Dcube: Portable Audio With Ogg And A Scroll Wheel 556
Slowtreme writes "There have been many attempts recently to cash in on Apple's iPod success. Napster, Dell, and others have made iPod clones. This Korean Dcube looks like they are going all out. With 1.5 gig, Ogg and MP3 support, grey scale display, USB2.0, wireless, FM radio, it looks like a nice device. Most noticeable however is the scroll wheel, Apple holds patents (pending) on scroll wheel design. How much noise will this make?" (The Napster-branded one is actually a Samsung product; Samsung, too, is supporting Ogg Vorbis in some models, though not in that one.)
FireWire (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:FireWire (Score:2, Interesting)
*I* would like to see more MP3 makers use USB2.0. It's faster than any MP3 player's hard drive can transfer data, so anything faster is superfluous. Virtually every computer in the world has USB2.0, so you can plug it in anywhere. Firewire's advantages are wasted on MP3 players, and it's not on many machines, so you get no speed advantage, and it won't work on at least 4 out of 5 machines.
Re:FireWire (Score:2)
Re:FireWire (Score:5, Informative)
Re:FireWire (Score:5, Informative)
Lower, but not far lower (USB 2.0 ~ 34MB/sec, FW400 ~ 40MB/sec). As others have pointed out, the transfer rate on USB 2.0 is not the bottleneck in this type of device, it's usually the storage device.
I always find the flip side of the equation funnier... When people buy external USB/Firewire hard drives, they select 7200rpm drives over 5400rpm drives. The bottleneck on those devices is the USB 2.0 or Firewire interface, so the (lower cost, cooler running, lower power consumption, quieter) 5400rpm drive is actually the better choice.
Re:FireWire (Score:4, Interesting)
What about for random access of many small files? For that, the limiting factor is likely to be rotational latency of the drive, and 7200 RPM will be better than 5400 RPM.
Re:FireWire (Score:2)
Too bad that doesn't matter since your mp3 player isn't going to hit the bandwidth cap of either medium. Firewire is overkill for an mp3 player. It does not make sense.
I'll take the USB2 device. It will interface with just about every PC you'll find these days, unlike firewire.
Of course, if you want to be l33t, maybe you can get someone to design you an ipod with a fib
Re:FireWire (Score:2)
In all cases (were they specify actual transfer rate instead), firewire rate are always higher than USB2.0.
See this one [lacie.com] for example.
Re:FireWire (Score:2)
I wonder if the 4th generation iPod will have FireWire 800...
Re:FireWire (Score:2)
Re:FireWire (Score:3, Informative)
up to 800Mbps
Re:FireWire (Score:5, Informative)
Re:FireWire (Score:2, Informative)
Re:FireWire (Score:5, Informative)
That's the theoretical maximum output, never actually matched in real life. Real life benchmarks [barefeats.com] usually display much better performance of Firewire 400 over USB 2.0. There is a FAQ [micronet.com.tw] on USB that sums up the difference as follows: USB and 1394 are complimentary technologies. 1394 is for devices where high performance is a priority and price is not, while USB is for devices where price is a priority and high performance is not.
Re:INTERESTING?? (Score:2)
Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $250 (Score:5, Informative)
BTW: IRiver also makes an Ogg-capable portable, several of them, but their 20gig model is about $399.
Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ (Score:2)
Because it's an iPod.
The reasons that I can just say that, and lots of people know what I mean, is the answer to your question.
Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ (Score:2)
Re:OOG? (Score:2, Funny)
Me get free karma now?
OGG? What is that about? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:OGG? What is that about? (Score:5, Informative)
parent misleading (Score:5, Informative)
Sorry to go around Slashdot being some kind of mp3-champion but i think it gets an unfair bashing around here sometimes. The LAME team (which I'm not part of) has put an enormous amount of effort into getting transparency at around 200kbps and to say otherwise is doing them a disservice I feel. It is true however that the design of MP3 as a spec has some limitations which are not completely solved even by using very high bitrates, for example, however your post exaggerates the severity of these in real situations. OK I'm done :)
OT: How do you spell art[e/i]facts anyway? :)
The price matters (Score:5, Interesting)
The one thing still preventing me from buying a portable audio player is the price.
I don't need 20GB of music in my pocket, 1,5GB is more than enough for me.
Re:The price matters (Score:2)
WTF? (Score:5, Funny)
NO! Nonononono. Dude. Come on.
This is Slashdot. "I don't need 20 GB of music".. of course you don't need it. But you will demand it. As a... nerd, or something.
Now suck it up, and demand a 1 ounce 50GB overmediaplayer with a folding plasma screen and support for Ogg Stupidname. For $50. It is your goddammed right!
Re:The price matters (Score:2)
Re:The price matters (Score:2)
Plenty of music in such a small device.
I wonder if it's got a HD or Flash memory by the way.
Re:The price matters (Score:2)
Re:The price matters (Score:2)
Re:The price matters (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't underestimate the convenience. 20 gig is enough for many people to rip and download all of their CDs. They don't have to plan ahead what they want to take with them.
1.5 gig is 10-20 albums, depending on how you rip. I would not like to have to pick what 10 albums I'm going to take to work each day.
Sometimes I listen to something like Pink Floyd or Neil Young, and then feel like more, and might end up listening to 5 albums in a row from that artist. Other times, after one album, I want something totally different next, like Garrison Keillor.
It would be horrible to have to pick in the morning which 10 albums are going to fit in with my mood that day.
Something for the wife. (Score:3, Informative)
My wife would love the FM recording, too.
FM Transmitter, not receiver (Score:3, Interesting)
On this page [nextway.co.kr] in the flash banner, it lists it as "FM Transmitter".
I think that's quite a cool feature. Maybe it does both? Dunno... but thats nice to have an FM link built in so I can just carry it in my pocket but listen to it on my car stereo without connecting it to another little box.
Oops, I was wrong... (Score:3, Funny)
And here is what babelfish thinks it says about "FMT":
Apple Music (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Apple Music (Score:2)
Re:Apple Music (Score:2, Funny)
What kind of fool could do that?!
Re:Apple Music (Score:2)
Anyhow, when Apple Computer was named, Apple Music's lawyers agreed to let them use the name as long as they didn't enter the music business.
This is why Apple's system beep replacement (when sound hardware became capable of more than a beep) is called "Sosumi".
I don't know what the legal situation is now that iTMS exists.
Amazingly bad copy (Score:5, Funny)
It's like on Charles in Charge where one of the sisters was noticeably hotter than the other one, and yet in one episode the ugly sister won a beauty contest just to show that there's more to a person than looks but that didn't change the fact that everybody still would rather jump the hotter sister.
Re:Amazingly bad copy (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Amazingly bad copy (Score:2)
Re:Amazingly bad copy (Score:3, Insightful)
It's entirely subjective. WFIW I think this is marginally nicer looking than an original iPod.
Re: (Score:2)
Scroll Wheel Prior Art (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art (Score:2)
Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art (Score:2)
http://www.bang-olufsen.com/sw1623.asp
Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art (Score:2)
Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art (Score:2)
Sorry, best image I could find... [google.com]
It is used to navigate menus and select tracks, just like the iPod one, too.
Apple patented the wheel? (Score:5, Funny)
previous art on b&o phone (Score:2)
Re:previous art on b&o phone (Score:2)
Re:previous art on b&o phone (Score:2)
Look at that dude's hand! (Score:3, Funny)
On the DCude site. It looks like their hand model must be having a heart attack off-camera; if the picture gets slashdotted, just imagine a hand with fingers contorted into a clawed husk, with the nice little dCube in the center of the hand.
Looks very freaky.
Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product page (Score:5, Funny)
Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product page [altavista.com]
However don't set your expectations too high, it seems they still need to work a bit on their Korean translation engine:
1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! (Score:2)
Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! (Score:4, Interesting)
The iPod works with the music store that currently makes about 70% of on-line music sales, works on both major desktop OS platforms, plays the major audio formats (AAC, MP3, WAV and AIFF with others possible) for high quality compressed and uncompressed audio, operates as a portable hard drive (bootable for Macs), replaces most of the fuctions of your PDA(calendar, notes, alarm clock, contacts, games) and generally does the best job at melding all the requirements of a portable player; mainly small size, long battery life, easily readable display, fast file transfers, high quality audio amplifier, easy navigation, and the elusive cool/wow factor.
It's long, but gramatically I do thing that qualifies as one sentence.
Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! (Score:2)
Thats the best you can do? Lets see, keep wad of cash pluss a good MP3 player or get an Apple logo with a good MP3 player. Which to chose. I think I'll take the cash.
Your opinion is not fact. (Score:2)
I have an iRiver iHP-120. After comparing all the drive based models and found that the price/feature balance was better represented with the iRiver.
Not to be confused with... (Score:3, Informative)
Dcube vs iPod (Score:5, Funny)
Where can I get one before Apple crushes them? (Score:2, Interesting)
"Scroll wheel" (Score:2, Insightful)
FM Support (Score:2)
Re:FM Support (Score:3, Informative)
Re:FM Support (Score:2)
Re:FM Support (Score:3, Interesting)
Now the built in FM transmitter (which this seems to have) IS new, as far as I know. If they do a good job with that feature, that would be quite nice.
History repeats... (Score:3, Insightful)
_s (Score:2)
They're seriously apeing the iPod's look quite a bit with this one, though -- down to the white earbuds.
Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways (Score:4, Insightful)
I see things like this "scroll wheel" patent as an example of the ridiculous things that get rubber stamped at the patent office. It's not as if Apple invented the scroll wheel/jog dial. They've been avaible on VCR's, DAT's, etc for quite a long time. That leaves two things their patent could cover:
1) Using a scroll wheel with *gasp* mp3s.
2) The specfic details of how their scroll wheel interface works.
(1) would be a junk patent. (2) would either be so broad it was a junk patent, or so specfic as to be worthless.
Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways (Score:3, Insightful)
Ever see the ORIGINAL ipods? Maybe you aren't as familiar with the item being discussed as you think.
It's a touch-pad, built in a circular form, and touching it acts to scroll it. That's what's patented, not a freakin' scroll wheel.
Do you have a reference for this? You don't seem to be aware of the different ipod models, so I'm not going to just assume you have all the relevant patents memorized.
If I were to buy a new mp3 player... (Score:4, Interesting)
I bought a second generation 20GB iPod soon after they came out. However, I now have more music than I can fit on it and I'm getting interested in re-ripping my tracks at higher quality or even investigating FLAC. Also, Apple is doing me a disservice by preventing me from using Ogg-Vorbis which I still think is superior to LAME's output. If I download .oggs, I then have to go through decompression and another round of lossy compression to create mp3s that will play on my iPod.
As such, I'm very interested in the latest releases of hard-drive based mp3 players. I especially like the look of the iRiver players and I'm hoping to try out my friend's new Rio Karma. Nevertheless, I will have to save up again if I want to get a new player and there are a few minimum feature requirements I can't help thinking would be easy to include on a new player.
I don't give a shit for ITMS compatibility or crappy organiser-style features or games. I just want to be able to fit all my songs in my pocket and find the right tunes to play when on the train. Is it really too much to ask?
Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... (Score:2)
Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... (Score:5, Informative)
* Native Ogg-Vorbis and FLAC support
Check
* Regular firmware updates that include customer suggestions
Check, double. The community surrounding the Karma is incredible, and the developers are amazingly responsive
* Optional remote (preferably with its own display
Not at the moment. The campaign goes on
* Ability to input audio via line-in and/or microphone. On-the-fly encoding not required
No, and very unlikely to happen IIUC
* FM radio tuner
No, ditto. But you've got 20Gb of *good* music in your pocket, why listen to the radio?
* Semi-decent interface with well-organised playlisting and options. So many cheap flash-based players coming out of Asia these days have terrible interfaces. Also, an iPod-style scroll wheel or similar input device is necessary for scrolling through thousands of songs
An emphatic YES. The Karma's interface is amazingly intuitive and fast, particularly when it comes to navigating your collection. Artists appear under first-letter tabs, for example, which when you have 500+ different artists makes a whole lot of difference!
* Ability to sort folders/playlists by date, album, last modified, year and artist et cetera (i.e. dynamic rearranging of playlists, song lists according to ID3 tab information)
Hmmm. Interesting - I suspect not, though I haven't tried. On the other hand, this is exactly the type of thing the developers at Rio are eating up at the moment . .
* Access to other parts of tag information including year and lyrics
All tag information is available. "Wicked cool" lyrics functionality in the works
* On-the-fly playlisting
Check
* Gapless playback
Check, for any format that supports it - including mp3.
* USB 2.0 or Firewire connectivity. Additional ethernet highly desirable
Check to USB2 and ethernet
* Can be mounted as external hard drive
Not at present, although apparently this is in the works
* 15+ hour replaceable battery essential
Check to battery life. It's currently replacable in Japan and the word is that this will spread to the US / UK soonish. However, the battery will last for about three years when used 6 hours a day as it is . .
The Karma is SUPERB. Really. I may come across like a fanboy, but that's cos I am - it's the first DAP which works EXACTLY how I want it to. The responsiveness of the community makes it second to none IMHO . .
P
Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... (Score:3, Informative)
Second point is minor, but the advantage of Firewire over USB (even USB 2.0) is that Firewire can supply 1.5 Amps, while USB can only supply 250 mA. If you use USB, you have to have a separate charger. Using Firewire, you can charge while you sync.
Third point is that where can you find a device with all you'v
Awesome, but... (Score:2)
For the love of all that is holy... The Beatles and NSync on the same PLAYLIST?!?!?!? [rhas.co.kr] WTF? =)
The question no one is asking.... DRM (Score:5, Informative)
My last MP3 player was a Compaq IPAQ-1. Compaq stopped supporting it and I had a lot of problems trying to get their software to work on Win 2000/XP/20003. I can't just copy my music to its memory cards because guess what? It is stored in a proprietary format. That means you need to have their software which means that if they go out of business or don't support your OS, your nice little gadget is worthless!
With my NexIIe, I can just plug the device in via a USB cable to my computer and it shows up as a disk drive. I can copy music files (or even copy other files for storage). If I want better performance, instead of connecting the NexIIe, I just pull the CompactFlash card and put it into a card reader. I use no tool more complicated than explorer to manage my music.
The current firmware even supports CF up to 2GB. I don't see why you would want a 2GB hard drive when you could have 2GB of solid state. That said, it would be nice to have a 10+ GB version of my player.
Neuros (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Neuros (Score:3, Insightful)
the REAL winners in the mp3 player wars (Score:5, Funny)
Calm Down Please (Score:4, Insightful)
But Apple isn't suing anyone or releasing statements detailing its intentions to do so just yet, mnk? Lots of things have scroll wheels. My mouse has one. I don't think we can patent a simple hardware control itself. i mean, why not patent a toggle switch if that were the case?
How about we wait and get just a LITTLE more information before we start branding patents as ridiculous or, on the other end, start a wildly speculative crusade to protect Apple's intellectual property.
Down with OGG (Score:2, Insightful)
Who gives a flying crap about OGG. It's always like Linux users to root for the underdog. In this case however, OGG means shit in the "real" world.
+5 Troll and +2 Flamebait modifiers.
Up with Ogg (Score:3, Interesting)
Dimensions (Score:3, Informative)
The iPod mini [apple.com] is 3.6 by 2.0 by 0.5 inches
The iPod 15GB and 20GB is 4.1 by 2.4 by 0.62 inches
The iPod 40GB is 4.1 by 2.4 by 0.73 inches
The D-cube is 88 by 48 by 19 mm (3.46 by 1.88 by 0.74 inches) using the conversion chart [reticles.com]
So, the DCube is smaller in height and width compared to the mini although almost as thick as the 40GB iPod.
Urmm (Score:2)
I would personally prefer something like this than something that is such a failing iPod lookali
$1 (Score:4, Funny)
More an industrial design issue than patent (Score:2, Insightful)
What I want to see in a player... (Score:3, Interesting)
Just to be annoying... (Score:2, Interesting)
I don't think it'd be TOO hard, and the results would probably be good.
Re:Just to be annoying... (Score:2)
Re:Just to be annoying... (Score:2)
Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous (Score:5, Insightful)
All the best interface designs are obvious ... in retrospect. You can't just say "It's a wheel!" without recognizing the enormous amount of effort and care that went into its design and engineering.
The wheel is what makes the iPod unique, and it deserves its success because of it. This is one of the good uses of patents, in the sense that it gives a manufacturer a temporary monopoly as a reward for innovative design, and will hopefully spur other innovative designs in the iPod comptetitors. Seems like a good thing to me.
Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous (Score:3, Insightful)
Hmmm.... just like to jog dial on countless other electronic devices?
Sure the wheel is a good idea, but it's hardly original. And it's not really a major innovation either, more of an evolution. Ever heard of Pong?
Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous (Score:3, Insightful)
Have you USED it? It's not the same as a mouse wheel or other wheels. You can move the wheel the same distance and it goes through the list at different speeds depending on how quickly, or how slowly, you move. You can move the wheel 2 inches and go through either 5 songs, or 100, depending on the speed.
It's no
Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous (Score:2)
Re:Patent a scroll wheel? (Score:2)
but when it comes down to it - it's on shuffle and the only time i touch it is to crank up the volume or skip that lame song that i keep forgetting to delete.
then again, for some people a car is more than just something that takes you from A to B.
Howard Dean on Ogg (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Howard Dean on Ogg (Score:2, Funny)
You forgot something:
YeeeeeAARRrrRRGGGHHH!
Thank you.