Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Media Science

Who Will Pay For Open Access? 390

babble123 writes "IEEE is thinking about providing everyone with free access to its publication database (which has saved many a grad student from a trip to the library). The problem is, where will they get the money to fund the journals if not from subscriptions? In this article, they discuss one proposed alternative, 'author-pays,' but they certainly aren't enthusiastic about it, and I don't blame them. And yet, the money has to come from somewhere. Any better ideas?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Who Will Pay For Open Access?

Comments Filter:
  • Simple... (Score:4, Funny)

    by goodEvans ( 112958 ) <devans.airatlanta@ie> on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @05:58AM (#11886663) Homepage
    Advertising and product placement.

    "This cable specification brought to you by Belkin, the choice of the home user"

    "Required test equipment: Craftsman digital multimeter model no..."

    "Why not take a break from reading this specification and enjoy a cool frappacino - there's probably a Starbucks within 100 yards anyway"
  • Easy! (Score:2, Funny)

    by nmb3000 ( 741169 ) <> on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @05:59AM (#11886666) Journal
    With popups and banner ads! The Internet was raised on these mediums so they must still work. Also, with all those words, think how good AdSense would work!

  • by Guanix ( 16477 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @06:31AM (#11886817) Homepage
    How about relying on Google and
  • by node 3 ( 115640 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @07:15AM (#11886952)
    The question would be how to choose what to pay for. The current system has the advantage that only journals which at least someone (even if it is some insane clique of social scientists) reads get money.

    That's not really much of a problem. First, the President should have a "Department of Science" cabinet, where it's made explicitly clear that science from that department will be clear of political influences, then you have that department choose to fund access to journals deemed worthy by a board of prominent scientists. In essence, you have the scientists choosing which publications to support, which interestingly is exactly the advantage you list for the current system.

    So now the journal is chosen by reason, is less subject to capricious market forces, and you have public access. This really seems win-win-win.

    The choice of which journals to support is opinion, which frightens many because it requires a certain level of trust, but I'd much more trust publicly accountable people in an open process over the so-called free market when it comes to promoting science.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @12:15PM (#11889266)
    1. Run a magazine...
    2. Provide all content for free on the internet...
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!!1

The best defense against logic is ignorance.