Spider-Man 2 Preview Online 425
Several folks noted that you can now see the first
trailers for Spider-man 2, provided you have some broadband action going on. It's nice to know that there will be something to look forward to after RotK comes out.
First post - source mongering... (Score:2, Insightful)
Anyone able to extract it?
BTW, Doc Oc rox.
Nice FX
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:2, Interesting)
Well done, Macromedia.
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:2)
Sorry, wrong answer. Win2000 Pro and IE 6 here. Its just that the Flash player install doesn't play well with proxies.
Better answer: use linux. the trailer worked perfectly fine for me on my debian laptop. Apt also works fine behind proxies. More than I can say for the crappy Quicktime trailers that apple pushes.
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:3, Insightful)
obligatory linux taunt:
Go Linux its your birthday !!!
Go Linux its your birthday !!!
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:2)
I'm still trying to figure it out. I wget'd the
The URL it gets the movie info from is http://playlist.webevents.yahoo.com/makeplaylist. d ll?pt=xml&sg_id= but it appends some junk to that, and then it only gets a playlist file of some sort. I logged my browser requets and found:
GET
But the playlist file only contains this information:
And I don't know how
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:3, Informative)
<PLAYLIST MEDIATYPE="FLASH"><STREAM AD="NO" APPNAME="ContentMgmt" URLPREFIX="rtmp://" SERVER="flvcontent.bcst.yahoo.com" BITRATE="3000" PORT="" PATH="/pub04root1/Pub04Share04/sonycorp.cm/555083 6
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm on a corperate network with a nice fat pipe, but I have to play the 100k version, the 300k version plays about 5 seconds, stops, plays the next five, stops, etc. The client doesn't seem to be able to cache properly. Even with flash's cache turned right up.
Just give us a damned MPEG or Quicktime file!
I bet this is mostly done to prevent copying. When will people realise that this just stops your advert from being seen by the most people. Normlly when a trailer comes out on the Apple site, one of us donwloads it and shares it with our mates, cos it's quicker. That's good advertising. This is like saying "no, you can only see adverts for Coke if you go to a special Coke store". It's not like it is the full movie, it is just a trailer, the first rule of advertising is make sure as many people see it as possible.
Bah, bloody suites.
I hope someone manages to extract it.
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:3, Informative)
Or maybe to make it work on more platforms? Macromedia's plugin is installed on all windows machines by default, and is easy to install under linux as well. Quicktime and WMP don't have nearly the same default install base. I wish they'd do more movie trailers using flash, as neither quicktime nor WMP work as a plugin on my system, usually resulting in me screwing a
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, it's a pretty sad state of affairs when companies are being this overprotective of their "intellectual property". I remember the good old days when companies actually WANTED customers to see their ads, now the ads themselves are restricted and controlled as if they were a separate product.
Oh well, if I can't see the ad, I can't get hyped about the product, and I'll spend my money elsewhere. They chose control over profits.
On a side note, I'm guessing Ap
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:5, Interesting)
a) The video is not contained within the
b) They did more then just load a video file on the same server, it appears to be coming from a streaming server of sorts, here is a piece from the flash code that someone brighter then me might be able to figure out:
StreamEngine.prototype.doConnect = function () {
this.standard_nc = new NetConnection();
this.tunnel_nc = new NetConnection();
this.standard_nc.cType = standard;
this.tunnel_nc.cType = tunnel;
this.standard_nc.connected = this.tunnel_nc.connected = false;
this.standard_nc.owner = this.tunnel_nc.owner = this;
this.standard_nc.onStatus = this.tunnel_nc.onStatus = function (info) {
};
fcServer = "flv1.broadcast.vip.dal.yahoo.com";
appName = this.playList.firstChild.childNodes.this.playList
var connectString = "rtmp://" + fcServer + "/" + appName;
this.standard_nc.connect(connectString);
trace (connectString);
this.tunnelLoad = setInterval(this,"tunnelConnect",1500);
way to pull a "lone gunmen"... (Score:3, Funny)
you ruined the trailer for me!
=)
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:2)
Re:First post - source mongering... (Score:2)
.torrent locations ? (Score:2)
nah (Score:2, Informative)
Re:nah (Score:2)
About the trailer... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:About the trailer... (Score:5, Informative)
Dr. Curt Conners might be in the film. He was mentioned as being Pete's boss before Pete got fired from the lab in the original film. Curt Conners in the comics became "The Lizard." However, it is doubtful "The Lizard" will make a reptilian appearance in this film. Remember, Sony plans on Spidey being a never-ending franchise, like MGM/UA's James Bond series.
But, from the way it sounds, the Scarecrow will appear in the new Batman film for the first 10 minutes before the movie focuses on Batman and his main foe, R'as Al Ghul. What a great film...Chris Nolan directing and they already have Christian Bale as Batman, Michael Cain as Alfred, the guy from 28 Days Later as the Scarecrow, and possibly Kurt Russell as Sgt./Commissioner Gordon...
Oh yeah, back to Spider-Man 2!
Re:This is getting spooky... (Score:3, Informative)
Join the club. Ever since WB was toying with the "Batman Year One" storyline, I had been posting on AICN that that idea was a mistake and that they should pit Bats up with Al Ghul instead of retreading on past movies. I was estatic when the rumors started appearing that Al Ghul was indeed the ma
Re:About the trailer... (Score:2)
Doc Oc's got enough juice to give Spidey a good ride for an entire movie on his own, he doesn't need the Lizard showing up for no damn good reason. This goes for any future Spidey villians down the road too: Venom (obviously), Carnage (you just know they're going to throw him in on the Venom pic), Return of Green Goblin/Hobgoblin (again, can't you just
Re:About the trailer... (Score:2)
God please not Carnage. The "Holy shit this groovy black costume I picked up during the Secret Wars is alive!" storyline promptly ceased being entertaining when the Marvel execs decided "Hey, if they like Venom, why don't we give them FIVE! WEEEE!". I
Re:About the trailer... (Score:3, Informative)
Screw .swf (Score:4, Informative)
Get it up on Quicktime/Apple like all other trailers, you bastards.
Re:Screw .swf (Score:2)
After all, the company that makes the movie and the trailer want that us buy their product, or speak about it, or reccomend it to friends. The whole idea of the trailer is that the people have a hint on how it will be. Putting things in a way that ma
Re:Screw .swf (Score:3, Informative)
How about an mpeg? 4 even
Re:Screw .swf (Score:2, Flamebait)
Oh wait, it won't play on my cell phone or my gameboy either...what about those formats? After all, people who love movies don't only use OS's that are niche products but also have cell phones.
Re:Screw .swf (Score:3, Informative)
WAY too small (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:WAY too small (Score:2, Funny)
Re:WAY too small (Score:2)
Re:WAY too small (Score:2, Informative)
1) Go to http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/sony/spiderma
2) As the other poster says, now right click and use the 'zoom in' feature.
Release date (Score:5, Funny)
Rus
It's Monday, so I guess we (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:It's Monday, so I guess we (Score:3, Insightful)
wow... (Score:2)
Re:wow... (Score:2, Funny)
Yep, all those sweaty, overexcited, unwashed nerds in one place at one time... you'll get quite a BO hit off that alright!
Real Life (Score:4, Insightful)
It's nice to know that there will be something to look forward to after RotK comes out.
Umm.. there's something called Real Life.. It's a hoot, I suggest you disconnect for a while and try it out.
Re:Real Life (Score:2)
Oh wait, Extended DVD! Got to make it one more year....then the gravy.
Re:Real Life (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, war, terrorism, women rejecting you, going uphill is work, getting killed doesn't result in a respawn...I can see the appeal.
Re:Real Life (Score:3, Funny)
Turn down the amp.
Damn guitarists. That's it. I'm getting a mike and an Amp.
Peter Parker - Still a Geek! (Score:5, Insightful)
The anguish between his powers/ reponsibilities and love life looks to play a bigger part in this movie. DocOct looks great without a cheezy mask to hide behind.. and it looks like they're working in the revenge angle for Harry Osborne. Looking good here!
Next up, Spiderman 3.. Introducing Venom!
Re:Peter Parker - Still a Geek! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Peter Parker - Still a Geek! (Score:2)
yup (Score:5, Funny)
"You've got the wrong man, officer. That guy wasn't wearing glasses."
Works every time.
Re:yup (Score:5, Interesting)
A psychologist friend explained to me that people zero in on a particular feature of the face to remember what you look like. With most people, it's the eyes and/or the nose. When you have glasses, it's the glasses and/or the nose and the eyes are pretty much ignored. Since that major feature is no longer in common with their previous mental image of you, their brains classify it as a "new" person until corrected by the observer gathering more information or being told.
If you don't believe me, get some stage glasses (no prescription) and go see some folks you haven't seen in a while at a bar or somewhere else that's crowded and public. Now see how long it takes for one of those friends to recognize you.
Re:yup (Score:2, Funny)
Obligatory Mystery Men Tie-In (Score:3, Funny)
Mr. Furious: He takes them off when he transforms.
The Shoveller: That doesn't make any sense, he wouldn't be able to see.
Re:Peter Parker - Still a Geek! (Score:2)
Re:Peter Parker - Still a Geek! (Score:2)
Re:Peter Parker - Still a Geek! (Score:2)
Rats! I'm still holding out for Paste-Pot Pete.
Let me get my hands (Score:5, Insightful)
I know it's getting hammered, but you can't even pause the damned thing to let it catch up, and if you restart it, you get 2 simultaneous audio streams at different time points.
Re:Let me get my hands (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Let me get my hands (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Let me get my hands (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Let me get my hands (Score:3, Insightful)
Then you arent thinking very well. The primary objective of advertising is to publicize your product, and not to track who is watching your publicity. If you have to sacrifice one for the other, guess which one makes sense to be sacrificed?
With regards to your second point - if someone creates a fake trailer and distributes it, how is the recipient to know that there is a real trailer that is only available from the official site? If someone is going to be taken in by a fake, it doesnt really matter what
Damned thing (Score:2)
Maybe it's Opera on Linux... Maybe advision.webevents.yahoo.com is blocked 'cause of that "advision" part.
Either that or they are just ignoring coding standards again.
Or we broke it again and they don't have their server set to provide useful feedback.
Either way I'll host a mirror with hella huge (edu) bandwidth if someone wants to give it to me.
Re:I had to launch it on IE... (Score:2)
Awesome CGI, good teaser (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Awesome CGI, good teaser (Score:5, Insightful)
No. Peter has already completely fallen for MJ, but can't endanger her by being with her. That's the tragedy of Spider-Man, that's the part (aside from fairly interesting baddies) which makes Spidey so interesting (to me at least). (Just because Clark Kent can't endanger Lois Lane by being with her and revealing he is Superman, doesn't make Spider-Man a rip-off, does it?)
Re:Awesome CGI, good teaser (Score:2)
Re:Awesome CGI, good teaser (Score:3, Interesting)
I can't even believe I'm arguing this point, but the crucial difference is that (at least at first) Lois wants nothing to do whatsoever with Clark, she only has eyes for Superman.
I thought in the comic that MJ knew Spiderman's secret identity all along -- IIRC, she flirted with both of them, knowing full well they were the same guy, but Peter of course had no
Only thing to look forward to... (Score:2, Troll)
Now that Saddam Hussein has had to pull out of "Santa Claus and the Weapons of Mass Destruction".
Crazy beard... crazy guy.
Features? (Score:2)
Streaming Sucks (Score:5, Interesting)
Spoiler (Score:2)
Doc Oc! (Score:2)
Speaking of comic books on film... (Score:4, Interesting)
Trailer is a dream come true (Score:2, Funny)
Doc Oc's accent (Score:4, Funny)
FOUR legs.....? (Score:2, Interesting)
And no, his real arms and legs don't count.
Re:FOUR legs.....? (Score:3, Informative)
And no, his real arms and legs don't count.
He went from a 4 limbed creature to an 8 limbed creature.
Why YOU don't count the first 4 is your problem.
Trailers spoil movies! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Trailer in theatres? (Score:3, Insightful)
Both rumour and plain logic says Rings on Wednesday - certainly, there is little else that you'd want to attach it to this week.
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:2)
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:5, Funny)
ORIGINALITY went the way of spellchecker.
gone forever never to return again
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:2)
Uh.... look at Superman 2 and Batman and Robin movies.
Some originality killed those series.
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:5, Insightful)
but is ANOTHER sequel to a bad movie something to look forward to?
What sequel to a bad movie are you referring to ? This story is about the Spider-Man sequel, you know, the great characterisation, the innovative twist on an old story, the great acting and The Macho Man Randy Savage as BONESAW!
Oh... right... it's trendy now to bash movies because they're mainstream. Ok, i'm sorry, Bad Mainstream Media for stealing our geek icons!! Bad bad! Spider-Man sucks since it's now popular and enjoyed by those non-geeks.
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:2)
Did you only watch the first half of the movie?
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:2, Interesting)
Well I don't know about anybody else but I've never read a comic in my life and I loved the first film.
Sure I knew most of the story from watching the cartoons and the old tv shows, but comics just never appealled to me as a kid - ditto for the X-Men.
Maybe I'm the perfect target audience, maybe I'm not qualified to comment at all, either way I loved the first one and will be seeing this when it comes out.
Right now I'm just waiting to see the RoTK (I did read those books as a child and never imagined I'd
EVERY year is unoriginal (Score:5, Insightful)
There have been what? 4 or 5 sequels out this year? Where is the origionality at?
So you're saying that years in which there are fewer sequels feature more original movies? You must be joking. Every year Hollywood puts out films that are copies of previous films. They change the names, of course, but most films follow the same tired old formula.
If anything, sequels provide the opportunity (I'm not saying they always succeed) to do something different from the first film for the simple fact that a lot of the character development has already been completed. Not to mention there is a built-in audience so they could (again I'm not saying they always do) try something a little more radical. The Empire Strikes Back was very little like Star Wars. Even The Matrix Reloaded wasn't very similar to the original Matrix, although some would argue that the sequel was a step in the wrong direction.
Bottom line: if you want to see something original, then look for movies by new directors or new countries (check out some of the movies coming out of India if you want something radically different). Complaining about Hollywood showing too many sequels is rediculous. Even if there is ever a summer with NO sequels, I doubt the films will be any more original than any other year.
GMD
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:2, Informative)
2003 Sequels:
Lord Of The Rings 3
The Matrix Reloaded
The Matrix Revolutions
Terminator 3
Bad Boys 2
Charlie's Angels 2
Final Destination 2
Hypercube: Cube 2
2 Fast 2 Furious
Dumb & Dumberer
Rugrats 2: Rugrats Go Wild!
Legally Blonde 2
Tomb Raider 2
Spy Kids 3D
American Pie 3
Jeepers Creepers 2
Scary Movie 3
Barbershop 2
Freddy Vs Jason
X2
And in 2002:
Blade 2
Austin Powers 3
Star Wars Ep 2
Harry Potter 2
Lord Of The Rings 2
Die Another Day (James Bond 20)
Star Trek 10
Once Upon a Time in Mexico (De
Re:Something to look forward to? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Something to look forward to! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Something to look forward to! (Score:2)
Don't forget Kill Bill vol2: after that, Spider Man 2, and RotK, there is nothing left to live for. No, not even Star Wars 3.
Re:Something to look forward to! (Score:2, Interesting)
Fantastic Four
new Superman
new Batman
A post-Matrix film from the Watchowskis
some other epic fantasy movie.
Even if just the movies, there's always something coming down the pipe worth living for.
Re:Something to look forward to! (Score:2)
If those guys never make another movie I'll be relieved.
Re:Something to look forward to! (Score:2)
Re:Something to look forward to! (Score:3, Informative)
Dude, what are you thinking? At least wait for the DVD to come out next summer. Or if you want to really hang around, Peter Jackson has discussed the possibility of filming "The Hobbit" after he completes his King Kong remake.
Personally, I think they could keep the WETA Workshop busy by doing a TV series of various storylines from the Silmarillion & Book of Lost Tales...
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Funny)
I can think of, well, one: awesome camera-on-a-rope shots.
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Funny)
Did you step out for a Coke when Kirsten Dunst was getting rained on? That's two redeeming features right there.
Re:Nothing other than Spidey after ROTK? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Nothing other than Spidey after ROTK? (Score:2)
Leading off with Lep2, that was inspired. Someone with some points get off their butt and give up a +1 Funny for this guy!
Re:You must be kidding! (Score:2)
Re:Mmmmm... MJ (Score:2)
Now just a minute, Comic Book Guy. (Score:5, Funny)
Let me see if I have this straight.
You don't like one of the most fun movies of the last year because:
1) The movie used a storytelling effect that differed from your interpretation of the comic book.
2) 4 seconds of seeing a guy's muscles made you uncomfortable, and you didn't like seeing Dunst in a wet shirt.
3) You disagree with the one thing that the movie did to really improve on the credibility of the story (web-shooters; what the hell, that was the stupidest part of the comic book, like a teenage kid is going to make those on his own), but your suspension of disbelief hinges on the credibility of the supposed actions or inactions of a bit character in an introductory subplot.
Not only does 1) make it clear that someone has funnelled the Saharah into your vagina, and not only does 2) make us question your sexuality -- but "Spider Man 2099!ONOZ!!" -- wtf.
I direct your attention to every episode of the Simpsons where Comic Book Guy is remotely involved.
Now, in classic Bart fashion, go and write on the blackboard 10 times "I WILL NOT EMULATE COMIC BOOK GUY".