try to pick up if you driving a Ford POS or a Beemer and then chose the ad based on that?

    What if I am listening to Art Bell? Would it show me an ad for the latest book on Shadow Gov? Jim Rome? How to have a take a not suck? Kim Kommando? Your a loser and need to return your computer right now? Top 40? All you $$$ belong to us - The RIAA? (off topic rant I know)

    Seriously, seeing an ever changing sign in a high speed/high traffic zone is an pile-up just begging to happen. I would hope they keep these kind of things in areas where concentration can be peoperly applied to them without the detriment to overall driving situation.

    (This post too sucky to spehl cheq...)
    • by goombah99 ( 560566 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:25AM (#7724256)
      I think these things work by detecing the radiated IF leakage from your radio (an old spy trick). But it also means you could spoof one of these. Just put a leaky battery powered radio right near the billboard.

      this way I could get the bill board to restrict its selection to topics. If my Ad was in that rotation then I probably just improved its visibility five or ten fold. I could sell that to people who place ads.

      • Wouldn't it be getting the local oscillator? That would need to assume a standard I.F. Its many years since I've played much with the internals of radios but are standard I.F's still 455 KHz for AM and 10.7 MHz for FM.

        You're right, it would be easy to screw up.
        • You're right, it would be easy to screw up.

          Yep, right until the FCC caught you. I'm pretty sure that could be construed as operating a jamming device, which is a felony. Even if it isn't, it's operating an unlicensed transmitter, which still gets you nailed.

          If you do this in your car, they might not care. Mess with advertising dollars, and they will.

      • That's the only way they could work. I can tell you from direct experience, though, that any billboards that have this are going to have to have a pretty sensitive receiver and a good antenna system, thanks to how weak that local oscillator signal is. That's going to drive up the cost significantly.

        Another consideration: Do all modern broadcast receivers use the exact same first IF frequency? I can say with confidence that very few 2-way radios do. I've seen a number of cases where even different model ser
      • Ah! I'll just install my antique Atwater Kent tuned-stages radio in my car, which is non-superhetrodyne!
    • Have some vision. Let's go about this paragraph by paragraph.

      How well would these wok in high traffic areas? I could see something like this in Kansas or some other place where you have time to hit the reciver, change the ad and such, but in a high traffic area?...would it try to pick up if you driving a Ford POS or a Beemer and then chose the ad based on that?

      Nope, the billboard cannot pick up what type of car you have... at least not until cars emit some sort of RF ID. So here's how it works. I have

    • I wonder what would happen if you designed your "leaky radio" signal on purpose to appear from multiple car radios. Maybe a career of driving in rush hour traffic for some unlucky bastard? Guys driving around town with special getups designed to break the threshold levels of the billboards and turn the adverts to their employer's ads? Ick. It sounds about as fun as artifically inseminating sheep for a living.
  • Hmmm.... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by telekon ( 185072 ) <canweriotnow@NOspAm.gmail.com> on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:16AM (#7724191) Homepage Journal
    I was thinking before I posted, "What happens when there's bumper-to-bumper traffic; how do you target every car when they move that slowly?"

    But then I got to thinking: could you drop a radio next to the billboard and amp the faint tuning signal, so, say, all the people listening to top 40 see ads targeted toward NPR listeners?

    I guess this is theoretically possible. Funny how every new advertising technology begs the question, "How can I subvert this?"
    • Re:Hmmm.... (Score:5, Funny)

      by plexxer ( 214589 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:31AM (#7724297)
      I was thinking before I posted, "What happens when there's bumper-to-bumper traffic; how do you target every car when they move that slowly?"

      Simple! If it detects traffic moving that slowly, it puts up an ad for the local metrorail system :)
  • The way I station surf - NPR, Rock, Top 40, oldies,.... all in a span of seconds - the billboard would be flickering like disco ball!
  • by G4from128k ( 686170 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:17AM (#7724198)
    It would seem that a particular radio station or advertizer could hack the system and bias the billboard by leaving a box of cheap battery powered FM radios by the side of the road (or a weak FM transmitter [physlink.com]). With all those radios tuned to the same station it would fool the billboard into thinking that the cars where tuned to that station. Thus the billboard would leave the same ad up and log high ratings for the station.
    • Broadcasters wouldn't want to do this because the ads ont he billboards would compete with the ads they play on their stations. The station doesn't own the billboard, Mobiltrak (or some advertising agency) does.

      If the advertising agency charges per impression, then advertisers also would not want to hack the system in this way. They are purchasing for a specific demographic and will have to pay for impressions outside of that demographic. Why not just get a standard still billboard in that case? Why advert
      • Broadcasters wouldn't want to do this because the ads on the billboards would compete with the ads they play on their stations. The station doesn't own the billboard, Mobiltrak (or some advertising agency) does.

        Good point. But if Mobiltrak data is used for radio station listener rankings, then hacking is good for broadcasters. If a broadcaster (call them K-HACK) looks popular (even by artificial means), then it can charge a higher rate for all of its ads. In fact, the data will inevitably bias adverti
  • Easily corrupted (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dheltzel ( 558802 )
    What if an enterprising radio station put a powerful radio tuned to their station next to the billboard's receiever?
    Then it would overpower the car radios and make it appear that all the cars are tuned to that station. This would seem like a good thing for that station's marketing department.
  • by pantycrickets ( 694774 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:18AM (#7724203)
    I lived right by the one they had in Roseville, CA. It was extremely bright, annoying, and dangerous seeming. While you are driving down the freeway (especially at night) it was so bright that you couldn't not look at it. Which I'm sure is the point. But when you have thousands of people flying by at 70mph, it just doesn't seem safe.
  • by ianscot ( 591483 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:19AM (#7724211)
    Out of passing (pun intended) curiosity, will this work for anything but the wholly-owned model like the Ford sales lot in the NYT article? I can see that idea -- country listeners want the F150s, the "alternative" station maybe gets the Ford Focus picture. But many companies don't have products for every demographic. Do they just not want to consider this option, then?

    Most billboard business is based on renting the space. If you have to rely on a radio station's demographic to get your ad up there, how would you pro-rate that rental fee? Does the radio station get anything out of it, if you try it that way? And so on. Seems like a substantially different business model could build around this idea -- something "hits"-like.

    (And more importantly, what does this mean for public service announcements? If I'm driving down the road and all the billboards are tailoring themselves to messages about the D.A.R.E. program, am I listening to Rush Limbaugh, or what? How about if all the pictures turn to messages about abortion?)

    • the "alternative" station maybe gets the Ford Focus picture

      [off-topic bit]
      This is something us brits don't understand, what is alternative about a pretty boring family car?

      I, for one, don't understand why these have taken off among the young in the states. Over here (where they where designed, manufactured in germany I think) they are driven by old folks.

      oh, a little bit of trivia, I developed the software that tested the seat rails in the focus. This is one reason I have for never owning one ;
      • the focus is popular among young people because it's CHEAP.

        the ford ka would probably take off here among people who don't want to spend money on a car.
      • This is something us brits don't understand, what is alternative about a pretty boring family car?

        I assume the OP was talking about the little tiny Focus, which seems to be the most popular one around here. The other Focii don't seem to be too popular.

        I was in the UK not too long ago, and I had a lot of fun looking at all the different models of cars on the roads. But I was surprised at the number of American cars there. I can kind of understand why some Americans buy American cars, but I don't understa

  • by jerw134 ( 409531 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:21AM (#7724230)
    This sign doesn't react to what it detects. It simply logs what stations people are listening to, so that the advertiser on the board can look at that info and decide who to target during different parts of the day. It works exactly like Nielsen ratings. The info gets collected and people look at it to make decisions, it's not reacted to immediately.
  • Some questions (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Psychic Burrito ( 611532 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:23AM (#7724240)
    Can somebody explain in layman term how this works exactly?
    • Why does every radio emit a signal? Is it inefficiency? Is it really every radio or only old ones?
    • Is this signal broadcasted back through your antenna or is this just a faint signal inside your radio and they have really good receivers in their billboards?
    • Has anybody tried to create a radio that doesn't emit this signal?
    • Is this only something with FM radio, or also with AM?
    Thanks for some clarifications.
    • Re:Some questions (Score:5, Informative)

      by cryptor3 ( 572787 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:33AM (#7724312) Journal
      Why does every radio emit a signal? Is it inefficiency? Is it really every radio or only old ones?

      Your radio has a component in it (an oscillator) that vibrates at the frequency of the station you're listening to. This is "tuning" into the station. This vibration is what emits the signal.

      Is this signal broadcasted back through your antenna or is this just a faint signal inside your radio and they have really good receivers in their billboards? Definitely a result of good receivers in the billboard. Though I think the antenna helps.

      Has anybody tried to create a radio that doesn't emit this signal?

      Not that I know of. I don't think it's really been a major issue worth pursuing in the consumer market. The best way to do it would probably be to shield the box. But since you've got to have an antenna linking the oscillator with the emag signal, you can never completely isolate it.

      Is this only something with FM radio, or also with AM?

      Both AM and FM. You've got to have an oscillator to tune into either one.

      • Not quite right (Score:5, Informative)

        by wowbagger ( 69688 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:57AM (#7724468) Homepage Journal
        You are almost right, but not quite.

        The way a modern superheterodyne radio works is like this:

        You want to listen to a radio frequency at F1.
        The radio creates a local oscillator (or LO) frequency of F2, such that abs(F2-F1) = F3, where F3 is a fixed, intermediate frequency (or IF). A common IF for FM radios is 10.7 MHz, and a common IF for AM radios is 455 kHz. By pulling the signal to a fixed frequency the rest of the radio's design can be better optimized and simpler.

        Now, F2 can be either F1+F3 or F1-F3, it make little difference. So one way to confuse the system would be to retune the radio so that it uses "the other IF" - i.e. if the radio is using F2=F3+F1, retune the guts so that it uses F2=F1-F3.

        Alternatively, replace the IF strip to change F2, and then retune the radio appropriately - if the sign's systems assume an IF of 10.7 MHz, and you are using an IF of 9.7 MHz, that will confuse the sign. The difficulty there is getting components designed for a non-standard frequency. If the radio is using the old "tuned slug" design this isn't so bad, but if the radio is using a crystal filter you are looking at custom crystals.

        However, there is no need for the LO to be coupled to the world - the first stages of the radio can amplify the RF and decouple the first LO mixer from the world. It just takes a bit more work on the sheilding of the radio - you use a milled block of aluminum rather than foil sheilds. I know, since that is what I do for a living - design radios (well, radio test gear, which is a special case of the class Radio)

        However, building a jamming oscillator at the needed frequencies to scramble this sign, while completely illegal, is also trivial - buy a cheap FM transmitter kit and retune it slightly. Of course, by causing interference you are in violation of FCC part 15 rules, and will get nailed if you get caught, so don't, 'mkay?

        If it bothers you, just don't listen to the radio.

    • Re:Some questions (Score:5, Informative)

      by mellon ( 7048 ) * on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:38AM (#7724343) Homepage
      Most FM radios use superheterodyne receivers (actually, I'm not sure how true this is anymore, what with software-defined radios, but it certainly has been historically true). There's a pretty good quick explanation of how this works at this site [fas.org]. Look at the text around the first diagram.

      The key is that the frequency of the local oscillator varies, so if you can detect the output of the local oscillator, you can tell to what frequency the radio is tuned. I'm oversimplifying greatly, and the article I've referred to is a pretty rough overview - if you really want to know how this stuff works, you need to do some serious studying. :'}

    • Re:Some questions (Score:2, Informative)

      by asquared256 ( 637499 )
      A radio has a local oscillator, operating at 10.7 MHz above or below the tuned frequency for FM and 455 kHz (?) above below the tuned frequency for AM. When you mix two frequencies, the two original frequencies, and their sum and difference result. The radio mixes the local oscillator signal with the incoming signal to get 10.7 MHz for FM and 455 kHz for AM. The rest of the circuits in the radio are tuned to that frequency. Actually older radios didn't do this, they just had variable tuning circuits in ever
  • I primarily listen to my iPod using an iRock FM transmitter. Its signal strength is low enough that I fear Billboards may overpower it.

    If I *ever* catch a commercial interrupting the sanctum of my iPod to my car stereo, I will clip the antenna lead and install a loop around the sticky pad where my iPod sits. If that doesn't work, I'll cut radio completely out. I'll get a preamp and amp with a direct connection.

    Who needs radio? I won't go back to radio until there is some kind of cellular packet radio wi

  • by hype7 ( 239530 ) <u3295110@@@anu...edu...au> on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:25AM (#7724257) Journal
    We've mentioned these before.


    Hmm, what's this then? Some kind of new editorial disclaimer to enable double posts? :)

    -- james
  • by garcia ( 6573 ) * on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:26AM (#7724265)
    Does it display a table of executives slaughtering a baby when you drive buy listening to a ClearChannel or Infinity station? ;)
    • In the UK Clearchannel own most of the billboards not the radio stations.

      If they start taking over radio stations wholesale they have a whole lot of advertisising space to push their wares.

      and now they can selectivly push them on roads where their pentitration is low ;-)

      sparkes
  • How long can these ads possibly be displayed? I dont know about your town, but in mine, there is tons of traffic, wouldnt these ads be changing quite quickly? Or do they simply take a random 'signal' every so often to determine the ad it's supposed to show.
  • by SmurfButcher Bob ( 313810 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:33AM (#7724311) Journal
    ... driving is soon going to be much more hazardous with the advent of new, "Pop-up Billboards".
  • I don't know what its like everywhere, but in the Washington DC metro area there aren't too many billbords. Zoning has eliminated them as "visual polution". I know of a few up along I-95 in Baltimore, but I can't say that billboards are too common along my drives.

    Would have been a great idea 40 years ago, though...
    • I don't know what its like everywhere, but in the Washington DC metro area there aren't too many billbords

      You are lucky. There are billboards all over the US. I've driven across the country a few times and you can't escape them.

  • by HangingChad ( 677530 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:35AM (#7724320) Homepage
    I have to have a foil wallet to keep my EZ-Pass and credit cards from finking on me, an RFID jammer for my clothing tags, turn my cell phone off to keep from being tracked with the 911 locator, the FBI can use my OnStar to listen to conversations in the car and now I have to have a billboard jammer to keep everyone on the planet from knowing what radio station I listen to?

    Being paranoid is getting to be more work all the time.

  • Feh! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Asprin ( 545477 ) <(gsarnold) (at) (yahoo.com)> on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:38AM (#7724338) Homepage Journal

    Prior Art? [imdb.com]
  • by dandelion_wine ( 625330 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:39AM (#7724345) Journal
    I been waiting for a sign that'll fix me up with a tuba-playin girl.

    Hello, this is Harris. I'm in right now, so you can talk to me personally. Please start talking at the sound of the beep
  • And Tom Cruise ignored the ads too. I was thinking the other day; I'm not sure I've ever bought *anything* on the basis of an advert. However, I've avoided certain products and services because I find their ads so incredibly annoying.

    Once we have finally achieved wall-to-wall adverts on every possible medium - and we're nearly there - the backlash will begin. It's like the PFY who comes up to you in an electrical store and starts trying to sell you stuff...why do I always want to punch him?

    • by peter303 ( 12292 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @09:48AM (#7724416)
      Advertising everywhere, all the time, reminded me of my experience at a Mexican beach last week. While a sitting on the beach admiring the natural and human scenery, hundreds of [ licensed ] vendors walk by every few seconds pushing everything from blankets, artwork, tatoos, food, sexual partners, etc. 99.9% of the interactions are "not interested", but they keep on coming all day. Its much like the MS TV commercial why the Blubberfly boots the salesmen.
    • I was thinking the other day; I'm not sure I've ever bought *anything* on the basis of an advert.

      It's impossible to know if you have. Adverts can influence you in indirect ways, such as a friend seeing one and trying a product and then recommending it to you. An advertisement can also bring a familiarity of a product to you, so that when you are in a grocery store and you are looking at many similar products, you would grab one that was advertised in your past (although you are not thinking of the adverti
  • "Minority Report" advestisers (maybe call it Mind Spam?) is if you trash these devices, they know who you are and can call 911 and report you.

    Never to get a hold of your dean's subcuteanous transpoder and clone it.
  • Dumb idea (Score:2, Informative)

    by dar ( 15755 )
    This is the kind of idea that sounds cool on the surface, but can't really work out irl.

    How many billboards have you driven past lately where you were the only one around in a car?

    Even if it does some kind of averaging. What, you're going to average Howard Stern and NPR? Is the result going to be better than the vanilla demographic they have for that area anyway?
  • And I have the right (Score:2, Interesting)

    by panxerox ( 575545 ) *
    to put a 5 dollar solar powered transmitter 20 feet from the billboard dialed to the classical station.
  • by POds ( 241854 )
    doesnt the melboure yarra river tunnel have this or something similar?
  • If they are able to scan your brain as you drive towards the billboard, they could possible determine something about you, and use that to select custom advertising for you....
  • by Greg W. ( 15623 ) on Monday December 15, 2003 @10:09AM (#7724564) Homepage
    So, what will the billboard think when it not only gets the news that I'm listening to a radio station that doesn't really exist (91.9MHz), but also gets blasted by the 91.9MHz FM signal my car's emitting? Will they use Tuneprint to figure out what song is playing? Will they simply categorize me as "geek" and display ads for computer stuff?

    Nah, they'll probably be too stupid for that. They'll probably think "Wow, this guy's listening to bumfuck cornfield radio!" or whatever the 91.9MHz station is that sometimes leaks through and interferes with my music. I'll probably get ads for Bibles or manure.

    Exception: I listen to a college radio station show on Thursday afternoons: Guerrilla Radio, on WRUW 91.1 FM, 1630-1730 Thursdays. Unless I forget.
    • Heh, I wonder what ads they will show if everyone driving by is listening to a non-existant station because they are all broadcasting their mp3 players to their radios.

      (Perhaps they'll show ads for car stereos with auxiliary input jacks...)
  • What would be interesting are billboards that send out ads. For example, you are driving by a heineken ad, and it says on it "tune your radio to 89.7" or something like that and you could listen to the ad that went along with the billboard. Might be useful if you wanted more information about an the subject of the billboard. Kind of like a drive-by movie theater where when you are in the right range, you can hear the movie audio.
  • I have a HERF gun [slashdot.org] that will fix this...
  • So what businees need is this filling? Did the Clearchannel radio execs wake up one morning and realize that 20 minutes of commercials per hour was not enough?

    Coming soon: Revolutionary new smart e-boards create customized, targeted advertising across multiple mediums to provide a fully immersive, multimedia marketing opportunity which responds in real time to complement FM radio advertisement, maximizing penetration to target demographics. Consumers can now receive 2 hours worth of advertisements every h
  • by gizmonic ( 302697 ) * on Monday December 15, 2003 @03:06PM (#7727549) Homepage
    That was the first thing I thought of when I saw this article.

    Personally, I found the advertising techniques in that movie to be a hell of a lot scarier than the whole Future Crime stuff. Probably because the advertising could happen. As I watched the movie I was picturing advertising execs having wet dreams, and board meetings saying, "We need this!"

    And now, here is the beginnings of it.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (1) Gee, I wish we hadn't backed down on 'noalias'.

Working...