Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media Entertainment Games

Splinter Cell Movie in the Works 42

Posted by Zonk from the sound-of-cracking-vertebrae-in-THX dept.
By way of Voodoo Extreme comes the news that a movie adaptation of Splinter Cell is in the offing. From the blurb: "Paramount has acquired film rights to Tom Clancy's video game Splinter Cell and hired Peter Berg (Friday Night Lights) to direct. Variety says Berg is writing the script along with Splinter Cell game writer J.T. Petty and John J. McLaughlin (Man of the House). Paramount said the movie is aimed at combining the game's blend of stealth action with a "dynamic, original" character."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Splinter Cell Movie in the Works More

Splinter Cell Movie in the Works

Comments Filter:

  • great (Score:3, Funny)

    by DrSkwid ( 118965 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @04:37PM (#11119533) Journal

    2 hours of someone runnning round an empty warehouse looking for a key

    • 2 hours of someone runnning round an empty warehouse looking for a key

      Don't you mean: 2 hours of someone sneaking round an empty warehouse looking for a key?

  • I hope this movie has Hellspawn and a Space Marine..

  • The goggles, they do nothing! (Score:3, Funny)

    by Poseidon88 ( 791279 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @04:44PM (#11119611)
    To be filmed entirely in night-vision.
  • This would end up like Mission Impossible except explosive bubble gum and defying-physics motorcycle is not in the movie.

  • Casting (Score:3, Interesting)

    by tb3 ( 313150 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @04:51PM (#11119687) Homepage
    I'd say Michael Ironside [imdb.com] was a sure thing for the lead role, but he might be a bit old now (at 54)
    • He definitely needs a cameo. Or maybe he can be the Big, Bad, Evil Guy.

      Nah, too much of a stretch.
    • He turned up on Smallville recently as a military general, sadly he's starting to look his age a bit I don't think he'll be offered the lead. As long as they don't cast Ben Affleck we should be OK.
    • I don't know, I'll continue to hold out hope - I'm a huge Ironside fan - he and Terry O'Quinn get the two "Actor wishlists" on TiVo, and his presence is enough to make me think fondly of Highlander 2.

      The lead character ("Splinter Cell?") is supposed to be an old war horse, he keeps complaining that he's "getting too old for this" and appears to be a contemporary of other characters who are themselves around that age.

      Sure, 54 is old, but makeup could probably take 10 years off.

      He probably won't be
    • Plus Michael Ironside doesn't even doesn't even sound like Sam Fisher

  • Yeah and like Doom (Score:4, Funny)

    by the_skywise ( 189793 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @04:59PM (#11119765)
    It'll be about a circus clown who decides to infiltrate the "evil corporation" that uses animals for experimental testing purposes.

    But rest assured, it'll maintain the spirit and flavor of the Splinter Cell franchise we know and love!

  • Original character? Wha? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by 2Flower ( 216318 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @05:01PM (#11119790) Homepage
    ...with a "dynamic, original" character.

    Okay. When the games are already highly cinematic and have Tom Clancy behind the scenes and are centered on a single well established character like Sam Fisher... WHY would you monkey with that and invent some new "dynamic, original" character for your lead? ...then again, we've all been wondering what was so freaking hard about demons from hell and marines in DOOM. Maybe Hollywood has severe head trauma and can't see the obvious, already established demographic-pleasing elements that are being given to them on a silver platter.
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • Well, if they want a dynamic, original character, that certainly rules out Sam Fisher, who was neither dynamic nor original.

      Of course, I think I'm about the only person in the world that thought the story to Spliter Cell was boring, incoherent nonsense, so maybe take my opinion with a bit of salt.

      --Jeremy
  • Put simply, if there was any real desire to make this a 'real movie' and not a 'lame video game adaptation', Tom Clancy would be on the writing credits. He threw his weight behind the game, why not the movie? Add to that a "dynamic, original" new character, and odds are really good that this is going to be very forgettable.

    • Re:No Tom Clancy? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by filth grinder ( 577043 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @06:36PM (#11120698)
      Because Tom Clancy didn't write the game. The closet to an actual credit is, "Based on some notes Tom decided to give us". Tom Clancy leads him name to a TON to crap that he doesn't write. "Tom Clancy's Ops Center", "Tom Clancy's Power Plays" and a host of other bad books that just tarnish his brand.

      This game has his name on it because it came out of his game studio (Red Storm entertainment which was bought by UbiSoft). It's just one more product he "branded" without having to do the work.

      Plus he isn't a screen writer. Tom Clancy's books are great fun books, but I've yet to see him produce a screenplay. Writing a novel, and writing a script are two different things. Notice how none of the movie adaptations of Tom's books feature him with a screenplay credit.

      What you should be looking at here is the game writer on the writing team. He's the one who should get credit for the story. He's the one who should have his name plastered on the game.

      Tom also pretty much loathes the video games as well. His comments have been anything but warm on video game subjects. He'll plaster his name on them because they sell.

      Executive Orders was the last good thing he's written.
      • Speaking of tarnishing his brand, Sweet Merciful Christ, have you read Teeth of the Tiger yet?

        Worst
        Book
        Evar
        Honestly, it is vastly worse than even the crap that's got the " 's " after clancy's name. And it's only half the book... I really want to go into details but won't spoil the horror for you. We'll just say that major characters died in between books and the fact only gets passing mention in one scene of dialogue.

      • This game has his name on it because it came out of his game studio (Red Storm entertainment which was bought by UbiSoft).

        I have to correct you on this one, the game was created in the montreal studio of Ubisoft. Ubi decided to tag it as a Clancy product simply because, as you said, it sells.
      • If Tom Clancy wrote a movie, it would be approximately 50 hours long, if he cut out some of the detail.
  • Let The Beating of the Dead Horse Begin! Soon tactical games like Splinter Cell and Metal Gear will join the ranks of other great dead horses like:

    Casualties:
    Mortal Kombat
    Street Fighter
    Tekken
    Romance of the Three Kingdoms
    Final Fantasy
    Sonic
    Mario
    Zelda
    Kirby
    G.I. Joe
    Heman
    Jason
    Freddie
    Pinhead
    Transformers
    "The First Person Shooter Game"
    "The Real Time Strategy Game"

    Can some soul out there actually make game that is fun to play rather then fun to watch?

  • Oooh! I bet I know what it's about. (Score:5, Funny)

    by alexjohns ( 53323 ) <almuric.gmail@com> on Friday December 17, 2004 @05:30PM (#11120065) Journal
    This one will take place on mars and feature hell demons.

    I can feel it. Can you?

  • Not a bad game, but as a movie?? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by meanfriend ( 704312 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @05:54PM (#11120280)
    I personally liked the gameplay of Splinter Cell, but I think it takes itself too seriously to be a good candidate for movie adaptation. Metal Gear Solid is the seminal 'stealth action' game and it lends it self better to a movie version because it's meant to have over-the-top characters and a little cheesy dialog doesnt look out of place. MGS storylines are pretty outlandish and far-fetched, but they work perfectly well in the context of the game.

    Splinter Cell, OTOH aims for gritty, semi-realism; something you might actually believe happens in the real world and a movie that tries to be faithful to the original game would likely fall dreadfully flat. (Though that's usually true of any video game -> movie attempt)

    IMHO, a MGS movie that's meant to be a little campy (think Hellboy or Spiderman) would be more appealing to me than a Splinter Cell adaptation.
  • It will suck arse and have nothing in common with the game or the book, except for the title.

    Maybe the game spin-off (of this game spin-off) will be really cool, just like all the other times they've done that [gamespot.com].

  • They should Get the X-Men Script Writers (Score:3, Interesting)

    by szyzyg ( 7313 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @07:19PM (#11121027)
    If only for the fact that a certain David Hayter is credited.... AKA the voice of Solid Snake in the Metal Gear games.

  • Get the Doom scriptwriter (Score:3, Funny)

    by trawg ( 308495 ) on Friday December 17, 2004 @07:52PM (#11121324) Homepage
    Its laughs a minute when playboy billionaire Sam Fisher, played by Roy Schneider, teams up with a wacky talking dog in a journey of self discovery as they traipse across the Sahara!

  • George Clooney (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    ...would be the ideal star for this.

Slashdot Top Deals

Somebody ought to cross ball point pens with coat hangers so that the pens will multiply instead of disappear.

Close