Big Demand for Digital Music Players 259
An anonymous reader writes "Market research company IDC is predicting a rosy future for MP3 player sales. They predict that by 2008 it will grow into a $58 billion industry - four times bigger than the US record industry. Also in the news, Sony will finally start making a digital music portable that plays MP3s. Their present players only read their proprietary ATRAC3 format, forcing you to transcode any MP3 files you want to play on them."
iPod=loose (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:iPod=loose (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:iPod=loose (Score:2)
Re:iPod=loose (Score:3, Informative)
I forget what the model number is. 4-something I think. 400mini? It should be on t
Re:iPod=loose (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:iPod=loose (Score:5, Insightful)
It's one thing to have fancy features, or a low price. It's another to be useful. I could operate my iPod in my sleep.
Re:iPod=loose (Score:3, Funny)
Re:iPod=loose (Score:2)
Don't write off Sony's potential offering as "just another mp3 player" before you see it...
Re:iPod=loose (Buy a Creative Jukebox!) (Score:3)
The Creative has a nice browser feature once you install the drivers on your computer too. I've been very happy with mine.
Re:iPod=loose (Buy a Creative Jukebox!) (Score:2)
However the iPod is also significantly smaller. Put them side by side.
From the register: [theregister.co.uk]
The Zen is more for geeks who like to count and compare features, and the iPod is more for people who don't like to have full pockets or purses.
Re:iPod=loose (Score:2)
They already do... (Score:4, Informative)
And I own one... It's called a CD/MP3 player and you can get one at any Target, Wal-Mart, etc.
They go for less than $50 and they hold as much space as blank CD-Rs you are willing to buy.
Re:They already do... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:They already do... (Score:2)
I use my old Minidisc all the time, but i have to re-encode to ATRAC in real time instead of being able to upload a file; newer ones support recording over 1X via USB, but the stream is raw audio and the player itself does the conversion. Otherwise, i'm very happy with it.
PS: Having minidiscs replac
Re:They already do... (Score:4, Interesting)
It's not really a problem with these players. They spin up for a few seconds, read the entire song into memory, and spin down. And even if you aggressively shake the player while it's buffering, it doesn't seem to stall the reading (i'm not sure what's different about Sony's anti-shock system, but it's superb). Battery life is great too, about 10-15 hours.
Sure, size a factor, but Sony already has cd players that are barely larger in circumference than the size of the CD and less than 1cm thick. If they extended that design to the 3" CD-Rs like Philips and others, they could probably make something pocket-sized.
Also, the disposable (or collectible) media is a huge advantage over solid-state media. I hate reloading music onto my player with my pc every time I want to listen to something different.
Re:They already do... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:They already do... (Score:4, Funny)
Apple had nothing to do with making them more popular.
Re:They already do... (Score:2)
Strategy reversal, trends & proprietary standa (Score:3, Insightful)
Sony supports MP3 on its CD products, but not in its best digital products which is what most people think of when it comes to MP3/music players.
The real story here is shift in business strategy. Sony was the king of portable music after the introduction of the Walkman, but has seen its share slip. It seems that someone at Sony has realized that using a closed, proprietary standard and forcing customers to listen to their music collections how Sony wants them to quickly turns them into ex-customers.
Tha
Mainstream (Score:4, Insightful)
Didn't it go mainstream a few years ago? Napster made it mainstream.
Re:Mainstream (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Mainstream (Score:2)
mp3s are the next floppy (Score:4, Insightful)
Regardless, I'd like a decent sub $100 mp3 player with decent storage. ipods are damn cool, but there is no way I'm dropping that kind of cash on what is essentially a fluff item.
Re:mp3s are the next floppy (Score:3, Interesting)
Whether or not a HDD based mp3 player is a fluff item is certainly up to debate, and I'm certainly willing to tell you why I don't think my iRiver H120 isn't. =)
Besides the 16 GB of oggs, mp3s, and wmas (*retch*), it can also record things. For Every class I've been to this semester, I have an 80 Kbit mp3. Did I miss something in my notes? I'll just look it up in my lectures folder!
It also has
What were they smoking? (Score:4, Insightful)
$58Bn is about $10 for every person in the world icluding babies. By 2008 there will be cooler things to spend your hard earned money on.
Re:What were they smoking? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What were they smoking? (Score:3, Insightful)
No thanks. If you want to integrate various portable digital devices, fine, as long as you don't include a cellphone in the mix.
Re:What were they smoking? (Score:3, Insightful)
Even worse, the phone is tied into your cellular provider, so if you try to change providers, it becomes useless. Not only that, but you can't transfer photos off of it, or music files onto it, without doing it over their cellular network for $$$/MB.
No thanks. If you want to integrate various portable digital devices, fine, as long as you don't include a cellphone in the mix.
***
all that is just a problem of your local legislation. you don't have to allow locked phones, you know.
Re:What were they smoking? (Score:2)
I'm glad the title says "Digial Music Player" (Score:5, Interesting)
I have a Neuros [neurosaudio.com] and its far from just an "MP3 Player". My Neuros plays MP3's, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, and even the dreadful WMA files...
I hate when people call it an "MP3 Player".
<shameless plug>
If you haven't looked the Neuros, you don't know what you are missing. It's the perfect player for the geek in you. Recently they have open sourced the Firmware, allowing us hackers to have our way with it.
</shameless plug>
Re:I'm glad the title says "Digial Music Player" (Score:5, Funny)
"Hey, what MP3 format do you use?"
"FLAC"
"Cool. I use WMA."
Re:I'm glad the title says "Digial Music Player" (Score:2)
Kidding, Neuros is a reasonable solution but just too darn big for most people. Rio Karma, whilst not OS, plays all the formats you want (including full gapless playback support which is, AFAIK, unique). It's also a lot smaller than a Neuros.
Re:I'm glad the title says "Digial Music Player" (Score:3, Interesting)
The Neuros looks damn cool, but does it work under Linux? The site lists Win?? as a requirement. Can you mount the flash/HD as a USB mass storage device under Linux? I have been considering purchasing a player, but ogg support (my 1000 CDs are ripped in ogg vorbis format) and Linux support are a must.
Thanks,the_crowbar
Re:I'm glad the title says "Digial Music Player" (Score:5, Informative)
I probably shouldn't reply to myself, but after digging a little through the Neuros site I found that there is software (written in Perl) that works great on Linux. The software, Sorune (linky [sorune.tk]), is to manage playlist and such for the Neuros. The CEO of the company also seems committed to open source (not just the firmware, but the specs of the player as well). I will do some more research on this tommorrow, but I think I may have just found my next purchase.
Cheers,the_crowbar
Re:I'm glad the title says "Digial Music Player" (Score:2)
I've had a Neuros for the past year. While I agree that it kicks total ass, the only problem with it is the size. It's a fucking brick and a pain in the ass to carry around on my daily walk to work. It's perfect for the car, but I'm switching to an iPod next week. I'm willing to forego the massive features for the form factor.
Not Too Big (Score:5, Informative)
There are other reasons to favor the Neuros over the iPod, but those are the big ones.
But, as for everything, personal preferences play a huge role in your selection of a personal music device (PMD).
I can see that... (Score:3)
Re:I can see that... (Score:2)
I've been listening to free music for the better part of the last week(demoscene stuff mostly).
if commercial music would disappear(as recordings, performers wouldn't disappear anywhere) that would not be a huge loss, and there would still be lots and lots of music to listen to.
Re:I can see that... (Score:2)
While you (and others) might be unaffected by the loss of commercial music, you are the exception, not the rule.
Re:I can see that... (Score:2)
if commercial music became commercially unviable then they would end up listening to 'non-commercial' music quite quickly, on the same second radio stations and mtv started playing them.
because there will be people that make music, regardless of if they get paid, and people who want to listen to music it makes little difference where the music comes from. what would change would be that a 'new' thing could strike through much easier.
Re:I can see that... (Score:2)
I don't think commercial music is going to die out soon (unfortunately).
Re:I can see that... (Score:2)
Besides, there's still good music being made today, but it's not owned by the major record labels. These people already sell in tiny volumes, and aren't going to quit as long as a few people still buy their stuff.
Re:I can see that... (Score:2)
That's funny (Score:5, Insightful)
For anyone who is excited or dismayed about this it's worth recalling that McKinsey, who are about the smartest and best consultants in the world made a prediction for the number of cell phones that would be in the world by 2000 in 1990. They were out by a few orders of magnitude. Motorola built the Iridium network on the basis of these figures and similar predictions and took a bath.
Don't get too excited. This is just some press release with a few ads.
Analysts are full of it (Score:5, Interesting)
Like almost all "analysts", it's about as solid as pea soup.
I worked in the IT department for a company that distributed analyst white papers, and these people were dumb as fucking bricks, according to the people in the company who had to deal with them on a daily basis. Like, "well, I can't figure out how to email this so I'm going to print and fax it to you", dumb.
As IT workers we were continuously astounded by how poor the reports were, making ludicrous predictions and giving blatantly bad advice. As others on slashdot have said- people pay for and buy these reports to justify positions, not to learn how to do something. When I googled names of authors on the papers- some of which dealt with hugely complex corporate IT problems- the authors were fresh out of college, often with a degree that had absolutely nothing to do with the subject matter. Ie- INTERNS, people!
It's like the old "it came into my email box, it must be true" adage, only with a real company with a fancy website and a list of clientele a mile long telling you that "sure, it's perfectly ok to dump water on your computers." Everyone's too concerned about looking stupid to admit they're being had.
Makes sense... (Score:5, Insightful)
This obviously makes sense seeing as mini hard drives are dropping in price so it is becoming reasonable to carry around a large collection of music with you (thus making it better than just carrying around a CD player).
However, I wonder if its at all sustainable. I mean, once you have a 40 gig player, I can't imagine needing much more. Sure, there are a few people who want more, and maybe there is a market for video players, but I think the current line is all I would need for now. Sort of like how CD players have just sort of stagnated. There are no real improvements, they just get cheaper. The only reason to buy a new one after your first is if it breaks. Will there be any real innovation in the mp3 player market?
so what you're saying is... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:so what you're saying is... (Score:2)
Re:so what you're saying is... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:so what you're saying is... (Score:2)
Obviously 40GB isn't enough. There's no such thing as too much storage. If they gave me a terabyte I'm sure I'd find a use for it.
But 40GB is too much for the current interface designs used on players. Even the "best" designs like the iPod make it too cumbersome to find songs when you've got 2000+ songs. There needs to be improvements in the interface before they start worrying about even more disk.
Re:Makes sense... (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah, I said that with my 540 meg harddrive, my 1 Gig harddrive, my 4 Gig harddrive, my 20 Gig harddrive, my 80 Gig harddrive. Once I get my 1/2 terabyte RAID5 music server, I can't imagine needing much more.
Re:Makes sense... (Score:2)
When I first got my computer, I didn't know what to do with the space. My old computer had a 10 GB hard drive and I didn't know what I would do with a 30 GB hard drive.
About a year later, I'm installing a 40 GB hard drive. A few months later, I'm adding an 80 GB external drive. Yesterday, I got a disk full message on the external drive.
Personally, I have over 50 GB of MP3s. And I haven't even e
Re:Makes sense... (Score:2)
Re:Makes sense... (Score:2)
I think there's options for improvement. I have a 40gig iPod loaded almost to the brim with audiobooks, but I might look to trade up eventually if a few of the above options (but not just any of them) were
Re:Makes sense... (Score:2)
Re:Makes sense... (Score:2)
Re:Makes sense... (Score:2)
40 gigs may be enough right now, but as HD space increases then peope will go for better quality sound and music files will grow in size.
This is not mentioning things like "Home on iPod". "Home n iPod" was an announced feature for a few hours on the Apple website. Basically, your home directory on your iPod. Go anywhere, plug in your iPod to any mac and you can log on from it just like it was your own computer at home with all your files and everything.
Re:Makes sense... (Score:2)
I mean, once you have a 40 gig player, I can't imagine needing much more.
Well, you can cram about 100 hours of lossless compressed audio into 40 gig. That would be enough for a lot of people. It wouldn't hold my entire CD collection though. It would probably all fit into 40 gig at 128kbps.
I have a large collection, true, certainly larger than many people. But it's by no means the largest of all the people I know. I have friends with 1000+ CDs, if they wanted to store all that lossless compressed, they m
End of Cassette Tape (Score:4, Insightful)
The constant in life is change. Good-bye "cassette tape".
Re:End of Cassette Tape (Score:2)
Re:End of Cassette Tape (Score:2)
Re:End of Cassette Tape (Score:2)
I never bought music until I had a CD player. I rarely bought movies until I had DVD.
Fast-forwarding and rewinding is maddening.
Further proof of Sony's idiocy (Score:4, Insightful)
For the time being, Sony customers will have to be satisfied with MP3 support in flash-based players, which could come as early as this year... The company is also considering expanding MP3 support to hard disk devices, sources told ZDNet France, but no decision has yet been made on that front.
Is it that hard to one unified plan? Why the restrictions on HD-based models. "It's OK to pirate music, provided it's less than 256 MB!"
Re:Further proof of Sony's idiocy (Score:2)
Then I can sit back and laugh as all the Sony fans continue to buy their crap, no matter how badly they're treated and how much the products limit them. Sony fans are a really strange bunch; they fawn over anything by Sony, and refuse to by any other brand, no matter how limiting the Sony stuff is or how much better or cheaper the o
Re:Further proof of Sony's idiocy (Score:2)
I predict... (Score:4, Funny)
that by 2008, none of the recording companies will allow me to purchase an MP3 in a store.
Re:Well, obviously... (Score:2)
Thats how they sell DVDs, CDs, and software. Can you think of another archival quality medium.
Or was this a joke that the mods and I didn't pick up on?
I browse with -3 on "Funny" posts. I'm being dead serious.
You May Already Have an MP3 Player (Score:2, Informative)
I'm sure this is not news to most of you, but it was to me (I got my player as a christmas present, as a refurb without the original packaging).
Re:You May Already Have an MP3 Player (Score:2)
It's always rosy future for those guys (Score:2)
December 2003: MP3 player sales for 2003 doubled [itfacts.biz]
February 2004: 7 million MP3 players will be sold in 2004 [itfacts.biz]
July 2004: No, 10.8 mln digital music players will be sold in 2004 [itfacts.biz]
September 2004: 50 mln by 2008 [itfacts.biz]
The first link, however, will tell you that 19% of those who download music online already have an MP3 player. Furthermore, you have a whole bunch of people who use a PDA, their MP3 watch or what not to listen to the music.
give me multi format! (Score:2, Interesting)
Sony MP3 Player!!! (Score:4, Funny)
It takes a special kind of asshat to make a portable music player with no MP3 support.
Sony, welcome to 1999!!!
Re:Sony MP3 Player!!! (Score:2, Funny)
Too late for Sony (Score:2)
Re:Too late for Sony (Score:2)
IDC 96% off (Score:4, Informative)
Look at these clowns trackrecord [theregister.co.uk]for the Itanium
Holding out for the in-car ogg player (Score:2)
It sure would be cool if one of these could play from DVD-R media as well.
Re:Holding out for the in-car ogg player (Score:2)
Inevitable (Score:4, Insightful)
/RIAA slaps forehead... (Score:4, Insightful)
ATRAK3? (Score:2)
I know God exists.
www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA
Removable Media (Score:2)
Alternatively, a slot l
Death of MP3 Players Not Demand For (Score:4, Insightful)
Only the diehards ( and clueless ) will buy them at that point..
Much as the MD market is now.. either you are clueless of the restrictions, or you find a way around them as you are determined to be able to do what you want with your own music, and have it portable.. ( though I do agree lack of marketing on Sony's part hasn't helped much either, most average Joe types don't know what MD is... )
iPod fort 199 and more exciting stuff!!!!!!!!! (Score:4, Insightful)
I finally bought an iPod because I was getting an audible.com account and I could get $100 off an iPod. I bought a new 4g iPod, which I love slightly less than my mother. Where was Sony? Where is my MP3 walkman? Man, they have the money, mind and moxy, why the hell is Apple getting the industry (other than the fact that Jobs has balz = steel and they hired a great marketting firm).
Sony already have an Ipod like device (Score:2)
The Aiwa HZ-WS2000 [aiwa.com]
Anyway 1.5gb and smaller and lighter than an Ipod Mini.
Sony's quality sucks! (Score:5, Informative)
I bought a top-of-the-line Sony VHS VCR back in 1991 and it lasted 10 years, giving an exceptional picture and brilliant audio.
The top-of-the-line Sony VHS VCR I bought in 1999 gave nowhere near as good a picture and just died, lasting only half as long as the previous one.
The top-of-the-line Sony VHS VCR I bought in 2000 was even worse in respect to its performance and died back in late 2001 -- lasting less than two years.
The 21" Sony TV I bought back in 1992 is still going strong and gives an excellent picture. The 29" set I bought in 1999 has crapped out twice and the tube is showing pronounced signs of softness. The picture geometry has also gone to hell in a handbasket.
If this trend continues, that Sony MP3 player probably won't make it to the shop doorway before it craps out.
As an electronics tech I took a look at the Sony VCRs and have to say that the standards of design and construction have fallen significantly in the 10 year period from my first to most recent purchase.
I don't buy Sony gear any more -- they used to be a premium brand with excellent quality but now it's actually worse than some of the cheaper stuff on the market. The budget 2-head NEC VCR I bought at the same time as the 2000-model Sony is still going strong.
When it came time to buy a new camcorder, I bought a Panasonic and have been *very* pleased with the results. Even my friends who spent 50% more on a Sony camera are very impressed (and kicking themselves a little
Sony? I don't think so.
You know... (Score:2, Interesting)
Sony dropped the ball on MD (Score:5, Insightful)
ATRAC sounds great, but since music MDs and data MDs are two completely different (and incompatible) things, the whole idea is crippled. If that barrier didn't exist, there'd be no market for the flash-players out there, and Sony would be sitting on top of the world. Same goes for the appalling mess that they made of NetMD. If MD portables acted as simple mass-storage devices, they'd be huge (and in time, cheap), and folks wouldn't see a need for a HDD-based mp3 player. It's a wonderful format for live recording, but when you're done, how the heck do you get it uploaded to a PC? You just don't. I still have a great Sharp unit that I use for recording, but it's a pain to have to play it into the line-in jack of my PC in realtime just to edit and store the thing.
If only they had done it right...
Here's a crazy thought :) (Score:3, Interesting)
According to the Fortune 500 list [usatoday.com], M$ and Apple are resp. :
46. Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Wash., 47, $32.187
301. Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, Calif., 300, $6.207
billon dollar businesses. - Now according to Steve Jobs himself (from WWDC2004 [apple.com]) the ipod's have a +50% market share (mesured by units!).
- - -
Ok, now let's do some *simple* math! :).
$58 Billions * 0.50+ = $APPLE.MP3.PROFITS+
${APPLE.MP3.PROFITS}+ + 6.207 = $35.207+ Billions
- - -
say, if M$ has to compete with the 'Linux Desktop' for markes share(s), which *let's assume will* hamper them from further increasing *much* ... APPLE would by 2008 at least catch up to them ... simply by not competing for the 'Desktop' :-)
Try lossless compression (Score:3, Insightful)
These codecs work like ZIP, no loss of quality or detail unlike MP3, and if you listen to subtle music (e.g. classical or jazz) in a not too noisy environment, it will make a big difference.
I am in the process of re-ripping my classical CD collection to ALAC, and once I am done, I won't have to touch a silver disc again - my G5 streams CD audio to my AV amplifier via Toslink optical fiber digital audio, and on the go, I have an iPod 15GB (3rd gen), which can store roughly 50CD's worth of lossless audio.
Re:Really? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Really? (Score:2)
Re:Really? (Score:2)
Yes, but the fight has been between the consumer electronics division and the content division. Which makes more money. A lot more. That's why they haven't until now.
My suspicion is the only reason they've gone towards mp3s now is that they risk losing mindshare among teens, and Sony hardware will be viewed as antiquated and not worth getting... and the Sony name (aside from in the front of movies or CDs) will become a thing of
Re:Really? (Score:2)
Re:Really? (Score:2, Insightful)
Sony; Too much to protect (Score:2)
Of course, they could have easily looked at it from the other angle and locked in their customer base (and whatever DRM they wanted) from the ground f
Re:Sonys don' (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Sony finally gets it.... (Score:2)
I love my Mini-disc player. The batteries last a long time. The discs hold over 2 hours of music and the sound quality with ATRAC is as good or better than MP3. The players are durable - I've dropped mine a few times from a few feet off the ground and still works great. The one thing missing is being able to transfer files to and from the recorder.
IMO, Sony is an in
Re:I don't see why... (Score:2)
The reason MP3 is necessarily for portable music players is because MP3 is overwhelmingly the most popular portable music format in the world.
It'd be like building a car that wouldn't work on paved roads.
It'd be like building a commercial airline that only went to and from deserted areas.
It'd be like selling food that most people couldn't digest.
If the market says X is a winner, then it asinine NOT to support X.