Napster to Offer Movie Downloads 190
sebFlyte writes "silicon.com is reporting that Napster is going to move into legal movie downloads. They are aiming particularly to tap the younger video-game generation."
Single tasking: Just Say No.
Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:5, Insightful)
To watch films on CinemaNow you will need the minimum of Microsoft Windows Media Player version 9
No problem realy I wouldn't want ot pay the movie industry any more then the music industry.
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:2)
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:3, Insightful)
We do not support Mozilla or Netscape. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
I can't wait for the time when the IE-only sites realize that their usage has gradually been declining.
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:3, Interesting)
I am a senior programmer for a fortune 500. Over the last 4 weeks I have been looking at our login stats. For the last two years, 96%+ of _all_ of our 140,000+ home employees have used IE. However, something _very_ strange has happend over the last 6 months to our web stats. I was taking weekly snap-shots, and I saw the IE market share continued to drop. The current IE share is now 88%! That is a _huge_ drop from pervious versions.
Or the first to fail (Score:2)
The Tivo/Netflix thing may have a good shot though, being a lot like pay-per-view and well integrated into the box. I don't think any cable service would partner with any of the movie download places as they would want to control that all themselves.
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:3, Insightful)
Business as usual at slashdot. Inflating the news for a good headline. Napster has no partners or agreements in place, at least none that they're willing to go on the record about.
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:3, Interesting)
untapped or non-existent?
i'm not convinced at all that a download video market exists. i don't see compelling reasons why downloading would be any more convenient or cost effective than something like netflix. and if they think they can charge more for movies than music, then forget about it because you can buy DVDs cheaper than CDs at most stores. also, there's no compelling reason to split up the movie contents - while ability to sell ind. songs definitely helped with the po
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:2)
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:3, Interesting)
In Malaysia they charge a hell of a lot for DVD's. around 70-80 ringgit for a "hot" title. A music CD is only 40-45 ringgit. And it's way too expensive to buy, especially when most of it is crap. 1 ringgit is 3.8 USD, but to put things into an "afforability" perspective, a meal at a fast food chain (say McDonald's) cost around 8 ringgit for a burger, a drink and some frie
Re:Move quick! You are the third to arrive... (Score:2)
The DRM on movie downloads will have to be extreme, and I doubt that Napster is prepared with sufficient technology. On the other hand, it doesn't sound like they are preparing to distribute Hollywood movies just yet. Maybe they can start with
BT (Score:2)
Re distribution/bandwidth probl
I don't see the interest for this being too great. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
Considering how much I dislike watching movies on a monitor, I doubt there are many people out there interested in downloading movies instead of renting or buying.
Considering how much I dislike hearing music on my laptop speaker, I doubt there are many people out there interested in downloading movies instead of renting or buying.
Many people I know watch movies from their computers, either onto monitors apparently better than yours, TV's, and even projectors.
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
Did I mess it up again?
Considering how much I dislike hearing music on my laptop speaker, I doubt there are many people out there interested in downloading movies instead of renting or buying.
It should be:
Considering how much I dislike hearing music on my laptop speaker, I doubt there are many people out there interested in downloading music instead of renting or buying.
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
Considering how much I hate brussel sprouts, I doubt there are many people out there interested in downloading movies instead of renting or buying.
Considering how much I hate being kicked in the face. .
Considering how much I hate you. . .
Considering how creepy most people think I am. .
=)
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:5, Interesting)
It's a chicken and egg thing. There are portable media players that will play the movies, but they won't be popular until there are plenty of easy and cheap ways to get the content legally.
portable music devices are a huge market, and CD burners are nearly ubiquitous in computers these days, plus you talking about the difference between a couple minutes and a few hours worth of downloading
1) the mp3 player market didn't spring up over night out of nothing.
2) DVD burners are becoming a lot more common, and will probably displace CD burners. Besides, other than capacity, are they all that different? Both utilize Shiny Disc technology.
3) It can take many many hours to DL an unauthorized copy of a movie on the file sharing networks, but people do it (often to find that what they downloaded is not what they wanted). Some people will happily pay a few bucks to guarantee that their getting the movie they want, that they can find it easily, and that it will download in a reasonable amount of time.
Anyway, these things just don't happen by themselves. A company has to actually try and deliver a product or service, or there is no market.
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
The music came before the player.
this time the player really came before the video. Though content is being distributed, bandwidth is a pain, quailty sucks, and storage requirments are high.
Of course MP3's were killing dial-up. So the questions are what will happen first. 10-20Mbs internet access? or high quailty content? Will consumers switch to watching movies on small screens when the bulk of the
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:4, Interesting)
The demand is there, otherwise we wouldn't see such a huge black market dealing in unauthorized copies.
Until downloading movies saves you both time and money, and is easy to use, I don't see the service becoming too popular.
I mostly agree with you, but it needn't save both time and money. Change your statement to "time or money", and I totally agree with you. Consider this: I want to watch some very obscure movie or TV show, and my local Blockbuster doesn't have it. Now, I can buy it on Amazon for retail + shipping + wait time, or I can purchase a single viewing download for $2.99, with the option of burning to DVD for another $10.
Whoever can execute this scheme the most successfully will make a good deal of money, and will be hailed as the movie equivalent of iTMS. Unless it's Apple, in which case we'll criticize the proprietary nature of their product/service combo, the DRM, and the pricing. =)
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
I'm not sure I agree with the pricing model, though... I'd rather just pay a single charge to own the movie in digital form. None of this "your movie will self-destruct" funny business that (the original) DiVX tried.
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
Maybe you won't think the same after realizing that for a small 2 hours download you can watch the latest episode (fansubbed) of Xenosaga: the anime series.
Movie downloads may not be really popular, but the anime market shows promise. Unfortunately I don't think it can be legitimized due to the marginally-legal status of fansubs.
Use a laptop much? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
You'd be surprised (Score:2)
Now, this is my bedroom, and when I'm in bed, it's about 10ft from the monitor to my eyes. It's a very convenient system and I didn't even
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
It all depends what equiptment you have at your disposal, at home I will usually use the 40-something inch TV in the living room, but if its being used my 21inch CRT monitor on my computer with its dolby 5.1 setup function admirably as TV/movie watching devices. Plus as I d/l many TV seri
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
> Considering how many people download movies off of
> bittorrent, I think there IS a market out there.
Except that this plan (such as it is) is aimed at a totally different group than torrent users. I mean, we're talking about a group who probably have a reasonably good idea that you don't stick the power plug up their nose, but not much better.
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
At that speed, it should be able to watch a high quality video stream in realtime as it's downloading.
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
The average TV is probably 24 to 27", and the average monitor is probably still 17" or less. I can't think of a single person I know (except people that down own a TV) who owns a computer screen larger than the TV they own. Unless there's a way to watch these movies on my TV, I wouldn't pay $ for a movie that would only play on my computer.
Re:I don't see the interest for this being too gre (Score:2)
I do, my monitor (as I mentioned in another post) is a very nice 19 inch screen, my TV in college is a 13 inch crt, I spend far more time on my computer that I do watching TV (not counting all the media that I usually watch on my computer), so I'd rather spend the money on my monitor.
Future (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Future (Score:3, Informative)
Speed (Score:3, Interesting)
...not that I've ever used that for movies...
Oblig. Casablanca ref. (Score:2)
'Here are your winnings sir.'
if it's anything like p2p music downloads (Score:3, Funny)
Re:if it's anything like p2p music downloads (Score:5, Funny)
Then it must have been "Matrix Revolutions" that you saw..
Re:if it's anything like p2p music downloads (Score:3, Funny)
Whoa. Déja vu.
Re:if it's anything like p2p music downloads (Score:2)
Yeah, it could be worse though. It could have Madonna telling you to quit stealing movies. And we know how bad movies that let Madonna in front of a camera are...
Re:if it's anything like p2p music downloads (Score:2)
Re:if it's anything like p2p music downloads (Score:2)
"tap the younger video-game generation" (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:"tap the younger video-game generation" (Score:2)
Video Games != Young (Score:2)
Movies are Shared Experiences (Score:3, Insightful)
After people watch the movie, they want to talk about it with their friends. How much fun is watching a movie by yourself?
The only exception is pornography. Unless Napster intends that its service will be predominantly for pornography downloads, Napster will not achieve much market penetration (pun intended).
Perhaps, Napster should offer a special deal: After 10 downloads, you receive a free jar of vaseline. <chuckle>
Re:Movies are Shared Experiences (Score:2)
Did I mention that I felt like I'd been ripped off $1.99?
Re:Movies are Shared Experiences (Score:2)
Sore neck, you must have.
Who knew? (Score:2)
Re:Movies are Shared Experiences (Score:2)
Not really a suprise (Score:3, Interesting)
Will it be usable if say I have a media PC? Would it look decent if I downloaded a movie and hooked my computer up to a TV?
If they can do that, and make download decent... it's got a good shot.
Unlike Kazaa, Napster is clean of viruses, trojans, and other garbage infecting files in hopes of getting a loophole in your buggy media player.
Key word: "Considering" (Score:5, Insightful)
So let's see... no business plan, no decisions on DRM or encoding format or anything remotely technical, just the statement that it's being "considered..."
Should this really be considered news? I mean, a lot of groups are looking at doing movie downloads...
Re:Key word: "Considering" (Score:2)
1. Put out a press release that Napster is "considering" movie downloads
2. ?
3. Profit!
Re:Key word: "Considering" (Score:2)
Re:Key word: "Considering" (Score:2)
Re:Key word: "Considering" (Score:3, Interesting)
"Original music download heavyweight Napster is considering throwing in the towel and conceding victory to Apple's iTunes Music Store. Napster CEO Chris Gorog said the company is currently examining ways to bail out of this mess, and was looking at distributing movies online, selling pet supplies, or creating a search engine to help the company out of its present plight."
"younger" video-game generation? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:"younger" video-game generation? (Score:2)
One in four people seems unlikley (Score:3, Insightful)
I know it is spreading in popularilty, but even so I know very few people at work (for example) that even know what Bittorrent is, much less have downloaded a film!
Re:One in four people seems unlikley (Score:2)
That's how I think it went (Score:2)
Does the market even exist yet? (Score:4, Insightful)
* Are there any decent portable movie players?
* Can we burn our movies to DVD like we can burn our music to CD?
* I have a Mac & PC, but for everyone here who lives on *nix, will there be cross-platform software?
* Are we going to be downloading 4.6GB DVD's or compressed divx-like files? Also, how are you going to pay for all that bandwidth without killing your customers with additional charges?
* Finally, what will be the selling point to downloading movies to your computer. Why not just go out and rent, or even yet, rent online through NetFlix or Blockbuster?
These are all very valid points that need to be addressed before anyone tackles this. Napster has yet to do this and I see them headed for a bust.
Re:Does the market even exist yet? (Score:4, Insightful)
Not really. e.g. MS Portable Media Center is only VHS resolution (320x240)
Can we burn our movies to DVD like we can burn our music to CD?
If so, don't expect to pay much less than the cost of a regular DVD.
I have a Mac & PC, but for everyone here who lives on *nix, will there be cross-platform software?
Of course not!
Are we going to be downloading 4.6GB DVD's or compressed divx-like files?
It's gotta be WMV9 or H.264 or VP7, which makes it a little harder to burn to DVD.
Also, how are you going to pay for all that bandwidth without killing your customers with additional charges?
By offloading the bandwidth cost to the customers (BitTorrent-style), of course!
Finally, what will be the selling point to downloading movies to your computer. Why not just go out and rent, or even yet, rent online through NetFlix or Blockbuster?
Owning != renting.
Re:Does the market even exist yet? (Score:2)
but does iTunes actually have anything in their library worth buying? every time i look stuff up it's not found, or just a compilation. even artists like rolling stones, the pogues, radiohead, etc. have pretty much zero presence there. a parody, some live albums, is all.
i wonder if the same will happen with the video content. it seems like the artists who sell their soul^H^H^H^Hstuff on iTunes need the extra outlet, i
Right direction, wrong step. (Score:4, Insightful)
So what's the catch? I don't want to sit around for a few hours while my laptop downloads a movie, only to have to burn it to a DVD to watch it on my TV (or plug my laptop in to the TV, making it useless for anything else). What *I* want is the ability to browse, order, download and view movies from my TV.
I think this is where TiVo, or perhaps and Apple/TiVo partership, would kick ass. Being able to buy and download a movie through my TiVo, and when it's ready, I can watch it all I want on the TV... or burn a DVD right there on the device. Or copy it to my laptop if I really want to watch it there.
THAT'S the way to go.
Re:Right direction, wrong step. (Score:2)
Funnily enough, I was looking at something to solve this a few hours ago. Depends on the format they send of course, but have a look at the Elgato EyeHome [elgato.com]. Sounds like a good product to me - stored films (in DiVX or various MPEGs), iPhoto access, iTunes access, wireless access...not bad.
The MythTV lot will be jumping up and down here too I imagine, and quiet rightly so. Cop
Akimbo (Score:2)
Try Akimbo [akimbo.com].
Movies are your foreground process (Score:2)
I don't want to sit around for a few hours while my laptop downloads a movie, only to have to ... plug my laptop in to the TV, making it useless for anything else
When you watch a movie, you are useless for anything else. Unlike music, which a fellow generally listens to in the background while doing something else, movies are intended to be watched as your foreground process.
Er... (Score:2)
Ohhhh. Napster. Yeah, I remember that. So this is some sort of commercial for them then?
"Video game generation"? (Score:3, Insightful)
They are aiming particularly to tap the younger video-game generation.
Is this some marketing term for the young kidz who like totally radical xtreme eye popping special fx at the touch of a button?!?!?!
Are "video games" the mark of the young generation? Are these a target group for downloading movies? Right now, the generation that "grew up" with video games would be anyone 35 and under. So is the main feature of everyone under 35 that they like video games?
What does any of this mean?
Re:"Video game generation"? (Score:2)
Cable companies will win (Score:5, Insightful)
Ultimately the cable companies will be the winners here. They have a high speed digital cable running into a box which is attached to your TV.
What more can you possibly say?
Re:Cable companies will win (Score:2)
Not sure how great this really is (Score:2)
I doubt this will catch on very well if Billy can't give a copy of a movie he's just downloaded to little Jimmy.
As far as I can see, this is still the same old business model with a slightly different distribution method.
Not that I'm suggesting a new business model (ooh, how about voluntary micropayments to the temporaily formed company that made the film instead of "If you don't
Music Videos (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Music Videos (Score:2)
One application of this I'd be interested in is perhaps the opportunity to buy music videos in addition to songs.
Then it is with supreme irony that you'll find the iTunes Music Store supplying videos for free while charging for the audio track alone. You don't get to pick and choose, though, since not every song gets made into a video.
Re:Music Videos (Score:2)
BLASPHEME!
Don't give them any ideas, right now they're free at the iTMS!
1 Chance (Score:4, Insightful)
They get ONE chance to win our trust and our praise on this, and one chance only. They screw it up, and they will have paved the road for Apple to do it right, which they inevitably will.
Napster needs to offer no DRM, fast downloads, no annoying and invasive advertising in the middle of the movies or anything, and a wide selection. If they can't do it, someone else will. Frankly though, I don't have much hope for them doing the right thing.
Re:1 Chance (Score:2)
The _name_ was bought out by another company. There is no relationship between the current Napster and the original pirate-enabler.
Napster are making a profit by making deals with movie companies. Those deals will undoubtably be just as free as the deals they made with music companies - i.e. not very free at all.
Napster don't get to choose whether there is DRM on the movies. Thinking they have any control over this is hopelessly naive.
Re:1 Chance (Score:2)
Re:1 Chance (Score:2)
Fine. Ads and content. Sure no one likes ads, but I don't recall anyone saying there's any legality problems with ads.
But really your premise is flawed. If you're paying for a download there's no reason you can't be paying for an ad-free version.
In what world will content providers allow fast downloads of non DRM content?
In one with genuine free-market competition. There is no way a DRM-crippled product can compete. Anyone offering non-crippled products will capture t
Re:1 Chance (Score:2)
Well, if they give it away for free then they are welcome to give away any sort of crippled crap they like.
However if I'm paying for a product there's no way in hell I'm spending a single cent on a crippled product.
the *only* way that studios allow their content to be distributed online
No one is saying anyone has to sell anything. But obviously anyone who refuses to sell their product isn't going to make make any money not selling it.
As long as record co
Better than your cable box? (Score:2)
Like the iPod/iTunes simplified music buying and listening, I think the cable industry has already solved the movide buying thing.
If they would just increase the library of movies on demand and allow us to save them in our PVR, burn to DVD, etc, then you have an easy way to buy, stor
Re:Better than your cable box? (Score:2)
The primary market is people with internet connections (presumably broadband), and some way of watching the movie (TV, computer display, portable media player).
You're making an assumption similar to those made by IBM that there was no market for the PC because customers using mainfr
Re:Better than your cable box? (Score:2)
I would wager that a study would find a direct correlation between those who spend money for premium cable services and those who buy movies (in any format - PPV, DVD, etc).
Re:Better than your cable box? (Score:2)
did anyone read the article? (Score:2, Informative)
why does this mean that napster is definitely going into the movie distribution business? lots of companies are considering lots of things - this is not news. and the headline "Napster to Offer Movie Downloads"? wildly inaccurate.
The Apple Stategy (Score:3, Insightful)
And assuming (this might be a stretch) that the "Asteroid" box is really a HD video box (Jobs said it's the year of HD) and that my iPod Photo has the hardware already to play movies [ipodhacks.com] then Apple will have a perfect set of distribution/watch on HDTV/carry on iPod. A formidable concept.
Apple is putting into place the exact pieces to create the iTunes store for movies. With Steves experience in the film business (Pixar) he already has more connections than he did with the record companies and now he has a track record, no, he has written the book on legal downloading.
Napster is talking abut dilly-dallying around with the concepts that Apple is preparing the major groundwork for.
How do you make money off this (Score:2)
Movies when you need them (Score:2, Interesting)
If it has a huge list of movies and a no wait download or any waiting time, i would personally watch them.
Instead of waiting on that hard to find movie coming from amazon that you ordered weeks ago, paying for postage and packaging , why not load up your napster client hit in your search for that movie and up it comes , sit back relax and watch the movie you cant find in the shops, or a new movie in the cinema maybe.
But how far will they go , will warez groups have the ab
Oh, that word: Legal... (Score:2)
When I was still running the Open Music Registry, it used to annoy me greatly that articles online and off would refer to "legal music downloads" in a manner that implied the only way to legally download music was to pay for it. No reference to or acknowledgement of the public domain. No open-licensing. Just "pay or it's illegal."
Obviously that pet peeve is ripe for renewal on a different front: "legal" movie downloads. {sigh}
shouldn't that read tapster? (Score:2)
I think they misspelled tapster.com [archive.org]
Background story>
sorry for the archive.org link, apparently tapster - like its lesser known brother - has succumbed to the power of the RIAA. Or was it because they streamed in dobly?
What for? (Score:3, Interesting)
I like my way better: there's a robot DVD shop around the corner. Open 24h. Costs me just one buck to rent a film for three hours (more if I keep it longer, of course).
Plenty time to view it and decide if I want to maxe an Xvid of it.
Anonymously. No restrictions. For a dollar. In any resolution. On any OS.
Could be too late for offering movies to download.
How about TV? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:How about TV? (Score:2)
So... you'd expect to pay $1-$1.50 for a TV episode, right?
But... if it's a buck they're downloading close to a gig for what Apple is selling 3.5MB for - that's a tough business proposition.
FTTH might make this a feasible business and it's starting to roll out, so by 2015 I should be able to cancel NetFlix.
Re:How about TV? (Score:2)
for their profit? (Score:2)
They'd probably have to write an extention to BitTorrent to hand it though.
Re:for their profit? (Score:2)
I'd rather have fiber to every door, but I think the speed is there.
Bringing it back to the topic of Roxio Napster (Score:2)
I abandoned those days (though it took YEARS) when I found out about the whole free software movement. Why pirate when you can have free/OSS legally?
Where is the free/OSS recorded music? Where are the free/OSS feature films?
Re:That Won't Work (Score:2)
Then what you are likely to see is an ISP branded premium service, something like Adelphia's $8/mo MusicNet.