Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Announcements Hardware Technology

Herman Goldstine, ENIAC Developer, Dies at Age 90 111

CodeFixer writes "Herman Goldstine, who as a mathematician working at the Ballistic Research Lab convinced the US Army to fund the development of the ENIAC and EDVAC, has died at the age of 90. His obituary can be found at the New York Times and descriptions of his involvement in the development of the ENIAC can be found at the Army Research Laboratory."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Herman Goldstine, ENIAC Developer, Dies at Age 90

Comments Filter:
  • Sad News (Score:5, Funny)

    by orthogonal ( 588627 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:37AM (#9550673) Journal
    Herman Goldstine, who as a mathematician working at the Ballistic Research Lab convinced the US Army to fund the development of the ENIAC and EDVAC, has died at the age of 90.

    I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.
  • by swordboy ( 472941 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:37AM (#9550676) Journal
    Goodbye World

    Hey - he was 90. We should all be so lucky. Life causes death.
  • by Omega1045 ( 584264 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:42AM (#9550730)
    New York Times
    Jun. 28, 2004 12:00 AM

    BRYN MAWR, Pa. - Herman Heine Goldstine, a mathematician who worked on the earliest electronic computers and helped the military develop the famous ENIAC, died June 16 at his home in Bryn Mawr. He was 90.

    His death was announced by the T.J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., which renamed a postdoctoral fellowship in the mathematical sciences in his honor. No cause of death was given.

    Goldstine, a winner of the National Medal of Science, worked on the ENIAC, as the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer was code named, when he was in the Army during World War II. He then became one of the chief scientists of the International Business Machine Corp. for 26 years.

    In retirement, he followed his interest in putting science into the larger human context as executive officer of the American Philosophical Society from 1984 to 1997.

    During World War II, Goldstine was an ordnance mathematician calculating artillery firing tables. When the War Department embarked on a top-secret program to develop ENIAC, the Army put him in charge of its part of the project.

    The result had 18,000 vacuum tubes arrayed as number-crunching machinery, measuring 30 feet by 60 feet and weighing 30 tons. It took 30 months and 200,000 hours of work to contrive; the results were kept under wraps until after the war.

    After that, Goldstine pursued the new computer science in academia and private industry. Born in Chicago, the lawyer's son studied mathematics at the University of Chicago, receiving a bachelor's degree (and was named to Phi Beta Kappa) in 1933, a master's degree in 1934 and a doctorate in 1936.

    He taught at the University of Michigan but left when war broke out to become a ballistics officer in the Army. He advanced to lieutenant colonel and was awarded several medals, eventually being named to the Hall of Fame of the Army Ordnance Department in 1997.

    In 1946, Goldstine joined the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton as a permanent member and assistant project director of its electronic computer project. His work contributed to the second-generation calculator built at the institute by John von Neumann. Von Neumann introduced it in 1952 as EDVAC, for Electronic Discrete Variable Automatic Computer.

    Goldstine joined IBM as manager, later director, of mathematical sciences for research in 1958. In 1965, he became director of scientific development for data processing. Part of his responsibilities was to act as liaison between the academic community and the company's research centers. After 1969, he was a scientific consultant to the research director and an IBM fellow.
    • by andyrut ( 300890 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:54AM (#9550833) Homepage Journal
      If you've got a NY Times link that requires registration, you can skip it by copying and pasting the original NY Times URL directly into regular Google Search [google.com].

      If the article is relatively new, it will probably tell you "Sorry, no information is available for the URL" but will then offer you a link to the address you just typed in - just click on this link. The HTTP-Referer will then be google.com and you can read it without registration.

      A few extra keystrokes, but gets around the registration process every time.
    • by Tree131 ( 643930 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:57AM (#9550854)
      Use http://www.bugmenot.com/ [bugmenot.com] for soul-sucking registration-free login/pass.

      • As i have wondered once before ,why cant we register with NY times with a fake id/email add/various other stats?We are already logged into /. with (mostly)our contact details available to all and sundry.

        Refusing to register with NY and posting various ways around that is just churlish and childish.

        For all its troubles in the recent past the NY times is still a VERY impartial,interesting,original and mostly correct source of information,if only because its not owned by Murdoch.

        C'mon /. let's behave in a m
        • As i have wondered once before ,why cant we register with NY times with a fake id/email add/various other stats?

          because it sucks up unnecessary time and effort to do so, and they ask for a lot of info.

          Refusing to register with NY and posting various ways around that is just churlish and childish.

          No, it's efficient and smart. Registering for NYT with f***you@f***off.com or chunky_lover52@aol.com is cromulent, churlish and childish. Avoiding the registration makes NYT's job of removing false addresses

  • by CompWerks ( 684874 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:45AM (#9550752)

    Quotes about the ENIAC:

    "Thus ended the life of the once glorious pioneer in the field of digital computation"

    "It's death was a natural one--it had served its purpose."

    As quoted from: The ENIAC Story [arl.mil]

  • we have to appreciate how different this guy's computing experience was

    for example, he had software bugs just like we all do

    except this guy's experience with bugs was literal:

    when the eniac went bonkers, personnel had to run and check every single vaccum tube in the whole gigantic apparatus to find the "bug"...

    moths would be attracted to the dull glow of the old vacuum tube transistors, and would inevitably fry themselves, and short the transistor, at some point in their dance around the bulbs

    that is where the term "software bug" came from

    and that is what herman goldstine's debugging experience was most probably like

    bugs, and debuggers, have come a long way

    but they show us how we owe a little appreciation to the pioneers like mr. goldstine

    rip my man
    • Re:rip mr. goldstine (Score:5, Informative)

      by REBloomfield ( 550182 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:59AM (#9550874)
      The term was actually coined by Grace Hooper:

      Moth found trapped between points at Relay # 70, Panel F, of the Mark II Aiken Relay Calculator while it was being tested at Harvard University, 9 September 1945. The operators affixed the moth to the computer log, with the entry: "First actual case of bug being found". They put out the word that they had "debugged" the machine, thus introducing the term "debugging a computer program". In 1988, the log, with the moth still taped by the entry, was in the Naval Surface Warfare Center Computer Museum at Dahlgren, Virginia.

      See here. [navy.mil]

      • The term was actually coined by Grace Hooper:
        The operators affixed the moth to the computer log, with the entry: "First actual case of bug being found".

        The term was in use before then, at the quote indicates. The "first actual case" would imply that "virtual" bugs had been found previously.

        See here [tafkac.org] for more information.
        • The term "Bug" had been in use in electronic circles far before then.

          This was the first recorded actual bug as related to digital computing equipment, but there wasnt that much Digital computing equipment around before then.
      • It's "Hopper" (Score:3, Informative)

        by Rufus88 ( 748752 )
        Not "Hooper". Though apparently, many web pages seem to make the same mistake.
      • I thought the term was coined by Al Gore. Didn't he invent the computer, or something?

      • by Anonymous Coward
        The term was not originated by Hopper. It was used much earlier, including a letter by Thomas Edison , 1878 (more precisely Edison to Puskas, 13 November 1878, Edison papers, Edison National Laboratory, U.S. National Park Service, West Orange, N.J., cited in Thomas P. Hughes, American Genesis: A History of the American Genius for Invention, Penguin Books, 1989, on page 75):

        It has been just so in all of my inventions. The first step is an intuition, and comes with a burst, then difficulties arise -- this

    • Re:rip mr. goldstine (Score:3, Informative)

      by TheSync ( 5291 )
      The first computer "bug" was found by Lieutenant Grace Murray Hopper while she was on Navy active duty in 1945.

      A moth found trapped between points at Relay #70, Panel F, of the Mark II Aiken Relay Calculator while it was being tested at Harvard University, 9 September 1945. The operators affixed the moth to the computer log, with the entry: "First actual case of bug being found". They put out the word that they had "debugged" the machine, thus introducing the term "debugging a computer program".

      In 1988, t
      • The first computer "bug" was found by Lieutenant Grace Murray Hopper while she was on Navy active duty in 1945.

        Although this is accepted wisdom in various quarters, the use of the word "bug" as a defect predates Lt. Hopper by quite some time [astrian.net]. Specifically, as the above link points out, the term was used to indicate a glitch as far back as the 19th century, and Shakespeare himself used the the term to indicate a disruptive person in Henry VI, part III.

    • There is no such thing as a "vacuum tube transistor". Most US tubes had a metal shell, and a fried moth would have no ill effects on that. European computer tubes (yes, I used to have a catalog of them once) had glass envelopes but the contacts were down inside the chassis, again a dead moth on a glass bulb would do precisely nothing.

      In fact, the things that bugs could affect were open relay contacts - in use surprisingly late on many systems, punch readers, tape and large floppy drives.

    • moths would be attracted to the dull glow of the old vacuum tube transistors
      Anyone else familiar with "vacuum tube transistors?"

      I agree with the poster's sentiment, though. There are few of the pioneers of the field left.

  • Well... now that that real Eniac's dead, maybe I can put a copyright on my nickname and get some royalties!! :)
  • by jamie812 ( 720355 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:50AM (#9550797)
    The Brainiac who made Eniac had a Cardiac.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    We, the Slashdot community, salute you.
  • A sad day (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Gorffy ( 763399 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:53AM (#9550821) Journal
    A great man who paved the way for many other great men and women. as a side note, It's interesting how so much technology, such as ENIAC, get started as tools of war.
    • It's interesting how so much technology, such as ENIAC, get started as tools of war.

      That's where the money is (: Hey, if war had something to do with developing the ENIAC that eventually led to the iPod and all our other cool computer gizmos, I'm cool with it.
    • Re:A sad day (Score:3, Insightful)

      by csguy314 ( 559705 )
      It's not a coincidence, a majority of technology funding is precisely for weapons research. Big tech companies get major weapon systems contracts (like HP and Microsoft). And universities which do a lot of research in technology also have weapons research labs that are heavily funded by the military (MIT being the obvious example).
      The entire tech industry was founded on the basis of military research.
  • it's amazing how in those days one person could determine the rest of our culture today by working on such influential projects that were the precursors to and inspired other works of computer engineering.
    • Re:wow (Score:5, Insightful)

      by dave1791 ( 315728 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @11:04AM (#9550917)
      You still can. It is called basic research. Like the Eniac, many things being done right now will seem to have minor signifigance for a long time, then they become VERY important. The guys playing around with quantum mechanics in the 1920's changed the world, but not right away. Kary Mullis' work in the early 80's made all modern DNA tools possible and enabled something whose effect on society is still unknown.
  • Just reading the article though prompted me to do a quick google on IBM, I knew they were around during the war and I was thinking it is some achievement for a company in such a rapidly changing landscape to be still going strong today. Its a further shock to discover they were incorporated in 1911! Lets hear it for our geriatric IBM overlords.
    • Re:Visionary guy (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Gorffy ( 763399 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:56AM (#9550841) Journal
      IBM also supplied many armies with the punch-card machines/readers used to keep track of war records. the armies included the US army and the German army.
      • Re:Visionary guy (Score:2, Informative)

        by beders ( 245558 )
        IBM also supplied many armies with the punch-card machines/readers used to keep track of war records. the armies included the US army and the German army.

        Including the legendary Nazi concentration camp punchcard systems

        http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3832141.stm
    • IBM made typewriters and adding machines years before they got into the first computers.

      In fact, when they announced commercial-level computers a lot of investors thought they were morons to take such a risk, and dumped the stock like crazy. A bunch of lucky (or visionary.... naw, just lucky) a-holes got the cheap stock and made the Big Bucks(tm).
    • Way Back When, I worked for a guy who had been in IBM since the early 60's, by which time the company had been around for decades already. IBM is an amazing phenomenon - it's always interesting to contrast a successful transition (IBM's recovery from the PC woes of the 90's) to a failed recovery (AT&T would be the first that comes to mind).

      I haven't been an IBM customer in recent years, used to work in a big IBM mainframe shop, but I had to admire them for keeping a focus on the big picture rather than
  • How long? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:56AM (#9550844)
    How long will you have to live to see as much change as this guy saw?
    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 28, 2004 @11:51AM (#9551304)
      2 more years, my orbiting battle statation will be ready then, and there will be big changes.
      • Can I refuel my slipfighter there? I'd like to see if the Andromeda Galaxy still exists, plus I could bring back a couple of nova bombs to help you out. Puny ICBMs taking on a weapon that destroys solar systems ah it'd be nice.
    • Re:How long? (Score:3, Insightful)

      by theCat ( 36907 )
      His 90 years were spent in the final decades of the Industrial Revolution, started (depending on who you cite) some 200 years before he was born. He did help usher in the next Big Deal; information technology and globalization.

      That one is still being worked out. I don't think we have fully entered into the Golden Age of Global IT just yet; we're still hacking, the equivalent of James Watt tinkering with steam engine designs in 1769.

      Once Watt figured out the optimal steam engine design, the next revolution
  • by mrmeval ( 662166 ) <jcmeval@NoSPAM.yahoo.com> on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:56AM (#9550845) Journal
    The ENIAC Java Applet [fu-berlin.de] and the ENIAC on a chip project [upenn.edu]
  • by DroopyStonx ( 683090 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:57AM (#9550855)
    EDVAC [wikipedia.org] and ENIAC [wikipedia.org]

    ENIAC, short for Electronic Numerical Integrator And Computer, was the first all-electronic computer designed to be Turing-complete, capable of being reprogrammed by rewiring to solve a full range of computing problems. It was preceded in 1941 by the fully tape-programmable but still mechanical Z3 designed by Konrad Zuse and by the all-electronic rewire to reprogram but not fully general purpose British Colossus computer. Both ENIAC and Colossus used thermionic valves, that is, vacuum tubes, while Z3 used mechanical relays. The requirement to rewire to reprogram ENIAC was removed in 1948.

    EDVAC (Electronic Discrete Variable Automatic Computer) was one of the earliest electronic computers. Unlike the ENIAC, it was binary rather than decimal, and was the first stored program computer ever designed. This design became the standard architecture for most modern computers. The design for the EDVAC is therefore considered a major milestone in the history of computer evolution. While the EDVAC was the first stored program computer to be designed three other stored program computers were built before the EDVAC finally became operational. (the British Small-Scale Experimental Machine at Manchester University, the EDSAC at Cambridge University, and the Australian CSIR Mk I).
  • by mikew03 ( 186778 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:58AM (#9550863)
    Not to denegrate Goldstine's contributions, they were important but he was really more of a project manager and made sure the defense department kept the money flowing. Presper Eckert and Dr. John Mauchly were the principle designers of the machine.
  • by sirdude ( 578412 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @10:59AM (#9550872)
    The power of modern communication - /. hears about it 12 days after his death.. :S

    Here's a better write-up..
    ----
    Computer Developer Herman Goldstine Dies

    By Adam Bernstein
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Tuesday, June 22, 2004; Page B07

    Herman H. Goldstine, 90, a mathematician who played a key role in early development of the electronic digital computer during World War II, died June 16 at a retirement community in Bryn Mawr, Pa. He had Parkinson's disease.

    Dr. Goldstine, who later worked at IBM, wrote "The Computer From Pascal to von Neumann" (1972), a highly readable account of the history of mathematics and the way it influenced the development of computer science.

    During World War II, Dr. Goldstine worked for the Army's Ordnance Department, which had an interest in developing faster and more accurate artillery and bombing tables.

    Assigned to the Army's Ballistics Research Laboratory in Aberdeen, Md., he began persuading Army officials to invest money in a computer project underway at the University of Pennsylvania engineering school. Dr. Goldstine became the Army's liaison to the project, which was being led by John W. Mauchly and J. Presper Eckert.

    The result, presented Valentine's Day 1946, was ENIAC, short for Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer.

    It was the first electronic digital computer and an unwieldy device -- 18,000 vacuum tubes, filling a room 30 feet by 50 feet and using 150 kilowatts of power. "It was like fighting the Battle of the Bulge to keep it running daily," Dr. Goldstine later said.

    The ENIAC could store 20 numbers of 10 digits each in its electronic memory and was a milestone in general-purpose computing. It impressed many at the time by performing rapid digital processing.

    Besides his supervisory role, Dr. Goldstine was credited with some of the mathematical underpinnings of the ENIAC. He also said he had a major role in bringing Johnny von Neumann to the ENIAC project after seeing him one day in 1944 at the Aberdeen train station and persuading the math giant to visit Penn.

    At the time, von Neumann was attending a scientific advisory committee meeting at the Army's Ballistics Research Laboratory. He was intrigued by high-speed devices that would help with his work on the atom bomb at Los Alamos, N.M. Many of the difficult calculations for the first atom bomb were made with electronic calculators that were essentially office machines.

    "Fortunately for me, von Neumann was a warm, friendly person who did his best to make people feel relaxed in his presence," Mr. Goldstine wrote in his 1972 book.

    "The conversation soon turned to my work," he wrote. "When it became clear to von Neumann that I was concerned with the development of an electronic computer capable of 333 multiplications per second, the whole atmosphere of our conversation changed from one of relaxed good humor to one more like the oral examination of the doctor's degree in mathematics."

    Herman Heine Goldstine was a Chicago native and received bachelor's, master's and doctorate degrees in mathematics from the University of Chicago.

    Early in his career, he taught mathematics at the University of Chicago and the University of Michigan.

    In 1941, he married Adele Katz, who helped program the ENIAC and wrote an operating manual for it. She died in 1964.

    Survivors include his wife, Ellen Watson Goldstine, whom he married in 1966, of Bryn Mawr; two children from his first marriage; and four grandchildren.

    After his Army work, Dr. Goldstine worked at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., helping create a stored-program machine that became the model for the early IBM computers.

    He worked at IBM from 1958 to 1984, serving as director of mathematical sciences in research, director of scientific development for the data processing division and consultant to the research director.

    In retirement, he spent 13 years as execut
  • Idea from English? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by MisanthropicProgram ( 763655 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @11:01AM (#9550892)
    I'm trying to remember where I saw the article - maybe it was here, but the English had an electronic computer for breaking the Enigma codes in WWII before we Yanks had one.
    I wonder if Goldstine heard about the British one and knew that we needed one too?
    • Probably not. They were built for different purposes. I once saw a documentary (PBS series from about ten years ago) and the Colossus machines were destroyed after the war and ended up as a footnote. IIRC- there was also a German telephone switch based computer that the Nazis decided was not worth pursuing.
    • by Detritus ( 11846 )
      The British computer (Colossus) was designed to attack the German fish (teleprinter) codes, not the Enigma. The British and Americans built large numbers of special purpose electro-mechanical machines (AKA bombes) to attack Enigma. NCR built the American version of the bombe.
    • I'm trying to remember where I saw the article - maybe it was here, but the English had an electronic computer for breaking the Enigma codes in WWII before we Yanks had one.
      I wonder if Goldstine heard about the British one and knew that we needed one too?

      In general, the Brit version was a good bit less powerful and dedicated to it's purpose - not so much of a "computer" as we'd think of them, more like a very complicated, electronic adding machine.

      Not to take away from the accomplishment though - brilli

  • To ensure reliable operation, circuits were constructed of rigidly tested standard components, which were operated at current, voltage, and power levels below their normal ratings.
    (And apparently the thing still ran hot.) Hats off to a pioneer. --Benanov
  • Eniac (Score:5, Informative)

    by stereo_Barryo ( 530287 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @11:10AM (#9550970)
    The NY Times story doesn't mention Macauly and Eckert at all. If you read the book "Eniac", they developed the ideas to make the first computer and Goldstein was a facilitator for funding, helping out with some of the theoretical background. It's strange they weren't mentioned in the article.
    • The NY Times story doesn't mention Macauly and Eckert at all. If you read the book "Eniac"....

      Agreed. That was an interesting book. However, I later discovered that John Atanasoff [angelfire.com] should more likely be considered the builder/inventor of the first computer, especially as we know them. The ENIAC [wikipedia.org] was a base ten computer, while the Atanasoff Berry Computer was base two.

      • Again, from the ENIAC book, the statement was made that the ABC computer never worked, and wasn't really a computer, anyway, lacking a stored program. Is the book wrong in this regard. Macauly went in an entirely different direction than Atanasoff, but kept Atanasoff updated on his progress. Do you have references that contradict this?
        • Apparently I'm going to have to stop posting to Slashdot entirely. I should have kept quiet since it's been a couple of years since I read that book and I don't even remember Atanasoff being mentioned at all.

          Accoring to this site from the university [iastate.edu] where he did his work, Atanasoff is the inventor of the digital electronic computer:

          On October 19, 1973, US Federal Judge Earl R. Larson signed his decision following a lengthy court trial which declared the ENIAC patent of Mauchly and Eckert invalid and n

          • According to the book, "Eniac", the judge 1) totally misunderstood the issues and was simply wrong and/or 2) had in mind to open up computing to many companies due to the importance of the machine and broke the patent for the economic and social benefits. If I had read many more books about it myself I could say with more authority who was right, but I haven't, so I won't.
  • Uh-oh... (Score:2, Funny)

    by beej_55 ( 789241 )
    What happens when Army computers get slashdotted? *hides in his nuclear bunker...for a week...* I'm betting most of the military computers are Win-based... And yeah, do imagine all the change this guy was so lucky to see! Forever will he remain, in the archives of Slashdot.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 28, 2004 @11:11AM (#9550976)
    Awww, man - can't someone host a mirror on a thin pipe, so I can make the obligitory
    "looks like the site is hosted on an ENIAC"
    joke?

    No?

    *sulks*
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Could someone "in the know" describe the instruction set and architecture of the ENIAC. Could it be modeled in TTL or discrete transistors? I assume that no one has done a simulator in software.
    • Researchers at the Moore School of Electrical Engineering, U. of Penn. (Home of the original ENIAC) made a functional equivalent on a custom silicon chip to commemorate the 50th anniversary a few years back. Info at:http://www.ee.upenn.edu/~jan/eniacproj.html
  • My dad was there (Score:5, Informative)

    by 192939495969798999 ( 58312 ) <[info] [at] [devinmoore.com]> on Monday June 28, 2004 @11:32AM (#9551139) Homepage Journal
    My dad worked with the ENIAC, and from his recollections to me, I can tell you that the people involved with that machine created nearly everything we now take for granted in software development (or wish we had, for those of us at shoddy development houses). We owe our lives to these guys. As the inventors of computers and computer science pass, let's not forget the ways they did it (i.e. check the code BEFORE it goes in the computer), and let's not doom ourselves to repeat the mistakes they tried so hard to help us avoid.
  • Was Herman Goldstine's idea of open source a wheelbarrow full of tubes?
  • by phr2 ( 545169 ) on Monday June 28, 2004 @12:58PM (#9551897)
    (written by Dr. Goldstine) is an excellent book about the history of early computers. It's an academic history book, not a mass market popularization, but it's readable. ISTR that about half of it is about the pre-electronic era and the other half is about ENIAC, EDVAC, and so forth. Goldstine became pretty good buddies with von Neumann and a lot of the familiar stories about von Neumann come from this book.

    Goldstine was also related in some way to the German 19th century poet Heinrich Heine, FWIW.

  • I commented on this [slashdot.org] on Friday, in the also-late story of Bob Bemer's passing. It seems like /. is taking more and more time to get the stories posted.

    Regardless, Goldstine was a great pioneer and his influence on early computing should always be remembered.
  • Goldstine did not create the ENIAC or EDVAC. He was just the Army supervisor for the project. Mauchly and Eckert designed and built the ENIAC and designed the EDVAC until Von Neumann and Goldstine stole the credit and the project from them. It was because of Goldstine's greediness that people say "Von Neumann architecture" and not "Mauchly-Eckert Architecture".

    "Give credit where it's due" - Dante (Hicks)
    Mauchly and Eckert are hardly reckognized for being the fathers of the first two electronic automatic
  • MathSciNet (Score:2, Interesting)

    If you look at Goldstine's publication list on MathSciNet [ams.org] (usually only available on University netwoks which subscribe), you find a strong collaboration with von Neumann and early uses of computers to solve scientific problems. For example:

    "Preliminary Discussion of the Logical Design of an Electronic Computing Instrument" by Arthur W. Burks, Herman H. Goldstine, and John von Neumann, 2d ed. Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, N. J., 1947.

    "Planning and Coding of Problems for an Electronic Com
  • Open filament? Excessive gas? Cathode interface? Low Emission? Loss of vacuum?
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Sorry to rain on everyone's parade in saluting what a wonderful person he was, but as a eniac programmer told me, Goldstine was a 'mean old son of a gun'. One major jerky thing he did was credit him and his wife for training the programmers and writing the manual, when in actuality the programmers were pretty much left to their own devices with a pile of schematics of the massive machine. Also the only reason Von Neumann and him got credited with a lot of the work was because as soon as Eckert and Mauchly w

What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey

Working...